ahmet

alternative sciences

this is a very old but still good musics to me. Sometimes I feel me very surprised to see very good musics were not being supported/preferred. anyway,that musics is below. my favourite turkish singer:

NANCY NANCY NANCY is one of my favorites

you can check SJR and DOAJ.

yes , to say: "the probability for whole domain set of random variable " might be better. in fact, I do not believe the ncertainity when we locate us in mathematics. because everything is definite/certain. the uncertain parts are most probably just belong to our failures. haha ,what I have written , like phylosophists

hahahahah that is just a theoretic part, and simply shows the summation of all possible probabilities. So ,equal to 1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmFP-EUIhV8

to me ,no. because it is not changeable,or personally I have not seen any application in such a way. however some interesting but real cases have potentiality to or might show that at least not. generally physicists (especially who want to be known as popular) have tendency to comment on this issue and most of those I saw were not claiming that it was linear.

I am sorry but I won't permit you say that good joke. to me , yes. but according to some articles ,no.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho07ByMBB9M

gosh I did not imply to just read. anyway... by by for now.

no, you can learn even if you do not ask. I have some particular wordings on this issue,but i think I don't interest. just for now,I can say that some narrowed areas might be available. (some keywords: gtp, g proteins, colours, race, human ,animal vision system.)

to me, it is not a meaningful question,sorry.

maybe under this thread I might be not the best one to respond. but more than this query: I was thinking this one: "whenever I see russians here, I clearly see that they are not same with me,although I do not have dark skin. but their whitenes is shining . so,the (probably equivalent ) query is that whether I would have skin as same as russians have had if I would go russia and live here for long time. and I respond my query by myself as almost always: even if not as same as russins ,it would get lighter. sure. one think I wonder: why have you opened this thread ,for what?

hi, may I request help from the ones who have interest to this issue, my queries will be: 1) whether the direct opinion would be correct , thinking like entry to prosperous countries would be better (i.e. will bring more income).Furthermore, turkish patent office (i.e. tpe) 's international preliminary examination shows that my invention has no inventive step. So, does this mean that the examination phase will fail in national phase of another country. (especially for prosperous countrys') (note: according to ISR (ISA=TR), the invention is novel,industrial applicable but lacking for inventive step as said. ) 2) whether there are any organizations or associations that might support us (just) for payment of ISR and Examination fees (i.e. PCT fees)?

I do not know very well what you exactly look for but if you are willing to do maths (category: algebra) , I think your prerequisites are to obtain knowledge about : --- >> normal operations (summation, mltiplication in R) --- >> sets (and all operations) --- >> what function is and properties of functions. (1-1,onto ,bijective and types and all other relevant properties of functions) Then slightly pass please into pure maths ("entry to algebra" in other words) but as studiot advises, do not try to do too much at once. I think even if anyone is so much intelligent ,there are some limitations that that one would not be able to pass them.

I newly explored this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_Xcb4e9Df4

I could not differentiate whether this was a bad or good musics. lets decide together my idea is that this musics contains prosodical problem (I m not sure whether I wrote the term correctly "prosodia". in turkish this is called as the compartibility of wordings and musical instrumental composition.)

ok ✔️

presumably this means that atoms have 3D placement. also @joigus 's comment. And what about the use of these compounds (i.e. metabolism), how does body differentiate whether such compounds are not useful/usable (i.e. harmful) or vice versa? note: I know or can accept that not everything could be classified as harmful things and vice versa , there might also be something like not harmful and not efficacious. But, here in turkey , generally medical doctors (professors) tend to say that trans fats were harmful. I am trying to understand the case.(implication). from my particular master program notes, I also know that unsaturated acids were a necessity and efficacious. simply ,how and explanation for the opposing case? from this comment ,I understand that trans fats' melting point is high. they tend to clog the veins. So ,problems are occuring in the mechanism. is this the consistence really? and does this show also that , they were not needed in fact? another question: I think we do not know or previously define how the compounds act,right? for instance ,here we know that unsaturated two forms have same formula, but because of their geometrical placement they are not same. one of them has tendency to be harmful while another one is efficacious and needed. but, in fact, we can only realise this after observation and experiments (I know that this detail is already known about TFAs) otherwise, it cannot be said whether a compound was previously harmful or efficacious (before it created and used (i.e. experiments and observations) all in all,I am again not sure really. bacause some scientific criteria might illuminate the way.