Jump to content

Amazing Random

Senior Members
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Amazing Random

  1. λ = h/mu the core of the dying star will have big mass dont you think?
  2. No everything must be tested . Since we cant test if there is God , there isnt.
  3. No it is not complex we may just cant calculate everything precisely.... We shouldnt modify physics when we meet infinities . Maybe infinities are part of the universe. Math is the language of physics it is not physics itself And we also dont need to believe the world is perfect. Nothing is perfect in nature . Maybe this works for the whole universe. And i dont want to give up but based on the physics we have discovered there isnt anything else to search for besides this.
  4. We may not be able to calculate everything . Ask de Broglie why quantum effects dont take place at the singularity or look at my explanation
  5. The mass needs to be enough to create bending to begin with ....:)
  6. First of all , God doesnt exist until proven otherwise . Only science exists for the time being . God can be an entity made by humans for the explanation of the unexplainable . The one who believes in God is as fool as any theories in science which are not verified experimentally. But the unexplainable may become explainable in the future . Or God exists to make us be moral . Or he exists because we dont want to feel alone as a species . God is pure psychology.
  7. We dont need quantum things . The deBroglie wavelength of the singularity is very small so I said no quantum effects take place . It is an empty quantum system . We can calculate by approximation. And math can stop working but physics doesnt stop working. No quantum effects take place .
  8. This topic is about the gravitational effects of the singularity. Get ready for shocking news ! "I dont understand why we the theory of quantum gravity would apply at a singularity of a black hole . Quantum gravity would describe the gravitational interactions between subatomic particles . On the other hand the mass of the black is too big for any quantum effects . But on the other hand we have a singularity which is dimensionless so it can be considered a quantum system . I think all the confusion begins from there : if we need to study the singularity as a quantum system or without quantum effects . " What does this mean? Tricky huh?
  9. I dont understand why we the theory of quantum gravity would apply at a singularity of a black hole . Quantum gravity would describe the gravitational interactions between subatomic particles . On the other hand the mass of the black is too big for any quantum effects . But on the other hand we have a singularity which is dimensionless so it can be considered a quantum system . I think all the confusion begins from there : if we need to study the singularity as a quantum system or without quantum effects .
  10. There is no such thing as anti-gravity . And gravity is not connected with QM because gravity doesnt exist in the microscopic world . Anti-gravity would require exotic matter and this hasn't been detected and propably never will be .
  11. I dont like your attitude.
  12. Yes if one observer is at the top of a mountain and the second observer is at sea level then time for the first observer passes faster for 10^-6 s every 1 day.
  13. It is worth spending the effort on , but I am currently trying to prove another theory ( gravity doesnt exist in the microscopic world ) so I cant work with two theories at the same . I just found those examples because they are easy and dont require effort.
  14. Because QFT is a nearly proven theory but there is also an unbelievably small chance that it is wrong , and fire-breathing dragons dont exist for sure.
  15. If you have the time , you can continue working with it.
  16. Yes but most people stick to the evidence.
  17. I am not trying to offend you , but all of the physicists in the world believe that QFT is correct . So either you are a genius or you are wrong . Due to this conversation being too good to be stopped by something like this , I proposed the other participants to accept your theory. So we need to imagine the quantum world as relativistic-independent.
  18. Try to think sound as waves and each wave is a circle . Ok let's take a source of sound or sound waves . The source emmits sound waves at a certain frequency . Ok? When the source is immobile the receiver receives the sound waves with the same frequency emmited from the source.When the source is moving however the distance between two waves changes (due to the moving source) so since the distance between the waves is increased the next wave takes more time to be arrived so the frequency received by the receiver is changed.
  19. Wow i didn't know that , thanks for the info? Do those criteria for electronegativity exist?Where?Give me a reference please.
  20. He wont change his mind anytime soon and this discussion is nice.
  21. I know it does but just for this conversation lets accept it.
  22. I think that the conservation is not related to the primary discussion anymore . Please accept the statement the quantum world doesnt have any relativistic events.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.