Bufofrog

That sounds about right to me. However, many scientists are religious and they would probably disagree with that. Warm and inviting is not how science works with new ideas. No one is attacking you, your ideas are being challenged (attacked). See, you are challenging the idea of a big bang, you are not attacking me.

What do you mean by communications? Are you saying that moss forms minerals?

You said: What I put forward was specific: "And breaking off a section, I noted it was stratified to a much higher degree and depth, and it was hardened minerals. What then are the implications?" My question: What do you think the implications are?

Approximately 7 years to design and build a plane. Will you now answer any of my questions to you?

What do you think the implications are? This is your thread.

Please proceed then. So far you have said you don't subscribe to science, we have discussed moss growth and you have hinted ancient Babylon is somehow significant. I don't know what point you are trying to make in this thread.

This isn't some sort of bible code stuff, is it?

Wiki. Contemporary english.

Don't you mean energy from Shamash? The Babylonians didn't know about energy, did they?

Completely agree, 100%.

I was with up to number 4. Our visual system detects 3 different wave lengths of light and our brains process the input to the colors we see. What does that mean?

I believe this answers your question, at least with the Pfizer vaccine. https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/12/pfizer-says-placebo-patients-will-eventually-get-its-covid-19-vaccine-the-question-of-when-is-complicated/

They won't get close to each other and fuse at anything remotely close to room temperature.

Not even remotely close. You're a lost ball in high weeds, when it comes to math.

Pictures are nice, but some physics would be better. x-x-posted with Joigus...

Because Star Trek is science fiction.

Look at this article: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/roots-of-unity/why-isnt-1-a-prime-number/ From the article: My mathematical training taught me that the good reason for 1 not being considered prime is the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, which states that every number can be written as a product of primes in exactly one way. If 1 were prime, we would lose that uniqueness. We could write 2 as 1×2, or 1×1×2, or 1594827×2. Excluding 1 from the primes smooths that out.

You do realize this is evidence that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. When you look at the rate of expansion long ago, you find that it is slower that the rate of expansion in the more recent past. In other words the rate of expansion is increasing with time. You then write: Then why did you quote an article that refutes that?

That doesn't make sense to me. What would be the opposite of time?

Of course it is. I didn't realize that something so trivially obvious was your point. So you you think that somebody's guess at how far a random star is from earth is closely related to the the actual distance? The guess is founded in distance...

No. I can't even imagine how you could seriously ask that question.

We know that is what you mean, and what everyone is telling you is that you are wrong.

Are you trying to get banned?

Out there, just out there...

This sounds just like my kids when they were little. Hey dad, what would you do if you saw a dinosaur?