what-about-bob

Scaling is derived from known time dilation.

You don't like the dynamic mass idea. How about sending an observed atom experiment into a region we know will be scaled larger. We would set the focal point to be what we think the scale will be.

You can't have the speed of light be the same in different time-dilation zones without the entire scale of everything (in the frame) changing to match. I did say "somehow", we know mass bends spacetime, so if we could dynamically change the amount of mass a volume has...

Right, but if you zoom out of those frames ..you can see the scaling. You act like time dilation isn't a thing.

I wonder what size the quantum/classical boundary inside a black hole is. The smallest point in a black hole that involves spacetime would be the boundary size in every direction in the shape of a sphere. Anything that goes beyond that point would be only dark matter ..quantum waves, time isn't there. https://1ucasvb.tumblr.com/post/142605511227/in-einsteins-general-theory-of-relativity-space Spacetime scales when it bends. Reality is scaling. We already know about time dilation ..but a meter stick in one time scale (region of space) will shrink or expand in another time region. It will still be a meter no matter how much it scales, because, for that region ..that is the reality of what a meter length is. This is why the speed of light does not change. If we could somehow harness spacetime, we could magnify atoms ..not optically, with reality scaling.