-
Posts
60 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Olorin
-
THE LAST WORD Is this an unsupported claim of the Mainstream pack that BeeCee is supporting? Don’t you need to provide evidence that the UNESCO Geological Map of The World is nothing but a fantastically expensive, highly elaborate, but fraudulent fabrication, however monstrously preposterous that claim may be? An attempt to present evidence falsely for “Earth Expansion Tectonics”? Oddly the rest of the pack is thinned somewhat in its assault here. I am reminded of the Dingo (Australian Carolina Howler) pack, tag teaming a kangaroo while running it in a circle and bleeding it to exhaustion, so all can join in and feed until the next opportunity. Arbitrary and unsupported claims are clearly among the forum rules, virtually creating a shrinking circle so that a parrot's mindless diatribe seems more scientific than any contradiction. When defeated, the last word belongs to Mainstream regardless. Plainly, unwelcome evidence is utterly ignored, flatly denied, and labelled virtual heresy, while no scientific hypothesis is true or false. (This honour belongs with Axiomatic Mathematics alone (see “Ideas and Opinions”, GEOMETRY AND EXPERIENCE, Lecture before the Prussian Academy of Sciences, January 27, 1921. The last part appeared first in a reprint by Springer, Berlin, 1921.) Before Trinity, you would have treated Einstein much the same way, and I'm not sure his work, as continued by others, hasn’t been rendered covert and publicly been twisted as handpicked Mainstream fluff by Academy financiers (Dark Matter, Quarks, &c.) to divert competition, and allay suspicion. I have offered supporting evidence on many counts more solid than the evidence for "Science falsely so called" 1 Timothy 6:16-20 (note here Einstein's postulate already recognised and equated with consciousness itself 0 CE). The Bible is discounted in the same way, yet your coin, and all who "buy and sell globally " do so by commission of the IMF, as prophesied to Abraham Genesis 22:15-18. Your counter evidence – an alternate history of the Jews and explanation for almost impossible prophecies, is simply SILENCE & RIDICULE without KNOWLEDGE. A paraphrased quote from Arnie's "Total Recall” is called for: "I can have anything I want so long as I keep the Turd-idiom coming, and my only concern is losing it ALL. AND YOU'RE MAKING IT HAPPEN!" Movie theme, same as “The Matrix”. Logically, the first cause can only be known by its (virtual) effects. AMEN? This is the Ancient Egyptian name of God so understood, the Jewish “I AM THAT I AM” to Moses, ABBA (Father) to Christ and Christians, the CAUSE of The ONE FORCE (virtual, pseudo, and other assorted malarkey)? So much for social media. “On the chessboard lies and hypocrisy do not survive long. The creative combination lays bare the presumption of a lie. Merciless fact forces checkmate and contradicts the hypocrite.” Emanual Lasker 1868-1941, World Chess Champion 1894-1921. Emanuel & Albert argued the constant c. Emanuel was spared the proof that his “fact” was a lie supported by the dodge “nature abhors a vacuum and for all we know, in a vacuum the speed of light may well be infinite.” He impressed Albert in that he recognised that the concepts of time and space were under threat and sought a counter (rationalisation). They discussed the topic for 8 years in Bern, Switzerland on long walks. Russia took Emanuel & Chess until Bobby Fischer (who understandably renounced his citizenship, and was rescued by Iceland), The USA took Albert, E=mc^2 & The ABOMINATION of DESOLATION under threat of Hitler’s Imperialism, for a shorter while. This eventually placed the World on the brink. What can Science bring in the future and to whom? The Einstein-Lasker story by Bill Wall is attached for anyone interested, which includes some Chess games. The hieroglyph of a man cleaving his head with an axe represents ‘wickedness’, ‘enemy’, ‘death’ and ‘the dead’. This last is also metaphorically used to signify ‘atheists’ in scriptures, such as Matthew 8:22 and Revelation 11:18 KJV. Einstein and Chess by Bill Wall.txt
-
Perhaps all particles are virtual, as comprised of a single force, which is itself virtual, and this force obeys laws which, by very definition are virtual in that they are an abstraction from observed behaviours of the creations of that force. Yet these laws, which do not confine themselves to subatomic physics, but may extend through all the macroscopic manifestations observed throughout our finite lives, remain like a sea of on and off bits and nothing more, the more macroscopic our delving goes, while it is one force from particles to atoms to galaxies to DNA + cytoplasm to mankind to civilisation to The Galactic Empire if it exists, with 3CPO's and Imperial Probe Droids keeping an eye on evolving threats to Emporer Ming. Through a microscope, the more we see the more we don't. How would you ever prove that there is a God as a part of your own virtual being, but without power to contravene God's Will. Your fate, your civilisation, your city and your life and death all beyond your control while you know not how to make your will any one of these to your own perceived benefit. Here's the problem. That's not "One for All and All for One", "What can you do for your country?", &c. Manifestly, mankind strives and since the Cuban Missile Crisis, succeeded to avoid his doom by the lessons learned. Coincidence? or a guiding intelligence that speaks to us directly? Good judgement is the result of experience. Experience is the result of bad judgement. Look back to the disaster of the French "Age of Reason". It is now being repeated by those calling "The Virtual Force" superstition.
