AlexandrKushnirtshuk

I propose an experiment that is possible to implement. Not very expensive and not very complicated experiment, that can prove the existence of aether.

I propose an experiment that is possible to implement. Not very expensive and complicated experiment, that can prove the existence of aether. With your permission, I will post this message also in the thread "The nature of light and the size of the Universe", because this applies to that topic as well.

Michelson-Morley experiment has completely wrong concept, prerequisites, and wrong understanding of aether nature, and light - as aetheric fluctuations. Photon is one aetheric wave. Just as water waves do not create flow, so ether waves do not create flows. "Aether wind" - is completely wrong concept, because aetheric fluctuations - light - do not move the aether itself, do not create aetheric streams or flows. Light is a visible manifestation of aetheric vibrations/fluctuations. Speed of light - is the speed of propagation of aetheric vibrations, but not the speed of the flow of the aether itself.

Out of the five evidences I have given, only one (fourth point) has some shade of conspiracy - and that is not unreasonable.

Not "aether affects light", rather light affects aether, but to be more precise - light is fluctuation of aether. Sun is a constant source (emitter) of aetherian fluctuations. The redshift of the spectrum is an indicator of the influence of aether resistance on light, it is simply misinterpreted. Here is the correct interpretation of the spectrum redshift: the Tired Light hypothesis. Aether - is a homogeneous medium of the highest order - a set (gas - aetherian subset of the first order; water - aetherian subset of the second order). Such specificity of the ether = stiff medium. Besides, official point of view assumes the absence of any resistance for light from outer space medium. Zero resistance for light (one photon) means infinite lifetime of one photon. No physical parameter can have zero or infinite value. In other words - any physical parameter with zero or infinite value - is a scientific nonsense. Because of incorrect concept (misunderstanding of aether properties) and, as a consequence, wrong experimental setup (prerequisites and expectations). Every source of light - is emitter of aetherial fluctuations (light itself). Sun is the closest and most powerful source of aetheric fluctuations - that is, light - that is, photons.

1) There are no contradictions in that two my statements. 2) Your question is a little bit incorrect. My answer is - aether is the basic ubiquitous (omnipresent) medium of the Universe - it is everywhere. Like water waves hardly (almost not) relocate/transport water, and sound waves hardly (almost not) relocate/transport gas medium, so light- and microwaves are only aetherial fluctuations which hardly (almost not) relocate/transport aether. So on your question my answer is that everything moves in aetherial medium, and the ether itself only vibrates (fluctuates) by means of light- and microwaves.

1) This evidence proves that solar flare coronal matter reaches SOHO and STEREO Ahead in several (3-4) hours. That means either wrong speed of solar flare coronal matter, or SOHO and STEREO are located not on the distance of the earth's orbit (from the Sun), because solar flare coronal matter reaches Earth in 2,5-3,5 days. Here is one example as proof, but there are many such examples in the SOHO's and STEREO's animation archives. 2) Why in the SDO satellite photo, the Moon has a clear (not defocused) outline, given the fact that the camera is clearly focused on the Sun (the surface structure is clearly visible), and the “fact” that the Sun is officially 400 times farther than the Moon?This is also because the Moon has no atmosphere, but with a distance difference of 400 times and a clear focus on the Sun's surface, the Moon's contour cannot be as clear as in that SDO photo. 3) Compare the scales of Earth's and Mars' surfaces on the sattelite photos. The Earth's scale on the image below is 20 meters, the Mars' scale is 2 kilometers. 4) Birds "on Mars". Human shadows "on Mars". 1) NASA – Mars VS Devon Island 2) Nasa’s rover not on Mars but on Greenland 5) How can one of the largest Black Holes in the Universe with a mass of 100 billion Suns disappear? ‘Missing’ supermassive black hole in distant galaxy leaves scientists perplexed

Aether existance is hard to prove with usual (regular) scientific methods, and almost impossible to detect experimentally. Aether has effect on everything by the means of its fluctuations - ubiquitous (omnipresent) light- and micro(EM)waves. God is the the sum of the consciousnesses of all living beings, each of which has its own: habitat, opportunities and responsibility; each of which is somehow interconnected with other cousciousnesses.

