molbol2000

Btw high technologies also always arise in the professional military cultures. That's ferrum, smelting steel, chariots, bows, flamethrowers (Median fire), and even the latest great discoveries such as the computer, nuclear decay and space originated in melitarized Germany Mittani and hicsos were schifians there is no doubt. There are all properties. Egiptians before Hycsos didn't have it

I have simplified somewhat, by the military culture I mean the professional armies, which in ancient times were mainly Eastern and Scythian cavalry and charioteers. This type of agrarian army, when they simply assembled a line of colonus or slaves and drove them in line, does not require masculine qualities. By the way, bows were mainly used by the Aryans and Persians, farmers (Macedonians, Rome etc) almost never used them.

because evolutionarily qualities are preserved only when they are claimed and rewarded Even in sports itself this trend very visible. Almost all sport disciplines are feminized, true man's disciplines with pure speed and explosive power, like sprint, olympic weightlifting, jumps, and so on, are not popular now

I see no contradiction. As a result of agriculture(and mass industry), the type of warrior, and therefore stronger and faster, is gradually dying out, and women become closer to men. I think the end result should be something like an anthill And note that ideology is headed in this direction. In fact, of couse, this is not proof that the difference already disappear. But the fact that women set themselves goals to be like men speaks of a trend. If traditional masculine values disappear, then the men themselves, bearers of these qualities, will sooner or later disappear.

That the male benefits in speed-strength sports are much greater than in endurance benefits (which is essentially a female quality)

A more sporty look is due to the fashion for fitness, but this is just cosmetics, and we are talking here mainly about functional qualities And this video can be misleading, since it is mainly about weakening men. In the old days, a woman warrior was an exception to the rule, this is no coincidence.

More information for thought. World records in marathon for men and women differ by only a few percent. Records in hammer throwing differ enormously, with a comparable throw length, the female sports equipment is almost 2 times smaller Both factors. As I said, in the strength and speed that determines genetics

I have read enough biochemistry and sports medicine literature to take for granted marginal claims that are contrary to both fact and science. And one of these facts is that the muscle composition of a woman is on average in the direction of oxidation, and in animals this difference can reach 90%

Of course, the role of training and lifestyle cannot be denied, but it is simply stupid to reduce to them, I will not even discuss it, this is nonsense. Yes, I have no direct evidence, but it is logical that if male qualities are not required for survival, then they gradually disappear

Does this scientist deny the difference in muscle composition, or does he deny the difference between glycolytic or oxidative fibers? These are too general words that are simply taken out of context.

You're not right. In sport science, it is generally accepted that things like speed and strength are innate and depend on innate muscle composition. This, in part, explains why a woman cannot achieve the striking power of a man in combat sports. Especially pure speed, it is almost not a trainable quality BTW musculs very strongly associated with the nerves. There is, for example, a category of high-threshold fibers that are excited only from very strong impulses.

Not sure there is direct proof, but simptoms are there it could be speeded up by things like genocides, wars, purges of the inquisition and so on Also maybe this is a myth, but I read like that in an ancient treatise that a charioteer was chasing a running horse. This speed is 2 times greater than the speed of a sprinter, that is, none of the modern men achieves this even approximately. Here is still circumstantial evidence. In the world of animals sexual dimorphism in tertiary characteristics is obviously higher. For example, composition of musculs of bulls differs from cows greater then men's from women's. Bull have more speed musculs

There is nothing to confuse, we just have the fact: more oxigen less power. That's all. 100 meters of run belongs about 10 second. It is possible to run this distance without breathing at all and sprinters never breath intensive when they runs.

as in technique: maximum strength per unit of time This is not a correct description. Apart from the possibility of lipolysis, in any case, everything starts with glycolysis, but at the stage of pyruvic acid, the process can turn into the citric acid cycle or the Cori cycle. In the second case, the substrate will be renewable, from the liver through the blood, glucose enters the cell again This was just discussed above. This does not correspond to reality, the example of a sprinter confirms this. Oxygen supply, on the contrary, reduces power

No, it's impossible. For example, the sprinter runs first 100 meters without deep breathing and his speed maximal. Then, when deep breathing arise, his speed becoming lower. Thus, the more oxygen is consumed, the greater the power drop

I will express my opinion. It consists of two things: race and gender. Last can have more wide interpretation, not only secondary gender properties, including man's fisical power, for example. A strong woman can be perceived as a man

The roots of sport are war, not hormones. All Olympic types of competitions are related to military affairs How do you think music is fundamentally different from other harmonious combinations that are found in painting, other types of art, beauty of faces, and so on? The beauty of faces, in principle, can be explained evolutionarily, those who sought the location of the military nobility survived and interbred with it, therefore beauty is often associated with the ancient Aryans, in their faces there is almost always something that is inexplicable but beautiful (for example, The Beauty of Lawlan)

Сertainly Book 10 of the Rigveda is a late insert with a completely different pantheon and speculative cosmologia. The Vedas even use different languages: Vedic and Sanskrit. Only the most ancient texts are written in Vedic, these are samhitas, mainly metric texts. And only these texts, samhitas, are really aryan.

I think the difference between a woman and a man is destroyed in about 1000 years. For example, in order to engage in agriculture, military qualities are not needed, this is reflected in evolution.

There is a contradiction here. If the mitochondria is energy efficient, then the aerobic regimen should provide maximum power. However, high-intensity exercise provided by an anaerobic regimen based on the Cori cycle