Bufofrog

Just more pictures??? I guess so!!!

You should quit trying to recall half remembered things and supply links for evidence to back up your idea. It seems that you are thinking of electrons as little spinning tops, that is not what is meant when physicists talk about spin.

Drop identical balls from the same height and measure the time it takes to fall that distance. One frame can be on the ground and other frame can be a jet flying at 500 mph.

I don't see that.

Why unobserved?

Still dodging and obfuscating. Why change tactics, right?

I can make an animation of a person flying by flapping his arms, the animation does not mean it is possible in reality!

You did not answer what m(liquid) is in your animation. And a guess what, your next reply won't answer it either. I don't know why you won't answer, I only you won't. Very odd...

It seems clear to me that you are unable to answer the questions put to you. You simply have an animation that shows a physically impossible situation and then hand wave and dodge questions about the animation since it is indefensible. This thread is due to be tossed in to the trash can soon. It certainly has my vote for the trash!

Is the above seriously supposed to be an answer to my question?

Oh good. One of the questions you didn't answer was from Swansont, he asked what is the m(liquid) in your equation since your diagram doesn't seem to have a liquid component.

Bustvov, why do you refuse to answer questions asked of you? Do you not want to reveal too much about your diagrams? But then what would be the point of the thread? Maybe you don't know the answers?

Yes. Agreed, you should do that. Velocity for one.

Why? What do you think that would accomplish?

You do realize you are breaking the site rules, don't you?

Yep, that's the whole point for you isn't it. Waste of time.

You can believe whatever you want, but your beliefs are not science.

So you are saying spacetime or the maker of spacetime is nice to living things??? That does not seem like anything in the realm of science.

Just wanted to clear up a few things. This cookware is called Visions and it was invented Corning inc. It is not tempered glass! Tempered glass would be a terrible idea. A small scratch could result in a catastrophic failure of the cookware when heated. Visions is a glass-ceramic. To make it glass is molded to the desired shape and then the glass is heat treated so that it devitrifies (crystalizes). The crystal structure has a very low CTE so that when it is heated or cooled there only very low stresses on the body, well below the stress needed for failure. My understanding is that the color is primarily due to the crystal structure, this part could be wrong. My info is from what I recall my wife telling me. She is a glass technologist who worked for Corning for 35 years. Here is the wiki on visions

OK.

The wavelength is not invariant. There are any number of ways to determine your relative speed to another inertial frame, sound is not somehow special. In the title of the thread you asked for help to understand the doppler effect. I suggest you listen to the help that has been offered. I fear you won't however.

Why do you think this breaks Galilean relativity?

What is the principle that this system is based on?

None of this seems very insightful or different than you could pick up from wiki. Like what?

Clearly it was a typo, he meant to say ducks and walruses.