Zodiac

Ban time for me again ! You are still a bunch of arrogant mediocre minded fools who know jack shit about physics . Your Nasa boy included , Cia lmao fools .

How about you learn how to create math as inputting values to existing formulas isn't math! If (a) = -0.5 and (b) = 0.5 then a+b=0 and a^3+b^3 still equals 0 . And if you mean the suns density question , the answer is var (p) where p is density . cm^3 on the Sun are dynamic in energy levels dependent to the kE going on ! Friction between particles creating heat energy etc. Tensor x = <E Tensor y = <E Tensor z = <E Not difficult too understand ! We could use +x or -x if you'd like . +v(x)=tensor <E etc... P.s Just to add something ''juicy'' . A cold core reactor will retain plasma flow around the core . The cold core will act as a ''tractor beam'' .

The net effect is momentum and additionally the visual universe expansion of the singularity we are within . Space isn't empty within a singularity , it is empty outside a singularity ! Enthalpy is thermodynamics , pressure etc . An enthalpic system has retaining properties etc . Field properties of the singularity are simple a^3+b^3=1/t and bodies within the field are also a^3+b^3=1/t i.e volumes The natural physics of the universe is only functional if a^3+b^3 = a^3+b^3 What this means is that bodies have to be equal and likewise in neutron polarity to the singularity spatial field . If this were not so then the permeability of the field would oppose motion . Thanks for taking the time to reply and read . I just love physics ! 🤩

Do you always say things you can't personally understand is meaningless drivel ? Consider a HIgg's field , a^3+b^3=V/R^n The field has the mechanics for free electrons to retain form but they will degrade over time to energy loss . The visual universe is a singularity of a^3+b^3=1/t that exists within R^n/t Within, the physics are slightly different to the out !

More or less yes ! A system can only develop if an electron and proton was to manifest simultaneously at any given point of a void . This is the only possible way some thing can form to have stability in a void . Then rather than self annihilating , a stable volume is formed and expands . a/R^n=0/t b/R^n=0/t delta 0 = a+b/t = 1/t 1/t = a^3+b^3+kE/t kE=(a^3+b^3)(hf)/t E=(a^3+b^3)+kE/(R^n/t) That is the physics ! I've added math and for support I add the Cavendish torsion ball experiment F(G)=<E , different mass balls . I also added earlier fire always points up towards less energy space , the stratosphere is cold hence the force is shown F=<E . Additionally the earth magnetic field is curved towards the poles , F=<E . the curve is what makes the density . To add : We can use internal energy of a system u and u/R^n=V/t Electrons are stable within an enphalpic system that is a^3+b^3=V , a singularity .

Within an already created , established system , maybe so . However in a void it is an impossibility and on the lines of Dirac thinking , a single electron or proton in a void would self annihilate by the extreme stress caused by the absolute force of gravitational transition F(G)=<E It would be a natural requirement for the energy to be divided by the void . All R^n spatial points naturally requiring to reach an equilibrium of energy level . To retain magnitude both the electron and proton must be present a^3+b^3=V to retain form and stability .

Are you really suggesting the present atomic model isn't electrons , protons and neutrons ? Gravity isn't push and pull , I'll retract that statement as a messup error , worded badly ! A single electron cannot exist in a void , it is impossible physics , there is no mechanical bond of the electron to retain stability !

Actually the electron strong force (force 1) converges with the proton strong force (force 2) to produce a weaker emitted force (force 3) ! F1+F2=F3 In science force is push and pull , gravity is both push and pull ! The field space interior of an atom also playing a role . Returning to the earlier post , I mentioned E/R^n and particles self annihilation , the reason a virtual particle self annihilates is because it is has no bond to retain form without a counterpart . A single electron in a void cannot exist , it would be torn apart by the mechanical stress of F(G)=<E

The beauty of physical process is that physical process is not subjective or fantasy . The physical process does not care what I or you think as the physical process works ! I don't know enough physics ? I have just explained a single spark in a void being attracted to the entirety of the void . This of course in regards to Dirac's work , particles popping into and out of existence . Advancing on that and correcting it . Virtual particles manifesting at any given point of R^n , that self annihilation as a consequence of F(G)=<E . Please do not make false claims that I do not know enough physics ! Recap : Newtons absolute space (Advanced and modernized:R^n an unspecified volume of real coordinate spatial points , an immovable reference frame ) Dirac particles popping into and out of existence (Advanced and modernized: E/R^n=0 density, causality F(G)=<E I told you , that physics agrees with me ! I am not making things up , I have advanced every scientists work who is involved ! I will return later to discuss the strong force required to stop virtual particles self annihilation ! (Atomic model)

The reason I am presently unable to present models is that I am working off a broken chrome book with limited uses . Based on evidence I have everything including the Universe expansion confirming my analysis and theory to be more fact than anything presently available . Do you really want me to produce dangerous math live for anyone to see ? Do you really want me to show you the physical math process of how to destroy an entire planet ? Not only show you but include the design to the doomsday device ? I know how to arc space-time energy my dear , I can sink an entire Navy my dear ! However I am a man of peace so i'd rather leave the boys with toys playing alone . Back to physics , a single spark in a void is attracted to the entirety of the void . The point energy source will be divided by the void , decreasing in magnitude and density to 0 . This is a fact and the momentum of dispersal is c , c being a consequence of F(G)=<E !

