serguei58

My advice to you, do not look in the mirror and the image of the asshole will not haunt you.

And I had no idea that you are not only a physicist but a geologist and seismologist. A scientist with a wide range of knowledge, for whom there is simple geology, ordinary physics, and not cunning mechanics. Are you by any chance a hemorrhoid specialist? Could you advise my grandfather?

I came to this forum to meet not only professionals, but also people with whom it is pleasant to talk, and I found pouty turkeys who are bursting with a sense of their own importance, like you.

List your questions. For example: 1.... 2 ... 3 ... It seems that bureaucrats have gathered here considering my dissertation for awarding me an academic degree. Prove that, prove it ... .. Gentlemen, I repeat once again, I have put the work here so that you people who know physics can give an overall assessment of my work, point out possible errors and advise some other scientific schemes when implementing my idea ... If you do not understand what we are talking about, then how to show this work to geophysicists who do not have deep knowledge of the physical processes described by me ?????

Ladies and gentlemen, I wrote this article and posted it on your forum with one purpose - to test my hypothesis on the possibility of determining the source of mysterious deep-focus earthquakes. I'm not going to dispute anything, I'm trying to get your advice and your opinion on the possibility of such a process in the depths of our planet.

What can I answer you? You probably think that my article was written in order to mislead you. Experiments with WDM are well known in the plasma research world and there are many good works on this topic. As Jesus said: Knock and they will open to you, or in your case - seek and you will be happy.

What are you laughing at? Fusing muonium in plasma doesn’t mean the same will happen with aluminum dioxide??????????? Quite the opposite, the first condensed plasma (WDM) is obtained from aluminum dioxide (or other minerals, rock, magma), and already the plasma (WDM) synthesizes muons during expansion. It is the scattering of the plasma that causes the appearance of muons, that is, the process is determined by the energetics of the process. The energetics of the process the first not the composition of matter.

Yes. Condensed plasma was produced by impacting a shock wave on aluminum dioxide Al2O3 Under what conditions? Are these conditions even remotely similar to what you propose? - ~ 2aμ = 2h2 / mμe2 ~ 5⋅10−13m.

It’s strange that you don’t know that before you build a model, you need to come up with its idea, design, and method of implementation. Sorry.

Why are you clinging to magma? Muons arise from the scattering of plasma, which was obtained in many laboratories around the world by the high-energy impact on many substances, including minerals and rocks. And magma is not included in this list? Magma only gives impetus to the process. The answer is much simpler than you might think. It simply means that nature has no other way to solve such a problem.

1. A decrease in the size of a nucleus by a factor of 200 already makes it possible to start a thermonuclear reaction, regardless of the size of the proton. 2. Nature has no concept of energy benefit, if for mankind it plays a huge role, then nature does not care. You yourself confirmed this with the words: The synthesis catalyzed by muons may have a "right to life", but it will be considered only if other, basic approaches will fail. Nature does, nature does not sort out the possibilities based on their benefits. 3. Have you heard anything about the Uranium blanket, which nature can use to cover the resulting thermonuclear reaction?

The fact of the matter is that trying to apply the laws of mechanics and simple physical laws to the calculations of stresses in the earth's crust, geophysicists have not achieved success in their works, which they have produced many thousands. To date, the results are zero! Not a single scientific prediction of earthquakes for the entire existence of geophysics by all geophysicists of the world! No one! This means that the chosen direction of search leads to a dead end. New approaches and ideas are needed. So I offered my own approach to the existing problem.

When other experimenters confirm the new data, then we'll talk. But, even without this 10% of the proton diameter, muon catalysis has the right to life, as confirmed by practice.

You will not find my hypothesis in the textbook. I express it on the basis of fundamental knowledge accumulated by humanity and have already been tested in practice. That is, the hypothesis has a scientific and proven foundation, therefore it has the right to be in the main part of the forum. Just before me, no one thought in the direction I indicated.

1. Pohl R. Antognini A. Nez F. et.al. The size of the proton.Nature 466, 213–216 (2010). doi:10.1038/nature09250pmid:20613837 2. Beyer A. Maisenbacher L. Matveev A. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen. Science 06 Oct 2017 Dubious assertion. And you should not doubt that the formation of muons does not depend on the composition of the magma, they are formed like this:e- + e + → µ- + µ +

Abstract At the moment, there are several hypotheses in geophysics that explain especially dangerous processes of the earth's crust movements - sudden outbursts of rocks and gas from a rock mass from the point of view of classical physics. Despite the fact that various macroscopic systems can be accurately described using classical mechanics and electrodynamics, a real mechanism and a working model of this phenomenon cannot be built. Consequently, to develop a model of sudden outbursts of rocks and gas, it is necessary to apply new approaches and methods, different from the description of macroscopic systems. This article describes a quantum version of the process of the ejection of rocks from a rock mass. In particular, we described the mechanism of the Coulomb explosion that occurs in the rocks of the earth's crust with a sharp change in rock pressure and built a model of the sudden release of rocks and gases. In our opinion, the quantum processes described by us can be sources not only of sudden outbursts and rockslide but also sources of more formidable phenomena - earthquakes and volcanic explosions. Quantum mechanism of earthquakes.docx

