ahmet

to me in the current status the management is effective ,also more effective than working hard. but this presumably more valid in good countries regarding technological and scientific developments. of course this is my personal idea,I might be wrong. what about the future?(Your question) it is not so much clear. But all in all , rather than working hard , working to what, will be effective.

I have not felt myself good in geometry (but not in basic topology) so I had not replied. but simply,this quotation is a good reply. and if I am not wrong, I think this user is confusing herself/himself. (Note: I know that hyperplane did not have to be 3 dimension. because I remember from somehwere when P is a plane,then P+t is hyperplane.

again crudely, , senses have modality and and the sensitivity is not same at ,all as you know or should know. defined by logarithm or via it. but of course ...yes , there is probability for some types of senses (also there might be different sense systems which WERE NOT DEFINED YET) because for instance there might be intersense or different senses. ... but intersense is surely possible. (even though it is not cogent for all) as one can experience if you apply pressure through your eyes, you will perceive a light although that organ is not being transdyced normally via pressure. I know ear (auditory) system works differently. but to me ,I consider the possibility for the case if any living thing can see, that would not be able to perceive. I think this is possible. if you mean "experience" is totally apart from "descriptons" or there exist some "experience" types that were not explainable, then I definitely disagree to this idea. We only do not know them,but that does not mean that they were not explainable.

this was good! but I am not sure on whether it would completely help, because there is also a good amount of difference between theory and applications in the current status. or there are many theorems that were not useful/applicable.

so, you mean that any blind one cannot realize (i.e. perceive) redness,right? I do not think that the description itself should be so much difficult, but I might miss some details ,too, not sure. really interesting question

hahahaah I have expressed something about this in the official jokes section today. and consider this, we do not act like robots, thus, we may change our ways sometimes. (I mean, we do not have to follow all the pathway in any map. continuing where I was) redness , redness, redness ,maybe is exaggration of the use of this smart word ? anyway, are you mentioning something like this: "how can anyone ensure a blind one learn how the red colour was?"

if you are asking here "how is a colour (specifically "red") being detected?" then ..this is about vision system , you will need to check G-proteins , the pathway and neural transmission and transduction. as I crudely know, there are main three colours (maybe computer scientists use that as a model also ("RGB") Red , Green and Blue. (others are the combinations of these) but here , of course there are some differences between descriptions and (to me as I said) there are many unexplained details.

simply,I gave a name to it "nervous cancer" , not categorized in psychiatry yet

light light light oh romantic?? noooooo! what ? just a tea ..

presumably I can create a very well designed nervous cancer

hi, I only very crudely overviewed the thread ,reading the explanations by jumping over some, I think the things we knew have high potentiality to be very less than the things we still do not know. all in all, it deoends on how you work and some external but important and sensitive points to find the answer. but currently I can consider something like interface systems. action & gradual potentials , impuls , summation etc. these are just a very small piece of the issue.

not so much far away. only 4-5 years previous.. monoromantic relations without any touch... just watching the past these days.

maybe something better exists..(html+css +js (+php))

you ask question(s) but you say "I can't wait to hear the replies."

thank you for the comment and/or help. Do you mention wordpress or something like this? I did not understand the last sentence of this paragraph. but I can say that in that mentioned book,I would not take pictures or any else information except the codes. if you recommended me wordpress..then first this seems like to escape to/through easy way. second, they use strict javascrip codes that I would not be able to dominate them well.In fact, I can normally develop very good webpages but being very busy these days , having a regular responsibility and something like these are all making it almost luxury to deal with anything else. (sorry really I am really not a lazy one..maybe postponing something be good for a while) thanks again.

hi again; can someone analyse this for me: I know a bit html + css (intermediate level) and entry level javascript. that mentioned part of book is about a design of webpage. I sent request to them two times but could not take a reply unforunately. so, could someone analyse this for me: i will use the outline scheleton or structure of the design (of webpage). (But I shall change almost all of css codes and some html's) so, will this still require me to obtain/take the consent??

oh well no, you will probably be a bit surprised because, I would most likely go to the top of my desk and table. for what? mmm, because I think our world needs many developments , my favourite: ENGINEERING. Also, I think we still live in a very crude world (So crude that can't even represent very relief environment for me ,like you depict with your wording "the door is open..." peheh (I NEED TO FLY,OR ENSURE SOMEONE FLY) . to have smarter one, I and my world need works

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eI8D-b5l2nE

ahaha fatima's dress reminiscents me a chicken's apperance.