Bufofrog

It is not clear to me how that would work.

Fair enough.

If you want to believe that relativity is 'just' a theory that's your right. Have fun with your speculating.

I am going to go out on limb here, but I don't think you got anything worthwhile here. Generally the only new physics discoveries are produced by researchers who actually work in the field. There is not a lot of 'low hanging fruit' in the field of physics. That being said, if you enjoy having speculative ideas, have fun!

Yes. Here it is for you. See the section on the consistency of the speed of light and read the links for more information. Single photons make a diffraction pattern, not a train of photons.

Oh, sorta like a steam cycle. Seems like controlling the pressure would be tricky in a closed system, but that's his problem to figure out.

Really, you can't google it yourself? I'll look it up later, I don't like using my phone to look up stuff.

I hate to be redundant, but experimentation shows that hypothesis is falsified. Google single photon interference.

Google it and knock yourself out.

It has been shown to be invariant by experimentation. So your hypothesis has been falsified.

Make an indoor wind generator out of methylene chloride?

If that is a question asking if that is possible, I would say the answer is no.

Since the speed of light is invariant and your hypothesis includes the idea that the speed of light is not invariant, your hypothesis is falsified.

This sort of kills your whole concept since experimental results will falsify your idea.

Couple of questions. Why do you specify the light source is at rest? Isn't c independent of the source speed? I don't see where dividing both side of the equation by gamma does anything or gives any new insight. What is the point of defining s = 1/gamma? Seems like you are adding an unnecessary constant. What do you mean by VR > c? A velocity > c?

So your point is.....?

I look forward to seeing it.

I don't recall any robots in the epic of gilgamesh.

Great question! What do you think? Is it possible that there are women shorter than 147 cm and if that is possible, is there any possibility he could meet them. Gosh, I don't know!? This thread is just so gosh darn compelling!

The idea that bronze age people had technology superior to ours is beyond absurd IMO. There is not even any evidence that Moses was a real person that I am aware of, let alone evidence that he wielded advanced technology. If you have evidence that shows I am mistaken, I would be very interested. It would have to be very compelling evidence I suspect.

Not a good start! The problem isn't that this is new, the problem is that it makes absolutely no sense.

There is no trumpet shape. You were looking at a graphical representation of the evolution of the universe. This level of understanding doesn't bode well for your new theory.

With a team like that you should knock out a far superior theory in no time...

If nobody understood relativity then it would rapidly fade away since it would be useless information. I would assume never. In the scenario where no one understood relativity, no one would care who he was and in a world that understood relativity he would be a scientist.

Yes. I am assuming that you don't actually mean instantly, you mean really quickly.