I explain briefly. You're right, the lifetime of a muon is about 2.2 microseconds. Each muon, "running" in search of suitable deuterons and tritons with which to contact. This can take from ten thousand picoseconds to the very death of the muon. But if the muon managed to form a molecular ion, then the start of a thermonuclear reaction will depend on the average distance between the triton and the deuteron, and in the case of a distance sufficient for the fusion of nuclei, the start of the reaction will take place in less than half a picosecond after the formation of a muonic molecular ion, which is only 5e-7 microsecond. This has been known for a long time, since the 1950s of the last century, for example, Jackson, J.D. (1957). "Catalysis of Nuclear Reactions between hydrogen isotopes by μ −- Mesons". Physical Review. 106 (2): 330. Bibcode: 1957PhRv..106..330J. doi: 10.1103 / PhysRev.106.330 With regard to the process temperature. You understand that due to the fact that during muon catalysis the distance between the nuclei decreases significantly, the required temperature also decreases significantly and can be only a few thousand degrees, which we have in the bowels of our planet. And do not forget about the decrease in the diameter of the proton, with the formation of mesoatoms. This fact alone will result in a temperature drop of about 3 million degrees. Apparently, I incomprehensibly described the whole process in the article if you ask such simple questions. Or have you read my work inattentively. It seems to me that the moderator needs to move my article to the section on nuclear physics. You did not understand my article. The composition of magma does not affect the passage of a thermonuclear reaction. Magma initiates the whole process due to the energy of water hammer, high pressure and temperature. It is these parameters that provide the formation of condensed plasma, which generates muons upon expansion. The circuit works like this:formation of a shock wave in the bowels of the earth → formation of WDM → expansion of plasma → formation of muons → formation of mesoatoms → reduction of proton radii → μCF → thermonuclear explosion → earthquake.

The spatial extent of the high stress zone that corresponds to the seismically active zone is realistically represented when we assume that viscosity decreases by at least an order of magnitude across the lithosphere....Who will believe that the viscosity of the mantle will decrease by an order of magnitude? Judging by their words, they themselves doubt it. Is it possible to believe someone if he declares: let us assume that this is so, then it will be so, and if we admit it, then it will not be so. 2.Yes, you are right, diamonds are found not only in Kimberlite pipes, but also in placer deposits. Where do you think placer deposits come from? I suggest, when kimberlite pipes are destroyed

Is the movement of magma through channels in the body of the Earth not covered in the scientific literature? Is the change in the diameter of a proton depending on the mass of an atomic particle in its orbit fantastic? Yes you are kidding mister. 1. Pohl R. Antognini A. Nez F. et.al. The size of the proton.Nature 466, 213–216 (2010). doi:10.1038/nature09250pmid:20613837 2. Beyer A. Maisenbacher L. Matveev A. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen. Science 06 Oct 2017

All hypotheses for deep focus earthquakes are based on the presence of subduction zones. But the deep-focus earthquakes that occurred in the Carpathians proved that this is not so. There are no subduction zones even close in the Carpathians. This means that all hypotheses based on this position are pseudoscientific. Diamonds are mined in the Kimberlite pipes, which are the vents of extinct volcanoes. Hence the question, where do they come from there? It would be nice if you could move my toрic to the section Earth Science

The idea behind this article is the work of physicists on the study of the properties of warm dense matter (WDM) and thermonuclear fusion based on the reaction of muon-catalyzed melting (μCF). According to our calculations, when the magma moves through the magma channel, hydraulic shocks occur, reaching the power of several Terawatts, which is enough to “ignite” WDM. With the subsequent mandatory expansion of WDM, a collision of electrons and positrons with the formation of muons will occur according to the well-known scheme: e- + e + → µ- + µ +. "Born" muons will replace electrons in atoms with the formation of mesoatoms. Since the Bohr radius is inversely proportional to the mass of the particle moving around the atomic nucleus, and the muon mass mμ = 206.7 me is approximately 200 times greater than the electron mass, the size of the newly formed atom orbital will be ~ 200 times smaller than the electron one. Plus, replacing electrons with muons will leads to a decrease in the diameter of protons by ~ 10%. These facts will allow the atoms to approach to a distance less than two mesoatomic units [(~ 2aμ = 2h2 / mμe2 ~ 5⋅10−13m.) - 10%], which will lead to the start of the classical reaction μCF, to the fusion of atomic nuclei and the start of the reaction natural thermonuclear fusion, the energy of which may well be the source of mysterious deep-focus earthquakes. Magma as a generator of plasma and thermonuclear fusion.docx

Gentlemen, for your judgments, I present my article on the role of magma in earthquake processes:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3738328 Magma as a generator of plasma and thermonuclear fusion.docx