-
The UNESCO Geological Map of The World that I have provided, a very scaled down version of its TIFF format (11322 + 8160) x 11496, came with an APP that can expand to the pixel all parts of the 2 maps represented. If one were to consider the vast differences between the Pacific (not) mid-ocean ridge when compared to all the other oceans, that person would find an explanation, at present, in James Maxlow's continued work on his predecessors theory alone. The "throwing off of the Moon" (Cayce quote), the core-Uranium heat source gain vs loss equilibrium differences considerations for Earth, Mars & the Moon, and the Oxygen generation by cyanobacteria since 3900 MYA, variously causing Solar Wind oxidation to H2O are my independent personal contributions since the articles in Nexus April-May & June-July 2010 were published. The June-July issue contains an admission that these matters were unsolved, and citation of Stephen Gould's (Editor) "The Book of Life" brought a great work of Palaeontology back into print. My sources are not limited by prejudiced opinions, as was the mode of some of the greatest Master of Science. The Fault through California may be traced back out to sea North and South. The Gulf of California was obviously, once upon a time, much as the Great African Rift with its Mountains first rising like a carbuncle before it bursts open and the sea rushes in, in similar vain to Madagascar previously. The variations in Primate species across the continents, even New Zealand’s only indigenous “mammals” (3three species of bats) speaks loudly for their independent evolution, with the bats, from pterosaurs. Just as venomous snakes may not be reptiles but descended from the amphibious caecilians, so may it be that primate are distinct from mammals in general. The Australian Funnelweb Spider has a toxin deadly only to primates among larger prey, deadly to us and harmless to cats and dogs. Bats may thus be used to prove these assertions. The smaller pterosaurs (fossils found evolved to bat sizes and furred) were possibly once their prey, judging from the Northern Tree-dwelling variety. Note that the smallest “mammal”, maybe not a mammal at all, is a 29-33 mm Bumblebee Bat. The San Andreas 'Mid-Ocean Ridge' goes out further from land toward Chile. These details may be observable form the maps I have provided in this thread. Checked against "Google Earth", New Zealand seems to be a once a submerged piece of a continent called Lemurea (in the Pacific – Atlantis in the Atlantic, Cayce) to the North. Lands pole-shifted away from the Equator were exposed, towards they were submerged. The Great Australian Bite is a 2000 ft sea cliff of limestone – Northern Australia submerges as river deltas, and Indonesia is, like Rio, shallow seas covered in mountain ranges and plateaus. The Bahamas contain Blue Holes, marine limestone caves with stalagmites Geologically recently submerged and full of stalagmites and stalactites that DON’T form under water, or last submerged for millions of years. The Palaeolithic remipede was found still extant in these caves, ancestor of the centipede and as toxic and nasty a predator. Yet this San Andreas ridge-fault-ridge is claimed as the edge of a subducting tectonic plate. The dating provided by the UNESCO maps for the laid down basalt tells a completely different story. As an exercise one may like to follow the more typical Indian Ocean ridge and observe evidence for its extension along the Red Sea, the Jordan valley, the Sea of Galilee and the 500 m below sea level Dead Sea. From the other horn of the Red Sea the Mediterranean Sea formed much sooner with the rift visible without silt near Sicily & the cause of the volcanic Mount Etna. Rifting will quickly be seen to have formed all major oceans, with specific dating, provided by the legends, proven by correlation of the magnetic orientation with fossil evidence. Nothing older than 180 MYO basalt (or silt near land) exists in the oceans. The legend for land dating back to 4600 MYA is therefore very distinct for that under the 180 MY oceans, tell-tale stretchmarks on an expanding mother Earth.
-
Perhaps you and many others might read the Scriptures before they have strong opinions one way or another. The Negative Confession from the "Book of the Dead" is straight forward enough. The Bhagavad Gita, The Bible or whatever. They say the same thing. Truth, justice and freedom come in sequence or the opposites. Religion is the cause of civilisation, "The Turning Away" (Pink Floyd, great tune) its undoing and ultimately war, and with increasing technology, ultimately annihilation by our own hand = fate decreed by higher laws or perhaps as a mercy "as lightning shines from the east to the west, so will the coming of the Son of Man be." J.C. How is this evil to say yet pure logic? Willing ignorance maybe? Okay. From very young I have been horrified by scenes of the American Civil War. "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly" is both the microcosmic and the macrocosmic result of injustice visited upon the sons ... between the three and upon the nation ... the most evil destroyed, the salvageable taught their lessons, the best available left to rule. Thus we learn, and evolve spiritually by gaining nous. Today the Jews rule those ruled by money = power and their history and lessons are recorded. You know where. How can I take ridicule seriously from patently uninformed opinion? I will believe that we are just animals when a monkey makes a stone axe. The axe was the hieroglyphic determinant signifying a god. "Ye are gods!" (Psalm 82 KJV, quoted by J.C.)
