CuriosOne

Oh, I thought capitol x as in capital X had some relavance....lol There is something else, I must add... Saw this in a conversion base "calculator" as I stumbled on.. "quotient" of "Base Systems"??? As in "The Difference Quotient?" Used in calculus?? How Odd! Where do those sum remainders go??

what's the capitol x for? about ^2 makes sense, ... undoublty "then" its ratio, length and time based all wrapped up in a nice tiny box of x...lol Ok, lots of questions here...if you may.. The counting base 10 system is the only one I understood so far...I will work on the others.. For the 60 and minute question. Is that 5 in 5*12 base 5?? Or is it some "form" of square root "base system" for 25*4 = 10^2 100 cm for the base 12 system...Maybe I should just open a new thread, but this is on topic.. Just to let you know I get this idea from 100 cm in one "meter second" the SI unit for the second, but from real time, not the speed of light...

0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 is understood, but when we add these to "units" from derived math formulas is where I get confused, very confused and "one of the reasons are:" You cannot have 60 seconds in one "completed cycle" ie time doesn't say 1:60 pm, it goes from 1:59 pm to 2:00 pm in a cycle of 59 seconds, not 60...Is this correct?? So what happens when we apply your explanation to time? Do we have 0->59 charectors of time?? I think were not including the most fundamental part of numbers and nature.. Well this just keeps getting more and more interesting! """"""""""""Thanks for telling me this""""""""""""

When I think of 1000 and 1, I see many things.. I see a conversion factor = 1 as in the inverse of this times 2 = 1/2 1/10^3 =0.001 where 1/0.001 "un" does the conversion, I also see 1010 looks like a binary number "who knows." I also see units of kg, or even microns...Its very hard to say what I see.. When I see "our more popular choice of base 10 I see both base 10 and base 2 as x^2 x= base 10 ^2 = base 2 Why would I think this?? For the rule of "like terms." By the way....How does minutes, hours and seconds apply to any of this to be something "reasonable" as for as the human perception of time goes?? In other words we do well with 26 = 26 letters of the alphabet, but how do we link numbers to "time?"

Numeric Bases was the gap I had.. "Thanks" for clarifying this. This reminds me of "cryptography" or The "Ceaser Cypher " That uses "keys" a position and an output "letter by letter" where the key is a constant.. I know this sounds weird of a question. But what base does algebrea use? I ask becuase it has a 2 above the x: x^2 I found this for Numeric Base.. In a positional numeral system, the radix or base is the number of unique digits, including the digit zero, used to represent numbers. For example, for the decimal/denary system (the most common system in use today) the radix (base number) is ten, because it uses the ten digits from 0 through 9.

Sounds much like "programming" a computer, or a statistical analysis questioneer, you know the ones where everyone makes 6 figures a year, has a dog and hige house with white picket fencing by the beach?? OHHH REALLY??🤣😂 It is where I come from.....

I'm totally confused on what you mean by "base and powers." I don't understand these sequences either...I see five sets of numbers, but dont understand what they mean..

And what benefit might that be?? Using dargatory language in a public forum without the Moderators telling you to stop? Sounds like you have issues with females... That's Funny...🤣

My OP is a function of "common sense."

Where's option 11?? Since that's the matrix of choice. Where's option 11?? Since that's the matrix of choice here... I no longer have questions on base systems... This makes overall sense for the engineer, the biologist and the computer scientist... Its the bases of creative thinking, the root foundation of "syncronization" or the Noble Attitude.... ThnXxxxxx, I will study this in more depth...Greatly Appreciate Everyone's Help.

So, you cannot build a cooridinent system out of thin air and you cannot create a base "numeral system out of thin air??" Yes, or No??

It's not me, it's the premis of the science model... Anyone can create a cooridinent system like anyone can creat a "base & numeral system." I keep asking is base 10 Counting by 10s?? Or is base 2 County by 2s?? Simple as 1 2 3, and I get answer that sound like ""alien technology."" Earth please???

I can agree with this.

Its the same realiable information that assumes you know what a "base numeral system is"" now I know it's a map anyone can build out of thin air...No wonder there is so much debate in science.. Proper time?? Really...?

This sounds more on the line of my insight...It makes better sense, its syncronized information...

That post was on "fractions" and your not going to understand why I'm thinking this, but: When I think of a fraction, "any" fraction "regardless" of any scientific explantion I think of a converging factor of 1.. Why would I think this?? Becuase of the inverse square law, the conservation of energy and believe it or not Hawking Radiation....I don't expect anyone to understand this comparison neither does it matter.. A base """numeral system""" made sense only after my Newton post, because in his time there were no computers, and anyone can create one out of thin air.. Your post now makes better sense becuase it's in "our time." So now it's fair to say your post clarified this.. I'm glad I ask basic questions.. Yes "please do" so as im trying to keep up with replies and insightfull guidance on very confusing stuff. Thnks and hopefully others will follow this positive example..

Your talking about "manifolds" hyper cubes and the fourth dimension? Now that I understand that a base numeral system is another word for a positive integer, I will research this, however eluded it might be from i as -1 of which we all know is pi ratio based.... The bullying comment was on my thread, so its directed to me however we want to do the algebrea on it....It should not by no means ellude peacfull and civil conversation between adults as it's very childish, especially on something science based...Knowledge varies from person to person for any reason at all, it's what makes life intresting And i can careless who likes me or not at the end of the day it's just me myself and I. I was just told any base numeral system can be created "out of thin air" and that calculus uses no base system... Who's not discussing in good faith again?

This is the 1st time someone told me that a base is a positive integer.. """But of coarse any successfully book needs to have a reason for readers to keep "flipping the pages."😏""" Oh, this might explains where -1 comes in.. "Chukkles!"

Yes its a question, "any base system" works, as any base system can be created out of thin air...The better one or more efficient is the winner.. So why doesn't anyone tell me this? I'm not concerned about binary numbers, computers and etc...This did not exist long ago when science was being formulated...I feel sorry for today's students that need to deal with this "simple" issue.

It was on my thread plain and simple.. please "keep" these comments off my threads as they are "polluting" my focus. I already "passed" my 24 hour chat box or e-bot test..

Thanks for explaining the directive "behind the insult." On a lighter note, maybe the chat bots "wiring is reversed" I have reported this abuser of peaceful scientific conversations to the moderators... I've not seen any complete answers, I've not seen a real world example of a derivitive that has units and numbers in them... Maybe later I will ask what is 1+3 I need to see a "visual example" of this... x this and dy/dx that "does not make sense."

No, the number is geometry based, and it looks like it's in 3d looks like oragami.. On another note, I'm seeking legal advice on cyber bullying...There are some members here that are purposely creating problems for me making it very hard for a scientific conversation..

Wait a moment here... Calculus is very advanced algebra and geometry, that uses a ratio "ie" derivative between at least 2 "observations." In other words its trigonometry based. "Unless of coarse" its pi based, another word for tri based...What ever it is at this point it's truly a mixture of things.. So you speak for everyone right?? Its called: P O L I T I C A L C O R R E C T N E S S Stop cyber bullying me...and stop instigating others to make fun of my posts..

Who's We?? The collective conscious? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣

This is what I've been seeing for years.. A sequence that does not resemble ordinary numbers, that when used with all known calculations resembles something like oragami... I'm glad I ask these questions... So there appears to be a conflict between the better choice..??