Thanks. Based on your help, and with a bit of research, I think I just misremembered it, and possibly misunderstood it originally. With my research, I found a couple of helpful pages. This one says that 49% of the radiation emitted by the sun is lower frequency than visible light, and Another source says that 55% of the solar radiation arriving at the earth’s surface is this type of energy.
http://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/radiation-sun.php
And the attached diagram (available at the link below) shows that CO2 absorbs more of such radiation than is emitted from the surface of the earth. With the huge increase in atmospheric CO2 over past decades, shouldn’t we have observed a change in the percentage of lower than visible frequency light arriving at the earth’s surface? If this diagram is correct, then wouldn’t increased atmospheric CO2 result in so much less energy arriving at the earth’s surface during the day that it should at least partially offset the increase in trapped radiation from the earths surface at night? Do the doom and gloom predictions take that into account?
http://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/how-greenhouse-effect-works.php