I have models , I have math and I have present physics knowledge to back me up ! I have everything which of course begins with R^n=0 . An unspecified volume of real coordinate spatial points . Now of course we could go into a^3+b^3=V and so on but simply E/R^n = F(G)<E explains most of the physics involved . P.s Yes I have useful calculations that work but they are dangerous calculations (Nukes are matches compared) .

Actually I have T.O.E including the relevant physical math ! As a consequence of discovering T.O.E , I have advanced physics . Additionally present physics , confirms my physics .

Yes I can demonstrate all my work is consistent in observation ! I have sketched a basic model for you to ponder over . hf/x=F(G)<E

I have a visual model , can create the math concept and additionally have the engineering for a working device ! Stars don't occupy the same volume of space constantly . The space within a star is constantly changing .

It is equally and proportional attracted to behind it so the body in motion will continue its motion unless acted upon . There is no gravitational drag and slowing down of the body in motion because of the equality of attraction . The Sun occupies an equal and proportional underlying volume of empty space . When the Sun eventually dies , decays to nothing , the volume of empty space will still be there . (E/R^n)/t Energy divided by real coordinate space over time is how I describe gravitational transition !

That is not correct ! The tensor of space time energy is the gravitational transition . This pulls the field lines really tight and it takes a lot of ingenuity to know how to make a curve .

1. I am working on quantifying it 2. Attracted to each other and ''empty'' space . A comet shows a comet is attracted to the space ahead , that is why Newtons law of motion works . 3. I'd strike a match and see which way the high energy state was directed

I can tell you now that it isn't 1.41 g/cm^3 ! The Suns density per cm^3 is dynamic and variable . I can tell you that the volume of the suns energy is denser than the surrounding space and as a natural condition of gravitational transition the Suns energy is attracted to that surrounding space . If this were not so , then EMR could not travel A to B ! 1. True but there additional physics to this which I am trying to explain 2. You can push energy , in fact you can curve it as in space-time curvature (please don't ask how as this process will cause the entire universe to arc)

I think this may be my last post of the day ! Replying to this post and Mordred's post . Consider a void appearing in the center of a volume of energy and then apply E=(mc^3+kE)/(V/t) You will find if you think proper , that mc^2 applies to area not volume ! Quite obviously the physics is that the surrounding energy of the center void , collapses into the void !

I am here in a serious nature ! The internal energy (u) of any system must be equally and proportionally divided by the volume of the system (u/V)/t Any system increases in (u) when that system experiences kE within the interior of the system that increases the magnitude of temperature in that system (u/V)/t+kE=>T where T is temperature A temperature increase IS an increase in energy in the system and this increase has to be divided , equally and proportionally throughout the volume of the system A BH is a lack of mass that gives the BH its mass ! What this means is that any point of space has the potential to become a BH by becoming a negative point , having no mass or energy . When a BH is formed , the negative point at an instant gains the maximum gravitational transition potential . All surrounding energy is then governed by gravitational transition to be centripetally attracted to the negative point . The BH is then formed and starts to expand gaining mass that in turn becomes a high energy state attracting lower energy states ( an apple falls to the ground ) The kE of field dynamics is a bit more complex but I am sure you are aware it is electrifying ! I think I only have one or two posts left today as forum first timer rules apply ! Sorry if I miss something out .

You are a moderator ? Mass and energy are equivalent as Einstein stated ! You can pick up an object with your hands and move it . A force is required to move that mass energy ! I am sorry but your answer is not good thinking! A body orbits another body because of gravity and Newtons laws of motion , a body will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force . An orbiting body is trying to travel a linear path but the gravitational hold , inertia , stops the orbiting body flying off into space in a linear vector . I do not accept your no answer to be correct as spectral transitions suggests high state energy transitioning to lower state energy . If energy is retained in a body in the form of mass then gravitational transition must be applicable ? A body will remain in motion because the bodies retained energy wants to make the transition to less energy state space ! No doubt this will be a short lived forum experience as moderators are often quite stubborn and become offended easily .

I am defining the energy state as energy density per point of a volume and proposing in question that any points energy is passive to other points that have less energy . If we are all in agreement that things reach room temperature , we have to explain the motion of energy from A to B . A force of propulsion or other is required ? In regards to space , the retained mass of a moving body , moves the body . The body in motion will continue in motion because the retained energy is required to move to less energy points , as the energy cannot leave the body , the body moves with the energy ? In reply to Strange , mass is attracted to mass but mass is also attracted to space ?

High energy state volumes such as the Sun transfers the volumes high energy to lower energy state volumes in transition . A volume of absolute space would effectively have E=0 and as a consequence of this , the maximum potential to gain energy as in accordance with thermodynamics , ''cold things reach room temperature'' . It is my belief that high energy is attracted to lower energy states , the force I assume is a gravitational transition ? >E attracted to <E volumes ? Force gravity = <E ? Thank you for your consideration and answers in advance .