ahmet

hi, may I request help from the ones who have interest to this issue, my queries will be: 1) whether the direct opinion would be correct , thinking like entry to prosperous countries would be better (i.e. will bring more income).Furthermore, turkish patent office (i.e. tpe) 's international preliminary examination shows that my invention has no inventive step. So, does this mean that the examination phase will fail in national phase of another country. (especially for prosperous countrys') (note: according to ISR (ISA=TR), the invention is novel,industrial applicable but lacking for inventive step as said. ) 2) whether there are any organizations or associations that might support us (just) for payment of ISR and Examination fees (i.e. PCT fees)?

I do not know very well what you exactly look for but if you are willing to do maths (category: algebra) , I think your prerequisites are to obtain knowledge about : --- >> normal operations (summation, mltiplication in R) --- >> sets (and all operations) --- >> what function is and properties of functions. (1-1,onto ,bijective and types and all other relevant properties of functions) Then slightly pass please into pure maths ("entry to algebra" in other words) but as studiot advises, do not try to do too much at once. I think even if anyone is so much intelligent ,there are some limitations that that one would not be able to pass them.

I newly explored this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_Xcb4e9Df4

I could not differentiate whether this was a bad or good musics. lets decide together my idea is that this musics contains prosodical problem (I m not sure whether I wrote the term correctly "prosodia". in turkish this is called as the compartibility of wordings and musical instrumental composition.)

ok ✔️

presumably this means that atoms have 3D placement. also @joigus 's comment. And what about the use of these compounds (i.e. metabolism), how does body differentiate whether such compounds are not useful/usable (i.e. harmful) or vice versa? note: I know or can accept that not everything could be classified as harmful things and vice versa , there might also be something like not harmful and not efficacious. But, here in turkey , generally medical doctors (professors) tend to say that trans fats were harmful. I am trying to understand the case.(implication). from my particular master program notes, I also know that unsaturated acids were a necessity and efficacious. simply ,how and explanation for the opposing case? from this comment ,I understand that trans fats' melting point is high. they tend to clog the veins. So ,problems are occuring in the mechanism. is this the consistence really? and does this show also that , they were not needed in fact? another question: I think we do not know or previously define how the compounds act,right? for instance ,here we know that unsaturated two forms have same formula, but because of their geometrical placement they are not same. one of them has tendency to be harmful while another one is efficacious and needed. but, in fact, we can only realise this after observation and experiments (I know that this detail is already known about TFAs) otherwise, it cannot be said whether a compound was previously harmful or efficacious (before it created and used (i.e. experiments and observations) all in all,I am again not sure really. bacause some scientific criteria might illuminate the way.

As far as I remember (from high school) it is about geometry. but...do not well what happens with these or do not know how these metabolised. I shall check the link(s). actually ,I remember this from high school but, what is the difference between these exactly? (seems same)

ah yes. trans fat is a form of unsaturated fat. thanks. And could you show me or explain: what is the difference between elaidic acid and oleic acid? a notation: I saw one turkish professor speaking on tv channel , she was blaming trans fats and advising to avoid from them. (But why ,because charonY's reply indicates that body could break down trans fats.)

hi, yes trans fats. so, as we can say that metabolism consists of catabolism and anabolism , can we say that your this answer indicates that body could either produce (naturally) trans fats or break down them? so this means ,YES human body can break down trans fats(?)

with a note before starting: I could not differentiate it well so this thread might either be considered in medical sciences or biology forum. sorry for the case. hi, I wonder whether trans lipids/oils usable in human body? among the contexts,I know that not all of saturated lipids were trans , in trans lipids , hydrogen atoms are inversed at bond points. and not all of saturated lipids / oils were useless. but do not really know anything about the certainty of information appearing in the thread. equivalently, can we say that once we obtain trans oils in known forms , then is that impossible to move away these lipids from the body up to death?

ahahaha something came to my ming like : to divide a penny from a point over its boundary along its diameter (maybe via hammer).

of course.but you can create something from theoretic parts. I mean that you could create your own application. anyway, yes. this thread is about engineering texts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vwn16r0S0_k

well, I say that ,because perspective is really effective. to me, if you have that you can achieve very bright things. but eventually we shall be able to say that these are different issues. --->> perspective --->> working hard. one of them conains talent while another does not have to. ,and a response to your another implication: I am almost sure that we would be able to create something new via rather general (even basic) theorems. for instance, bernhard bolzano had lived between 1781-1848. but that does not mean that his thorems would not cause new results in the far future (e.g. 2200) I do not really believe that any book's importance/value/prominence would be measurable via its cover page (i.e. appearance) nnnnever !

ahahahaha ha aha ,congrats for your effort with such studies. but, I do not think so. it all depends on your perspective to me.

mmm, yes some of the songs I listen might/may contain ,I think this one is one of such musics but again natalie horler's voice is good,I listened her many times in the far past. the background of the music that this artist does may contain electronic dance music

mm does this mean that ...they were (particularly or " a bit" ) monotone. I shall again respect. Here in turkey we have very well fixed sentence (like in the manner of idioms but a sentence that have predicate) "pleasures and colours are not discussible" . So, whatever you say, I know that I (should & would) respect that in this regard.-but normally , I enjoy/prefer the musics which enables me to obtain/create/produce or have inspiron and sometimes intuition,in general.

a ha ah ah I respect that , really I already almost totally believe the power of "freedom" so, you and everyone is perfectly free about what to listen. hahaha haha really I have also though like that many times, but cannot stop myself sharing the musics I like. oh my gosh !

hahahah hahah ha ha , that girl really has not discovered how the love was! hahahah haha anyway, music fits you tamiga & bad. artistica , congratulations anas otman. nay nay nay , nay nay nay