-
ZEP 3:1 Woe to her that is filthy and polluted, to the oppressing city! ZEP 3:2 She obeyed not the voice; she received not correction; she trusted not in the LORD; she drew not near to her God. ZEP 3:3 Her princes within her are roaring lions; her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones till the morrow. ZEP 3:4 Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: her priests have polluted the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law. ZEP 3:5 The just LORD is in the midst thereof; he will not do iniquity: every morning doth he bring his judgment to light, he faileth not; but the unjust knoweth no shame. ZEP 3:6 I have cut off the nations: their towers are desolate; I made their streets waste, that none passeth by: their cities are destroyed, so that there is no man, that there is none inhabitant. ZEP 3:7 I said, Surely thou wilt fear me, thou wilt receive instruction; so their dwelling should not be cut off, howsoever I punished them: but they rose early, and corrupted all their doings. ZEP 3:8 Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the LORD, until the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy. ZEP 3:9 For then will I turn to the people a pure language, that they may all call upon the name of the LORD, to serve him with one consent. See Jap Herron by Mark Twain page 41. Jap Heron by Mark Twain.pdf Jap Herron's Media Reception.pdf
-
For some individuals capable of deep trance states (labelled “autos” by the Great Hypnotist Franquin, Francis Patrick Joseph Quinn 1914 -2010), hypnotic regression can be used to recall past life experience. Remarkable information has been revealed, investigated, and verified without any explanation deriving from the subject’s current life experiences. Psychology sidesteps with “We don’t know how the information is supplied but refuse to accept past life experiences.” The body-mind must be suspended in that state as the recollections would derange an ordinary individual. Edgar Cayce could achieve this state and was allowed access to the akashic records of souls seeking information of a helpful kind. He had to read his own output AFTER each reading. "There is a River" is a biography of Edgar Cayce 1877 - 1945, the book name coming from Psalm 46 KJV, a reference to the akashic records. Being a Baptist from a tobacco farm in Alabama, Cayce was shocked and horrified to discover, from his trance readings, that reincarnation, the chakras and astrology were a fact. The reading turned out to be for the once Hector of Troy. Heckling from the peanut gallery was quelled after Troy was rediscovered. Cayce re-read the Bible KJV again, and decided these assertions could be read in or out according the readers predilections (or personal incredulity) = free will. Flipping open his KJV as an oracle, Cayce’s finger landed on Psalm 46, "There is a river...". Another very mystic Psalm quoted by Jesus with similar overtones, is Psalm 82. Written by Asaph who, according to the readings, was an incarnation of the Christ. Yeshua ben Yoseph was his real name. Isha, author of the Upanishad by this name, was very likely a corruption of Yeshua (also variously rendered as Jeshua & Joshua). This Upanishad is virtually transliterated from the original Sanskrit by Sri Aurobindo. Notably, J. Robert Oppenheimer, with assured credence, studied Sanskrit to access information about the use of atomic weapons by the ‘denied’ past prediluvian civilisation. Robert & Albert were both obviously unconstrained by their social environment, and at variance with fanatical atheism, gone full swing in 1900 to rapidly precipitate WWI. Likewise was Woodrow unheeded on a recurrence within a generation). https://www.google.com/search?q=isha+upanishads+sri+aurobindo&oq=&aqs=chrome.0.69i59i450l8.6280313j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Of the author Isha it is was found written about 0 CE India “The Great Isha has been murdered in Jerusalem.” Jesus the Christ, to Occidental peoples, quizzed the Pharisees about Psalm 110 (the Matthew 22 debates) who, in their “not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God” were unable to answer “Asaph” and “were put to silence and durst ask no further questions”. John 3 echoes Job 1 KJV taken literally concerning reincarnation as: “Then Job arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground, and worshipped, And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: the LORD gave, and the LORD hath taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.” This conviction, I think, IS the Grail, metaphorically represented in the movie “Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989)”. Without the ability to distinguish the literal from metaphor, Religion(s) and Science(s) are at variance across the board(s). A “prophet” like Edgar Cayce or a solid uncompromised tradition (like the Masons or The Jews [“Ideas and Opinions”] maybe) is possibly the only way to resolve the distinctions and reveal the mysteries. The 1900’s also saw fulfilment of the prophecies in Daniel, an incarnation of Jacob and also the author of Revelation according to Cayce. The book of Malachi prophecies the return of Elijah (NT Elias) identified by Jesus as John the Baptist Matthew 11:13-14. Metaphorically discernible in Daniel are The Internet, the Atomic Bomb and assurances for those “with ears to hear” from Michael the Archangel and Lord of the Way “standing up for His people”. The OUIJA Board output of the discarnate Mark Twain (“Jap Herron”, precipitating crucifixion by several vested interests, a media circus and lawyers in less time than it took to compile over 2 years), Patience Worth (“A Sorry Tale” &c. Missouri Historical Society 10 Volumes over 25 years) and the healings by Grigory Rasputin (daughter’s biography, Pan books) are the most notable “EVIDENCE” (degree of correlation of extensive information vastly rivalling Scientific standards if arbitrary exclusions are disallowed). In God we trust? Zephaniah 3 KJV. It isn’t missile science…I think it will be…an asteroid belt between Venus and Mars if James Maxlow is correct. The other asteroid belt seems to have formed during the Ordovician, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordovician_meteor_event when 100 x the current meteor strikes, and second largest mass extinction left a record, also from astronomical causes. At the end of the Preface to the novel “Jap Herron” detailing its dictation from the “other side” and called “The Coming of Jap Herron”, Mark Twain makes a consistent prophecy. Interestingly, Mark was an atheist in life, and providing for his daughters by creating the legal conditions of Copyright 50 years posthumously that destroyed his work as a literal Ghost-Writer.
-
You are probably right, and I must thank you all for your patience. I guess I'm lucky to have lived in this time and take in what I could. I hope I'm not wrong about reincarnation and we all get to see how these things advance in the years to come. Personal incredulity? Who knows? What is consciousness? Spirit? Timeless? The grail?
