ahmet

I am a teacher in one of the branch of science. So,I think I can observe something from the top of the portrait or a map and normally can make some distinction between the speakers. But that thing whatever we say should NOT of course pass the treshold of the reality. I clearly remember what I said, feel free please to speak more clearly. I am again sure, this OP of topic is not unintelligent. What is more, he can understand and make distinction between what intented to be said and what sounded ftom the text. but unfortunately this user does not have sufficient (as swansont says "fundamental") contexts of maths. Thus everything is problem for him in this regard. anyway, perhaps some people do not want to accept the reality or cannot see it well. a recommendation: as independent researcher and maths teacher ,here I could not really judge what the OP would like to learn or ask in the work of maths. so, I recommend the topic to be closed.

oh,I am not sorry. because I have not sufficient time to worry for anything

instead this sentence, you should use this sentence, I think. "generally making somethings worse is easier than making that things better"

lol , this is not valid or inconvenient for mathworks. meanhile, I can remind that that man was not a mathematician as I know,he was physicist. And here, I do not encourage anyone to work for pure maths. I only know the way.

I do not know really such videos. Maybe causing by the novelty of the area,because springer's one journal (taht almost newly founded) publishes basic contexts too. but.. I am sure that you would be able to find many written materials on the issue/topic and do not know why you do not try that.

so, does this mean that in fact, we did not need to use soap? interesting. if not; how do we remove viruses from the surface of our hands? addition: I was almost forgetting bacteria.sorry. but the question still stands. may I ask a question: I remember you had said that we would have a probability to face a new diseaase (i.e. pandemic) in a thread. now turkish media announces a mutated version of covid19? if this case satisfies your (or proves that you were right in your prediction), how did you reach that information?

ahahahhaa hahaa ha aha aha hahahahha ok, I will try to start a new meaningful thread.(I shall have dinner ,later..maybe)

peheh , pahah to me, this is just waffling ...

I think he is classsical mathematician. In fact, I can't see an extraordinary mathematician at anywehere (all around the world). (i.e. superb) but this will be another thread. lets start a new thread for that if you are willing.

deleted..

it smells lovely to me, could you provide more infor about this book to us? which publication? author? publication year? thanks.

just smiling...

I am sure that this dialect was ot MSA. to me, the best of levantine arabics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHyDHLI0TAs

honestly, your achievements are yours and no relevancy with me. but...it seems even if you are not as knowledgeable as @swansont, to me you are more intelligent than him. sure. because in spite of the failures I had done, you have understood the message what intended. so , congratulations. (and to swansont, I predict, I will have published materials also in english, so don't bother yourself. you are wrong. the only disadvantage ,I had wrote that text with my phone and I was on a urgent way,so I could not make any reform. sorry for that. anyway, lets go on the topic you claim or it is being understood that you mention that two points would be linear or not linear. this is wrong. linear is a description not just for two points , but for functions. (to use just for two point is wrong) shortly, a linear function would be the property of a function that satisfies [math]f(tx+my)=tf(x)+mf(y) [/math] where t and m are scalar and x and y are vectors. (f is a function/operator on a vector space)

I think you are confused even very basic instructions. Joigus tried to "politely" provide basic notations or kindly tried to ensure you understand that some keywords you used in your previous comment were incorrectly used or not understood by you. But to better help you, i can suggest that you first know; _ mathematics is a discipline _ first of firsts please ensure how maths could be better studied ( big clue: please study by writing, and feel yourself as you responsible for everything you express, in progress you should also accept that you must prove everything you say in every step of proofs. _ you need to be patient, but hardworking or having regular work ( everyday please at least 1_2 hour per day in average with the exception of course you take (if any) _ internalize first basic descriptions and thorems. In progress you can either run or fly depending your dedication or work manner. Good luck ahmet

what you ask does not seem clear to me. but basically, the slope of tangent is the value of derivation function at the point where tangent is drawn. this is valid for functions with 1 variable. but for functions with several variables, we prefer differentiation instead of derivation. this seems to me: meaningless and irrelevant..sorry.

a very very bad video , but a qualified musics

an artistic party would be good really under a music like this : piano piano piano

I I think no.(because in fact,it seems that there is no meaningful correlation between these two conditions) Also, CharonY 's reply is a bit supporting this , especially here in turkey if we were to comply the doctors ,I think,we would potentially die even earlier. Almost All of my family got catched to covid19 and sadly, my mother returned at the side of death but why? I think because of the unqualified medical service. I do not mention the non existence of cure or vaccine for this new disease, but the doctors... the most common thing here we see turkish doctors write drugs, commonly even random. yes, without any examination it is really not an extraordinary to see turkish doctors write many drugs. as result: There was nothing to do with tension ilness (i.e. no problem with blood pressure and etc all other details(i.e. blood illness)) but after the 15 days cure in hospital (she had slept) according to the doctor who examined her, my mother's illness changed to blood pressure. (because they did something we do not know and also after going out from the hospital, one drug was given for blood pressure (I can also write the drug's name: seneloc) anyway, I am sure that was nothing to do with my mother and blood pressure problem (i.e. disease). but the doctors thoght that she had had blood pressure problem. my mother did not continue that drug and still she has no blood pressure problem. but unfortunately I commonly observed this: whenever the doctor is not capable to give a response to the case, she/he writes / prescribes the drugs. result 2: I do not believe the quality of modern science. the case might be better at somewhere or in comparison to in the past (but not passing 1400 years before) however, in far past,I think the better system might have existed. do you agree that we would find us in a well ordered uncertainty if we were to do everything in compliance of existing doctors ' advices ? because it is almost impossible. in fact, I do not blame anyone , but the system is not good enough. UPDATE: sorry ,I missed some points. (I was also supposing we were in medical science forum) yes ,I agree that science could make us live longer. why not? but the system is not sufficiently good really in the current status. Also one should take into account that science was not always being satisfied/obtained by education. some useful keywords: intelligence, knowledge, science, education.

send your paper to journals. if the paper is suitable for publication they will accept it, if not they won't accept. as I look for something about "real life applications",I only overviewed and ...consider the probability that it would not be a new thing you provide. because not only taylor series,we have complex series,too (Laurent series) ....

@Sensei expresses that when anyone announce/advertise his/her website here ,it would be risk for the security of that website. so,does this forum limits shares on personal websites because of this ?

this is correct ,I also sometimes add the mechanism of +TCP,UDP protocols and all the content relevant to this. but in spite of these details, I see many people using their own websites,though. Can we say that most of them were not sufficiently knowledgeable? About LaTeX: I have not used it so much and I was supposing that it would not contain good/shining colours. (i.e. not suitable for a good presentation) setting formulas, colours , borders , etc ...this is a part of programming that might require good work.