Complexity

What specifically creates the momentum of EMR ? I believe there is a force that attracts it .

An object will remain in motion unless an external force acts on that object . I am aware of the laws of motion and I am additionally aware of thermodynamics . Radiated heat is a thing and can be seen using thermal cameras . If it weren't a thing , thermal cameras wouldn't observe temperature differences of the emission spectrum . Would you say that it is a fare comment to state >E transfers to <E , i.e heat transfer Newtons first law could be applied if when light exits glass , it didn't speed up again . Light does speed up when exiting glass so this to me is suggestive of either a propulsion force or an attractive force creating the constant momentum .

F=ma How can anything move position without there being an applied force ?

''In physics, the second law of thermodynamics says that heat flows naturally from an object at a higher temperature to an object at a lower temperature, and heat doesn't flow in the opposite direction of its own accord.'' Why if not an attractive force by the lower temperature ? Would it be incorrect to say that the object at a lower temperature has <E of the higher temperature object ?

I totally agree with what you are saying but sometimes the why answer is completed . I have good reason to think and consider there is a force involved . In observed spectral emissions can you please answer how energy makes a transition from a high energy state to a lower energy state? Doesn't this imply a change of position for some of the energy ? Isn't the higher energy state attracted to the lower energy state ?

I disagree in '' It is just what light does''. Isn't it imperative that scientists , especially physicists , look for completeness in an answer rather than ' 'It is just what light does''? I'm sure you are aware of the term causality and I do consider that lights speed has to have a cause . Wouldn't the correct statement on force be : There is no known force involved to this present date ? Isn't it possible that in the very near future we could establish the cause of electromagnetic radiation distribution throughout a volume ?

Ok, I see your point now but I still do not feel I've being given the answer to my original question in the context I mean . I will redefine my question : What force spreads light throughout a volume ?

How can that be meaningful ? Unless you mean 1kg of gold and 1kg of feathers type situation ? 1kg = 1kg so no need for the gold or feathers ?

Yes the light spreads out (divides) , into the volume of the room . The question is what makes it ''spread out ''?

Is it not true that the mathematical concept always represents a physical act of separation although the physical part may be in imagination rather than physical applying it ? If not , please provide a demonstration of other use .

I mean something like , we lit a candle in a room , the light emitted is not as bright as the flame , what physically divides the light around the room ?

I agree but nonetheless the equation does represent something physical ! Perhaps I have not defined my question specifically enough . What physical reality divides light by an unspecified physical volume ? Exactly !

Apples , pears ! Anything that is dividable . i.e physical realities .

Indeed , those numbers have to represent something ! You say units , do you mean joules for example ? Would a cake and 5 people be units ?

Let me get this straight ! You are saying that if we take the equation 1/2=0.5 , there is no physical realities that go with that equation ? Wouldn't that make the equation meaningless ?

I' m afraid it does not answer my question ! Divide in math is also a separation process and has physical realities that accompany the math . I'll extend my question to help save confusion . What divides the mass of water (oceans) , around the earth ?

It says on google search However , it doesn't explain the force involved that divides mass by volume .

A linear force is straight line ! I am distinguishing the difference to a vortex . My equation means that lights speed is a product of gravitational force rather than a unique propulsion . The photon in the diagram is travelling left to right .

G=gravity F=force e=electron 1e=proton R^n=real coordinate space My supposition in full is e + 1e = 1N where N is a formed Neutron point particle and neutral in electrical charge A Neutrons mass (1) is then attracted to the gravitational strong force of 0 mass (3) because 0 mass has E=0 and the point particle is being forced to make a transition . However , the strong bond between e and 1e has enough inertia to retain the point particles strong bond although the point particle gains dimensions because of the 0 mass gravitational force . A consequence of this process is that the Neutron energy is stretched by the tensor of the 0 mass gravitational force creating a quantum field (2) with a weaker gravitational force than the atomic bond and 0 mass gravitational force . e + 1e / M0 explains a singularity but in respect to number 2 and quantum fields . I thank you for your replies , this is my 5th post today , as forum first timer rules apply I will not be able to answer further communications today sorry . I wish you all good day , thanks .

My apologies , after re-reading my post and your reply I feel I did not explain my speculation precise and well enough which may of lead to misunderstanding . 1. Explains the gravitational force between particle mass 2. Explains the gravitational force of quantum field mass Denser gravitational mass (1) , linearly attracting less dense gravitational field(s) mass (2) , a consequent result being the curvature of otherwise linear field lines . Additionally I'd like to speculate a third gravitational force that is somewhat peculiar . 3. Zero mass gravitational force A speculation that both 1 and 2 are both attracted to zero mass gravitational force , a speculative argument for the universal expansion and a 0 mass beyond . 3. F=G=-e+1e/M0 where M is mass . As for your question about time dilation , I assume that is contributed to quantum field density , proportional to the inverse . An atoms vibration frequency being at it's fastest at the center of gravity , the densest point . The spectral absorbing and spectral emissions of electromagnetic radiation by atoms being the contributing factor of the rate of time , vibration and frequency .

My apologies for being so unprofessional with my comment !

Quite harsh for a speculation section but I'll give it my best amateur efforts . 1. F=G=(-e + 1e)(-e + 1e)/r^2 2. F=G=(-e + 1e)/r^n

Gravity is a natural phenomenon that is best explained as forces as opposed to a unique singular force . Gravitational forces being the fundamental process of universal construction and additionally contributing to the natural momentum of matter in space , this inclusive of a photons momentum . Gravitational force can be most accurately explained as being two individual forces : 1) The linear force between masses 2) The linear force between matter and space The linear force between masses is the gravitational force that keeps us firmly footed on the ground and additionally the force that allows an apple to fall from a tree (Newton) ., gravity within an emitted gravitational field . The linear force between matter and space , being the gravitational linear force that curves space (Space-time curvature :Theory of relativity , Einstein 1915 ) . Additionally the linear force between matter and space contributes for the momentum of matter . All matter attracted to lesser energy geometrical spatial position(Thermodynamics) . The natural momentum of a photon = F<E where F is force and E is energy . With regards Steve