-
Glad you are all having a party with this. So certain you are! They were certain in '61 when this table was compiled too. Can we really discern two kinds of nucleons in the nucleus (protons and neutrons) and not just one, protons covered in electron glue? Can we be certain that events caused by neutrino's are not from another source? That they have a rest mass at all, and that the postulated and convenient three species for our quantum model are not our best guess when, in fact, they have an entire spectrum of mass equivalent energies? The scattering patterns of protons are without doubt proof of the new crew of fundamental particles? And some randomness statistically discerned is absolute proof that matter-antimatter reactions are asymmetrical? I may have faith in things I've studied and you have patently not, but I find little to convince me that the proposed basis for a steady state theory is contradicted with the certainty you entertain, at least partially. Is any of the wondrous subatomic physics actually applied by the military-industrial complex beyond convincing us everyone that everything is particles made up of particles with more to come, and not a fracture of The Force (laugh it up fuzzball!). Neutrons last 10.3 minutes outside of a stable nucleus. Light produces two kinds of particle pairs that are stable outside a stable nucleus with perfect conservation. Everything recycles until we get to here, and with countless proposals for facts have not explained why pair production happens and why protons are 1830 or so more massive than electrons, and don't look like you will soon. Meanwhile the Universe is ACCELERATING in its expansion and you haven't invented a new dark something to cover that one? Good luck with the show. I was right yesterday (1961). You are right today. Someone else tomorrow. Everything explained. No contradictions.
-
Your sugestion is a good beginning toward eventual expansion toward a Steady State Theory. This is ancient wisdom expressed in the Hermetic text "The Divine Pymander of Hermes", which would today be discounted much as Plato's "Timaeus and Criteas" history of Atlantis by Aristotle the Imperialist and mentor of Alexander called Great Brigand. The Divine Pymander of Hermes Mercurius Trismegistus The Second Book called "Poemander" 15. But the Workman, Mind, together with the Word, containing the Circles and Whirling them about, turned round as a Wheel his own Workmanship, and suffered them to be turned from an indefinite Beginning to an undeterminable End; for they always begin where they end. While the matter of nuclear residents seems obscured by "Quantum Mechanics", I own a book called "General Physics" printed in 1963. The critical page is attached, and delineates as stable the same non-zero rest mass particles as above (please excuse the misleading grammar). The photon is "its own antiparticle" (sus) and the neutrino coexists with a distinct antiparticle and 1/2 spin. Determining this had to be clairvoyant or ad hoc for a particle that can reach the Sun through solid lead. Note also that, without another player, pair production cannot happen. I suspect that the neutrino is an antiphoton, each a particle functionally in a frame of reference determining its mass equivalent energy, but ultimately forming a bidirectional disturbance of the Force. All other particles break down like Uranium to lead 206 to four stable particles and energy. How and why has this information been converted to the new technicolor quantum mechanical palette? It made perfect sense and was simpler before neutrons replaced relativistic electrons in the nucleus. I think the script writers of "Big Bang Theory" has much the same opinion. What objection does physics have against relativistic nuclear electrons, may I ask?
-
10 hours ago, beecee said: As yet you have not shown any evidence for that nonsensical claim, among your other speculative claims. Even though you are in speculations, I believe you are still required to show evidence of your speculative ideas. "The giant-impact hypothesis, sometimes called the Big Splash, or the Theia Impact, suggests that the Moon formed from the ejecta of a collision between the proto-Earth and a Mars-sized planetesimal, approximately 4.5 billion years ago, in the Hadean eon (about 20 to 100 million years after the Solar System coalesced)." This is THE alternative Mainstream hypothesis, a scenario CONTRADICTED by the isotope proportions found in Moon Rock. That scenario omits the time to achieve such homogeneity, to the limit of measurement! Explanations are missing for several other Moon facts and provided here (far side different, no iron core or ancient volcanoes contrary to Mars, 45 out of 5000 satellites in the solar system asynchronous, tidal drag only applying to slowing the Earth by a constant current (a LEAP SECOND added about every 4 years), the anomalous Pacific Ocean characteristics, and the water resident on Venus & Mars requiring an explanation for NO OCEANS that makes a wee bit more sense than the Solar Wind blasting them into space but leaving behind appreciable CO2 (Mars) & SO3 (Venus) AND H2O (both, free or as H2SO4). Fair go! The scenario here fits the information presented in Stephen Gould's "Book of Life", the EVIDENCE of UNESCO's "Geological Map of The World", and the Moon FACTS. One planet sized piece of evidence is a spherical Pangaea jig-sawed out of the land masses, with a small piece missing in the Pacific region, and with half the current radius. I have seen less evidence for "neutrons in the nucleus", "asymmetric matter-antimatter reactions", "quarks", &c. and what I call mathacadabra (even Elo Chess Ratings are little more, compare the real rating transformation equations, efficacy assured by simulation: A = ½ ( Ao + Bo + R ) B = ½ ( Ao + Bo – R ) P = 1 / (1 + e ^ ( –KR ) ) R = (log ( (e ^ ( KRo( Ro> 0 ) ) + S ) / ( e ^ ( –KRo( Ro< 0 ) ) + 1 – S ) ) ) / K K = –( log ( 1 / Ps – 1 ) ) / Rs ). That’s just Subatomic Physics. How about YOU supply ME with evidence for the BIG BANG SCENARIO" with like rigidity that you require. It seems more like the "easy way out", or "the only way out" until we clean up SCIENCE. Mainstream even avoids "Two theories that cannot be differentiated must be considered equivalent." For instance, Hermetic Philosophy cannot be differentiated from (explicitly) "The Universe has an existence independent of the observer." The latter has been unequivocally DISPROVEN by RELATIVITY. So why the paranoia? We both know the answer and are too nice to say, or else sh*t scared. Mainstream Science should use the word HERETIC instead of CRACKPOT, or kindlier, distinguish the SCIENTIST from the TECHNICIAN. Only the former may practice free-thinking, obviously. Every hypothesis is an unprovable opinion until shipwrecked by the Gods. Ignorance is Saint Theodora (Gift of God) with divergent historical records. Anyhow, here's evidence (since the Internet Link has been removed?):
-
Answering the second question, "by what means is the Earth's radius increasing?", the material from meteorites, &c. is insignificant. My proposal may be presented as a question. What temperature gradients would be required, between the center of the Earth and the surface, both 180 MYA and today, to cause a doubling of the Earth's radius in the time between these dates. The evidence from the UNESCO Geological Map of The World concerning the doubling of the radius is incontrovertible. But rail expands and contracts by inches over 100 m and buckles track in temperature extremes that are insignificant by comparison with core temperatures. It is likely significant Uranium is alloyed with the iron. I believe that the equilibrium that ceased volcanic activity on Mars where an extinct 20 Km volcano exists went the other way on Earth due to a worldwide sea originally, and a thickening lithosphere, beginning expansion with the creation of the first "ocean" rifted, eventually allowing fresh water resources for the Cambrian Explosion 540 MYA. 245 MYA saw the joining of rifts produce the Permian Extinction due to the (iron core-less) Moon hurled out of the Mantle. Then 180 MYA the current mid ocean rifts began producing the stretch marks we call oceans today. The Moon's far side is crust, not mantle material, and its Titanium isotopes are in exact proportion to Earth rock, while a piece of continent is missing from the Pacific on the half-radius jigsaw. Our Paleolithic evolutions remain fresh water life to this day, and marine life waited until new oceans diluted salts enough to contain oxygen from the late Triassic onward.
