molbol2000
Senior Members-
Posts
121 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by molbol2000
-
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
I google it and get the point. In general, I said everything correctly, the point is that if there are no celestial spheres, then it is necessary to somehow explain the holding and movement of bodies The very appearance of the hypothesis of gravity is connected with this. But this, according to modern concepts, is a pseudoscientific hypothesis, because there is no action at distance -
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
I still do not understand what is the connection between gravity and heliocentrism, but it seems that you yourself do not know. -
This is the explanation that I have come across, that which was taught, and I have never heard anything else. Vikipedia also says this. Voice your version please
-
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
That is, geocentrism does not need gravity at all, right I get it? What is there instead? After all, how is it necessary to explain the fall of bodies and their retention in orbits? Suppose we could explain the fall of bodies by the theses of Aristotle that the heavy materia falls, and the light rises. We could explain the holding of bodies on by the presence of celestial spheres. Do I understand correctly? And what exactly is gravity not suitable for such a model, what is the specific contradiction? -
Freedom of speech - Can we really have it?
molbol2000 replied to StringJunky's topic in General Philosophy
Lie is limit(conceptually) Actually, modern censure is political, it not have deal with moral or conception, this is simple interests of group of people, that hold power This is not differ from incvisition -
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
why can this be applied to a heliocentric model but not to a geocentric one? -
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
sounds like a story from comics By the way, do you know that most of this filming was filmed in Hollywood, at the studio? True, there is debate about how much material was filmed there, 100% or less- 30 replies
-
-7
-
I play a little guitar, and I noticed long ago that the role of melody and notes is greatly exaggerated there. Much more depends on how clearly you hit the strings, on the volume, pauses, bar, and so on. The same chord will sound differently depending on how you hit the strings and on what sequence, what resonance. This may be one of the reasons why classical music and opera are usually rubbish, despite the fact that everything there is clearly calibrated and clearly performed. Only snobs listen to classic and this is not because others do not understand it, the point is not in the refinement of taste, but in the fact that it is really rubbish In general, in my opinion, about 80% of the sound on a guitar depends on how clearly and strongly you hit the strings with your right hand. Almost any random combination will sound if the right hand works well. It is also interesting that many of the sounds that a person hears while playing do not actually come to the ears, but are formed by the brain.
-
What is the atomic structure of life?
molbol2000 replied to Saiyan300Warrior's topic in Evolution, Morphology and Exobiology
Оbviously carbon and its compounds -
I noticed that there are 2 types of female build. 1 is in one way or another just a copy of the male, with the exception of the width of the shoulders, and the second type is represented by wide-hipped women, and this hip width, contrary to stereotypes, most often not due to the width of the pelvis, but due to the turn of the neck of the femur, that is, the hip at the place of attachment to the pelvis just diverge to the sides. The second type is apparently associated with cellulite. This second type, I assume, is associated with the Paleo-Europeans. This is confirmed by the Palaeolithic Venuses in particular. How could this shape of the thighs arise?
-
It is believed that this is associated with childbirth, but it is quite obvious that this is not the case, because there is a mass of evidence that childbirth is not directly related to puberty, at least with the appearance of secondary sexual characteristics. Psychologically, this is also not justified, because it is well known that children have emotions associated with gender relations. In that case, what is it? I guess this is the inclusion of genes that reprogram humans (and animals). Why this happened is unknown, but it seems to be true. The "childbearing" version is generally ridiculous, what can teeth and hair have to do with childbirth?
-
Everything is simpler. Scammers simply change the meaning of the terms and they become a simple tool for crowd manipulation. in fact, no one now really knows whether he is a liberal or a conservative, moneybags now claim to be conservatism, although they were precisely the product of liberalization At the beginning of the 20th century, the communists claimed to be liberal, although at that time in Eastern Europe there was already a liberal government that freed the peoples from slavery. When they came to power in Russia they actually revived slavery and even banned movement. So who are they, liberals or conservatives? If we say that they are conservatives, we will come into conflict with the modern definition of liberalism, because they introduced the liberalization of marriage, complete emancipation, and even at first they defended homosexuals and prostitutes the truth is that the swindler does not care what flags to sit under, he is on both sides Someone might say that he sympathizes with liberalism, because he does not like to walk in formation, but why should he join those who want to free all dirty instincts, why should he move to the pigsty?
-
For physics, this is the observation of nature. This is actually a strange question, I don't even know how to answer it so as not to offend anyone Do you understand the differense between declarations and facts? The simplest example with Newton's laws, they are not taken from experience, but simply declared (although Newton relied on the ancient Greek sophists, this is not again not an objective experience) But is a solid foundation
-
For those who do not understand, I will explain it for the last time. If with the help of a small lexicon it is possible to express the same as with the help of a large one, then a language with a small lexicon is more expressive than one that has a large I think this is clear enough
- 88 replies
-
-2
-
This approach leads to fraud if postulates are obtained inductively from experience, they are not completely reliable, but they are more reliable than mere speculation. This is verification, scientific method
- 10 replies
-
-3
-
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
if we assume geocentrism it won't work? -
This example is easy to understand in the counter-example of polysemy. One word in different contexts means different things, respectively, expressiveness increases and vocabulary decreases
-
another example: synonyms, that mainly due to borrowing and mixing of languages, in fact they are superfluous
-
I realized. This is not a valid comparison.
-
if all of them explain one thing or fixed set of things All languages describe a fixed number of phenomena, and if more words are required to describe them, then the language is less expressive. Although this is partly due to the clutter of the tongue
-
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
collisions change movement. Space is not sterile, there is dust and particles This topic is related, I have already said exactly how. I have already given the evidence, I believe that the wave nature of light proves a luminiferous medium (aether) If you insist, we can not discuss it How exactly is gravity with heliocentrism? In general, gravity itself is an extremely dubious hypothesis, because it provides for action at a distance, which is generally rejected by science and has never been observed anywhere. That is not prove of gravitation hypothesis,- 30 replies
-
-4
-
Is there the proof of heliocentrism?
molbol2000 replied to molbol2000's topic in Astronomy and Cosmology
Generalization of experience is the basis of real science. This is easy to prove. If a set of vocal statements is taken as the basis(axioms), then the scientific method is no different from the scholastic one. Since the scholastic method is not scientific, experience must be put in the foundation of science. Proved This cannot be already even because they collide with small particles What has changed now?- 30 replies
-
-1