Bmpbmp1975

Yes but there is a part that says 150 uk colder and also I read the wiki before also this supervoid is below 0 which can cause collapse which may be on its way here now? from what I have been told anything reaching us now regardless is reaching us now does not matter what it is.

No i am reading them and that is my understanding that’s why I am here hoping to learn to understand also the numbers do not say fractionally but big differences in the temp to the point of under 0 àlso still confused on the things reaching us now but not reaching us for billions of years also I may not fully understand but understand enough

Sorry wrong link posted https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20200210a/full/?fbclid=IwAR0Tu2BQnV6jBMs5F5j_UzeLXEMkBruEa4P9JleiCOOS5Txle0RpinjAIBk& and the second article about the supervoid in the other article article that works show that the kev of the universe is colder than thought so this adds to the collapse theory.

Sorry some answer spoke about Lambda constants. And the article I present shows it has changed to possibly a new vacuum state? also the cmb part falls into the replies I got about if universe falls under a certain temp then vacuum collapse is possible. also what we see billions of years ago is reaching us now so if for example the temp has changed and we see it that means it is hitting us now.

I apologize there are so many answers and all seem to be different so having trouble grasping it all also this article implies the actual cosmo constant has changed also which confuses some of the answers here 73.8 ± 1.1 km/s/Mpc according to this new measurement. How much does that increase Lambda (cosmo-constant) looks like it was by 5 http://www.physics.org/article-questions.asp?id=103 then this article below talks about the universe colder a very low levels which what was said above will not happen anytime soon https://physicsworld.com/a/the-enduring-enigma-of-the-cosmic-cold-spot/

Not sure what you mean by slim possibility and are we not in a false vacuum state now?

I have read it and it is happening soon from what I read?

Not sure what the last 2 posts have to do with Katie Mack’s theory of vacuum collpaset

I see, the only thing is the works of katie Mack say otherwise and I am not sure where your thermal equilibrium has anything to do with the vacuum collapse or the universe falling into a true vacuum state below a constant

I don’t understand exactly , can you please explain why it won’t happen in our lifetimes according to Katie Mack it can? what do you mean cool down enough? The cooling has nothing to do with vacuum collapse it is all due to the state of Higgs bosin

Yes but at our current state now we are sitting at a vacuum collapse happening at any time now in our lifetime

i am talking vacuum collapse that will destroy the universe I am still confused with the science, this state has recently changed of the Higgs a true vacuum. So clearly something caused it to change recently.

So we are currently looking at a possible vacuum collapse happening at any time

Again I am confused so basically we are currently sitting in a true vacuum this states we are on the verge of vacuum collapse

I am sorry but you lost me, you stated before it was not possible in our current QM. Now it seems your stating it is possible. from my understanding this value is changing and bringing us closer to a true vacuum state under 1

Sorry vacuum collapse stupid spell check

And you also stated it can be an change in the vacuum colloque theory

I didn’t know it was impossible all the articles I have read and the works of Katie Mack state it is possible?

QM?

So that’s a yes then, a change could lead to vacuum collapse

My apologies I am still new and limitied to 5 posts per day. I saw your answers and that helped my understanding. Question can a change in the fine-structure constant lead to vacuum decay.

So someone in another forum told me that the Newley found dead galaxy can mean the 1/137 has changed? so if it did change then it can put the universe constant less than one which would move the universe out of metastable state ( Well I would question such a claim unless they could provide a decent peer review article on it. There have been numerous studies of a potential varying fine structure constant. However deep field studies show no variation outside error measurement bars.) ? has the 1/137 changed? has the métastable state changed?

From what I have been told the constant of 1/137 may have changed and if it fell below 1 it can put the universe in universe in a vacuum decay state with this data found Is this true if that is the case how long before it hits us

Betelgeuse is to close for confort And will be bad for us here when it goes?

So is this stating the black hole is headed towards us?