-
"It should be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid." - Albert Einstein. Does this contradict the following quote from "Ideas and Opinions" by the same author? THE WORLD AS I SEE IT (Originally published in Forum and Century, Vol. 84, pp. 193-194, the thirteenth in the Forum series, "Living Philosophies." Included also in Living Philosophies (Pp. 3-7), New York: Simon and Schuster, 1931.) "...I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature." Being gagged by fear of the label "conspiracy theorist", I may not suggest that the apparent complexity of physics is possibly the work of man, and not of the Universal Mind. Likewise, the labels attached to believers in a Universal Mind could "scare an elephant to death" (quoting another great Master - Alexander Alekhine). But such marginalisation of particular opinions by "authorities" is reminiscent of Stalin, Hitler, and Mao Tse Tung, while simultaneously ignoring Thomas Jefferson and many other famous humanitarians and their eroding legacy. Einstein is ignored on both scientific and social matters, for instance the impossible escape velocity from the Universal Bang consistent with recession velocities (Science), and socially...this gem, also from "THE WORLD AS I SEE IT". "This topic brings me to that worst outcrop of herd life, the military system, which I abhor. That a man can take pleasure in marching in fours to the strains of a band is enough to make me despise him. He has only been given his big brain by mistake; unprotected spinal marrow was all he needed. This plague-spot of civilization ought to be abolished with all possible speed. Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism-how passionately I hate them! How vile and despicable seems war to me! I would rather be hacked in pieces than take part in such an abominable business. My opinion of the human race is high enough that I believe this bogey would have disappeared long ago, had the sound sense of the peoples not been systematically corrupted by commercial and political interests acting through the schools and the Press." THE MEANING OF LIFE (Mein Weltbild, Amsterdam: Querida Verlag, 1934.) "What is the meaning of human life, or, for that matter, of the life of any creature? To know an answer to this question means to be religious. You ask: Does it make any sense, then, to pose this question? I answer: The man who regards his own life and that of his fellow creatures as meaningless is not merely unhappy but hardly fit for life." To remove the implication of contradiction in the mind of one who, as a champion of consistency, rescued physics from a great conundrum (time and space transformations), an assumption is called for. "The Reason that manifests itself in nature" that is ever so tiny IS physics, while the meaning of (human and other) life is becoming ever more manifest as our power increases our disregard for the genius that has created finite life and its Universe. "The devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature" is both SCIENCE & RELIGION which Einstein claimed were branches of the same tree. Time and space are a facture of "the Reason that manifests itself in nature." Its power is ENERGY, and as the FIRST CAUSE can only be known by its effects. This is the ancient Egyptian concept of AMEN (E.A. Wallace-Budge "The Gods of the Egyptians"). Without a timeless cause of time itself (an effect), how can we arrive at the present from an infinite beginning? How many dubious hypotheses form a basis for the bewildering labyrinth we now call Physics? Einstein's hypotheses are few and simple, and he didn't produce entities to explain phenomena. He once produced a law which he possibly hoped would be vindicated mathematically, only to denounce his ad hoc Universal Constant as his greatest blunder. Concerning LIGHT itself, I'm not sure if he spoke of quanta per se, or only of the quantization of light as an effect of finite time to interact with an electron in its particular inertial frame, in supplying sufficient energy for the electron's "escape velocity". The quantum theory so spawned became, to him, more laughable the further it went. Considering that the "quantum" or "photon" has no actual rest mass = energy, unlike the four material quanta here hypothesised, it seems that the hypothesised "photon"/"antiphoton" pairs actually keep the "accounting books" as electric field disturbances, and allow material to be drawn into being like moneys from banks through pair production into our finite but unbounded Universe (Einstein). Specifically stating a set of hypotheses, we may have, if I may, that: 1. The only quanta in existence are protons, electrons, and their antiparticles. 2. Relativistic electrons with appropriate wavelength glue protons together in a nucleus by equalising forces; 3. Nuclear energy is a result of the release of these relativistic electrons; 4. Technetium has no stable isotopes due to a geometrical impossibility for balanced forces; 5. That all decay or collision products are either stable or unstable nuclei including the so-called neutron, with the longest half-life, 10.3 minutes; 6. Electromagnetic radiation is in fact, electro-magnetic-gravitational, and quantisation effects in opposite directions somehow incorporate a "left-hand-rule" so that only matter is affected in one direction, and only antimatter in the other; 7. "Quanta" and "antiquanta" with sufficient energy in any inertial frame can cause pair production with the excess energy responsible for the kinetic energy of cosmic rays so produced; 8. Matter and quanta are converted to antiquanta in the attracting gravitational singularity or pole and repelled through all galactic material without significant impedence (except for pair production. Messier 82 is an example, where relative antiquanta of high energy (anti-gamma- rays) are focused, gravitationally, normal to the galactic plane and are materialising with incoming quanta); 9. All matter-antimatter and quanta-antiquanta reactions are completely symmetrical and distinguished according to the observer's material; 10. Quanta and antiquanta are produced simultaneously, akin to pair production, both cyclically maintaining absolute Universal conservation; 11. Circular motion (General Relativity considerations of acceleration toward a point) of electrons or antielectrons, shell or nuclear, are responsible for gravitational dipoles as well as the universal inertial forces, in much the same way that magnetic forces are a result of moving charges due to General or Special Relativity considerations respectively. 