Bufofrog

If it has been proven, then just the supply that evidence and everyone will have to agree with you. Easy-peasy... Just had a thought, when you say 'magnetic currents', do you mean 'magnetic field'?

Since you are only injecting a substance into your bloodstream, probably you don't need to spend a lot of money on safety. If Putin said it, it must be true.

Bingo! Just an after image.

Sorry, but, ewwwww.

I got nothin'. Good luck.

Oh, is that all.😊 Like I said before, there aren't any. At any rate it looks like you trying to explain an alien space craft (which doesn't exist) with pseudoscience. Good luck.

The very first thing you need to do is learn what a dimension is!

Correct. Do you think the clown wasn't an actor in the video? None. You do realize there are no self-sustaining fusion reactors, right? AFAIK the only manmade device that uses heat AND pressure for a fusion reaction is a hydrogen bomb.

That makes no sense. Not that I know of. You are trying to use physics to explain a silly YouTube video? I am pretty sure your physics will be as real as the YouTube video

You can't just state what the point is? You can increase the pressure but not in the Tomakak which you were asking about.

1. Yes, the temperature would be high enough for complete ionization. 2. No What does any of this have to do with E=mc^2?

Sorry for the condescending tone. Terminology is vital if you want to get your idea understood. Here is a suggestion, pick one small piece of your ideas and take some time to write it out. If someone questions an idea like "energy has direction", let's discuss it and make sure we have the same definition of 'energy' and 'direction'.

If you know this little about shielding you definitely should not be screwing around with a used X-Ray unit. I HIGHLY recommend that you dispose of it properly before you hurt yourself or others.

I am rather amazed that you have spent a decade researching this and you do not understand the difference between basic physics concepts. This is not a vernacular problem, this is a conceptual problem. You should go to a basic physics site and look up the definitions of velocity, acceleration, momentum, force and energy.

That makes no sense. Energy is a scalar it has no direction. What does, 'resolves its structure' mean?I

Energy is not directional, it is a scalar quantity. I have no idea what this means.

Really? You can't in a couple of sentences describe the concept of your engine? I think I can describe any current engine in a couple of sentences to give the gist of the concept.

I assume the silence was due to the pseudoscience nature of your paper, I do not know for sure because you haven't presented anything in this post that explains anything. Why not show how your idea explains the speed of light in the next post?

I like that he writes in a larger font in hopes that we will now understand. It is like speaking to someone in a foreign language and when they do not understand, you just try speaking louder. Kinda cracks me up.

Thread closed, maybe?

It kinda sounds like your trying to get hits on your website.

It seems to me that cause and effect are based on events, if there was no time there would be no events, so, no cause and effect.

Why? It seems like you are saying we need a definite answer to the question is a quantum particle really a wave or a particle. If that is the question I'm afraid you simply won't ever be satisfied with the answer, because it is neither.

Was that supposed to be a joke?

Why would you do any of this? Is there any point? Is there any bottom line to this at all?