Bez

Last Post Well, I had a short text session with my Nephew and afraid I didn't fair much better with him (he was busy and preoccupied and gave me a few irrelevant links). I admitted I have all the signs of a crackpot in an earlier post. Observation is the foundation of Science. I have tried to post what I see (for better or worse). I understand why no one would take me seriously as I don't know the terminology and have no formal training in this field (why would anyone give me the time of day?). Really, I understand and I'm OK with it! Would you ask a country bumpkin for stock market advice? A Unified theory? My interest in Physics stems from a lifetime of metaphysical experiences (oh oh here we go). I first stood beside myself while sleeping in bed at age 7. I could fill a book of experiences and no one would believe me. I have wondered once if I was delusional. I had delusions of grandeur (due to all the experiences). Then I ran from myself most of my life. Now I have come to terms with myself and promise I am perfectly lucid. Now I realize no matter how great of experiences I have if I am honest with myself and recognize my shortcomings and seems those things I want to do (I do not do) and those things I don't want to do (I do). So thereby comes humility with recognition of my shortcomings. Plato in the, "Republic", states this world is a description we take for granted as being it whereas there is much much more beyond all this and the very words we learn to speak as a baby take us away from ourselves and awareness. Being a Zen master I can relate to this. Also, what you perceive with your eyes is but a very very small part of all that there is. Even the Universal universes is but a small part. You cannot imagine how big things really are! Since I have been shutting off my internal dialogue since I was 16 (and am 59 now) it happens naturally (has been for over 40 years) so my mind works mostly in pictures. What I have tried to do is post what I see. Doesn't make it true or correct and surely would have to be tested but if even one person can see something in this stuff I posted and run with it and others can benefit then this was worth it. Thank you for your time and opportunity to post here. Bez

lol...some of you have to much time on their hands! Later

Do we know I'm wrong until we quantify the equation?

I agree wholeheartedly! It's why I came here for help but found little and so my Nephew can quantify my equation! And I wouldn't say I'm guessing but yes reality is not what you think it is at all!

I don't know if I'm right. I believe I may be right. If I am wrong merely because I don't fit your mold (lack of academia) that is ridiculous. I do have an IQ or 160....do you?

Friction caused by rubbing a balloon on your hair creates static electricity and then turns it into a magnet or sorts (same principle). My nephew hasn't gotten back to me yet....(that's a good thing). Just suppose for a moment all that I write here is correct? If on this 14th day of May in the year 2019 this equation: E=MC squared F=Friction E X F = Electromagnetism Electromagnetism X Motion X Form = Everything Form = Geometric shape and size Form based upon near-sphere's with circular and elliptical orbits from the smallest particles to the largest planetary body. is correct then here is a list of what I have given you thus far. 1. Why some planets do not have a magnetic field 2. That the Earth is a simple generator due to spinning/wobble producing friction (plus spin...spin makes the difference in some cases but if a planet doesn't wobble enough (if too spherical like the moon then no magnetic field). 3. Super-heated surface of the sun due to unseen friction 4. Dark Matter = Unseen intersecting Universes 5. Dark Energy = Electromagnetism (from Friction X Energy) 6. Black Holes = Galaxy building necessary vents that puncture and regulate the speed of expansion of the universe 7. A new view of the Universe 8. A unified theory/equation 9. A long awaited breakthrough! I'm sure there is more I have given you but this list not bad IF I am correct! So those of you that say all this is nonsense might want to what until the juries is in! Because I don't fit your mold is irrelevant! What you think or believe does not effect the reality that is! I do have to thank this site though as my posting here allowed me to see the equation (from my own writings..both friction and form) Have a Good Day I'll report back my Nephews findings (maybe he my new partner).

lol..can't you be nice? It's ok I still love you! Sometimes I think perhaps it's better I have no formal training because I don't have all that dogma and restrictions Academia can confine me in my thinking. Because it has to be this way or that way. I didn't go on to pursue Masters degree in Anthropology because aside from Physical Anthropology IMO the rest of it is much BS (soft social science). People making up stuff and have no idea what actually took place oftentimes in Prehistory. What I learned then many years ago has had to be rewritten several times over now. When I was there Clovis Man was the oldest (many years ago). I also don't have the movements where these guys believe this way and these other guys say no it's their way etc. I get a purely fresh look based upon visual observations mostly. In my opinion that's a good thing!

I emailed my equation to my PHd in Astrophysics Nephew. Maybe he can see something in this. Funny you should mention my infatuation with friction as while I posted about my Hypothetical Universal Universes I saw where, "friction," was so important (and form). The pieces of that puzzle I couldn't see until I saw my own writings here! Funny how when one has no one to discuss this stuff with and never write anything down how revealing one's own writings can be (even to oneself). Without friction no electromagnetism! The part I saw was almost everything is off slightly. Off slightly for a reason. Near sphere/near parallel etc. Imagine how much energy a slightly off parallel universe (which I know wouldn't be parallel then) could produce spinning and rubbing next to another universe. The reason it's not all perfect spheres is they need to be off slightly to produce electromagnetism by increased friction. I believe A perfect sphere will not cause nearly the friction compared to one slightly off. Perfect spheres may not be able support a magnetic field due to lack of friction. The near sphere wobbles slightly increasing friction even more.