12. A universal status quo has long been reached since the Universal Mind said "Let there be Light, the light called day and the dark called night." The Universe expands, recycles and regenerated material, and according to Einstein, is unbounded but finite. On a clear day you can see the back of your own head! This is A Steady State Theory that Einstein could not complete because the anti-proton, and thus anti-hydrogen, &c. were unknown during his effective lifetime. Next life, I may attempt the mathematics, but the book "Jap Herron" (by Mark Twain, posthumously) indicates that this planet will not continue, and Edgar Cayce indicates that we will move to Polaris from here, as indicated by the alignment of The Great Pyramid's ascending passage. It represents spiritual decline into the Kali Yuga in one direction, and in the other "the system to which the soul takes flight when it has completed its sojourns in the Earth." I wonder how many worlds we ruined before we arrived here. There are so-called "facts" we should be sceptical of, but also some we should not! "When a man stops believing in God, he doesn't believe in nothing, he will believe anything." - Gilbert Keith Chesterton 1874 - 1936
-
Apologies for the error above, of course. As for the connection between Sprites and Plate Tectonics, there is none. Sprites are one of three ways that the Earth has accumulated water, although it began, like the other Rocky Planets with very little as on Mars, and Venus. The latter has all its water tied up as Fuming Sulphuric Acid because Sulphates decompose at the temperatures there, leaving the Oxides of Metals like CaO, &c. The Red Sprites match Aurora Australis in colour because these are both produced from the H+ part of the Solar Wind Plasma, as these are discharged by the e- current from the Clouds or the Earth respectively. This process continues since 3900 MYA and accelerated with the evolution of chloroplasts. Thus, while the Earth has doubled its radius since 180 MYA, there was less water but a very wet Earth full of Swamps and Lakes, and Brontosauruses were not on a Water World. With continued rifting our Oceans formed and grew bringing the dryer Cretaceous. Without this explanation for the Earth's Oceans, Earth Expansion Tectonics makes no sense.
-
Major General Richard William Howard Vyse (25 July 1784 – 8 June 1853) a British soldier and Egyptologist, was a very ambitious and very privileged individual, and his Gunpowder Archaeology was questionable, as was any verification of the claim by Vyse. More likely any opposition was summarily dismissed. It is uncertain that Khufu, from the fourth dynasty 2700 BC, built the Great Pyramid as has become more of a tradition than a fact. The cartouche that purports to be Khufu's is similar at best. It has also been discovered from Vyse's notes that this cartouche was transcribed, with accidental changes in the notes, in transit from the Valley of Kings to Gizeh. Entry was forced into the relieving chambers and Vyse likely had the cartouche placed there from this incriminating source. The notoriety had him elected Mayor, and individuals on his archaeological quests were stood down over controversies. In his days of plundering Egyptian artefacts for the British Museum, integrity was obviously not high on the agenda. "Atlantis Rising" magazine carried this story of the intrusive forgery, and the book "Pyramid Odyssey" by William Fix has extensive research proving that a dating based on an Egyptian King list used by Egyptologists has not been modified after longer lists have been found, revealing many deposed Pharaohs who were deleted from lists and monuments through disfavour. Last but not least, Fourth Dynasty technology did not build the Great Pyramid with "bronze age" tools during this Fourth Age of man, 11,500 BC to now. The Bible records a similar fate as did Plato for the third age world conquering "Atlantis" (a book by Charles Berlitz) before the flood and ice age. Six million tons of limestone with white marble casing stones, upper passages (absent from more recent copied inferior structures), air vents, and a legendary gold capstone, aligned with the four cardinal points, and having an ascending passage aligned with the Earth's axis of rotation, with every stone cut to diamond precision and mortared with a 1/50 inch spacing, with an average 3 ton block, cut, transported, and placed every 90 seconds was NOT built by 100,000 slaves in 20 years, nor any other means yet explained. No doubt, it will continue to draw claims from other notoriety hunters with little concern for the truth. Its mathematics and geometry relates the transcendental number Pi to the algebraic number the Golden Mean phi = (1 + sqrt(5))/2, answering the Delphinian Oracle's riddle of squaring the circle. The oracle alludes to the Great Pyramid thusly, as does the Pentagram of the White Brotherhood symbolise the proportions phi and pi. The largest right angled triangle through any three vertices of the Black Granite Sarcophagus is the 3,4,5 Pythagorean Triad. The design architect was Hermes, known to the Jews as Melchizedek (Melchisidec NT Hebrews). As for the symbolism of the Sarcophagus: "Q-8. What is the significance of the empty sarcophagus? "A-8. That there will be no more death. Don't misunderstand or misinterpret! but the interpretation of death will be made plain ... 5748-6 "When the lines about the earth are considered from the mathematical precisions, it will be found that the center is nigh unto where the Great pyramid, which was begun then, is still located." 281-42 "At the correct time accurate imaginary lines can be drawn from the opening of the Great Pyramid to the second star in the Great Dipper, called Polaris or the North Star. This indicates it is the system toward which the soul takes its flight after having completed its sojourn through this solar system." 5748-6
- 13 replies
-
-1
-
