Angelo

Can you accept that Einstein was not correct about everything and that unfortunately too many people do not accept this

Actually I said, "There were no observations that the universe was expanding at 5 times light speed 20 years ago." Then you said "Yes there were. This has always been known." So since the expanding universe was officially discovered in 1929 it has not always been known, and since the speed of light was first calculated in 1676 by Danish astronomer, Olaus Roemer, this also has not always been known. I read and comprehend just fine

Sorry the speed of light and even an expanding universe has not always been known. Honest, not sure where your ideas come from as they are not based upon science

Actually if the big bang were real all of the information in the form of moving galaxies could be reversed to the beginning point. This is elusive however as there seems to be no such point. However to determine the true center of the universe one would need to know what the boundaries are. Without this info finding a center is not logically possible, also are you referring to a geographic center or as typically proposed the beginning of expansion which can not be found. Technically the Earth is the center of humanity in the known universe, so there are many ways to express center Wrong, as Neptune was and is not moving at 5 to 6 times the speed of light as NASA has observed. Also Einstein can not be correct as is now accepted which agrees with the current observations

So you want to return to the 80's and deny the billions of percent more processing power since then and how much data this has gathered. Irrational, you might as well claim that the Earth is the center of the universe if you want to go that route

You are correct but you said that this has never happened and I assure you that it has The 80's before computer imaging. What has resolution increased since the 80's Well to steal a line, resolution has increased billions and billions of percent since the stone age 80's. 80's like in Atari asteroid Are you serious

You are determined to argue with me, however I am just referencing NASA observations. If you know please contact NASA, they will accept your input because they are stumped https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1187112/nasa-news-albert-einstein-wrong-theory-relativity-hubble-telescope-messier-87-spt Do remember that Galileo accepted NOTHING and was right about everything PS. The Navy just admitted that UFO's are toying with F18's

The Hubble telescope made the observation not me, so explain your ideas to NASA and do believe me they are accepting new ideas because the old ones just failed http://www.stsci.edu/ftp/science/m87/press.txt

There were no observations that the universe was expanding at 5 times light speed 20 years ago. This is why the new measurements are causing men like Tyson to question reality for simulation There was no standard belief at the time that was based upon science. Hell the standard belief was once that the Earth was the center, so what does standard belief have to do with anything at all?

What work exactly did Einstein do to determine that the universe was not expanding? And I am being quite serious, Hubble observed, Columbus sailed. Einstein sat down with a pencil and claimed to know everything about everything that he never even saw. Hubble looked and had to correct the pencilneck

No One Can Agree How Fast Universe Is Expanding. New Measure Makes Things Worse. By Adam Mann 2020-01-09T20:37:47Z We just might need new physics to get out of this mess. New physics means that the current rules do not allow for the observations to be real and thus must be corrected Or the universe might be more complicated than can be understood just by looking at billions of year old photons will allow for. Yes that has been done to me many times as my existence is not limited. See you can not know everything about me by what you see here nor can you understand the universe by billions of year old light

When I do not post the article I am accused of copyright infringement. Now do you agree or disagree with the article, remembering that if you disagree that you know more than the entire rest of the science community combined. Actually the article is about the newest most accurate measurement that invalidates physics as it is currently known. This is the crisis referred to

LOL Sagan said that science was over, that the pace of learning would drastically slow because basically everything had been discovered. Intel ignored Sagan, as are computer engineers today. Sagan was as wrong as wrong could possibly be as 99.999 percent of all knowledge is still unknown and may always be as we can not see outside the universe to achieve the perspective on what it is.

You would know it's a fish, in water exposed to 1G and you would be close enough to monitor it, and it would not be moving in excess of 3 billion miles per hour or more, in an unknown medium

It would help if we actually knew what the universe was