ahmet

in this case, I prefer to say : I AM ALREADY GOOD , WHY AND HOW TO GET BETTER ?

what does "getting better " mean ? I may think inversely , because I would like to remain young ,healthy and , and,....and simply static. ahaha if you are asking what our purpose would be each, I am sure that each will change one by one if you are asking what should it be,then ,well you are trying to asnwer ,but this will include risks to respond. I personally do not explain purposes ,why to do that ? because I am very cute hahahah one very important sentence will be good to share : I LOVE MYSELF , THIS IS THE RULE TO FEEL HAPPY ,I BELIEVE.

sorry but I did not understand what you exactly imply or what the correlation was ,with this thread. could you provide more details please?

I knew this as "a medical knowledge that runs/works but does not have; a suitable place or is not convenient to be existed amongts the current, medical literatures furthermore, that is really available (I believe ,because I saw and observed!). maybe we might discuss it in suitable place of forum.

I was also thinking this. And gave a potential probability to wtf 's notation , stating or pointing out : [math] e^{i \theta } = cos(\theta) + i sin(\theta) [/math] formula. but as I realised that OP has no basic knowledge in analysis,I did not want to give any instructions in complex analysis. so, automorphism seems like useless to mention for ensuring the OP understand the issue

I suppose you cited my previous comment. well, but interestingly almost the same styles may have wide ranges of fans while that mentioned music was not being supported. All in all you might be right. because there are some artists that have good musics ,but just one sample is good. ,,or I have not heard the more. for instance this one: although I enjoyed this, it is listened just over 2 million. I have more smaples but this one seems enough for now. thanks for stating your opinion.

...removed. might be updated later.

technical means , the methods used in one, of branch of science, profession or art.

[math] x^{2} =-1 [/math] ( the existence of [math] \sqrt{-1} [/math] ) or the creation of complex numbers in other words. is an acceptance. if you can (I do not know whether you can) solve quadratic equations, this may help you. and the graphs may (also) be helpful

thank you for both of your replies. Really I intended to mean something different but most presmably yes ,speculations should be close to the thing I look for in the current case. and hahahahha cannot control myself to smile .

alternative sciences

this is a very old but still good musics to me. Sometimes I feel me very surprised to see very good musics were not being supported/preferred. anyway,that musics is below. my favourite turkish singer:

NANCY NANCY NANCY is one of my favorites

you can check SJR and DOAJ.

yes , to say: "the probability for whole domain set of random variable " might be better. in fact, I do not believe the ncertainity when we locate us in mathematics. because everything is definite/certain. the uncertain parts are most probably just belong to our failures. haha ,what I have written , like phylosophists

hahahahah that is just a theoretic part, and simply shows the summation of all possible probabilities. So ,equal to 1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmFP-EUIhV8

to me ,no. because it is not changeable,or personally I have not seen any application in such a way. however some interesting but real cases have potentiality to or might show that at least not. generally physicists (especially who want to be known as popular) have tendency to comment on this issue and most of those I saw were not claiming that it was linear.

I am sorry but I won't permit you say that good joke. to me , yes. but according to some articles ,no.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho07ByMBB9M

gosh I did not imply to just read. anyway... by by for now.

no, you can learn even if you do not ask. I have some particular wordings on this issue,but i think I don't interest. just for now,I can say that some narrowed areas might be available. (some keywords: gtp, g proteins, colours, race, human ,animal vision system.)

to me, it is not a meaningful question,sorry.

maybe under this thread I might be not the best one to respond. but more than this query: I was thinking this one: "whenever I see russians here, I clearly see that they are not same with me,although I do not have dark skin. but their whitenes is shining . so,the (probably equivalent ) query is that whether I would have skin as same as russians have had if I would go russia and live here for long time. and I respond my query by myself as almost always: even if not as same as russins ,it would get lighter. sure. one think I wonder: why have you opened this thread ,for what?