awaterpon

Two set of gear box one with 1:14 and the other of 1:56 the total is 784 Torque is first reduced by 1:14 then stored in spring then the spring release its energy to the gearbox 1:56. Video

Hello, I was able to build a machine to reduce torque with high ratios up to 1:700 gear box. What applications in mechanical engineering I could use my new invention in? Thanks,

An object at uniform motion is different from accelerated object my idea applies to accelerated objects gravitational waves also appears for accelerated objects New range caused by a rotating mass is different from gravitational waves this is a prediction for my theory and now it could be tested

In my thread here and according to this quote" "When an object moves , it tries to displace space in front of it " making non existence in space " space will resist its motion " inertia of an object" logically space can't be displaced without exerting the same force against the mass .Exerting force continuously will result in displacing space continuously and making non-existence in space continuously .The two forces " force exerted on an object and resistance force by space will make energy creation "as energy and mass are interchangeable then the process actually creates new mass amount" I can predict and test my theory as follows: instead of mass popping out from nowhere we have energy or mass/energy coming from original energy transferred by force , when an object moves its mass increases causing new curvature in space-time doubling the curvature already there .I can predict that new range of gravity will start from time t equals zero and extend this also could be tested

When an object moves , it tries to displace space in front of it " making non existence in space " space will resist its motion " inertia of an object" logically space can't be displaced without exerting the same force against the mass .Exerting force continuously will result in displacing space continuously and making non-existence in space continuously .The two forces " force exerted on an object and resistance force by space will make energy creation "as energy and mass are interchangeable then the process actually creates new mass amount I can conclude to this: If space exerts force on mass "inertia" then non-space will also exert the same force on space. if non-space exerts force on space between two masses and this space exerts force on the other mass then attraction or gravity will appear according to my view. All these entities " space, non-space , mass " exert forces on each other mutually. Space is everything that is not anything mass is what has weight.

I will think about this. I made a mistake mistake: Mass m is attracted to non-existence of space inside mass M and mass M is attracted to non-existence of space in mass m. I made another mistake mass and non-existence of space are opposites if there is mass then something is missing by the existence of mass " this thing is space itself" causing non-existence of space

Whether there is internal structure or point particle in general we have mass that fills a place of space and we have space that fills the place where there is not mass.

Space doesn't mean measurements from mass edges .There is still gaps between particles. Gravity is particle to particle attraction the collection is mass m.

Well , I'm not against GR this is a new view added to GR view of space time curvature of positive and negative attraction concept. Does space exist inside mass m? No since mass m occupied the place of space. Does mass m exist in place of the space I mentioned? No space is nothingness there is not mass occupied in it So mass m occupy space , this space is equivalent to mass m. If mass m occupy space " there is not space in the place of the mass" then mass m causes Non-existence of space in that place If we have to masses M and m they will attract each other This is due to mass m is attracted to non-existence of mass M and mass M is attracted to non-existence of mass m. Mass tends to fulfill the non-existence of space caused by other masses .The two " space and matter" are opposite mass means no space , space means no mass so they have such interaction of fulfillment . The fulfillment tendency causes potential between masses and force we have such concept in electricity where positive charges are attracted to negative charges. Non-existence of space could be like a negative charge and mass could be like a positive charge. Notice the medium here for the force is space itself so I'm not against GR . I mentioned the space which has been occupied is equivalent to the mass m so in the equation of Newton gravitation mass m and M can represent both masses and equivalent space Fulfillment tendency happens for sure. If mass interacts with space and curve it according to GR then mass"positive " will also interact with non-space "negative" causes attraction between two masses

Neither of these is applied to the fact that gravity is infinite then no one can scientifically say gravity is infinite.

Not gravity in general but the fact that it should be infinite, how physics determines it should be infinite ?

I post a thread here in speculation proposing that gravity has a limited range I would like to ask some questions about the existing fact. My questions are : What does science think of infinite gravity " gravity being everywhere" ? How it is mathematically described "giving the idea that Newtonian gravitational law doesn't work for infinity distance" ? Is the idea of infinite gravity part of GR ? how it is described according to GR? Is there a proof for gravity being infinite in range ? Thanks,

I have started one .

Thanks.

I mean gravity is not infinitely throughout space. It is limited to a range extendable with speed of light c.

Just one last thing: What if there is not new math, is that possible ?and it's only an addition to GR and just the equation I presented which shows limited time instead of infinite distance ?

r=cT , at each point from mass the mass spent T time to reach this point in the past.Time T spent at this point in the past multiplied by c equivalent to distance r. We have limited time T instead of infinite distance r.

A new equation : F= G mM/(c^2* T^2) T: is from zero to current time since the existence of mass

I will think about a new mathematical equation I think I get it now.

The math is difficult I will try again. What if I eliminate both time and speed and add r? (1-r/cT)

Giving the idea that magnetic field in a wire spread with speed c , my equation would be similar to electrodynamics one , but I couldn't find that equation for electrodynamics where magnetism on wire spread with c speed.

Well, when a current is started in wire the magnetic field starts to spread with speed c similar to light itself. Now let's test a point where the magnetic field didn't reach yet.How the equation of the squared proportional distance and force works then. There should be a point when magnetic field drops to zero suddenly .And there would be a place where magnetic field didn't reach " out of range" how the equation applies there? The equation I'm referring to is the magnetic force is inversely proportional to distance r

I don't know yet. But should be something similar to what I presented for gravity, the same idea of limited range extendable with speed of light c. I showed a mistake in current physics a magnetized wire if its magnetism spread with c then it should have a limited range of magnetic force and the equation in which force is inversely proportional to squared distance won't apply"out of range" . The same for gravity I described in fact they all have things in common.

But magnetism equation is the same as gravity equation in which a magnet can affect a magnet at infinity and force is inversely proportional to the squared distance . If not and magnetism of a wire spread with c then how the equation applies for distances out of range. T here will be measured from the time the magnetic field started in a wire.

"It should be for both coulomb's law and magnetism. For a wire when the circuit is closed the magnetic field starts to spread with the speed of light an experiment could be performed to determine whether magnetic field is already available at a point or it will reach that point after a time"it is not logical that the magnetic field already at infinity since we had a current started to flow at specific moment and shouldn't be available before that moment ,so how it would be available everywhere at an instant?" What do you think of this ?