1) Earth and Sun moving around common center of mass approximately like on this animation. 2) Officially considered that 98-99% of mass of the Solar System is located in the Sun. Why then the barycenter of the Solar System travels beyond the boundaries of the solar sphere? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barycenter#/media/File:Solar_system_barycenter.svg Formulas for the motion of the planets work, spacecrafts fly in their calculated orbits, but it is quite likely just on a different scale. Changing just one calculated coefficient will lead to a change in three parameters: distance, speed and size. Do you understand what I mean? The whole point may be in one single calculated coefficient, which distorts the actual parameters of space (real distances, speeds and sizes). However, such a distortion does not affect the ratio of proportions - just the scale is different, and it most likely does not correspond to the actual cosmic distances, velocities and sizes.

Can you realize that, it is completely possible that existing of aether is impossible to prove (or detect) by the usual scientific methods and instruments. Do you realize the specifical features of the micro- and nanoscale research that leads to paradox of merging objent and instrument of research - waves - into one whole?

Distance between Earth and Sun is bigger, but the ratio of the sizes of the Earth and the Sun is approximately the same as in that animation. Here my thoughts about light- and microwaves medium - aether. What if it is physically impossible to detect (measure and weigh) aether with scientifical certainity for 100%? That's why. (do not judge me strictly - I'm trying to translate my thoughts about not simple things from russian) Water waves have no mass, but the medium of their propagation - water - has mass. Sound waves have no mass, but the medium of their propagation - gas - has mass. Light and electromagnetic waves have no mass, but the medium of their propagation - ether - must have mass. All three of the above types of waves have weight - that is, they create pressure. The wave cannot create pressure outside the environment, the wave cannot exist without the environment. Waves are fluctuations of the environment. Any wave phenomenon must have a medium. Wave phenomena (fluctuations) outside the environment are impossible a priori. If there is a wave, a fluctuation, then what is fluctuating? Medium only. Presumptive reasons for the impossibility of detecting aether by scientific methods and means (instruments). 1) Water and gaseous medium are subsets of ether. Ether is the basic medium of the Universe (it is everywhere), water and gas medium are limited and located inside the ether. Ether is the basic set. Gas is an aetherian subset of the first order . Water is an aetherian subset of the second order. 2) Research on a micro (nano) scale has a very specific feature - with a decrease in scale, the object and the instrument (means) of research gradually merges into one whole. Example. Science explores phenomena using light and microwaves. That is, we can say that light and microwaves are the main tools of scientific research. But how to research light and microwaves themselves? For the study of light and microwaves, there are no better and more suitable instruments than light and microwaves themselves. Thus, the smaller microlevel - the more object of research and research instrument merge into one whole - more and more become indistinguishable.

To avoid complicated explanations and language issues here are one animation and two schematic images from which, I hope, everything becomes clear as day. Link to the article with Earth Blobs animation of bigger size and higher resolution: The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs.

Understood. Removed that thread from my comment (message).

If your conjecture states this is impossible and yet it occurs, then your conjecture must be incorrect. Right? Not quite. I don't know how to explain more accurately than in this article. Maybe some problems with translation and/or understanding. I'll try short and simple. 1) Water waves have low speed and high lifetime. 2) Sound waves have middle speed and middle lifetime. 3) Light waves have highest possible speed (300 000 km/s), so they must have lowest lifetime. Obviously that it all depends on the source of the wave vibrations, and there must be light waves distribution medium - ether. It is completely impossible for any kind of wave vibrations (oscillations) not to have their environment (medium) - such as officially unacknowledged (a)ether.

The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs. https://eos.org/features/the-unsolved-mystery-of-the-earth-blobs I have no experimental evidence, but there are strong theoretical grounds to assume that the lifetime of one light wave (photon) is very short, and cannot exceed approximately one minute (depending on the power of the wave source). I suppose even light waves from the Sun cannot live more than one minute (approximately).

