Big D

I'm to late, someone has already become too emotional. You see the more testosterone that a person has the greater the chance is for violent behaviour. This explains much of why men are more violent then women.

Well I don't want get people here all emotional, but I do believe that humans evolved from the great apes of Africa. And if you believe that then as I do, you would see "blacks" place in the human evolutionary chain.

Maybe i'm taking it a little to far by saying different species, but it is obvious that is the direction that the different races are and were heading. Without all contact being made between all the different "races" the gap would have grown much greater. The point about you being "politically correct" is that I have pointed out some of the differences between the different races of people, you know that these differences are true, you just don't like what they are. People like to say "celebrate diversity", you know celebrate our differences, but once any one points out what our differences are, well then the celebration is over.

Phil, I just gave a whole list of just some of the differences between blacks and whites. (None that have been disputed) If not for the people like yourself trying to just be politicaly correct instead of scientific, blacks and whites and Asians would be considered different species. But, we don't want to hurt anyone's feeling's.

In my opinion to be superior is different then to be less evolved. Here are just some of the reasons why I believe blacks are "less evolved". The hair is black, crispy, and "woolly" in texture, it is flat and elliptical with no central canal or duct like the hair of Europeans. The nose is thick, broad and flat, often turned up nostrils exposing the red inner lining of the mucous membrane similar to an ape. The arms and legs of the Negro are relatively longer than the European. The humerus is a trifle shorter and the forearm longer thereby approximating the simian form. The eyes are prominent, iris black and the orbits large. The eye often has a yellowish sclerotic coat over it like that of a gorilla. The Negro has a shorter trunk the cross-section of the chest is more circular than whites. The pelvis is narrower and longer as it is in an ape. The mouth is wide with very thick, large and protruding lips. Negro skin has a thick superficial horny layer which resists scratching and impedes the penetration of germs. The Negro has a larger and shorter neck akin to that of anthropoids. The cranial sutures are more simple than in the white type and close together earlier. The ears are roundish, rather small, standing somewhat high and detached thus approaching the simian form. The Negro is more powerfully developed from the pelvis down and the white more powerfully developed in the chest. The jaw is larger and stronger and protrudes outward which, along with lower retreating forehead, gives a facial angle of 68 to 70 degrees as opposed to a facial angle of 80 to 82 degrees for Europeans. The hands and fingers are proportionally narrower and longer. The wrist and ankles are shorter and more robust. The frontal and paricial bones of the cranium are less excavated and less capacious. The skull is thicker especially on the sides. The teeth are larger and are wider apart than in the white race. The three curvatures of the spine are less pronounced in the Negro than in the white and thus more characteristic of an ape. The femur of the Negro is less oblique, the tibia (shin bone) more curved and bent forward, the calf of the leg high and but little developed. The heel is broad and projecting, the foot long and broad but slightly arched causing flat soles, the great toe is shorter than in the white. The two bones proper of the nose are occasionally united, as in apes.

There are numerous articles and study's on this subject, here is just a couple. The news is worse for men in the District. Prostate cancer is the No. 1 health concern among men in Washington, according to the National Prostate Cancer Coalition. Black men are 60 percent more likely to develop prostate cancer and 2.4 times more likely to die from it than men of other races, according to the coalition. Researchers don't fully know why this is, though they know blacks metabolize testosterone in a speedier fashion, which contributes to accelerated tumor growth. http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050502-101052-3372r.htm It is my hypothesis that increased testosterone increases HIV infection rates and AIDS . This will explain why AIDS is so high in Africa. Blacks produce more testosterone than whites, and the infection rate of blacks far exceeds the rate in whites. Blacks males produce significantly more testosterone than while males. http://www.anthropogeny.com/Why%20HIV%20is%20so%20Prevalent%20in%20Africa.htm Blacks in the USA have the highest prostatic cancer rates in the world. Their two-fold increased risk, compared to US whites, is evident at the earliest age at which prostatic cancer occurs. Ross et al. [ref: 24] showed that young US blacks have a 15% higher mean testosterone serum level than young US whites, and argued that this difference could readily explain the two-fold difference in rates. http://www.inchem.org/documents/iarc/suppl7/androgenicsteroids.html I don't believe one group of people is "superior" to another as you suggest, I just believe they are different. Here is another difference: Most people often discount I.Q. test results with the excuse that they are culturally biased. Nonetheless, NO ONE, not the NAACP nor the United Negro College Fund, nor NEA had been able to develop an intelligence test which shows Blacks and Whites scoring equally.

Is not the fact that blacks are less evolved the source of so called "racism"?

Ya sure, it's got to be "racism". The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If blacks, for example, are equal to Whites in every way, what accounts for their poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is White racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state. All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on White wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences. Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's Whites must have oppressed them. If Whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them Unconsciously. If no obviously racist individuals can be identified, then societal institutions must be racist. Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply must be millions of White people we do not know about, who are working day and night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of White people. The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe that the only explanation for non-White failure is White racism, every time a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, White society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-Whites is standing proof that White society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be committed almost exclusively by White people. Indeed, a black congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have argued that only White people can be racist. Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she explained that all Whites are racist and that only Whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality? http://www.planetpapers.com/Assets/3874.php