There is absolutely no record of the building of the Great Pyramid and its Sphinx, only a stone recording repairs to the latter ordered of a Pharaoh by God. "The Egyptian Heritage" based on The Edgar Cayce Readings by Egyptologist Mark Lehner compiles the saga of its construction. From the preface: "There are 1,159 Edgar Cayce readings which contain references and information on the Ra Ta period in Egypt. The story presented here has been culled from approximately 300 of these readings. This number includes all those readings which deal extensively with the subject." Mark points to the correlation of the saga with Egyptian history and mythology. Having studied the many books by E.A. Wallace-Budge on Egyptology, I have to say that times were so different 12500 years ago, that without this prerequisite study, I would not have believed the account. But from amongst the readings quoted by Mark we have these: "... remember, there is nothing in the present that hasn't existed from the first. Only the form or the manner of its use being changed, and many an element then used that the art of its use has been lost, as we will see the reason why, and many being re-discovered by those called scientists in the present when in that day it was the common knowledge of the most illiterate, as would be termed in the present." 294-148 This may not seem plausible according to current thinking, with special thanks to Aristotle for denying Plato's history of Atlantis. We are robbed of the credence of ancient wisdom. Explained however is the Great Pyramid and much other massive stone work across the globe. I was motivated to study Ancient Egypt because it became plain to me that Politics and Exploitation has lead us to a brainwashed state, and knowing belief systems from long ago may produce clues of our thinking and beliefs before this darkening. Concerning the Great Pyramid: "This, then, receives all the records from the beginnings of that given by the Priest, Arart, Araaraart and Ra, to that period when there is to be the change in the earth's position and the return of the Great Initiate to that and other lands for the folding up of those prophecies that are depicted there. All changes that came in the religious thought in the world are shown there, in the variations in which the passage through same is reached, from the base to the top - or to the open tomb and the top. These are signified by both the layer and the color in what direction the turn is made." 5748-5 "Q-14. How was this particular Great Pyramid of Gizeh built? "A-14. By the use of those forces in nature as make for iron to swim. Stone floats in the air in the same manner. This will be discovered in '58." 5748-6 "Q-3. By what power or powers were these early pyramids and temples constructed? "A-3. By the lifting forces of those gases that are being used gradually in the present civilization, and by the fine work or activities of those versed in that pertaining to the source from which all power comes." 5750-1 "Q-5. What was the date of the actual beginning and ending of the construction of the Great Pyramid? "A-5. Was one hundred years in construction. Begun and completed in the period of Araaraart's time, with Hermes and Ra. "Q-6. What was the date B.C of that period? "A-6. 10,490 to 10,390 before the Prince entered into Egypt." 5748-6
- 13 replies
-
-3
-
Now you disagree, not with me, but with Newton and Einstein to the nth degree. They did not read only the prescribed textbooks of Mammon's handmaidens. Would you really hurl this sh*t in their faces? I trow not. Go to the masters, not the maggots. You have a soul (psyche) and Psychology was the first Science to begin the systematic rape of Science, moulding everything particular instead of energetic. The Beast that was dead rises and all who “buy and sell” must worship. This precipitated WWI in short order. This is recent history, but Genesis 1-5 takes you back in symbols to what you call The Big Bang, and is taken literal to divide Science and Religion. The Universe came from the Light, or more specifically, the Electric Field as Edgar Cayce explained (above) before Einstein had a dozen comprehending the significance and implications of c. We still don't see the significance of the K.E. term independent of v as P.E. above the singularity pointed to by the gravitational field, or the zero points where new ellipticals will reform, while NASA frames every explanation WRT BBT, and Wiki dances to the same tune. For a recent "miracle" (the altering of normal occultations required for continuity and consistency), Mark Twain wrote a book over a OUIJA Board, called "Jap Herron". Vested interest shut this trend of post-humus authorship down using Lawyers and a Media Circus. Here is the book (also available as PDF): https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/jap-herron-a-novel-written-from-the-ouija-board-1917 and the Media Articles: https://splinternews.com/how-mark-twains-ghost-almost-set-off-the-copyright-batt-1793855099 The execution proceeded with: The New York Times, February 3, 1916 and ended with: The New York Times, July 28, 1918 The novel took two years to produce by the Psychic Research Society and less time to legally crucify, and all remaining copies ordered to be destroyed, unless they would admit fakery, few surviving already sold with PDF now downloadable. “The Coming of Jap Herron” prologue ends with a premonition, I know not of Global Thermonuclear Conflict or, based on Maxlow’s research, our possibly becoming a second asteroid belt, but either way, fulfilling these prophecies far flung in time: Deuteronomy 32:22, Zephaniah 3:1-8, 2 Peter 3:1-10, Revelation 11:18. The door to the other side slammed shut. Secular Power and the Christian Orthodoxy would not have been displeased for their own reasons. I have seen a textbook disappear from a tertiary library full of underlined passages when, obviously for the first time, I produced a critical summary of the entire book rather than cursory quotes and some vaguely related BS for an assignment on Sociology. It went above and beyond, and was marked down short of a fail, publicity too expensive to risk. One anecdote among many of poking the bear. "The majority of the stupid is invincible and guaranteed for all time. The terror of their tyranny is alleviated by their lack of consistency." Guess who. He also poked the bear but interests were altered by the Germans and Japanese, returning global conflict within a generation as predicted by the editor or "The Fourteen Point Plan", authored secretly by...Edgar Cayce upon request by the once President of Princeton where Einstein and Oppenheimer worked from 1939 to 1945 on...PROOF too loud to ignore. The risk of Hitler achieving, indicated by German activity in the Uranium source in Czechoslovakia: https://www.osti.gov/opennet/manhattan-project-history/Events/1939-1942/einstein_letter.htm could not be ignored. Pair production for Protons, alluded to in the second Edgar Cayce article above, was not achieved in Einstein's effective lifetime, and his "Steady State Theory" remained out of reach with only a Positron for evidence, accompanied by some nonsense theory still extant. Fate? Psalm 82 KJV.
