Somehow I think you are wrong on this one, a probability are a probability there are no other interpretation and possibility. Either they can travel all that way out there or they can't.
Might have used wrong terminology, it's when things are in superposition, we can agree that superposition are only without observer effect? Yes?
With SP things become unpredictable, like the photon can go through both slits, through either or none at the same time!
With OE things are predictable.
That's a nice Einstein quote, but unfortunately Einstein couldn't fully pair his theories with quantum physics, it seems he only could account for things with observer effect, so you are slamming me with an incomplete rule.
I didn't say instantaneous, I specifically said slow down as in time dilation, but that's TD with observer effect you are talking about, without observer effect time dilation can further dilate with a factor of 1000^1000000000 (random figure)
You are thinking in too rational lines with observer effect only, you should try imagine the photon in superposition and see where it would be if 1000^1000000 years has passed, it wouldn't be in the same place.
It will account for the weird paths the photon can take in superposition.
Thanks but I don't read books.
Please forgive me, what I meant to say was when in superposition things will further dilate by a factor up to 1000^1000000 (random figure), but with observer effect there will only occur minor dilation.
Just because physics can't fully describe the path integral, doesn't mean it isn't real, it's still happening, so just because you don't believe in it, doesn't mean you should exclude it and slam me for it.
My watered down version is all I can offer, just because it isn't as prestigious as other people can dish up, you shouldn't turn me away.