Wow, OK! I never said what, "I see," didn't need to be tested! (seems even with the unknowns could plug in some numbers/etc. and see what comes up). Screenshot everything and email it to myself (computer forensics will date it). And on to the next site (at least I'll be more prepared next time). Why no dislikes on the equation post? E=MC squared F=Friction E X F = electromagnetism (changed) electromagnetism X motion X form = everything and thanks for the info on it's: Energy times Friction If at least one person can see something here and run with it then it was worth my posting. Your allowing me to post allowed me to formulate the equation (now I just need to quantify it). Thank you for your time I won't bother you guys any more.

Partner Up? I can see the whole shooting match moving in my mind like my mind is the Universal universes! I swear I can even hear it! Like a giant engine! You might be surprised if you asked me some questions! If we truly are close to the scientific, "Holy Grail," (which surely would include a Nobel) then let's partner up. You are the guys that know about his stuff (I'm just the guy with the pictures)! And it's your lucky day! You guys get 2X the money because I can't take money for this stuff and I'm a poor man (somebody can buy me dinner though..lol). If it's still a million then you could have a team of two or whatever and split the money. Why can't I take the money? Hard to explain without looking like a crackpot. About the only clue I could give you is, "talking donkey"! So no worries and think about it.

Wow, thanks man! Good stuff! So it's Energy X Friction? So we don't see mainly, "near sphere's", in circular and elliptical orbits from the tiniest particles to the largest planetary systems? I am posting what I see (not making stuff up). My mind works mainly in pictures. Anyway, I would appreciate all the help I could get here! Thanks Edit: I have a picture like a puzzle and am trying to piece it together to get the full picture. edit: doesn't help that I rolled in here with nearly all the signs of a crackpot...lol. I also have never taken a Physics or Astronomy class (I do have a BS in Anthropology of all things...lol). I was top of my class in upper mathematics (University level) and my instructor said I had a future in Math because only two of us got A's (out of 25) and when I went to pick up my final exam she asked me how I figured out a shortcut. I said I must have learned it in class and she said no she hadn't taught me that it was new and how did I know to do that. I told her I guess, "I saw it,".

There is a typo or two but for now let's call all of this a decent sci-fi story (today's sci-fi tomorrows fact). E = MC squared (energy = mass x acceleration squared....speed of light) F = Friction E + F = Electromagnetism Form = geometric form as well as size (from smallest particle to largest planetary body) On other thread I posted that a simple observation shows us that almost exclusively we see (from smallest particle to largest planetary body) spherical, circular, and elliptical in formation and motion. No matter how one slices a sphere it's still geometry....thus the "Form," included in equation. So in the equation, "Electromagnetism X Motion X Form = Everything," the only, "unknown variable," is Friction because we can measure both Form and Motion and we know, "the speed of light,". The accumulation of combined friction from the 8 speeds/motions mentioned above should be near constant. The background, "Friction," behind our universe (intersecting universes) is constant also so for our universe can we get by with just the accumulation within our universe? It is interesting to note all the motion going on around us (8 speeds/motions) within our universe. That's a lot of Friction. Also, we notice none of this motion beyond seasons and day and night and all that we perceive is relative only to this uniform motion system. In the above post I used the term, "layered", friction (for lack of better words) but meaning the combined friction of all motions within this uniform motion system (expansion/spin of universe, expansion/spin of galaxy, etc.). Also, Larger object = greater friction I mentioned as speculation (this is the speculation forum) that the, "dark energy" (missing energy) is the, " Energy + Friction = Electromagnetism." Because we can't see it...but we should be able to measure it. Also, as speculation I put forth that all the missing matter (dark matter) are the other intersecting universes (that we can't perceive). I'll mention the super-heated surface of the sun as evidence of this unseen friction. And below looks a generator to me!

I thought of something else...gotta get em when the come through. So two main elements of ,"friction," 1. Motion 2. Size of particle or planetary object So let's count the speeds/directions we are currently going in from Earth 1. Our universe expanding and spinning (2 speeds) 2. Our galaxy spinning and crossing universe (2 speeds) 3. Our solar system spinning and going around galaxy (2 speeds) 4. Our Earth around the sun and rotating (2 speeds) Total (8 speeds) Don't mean to scare you but there may actually be nine speeds (one unseen entirely but we will stay withing the Universal universes for now as the 9th motion won't effect us (I don't think)...I have an even bigger hypothetical beyond the Universal universes). Each of these speeds (and associated friction) will have to be taken into account to determine, "friction".

Oops ran out of edits! Electromagnetism X motion X form = everything So the, "form," part of this is size of the given particle or planetary body. Both, "form," and "motion," then we can measure. We also know Energy = acceleration squared (the speed of light) E=MC squared So the only variable here is friction. Friction would be in direct relation to, "Form," (size of the particle or planetary body). In the hypothetical Universal universes there would be layered friction. The other intersecting universes, our expanding universe, the galaxy motion, and those parts the sun doesn't protect us from and even our orbit and rotation. edit: This friction could also be the, "dark energy," just as all the intersection universes are the missing, "dark matter."

Thank you for constructive paths to pursue! No really knows for sure what is going on in the center of the Earth or what causes it so that is a hypothetical! I will obviously detract that part as evidence graciously for the time being and back to the drawing board (which is my mind as never have written anything down (may be the problem good time to start relearning math) but has helped me here to post and formulate this for myself). I have never taken a Physics class (I know it shows) and have never had anyone to discuss this stuff with. I am also a work in process! Bez Edit: somehow replacing form with mass doesn't work geometrically. Form would be the size of a given particle or planetary body. Also, oftentimes the simplest observation/explanation is the correct one. One last edit as not sure how many more posts I will have here. I think it's possible (in my hypothetical Universal Universes on other thread) that black holes not only serve as vents in relation to the expansion of the universe but also regulate the speed of expansion.