The nature of light. A photon has has energy and momentum (weight) but no mass . It is obvious that light is vibrations of some medium (ether). This environment cannot but have resistance, damping or absorbing light vibrations with time and distance. I will describe the essence in simple words so as not to complicate and not drag out the explanation. 1) Water waves. They spread longer (in time) than sound, but at a shorter distance (at a lower speed). Distribution medium: water. 2) Sound waves. The lifetime of sound waves is shorter than that of water waves, but the speed (and distance) is greater. Distribution medium: atmosphere (gas). 3) Light waves. By analogy, the lifetime of light waves should be much shorter than the lifetime of sound waves, but since the speed of light is about 300,000 km/s - the propagation distance is greater. Distribution medium: ether. (a schematic representation of a photon - a conventional unit of oscillation (wave) of the ether) Image text translation: The movement of one light wave (photon) from the source to complete attenuation and / or absorption by the medium (ether). At the beginning of the 20th century, scientists rejected the completely plausible hypothesis of the Tired Light, began to carry out fortune-telling by redshifts of the spectrum (like on coffee grounds, only by the emission spectra), and billions of light years, black holes, dark energies, and distant, distant galaxies rushed. Light years? A photon cannot exist not only for years, but even for minutes. Example. Standing in the lake. You throw a stone. First you hear the sound, later the waves come. Waves on water, sound waves in a gaseous medium and light waves in ether are phenomena of the same nature, but of different orders due to the environment. If waves on water “live” for minutes, and sound waves in a gaseous medium “live” for seconds, then light waves in their medium (ether) “live” for a fraction of a second. All this depends on the power of the source of wave oscillations, so it can be assumed that light waves from the Sun can exist for several seconds, but not more (not minutes, and even less years). Even if in the space environment (vacuum) there is no resistance, there is no heat exchange, then the distance is overcome (volume expansion with distance), which cannot occur absolutely without energy consumption. In addition, the space of the cosmic vacuum cannot be absolutely empty. There cannot but be certain, albeit minimal, resistance and heat transfer. Light years and 8 light minutes from Sun to Earth are physically impossible. Again. Attentively. This is very important to understand. Overcoming distance in any environment, that is, regardless of the environment, cannot occur without energy consumption (or with zero energy consumption). Since a photon has a very low energy charge, and a very high speed of movement, and no medium (including space) can have absolutely zero resistance, then, accordingly, the lifetime (life) of one photon (wave oscillation of the medium - ether) is very short, not exceeding at least one minute. Definition. The lifetime of a unit of wave oscillations (one wave) is inversely proportional to the speed of their propagation (or directly proportional to the inertia of the medium) and is directly proportional to the power of their source. Since the ether is not scientifically recognized, it turns out that a photon is a conventional unit of wave oscillations of an incomprehensible medium? A photon has weight (energy and momentum), but no mass - it is obvious that this is an oscillation (wave) of some medium (ether). Addition. If the distance from the Earth to the Sun were 150,000,000 km, that is, 8 light minutes, then the STEREO Ahead and STEREO Behind spacecraft would simply be impossible to control, and it would be impossible to receive any data from them. For example. STEREO A (itself being in constant motion in orbit) sends a signal to the Earth that flies in space for 8 minutes, and during this time the Earth moves in orbit for 8 minutes. * 60 sec. * 30 km/s = 14 400 km. Not to mention the enormous degree of radio signal scattering over distances of tens of millions of kilometers or several light minutes. (animation of the movement of STEREO spacecrafts around the Sun) There is a photo animation on the web that shows a solar flare in the direction of one of these satellites. The STEREO Ahead spacecraft supposedly moves along the Earth's orbit, that is, at the same distance from the Sun as the Earth. This is an animation of STEREO A photos from July 23, 2012. The solar flare flew exactly in the direction of STEREO A. It began at almost exactly 03:00 (UTC), and the first visible particles of coronal matter (white ripples in the animation) flew to STEREO A at about 07:00 (UTC). If the distance from the Sun to the Earth's orbit (on which the STEREO spacecraft are located) were 150,000,000 km, as is officially believed, then the speed of coronal material particles would be 150,000,000 km. / 4 hours / 60 minutes / 60 seconds = about 10,000 km / s. - this is 3% of the speed of light, which is hardly physically possible. The solar wind is a stream of ionized particles (mainly helium-hydrogen plasma) flowing out from the solar corona at a speed of 300-1200 km/s into the surrounding space. In addition, it is generally known that the flow of coronal matter from a solar flare reaches the Earth's orbit (in which the STEREO spacecraft are supposedly located) in an average of 150,000,000 km. / 750 km / s / 60 sec. / 60 min. / 24 hours = ~ 2.5 - 3 days. But in fact, the animation of the photos turns out to be 07:00 (UTC) - 03:00 (UTC) = 4 hours. And it turns out this way because spacecraft are orbiting Venus in the Solar System (Universe) with approximately the same parameters as in the schematic image below. (ProtoEarth, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars; common center of mass between Earth and Sun; distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km., distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.; Oort Cloud is the border of the Universe where all the "stars" and "galaxies" located; the diameter of the Universe does not exceed one light minute) The rotation of the Earth and the Sun, as two commensurate objects, around a common center of mass, is difficult to describe in words and to draw schematically - therefore, I end the article with a corresponding animation, in which the size ratios are close to reality (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller). Link to the source article in russian: Природа света и размер Вселенной.

