Softdude

As I said, I give up, at least on you. The concept I describe should be simple for anyone who has visualized the effects of "gravity", which is nothing but a distortion of time and space. And I know time is neglected because the word singularity exists. I have been thinking about this for over 50 years.

The best I can tell you is to take conventional relativity into the black hole with you. Where does the gravity well go when you hit bottom? (gravitational collapse) You can't answer that with your math because you do not grasp what happens inside the black hole. You are forgetting completely about time when you say it becomes a singularity. At the point where the singularity exists, time would stop. Therefore, you could never get to that point. Space would be created around it faster than you could ever approach it. As time slowed, the distance would become greater and greater. Such is the nature of spacetime. How would this appear to an observer. "Infinite"space in the middle and very limited space towards the outside. The outside OBVIOUSLY looks like the middle now. and the middle, the outside. Space reverses and new dimensions are required. If you don't get it now, I give up. At some point, the creation of space by the slowing of time overcomes the the contraction and no singularity is produced.

The event horizon's trans-dimensional manifestation, otherwise known as the great attractor, is a singularity, as it has the entire mass of the previous universe condensed into a single point in our space. By previous universe, I mean where it exists as an event horizon. In that universe, everything is accelerating towards that event horizon. (just the opposite of ours) It should be fairly easy to figure out the terminal diameter of this universe. Where the mass will be traveling at the speed of light due to the observed acceleration, or the point of infinite redshift. At that point, you find yourself accelerating towards the black hole that we are in. 11 dimensions looking forward and back but really only 7. Four are only apparent in the math, with the fourth being time running backwards, which it doesn't. The beginning progresses to the end, which becomes a new beginning. In all time, all possibilities will have been expressed. And that, my friends, is God at his finest. Actually, for me, you can make that god. But hey, it is up to you. Who is to say there are no dimensions outside this loop. Or even something Divine. If you claim to know... The other dimensions, for lack of a better description, are length prime, width prime, and height prime. They can exist within a point in the non-prime universe and also the converse.

Time isn't going to stop and nothing is infinite. There is no "just past" the initial mass of the black hole we're in. It would be beyond the point that is in the center of that mass. Another dimension would be needed and probably exists. It can't be "past" in the dimensions where that mass exists. Nothing prohibits those dimensions appearing in ours. While time is elapsing forward no matter where you are, nothing prohibits that mass from showing up at the "beginning" of time. Relative to us, (in the black hole) it will again achieve light speed, less the quantum leap. Then it will transition back to the beginning of the "loop". And since all that stuff out there emitted its light so long ago, it is going much faster that it was then. Spacetime is indeed like Swiss cheese, in a multi-dimensional way. Wrapping your head around it is difficult, to say the least. In your math, the necessary symbols do not exist to span the event horizon. If you can't get it from the description (which defines the symbols) you wouldn't understand the math anyway.

Actual plot of a multi-dimensional equation? How exactly do you plot multi-dimensionally? Yeah, I thought so! There is an inherent problem with a multi-dimensional visualization, you can't draw a picture of it. You don't "see" it like a picture. What happens to your graph when the event horizon is reached? Your inability to visualize is keeping you from "seeing" what I am talking about. I don't think I'll share the math because you humans would just make a doomsday weapon out of it. Not that I am not human, I'm just not motivated by the same things YOU humans are. I suppose I should start another topic but the gravitational waves compress space and lengthen time, for a net zero measurable event. What you might measure is the magnetic pulse generated. That is more than likely what you did. Honestly! Must you be able to actually see something for it to exist.

Basically, you can either visualize in more than three dimensions or not. Gravity wells are well known phenomenon and the deeper into the well the object goes, the farther away the object is. Spacetime is anything but linear and the two dimensional depiction of a gravity well is very misleading. The curvature is reversed with the amount of space getting greater as you go down the well. You have to be able to conceptualize this if you don't have the ability to directly visualize it.

Relegated to the fate of meteor crater in Arizona. Does it really need to take 40 years for you to see this.

Just for a minute, think what the collapsing core of a black hole is doing to spacetime. It creates its own space and lots of it. There is vastly more space inside a black hole than it takes up in our universe. Looking from the outside, space is reversed, with more and more space as you approach the center. What this looks like from inside, is that the event horizion is in the center and the initial mass that collapsed is fleeing into outer space. There is a quantum leap at the event horizon. You either go slower than light on this side of the event horizon, or go slower than light on the other side of the event horizon. Time always elapses forward but space reverses. Relativity obeys the same rules out here as it does in there. The event horizon is the only singularity and it has no mass. It isn't a big bang, it is a big whoosh. Dark anything is only an artifact of the acceleration of matter in this universe towards the outer limits. (pun intended)

Maybe the question is better put: Dies the Earth have a surplus of electrons, a deficiency, or is it in balance? Does the solar wind buffeting the magnetosphere deposit electrons, strip electrons, or perhaps neither. Does our everyday chemistry depend on the absolute quality of available electrons? How would you even know the answer if you don’t know the mechanisms that are in play. Too few electrons might cause the field to collapse, equalizing or increasing the number of electrons, starting the cycle anew.