Formation of continents. Take a close look at the animation of two huge, diametrically opposed formations on the surface of the earth’s core. They cannot but be directly related to the formation of continents. They are both biased to the same direction (east). Continents are displaced from them to the east. Compare with the official model for the formation of continents. These huge structures are contrary to the official model of the formation of continents. Link to the animation source with better quality and higher resolution. The Cordillera – the Andes, the Iranian highlands – the Himalayas – are also two huge formations of a similar shape, also diametrically opposed to each other. Both are displaced to the east of two huge formations of the Earth’s core (HFEC). Cordillera – The Andes are displaced further from their HFEC and are more split. Iranian Highlands – The Himalayas are closer to their HFEC, and are strongly displaced to the north. New model of the Universe. From the above, we can conclude that before the moment of the so-called “Big Bang” in the Universe there was a certain material sphere with a diameter of about 20 thousand km, the substance in which was in the stage of the limit of density (the state of singularity). Let’s call this sphere ProtoEarth. As a result of certain processes at the Proto-Earth’s poles two PreContinents were gradually formed – PreAmerica (North America, South America and Antarctica) and PreEurasia (Africa, Eurasia and Australia), in the centers of which the Sun and the Moon were gradually formed. Parallel to this, water was formed in a wide strip of the proto-Earth’s equator as a result of certain processes. At a certain moment, a critical mass difference accumulated at the poles, the equilibrium of the system was violated, the separation of the Sun and the Moon began, the proto-Earth’s axis of rotation shifted from conditional zero degrees to the current 23.5 degrees, and the formation of modern continents. (a huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing) A few more arguments in favor of this model of the Universe: The coincidence of the apparent diameters of the Sun and the Moon in the sky. The coincidence of the axial periods of rotation of the Sun and the Moon (27 days). Only Mercury and Venus have no satellites. Only Mercury and Venus have incommensurably large periods of rotation around their axes 58 and 243 days, respectively (Earth, Mars – 1 day; Jupiter, Saturn – 16, 17 hours; Uranus, Neptune – 9, 10 hours). In each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side. (schematic comparison of the official and new model of the Universe; ProtoEarth, Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars and common center of masses between Earth and Sun) Thus, it is very similar to the fact that the Universe looks approximately like on the Tycho Brahe's model of the Universe, only with the correction for the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass. The Oort cloud is the border of the Universe, where all the “stars” and “galaxies” formed from the proto-Earth mantle, with diameters not exceeding several tens of kilometers, are located. The diameter of the universe, presumably, does not exceed one light minute. In all this, a correct understanding of the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around a common center of mass is very important. The ratio of diameters is approximately the same as in the animation (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller). Addition. The rotation of Venus around the Sun is very similar to the rotation of the Moon around the Earth, except for the direction of rotation. That is, Venus is not always facing the Sun with one side, but in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side. As you can see from the quote above, in the official model of the solar system there is no explanation for such an orbital phenomenon of Venus, because it can in no way be a coincidence or the result of the tidal interaction of the Earth and Venus (at least with the official parameters of the solar system). The paradox here most likely lies in the misunderstanding of the reference point (coordinate system). When calculating the orbital rotation period of the planet (in this case, Venus), the immobility of the Sun and the rotation of the Earth around it are taken into account, and therefore the paradox of the mismatch of the orbital and axial rotation periods of Venus (225 and 243 days) and the fact that “in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus faces the Earth with the same side.” The answer to this paradox, most likely, is that it is not the Earth that revolves around the Sun, but the Earth and the Sun revolve around a common center of mass, and then the officially paradoxical coincidence of the orbital and axial periods of Venus’s rotation becomes quite natural. But since the convergence of the Earth and Venus occurs approximately once every one and a half years, the orbital period of Venus is 584 days (the synodic period of Venus), and the axial period relative to the Earth is 146 days (that is, exactly four times less). This is difficult for a spatial representation (especially considering the massive brainwashing with the official model of the solar system), but when the Earth and the Sun rotate around a common center of mass, this is quite possible, does not contradict visual observations of the movement of the planets and the Sun in the sky, and most importantly, this explains the fact that in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side. Two animations for better spatial presentation. On the second – the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller). Link to the source article in russian: Новая модель Вселенной.Часть II: АРГУМЕНТЫ.