- 13 replies
-
-2
-
Not wishing to "Hijack" another thread, but keen to help where possible by opening doors for those asking... ":How did we come from nothing" &c. ...I have assembled the following which, as far as I can see, is much better than "nothing". Read on, and Isaac Newton himself will have a few words to say which defends my efforts here. Those who are offended may...choose their own opinions. This IS speculations, although every hypothesis really is. That position I will answer quickly. As you have witnessed, Mainstream Science is not equipped to answer your very reasonable question. If I may, I will provide the answers that my research has turned up, as an unsatisfied customer, due to some anti-intuitive Mainstream hypotheses (in my opinion). Understandably a ship can only have one Captain or else flounder, so Speculations is where we belong while Scientific research and application continues otherwise. Science has drawn a line in the sand. It has made the senses the irreducible reality that cannot be disputed, since all functional and rational human beings agree on this level, but this may only be the manifestation provided to evolve us, provided by our Source. Edgar Cayce has given “Time and Space are incomplete” long before Einstein proved that these were not independent of the observer and has said so directly. The basic disagreement seems to arise from the perspective that the Universe is unintelligent, and chance has utterly defied entropy from particles to galaxies. We put it bluntly without pussyfooting around opinions forged into our social environment by vested interests (like “conspiracy theorist” like Thomas Jefferson maybe? Let’s get real.). ‘... when Dr. Halley ventured to say anything disrespectful to religion, [Isaac Newton] invariably checked him, with the remark, “I have studied these things – you have not”.’ https://webspace.science.uu.nl/~gent0113/astrology/newton.htm The source of the senses is assumed to be the organs of sense relaying information to the conscious mind on the level of one conscious physical life. The past, present, future theme is found in the oldest chapter of the Egyptian "Book of The Dead", Chapter LXIV. "I am yesterday, today and tomorrow, and have the power to be born a [again]", transliterating "a second time". Reincarnation (in our own order, human) is our most ancient belief. Though not rejected by Jews, the Fifth Ecumenical Council in Constantinople of 553 AD rendered such doctrines and their corollaries heresy, on pain of burning at the stake, and simultaneously obliterated the Egyptian Gnostic Christianity, banned the teaching of Hieroglyphics, and possibly created both the Gypsies, the Masons and their Tarot Cards encrypting the meaning behind the 22 Chapters of the Book of Revelations, KJV. All this is conjecture but with strong evidence. Fortunately, the Dharma has raised Western Civilisation to a world power despite the subsequent darkening, confusion and ultimate turning away. The Revelation has only been satisfactorily explained, in profound depth and requiring decoding using "modern" knowledge (the endocrine system of the human body for example), by the psychic Edgar Cayce (1877 - 1945). Twenty Four psychic discourses, commencing at Reading 281-16 through to 281-39 may produce the depth of understanding attainable only by those with prerequisite knowledge and life experience, but above all, a level of righteousness which will allow the individual direction toward such understanding ("...men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved." John 3:19-20, true for The Bible KJV as a whole, the Bagavad Gita or whatever. J. Robert Oppenheimer studied the Vedas to unearth ancient knowledge and was not deceived by the imperialist Aristotle's lies about advanced prediluvian civilisation. Why are so many wise "Fathers of Science" brushed aside on these issues? Is it not clear what made them so? Returning to our "Nothing comes from nothing", obviously a beginning is necessary because the present cannot be reached from an infinite beginning. This implies that time and space themselves were at some point created from a timeless source. A student of the modern Hindu religion called Sir John George Woodroffe (Arthur Avalon 15 December 1865 – 16 January 1936), deals with the chakras (powers behind the endocrines, the "Seven Angels of the Churches = meeting places of forces to be disseminated) in "The Serpent Power". He provides, from those sources, "The ultimate or irreducible reality is 'Spirit' in the sense of Pure Consciousness (Chit, Samvit) from out of which as and by its Power (Shakti), Mind and Matter proceed. There are no degrees or differences in Spirit. The Spirit which is in man is the one Spirit which is in everything and which, as the object of worship, is the Lord (Ishvara) or God." Edgar Cayce provided pre-emptive knowledge in many areas of Medicine (the Pineal gland)/Archaeology (Troy, Atlantis=The Bimini Road)/Politics (Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points)/&c. Two readings should be of particular interest to Science. Note the pre-emptive dates attached to the most advanced Science yet (in my opinion). “Remember, as given, the earth is that speck, that part of creation where souls projected themselves into matter, and thus brought that conscious awareness of themselves entertaining the ability of creating without those forces of the spirit of truth. “As this came about, it was necessary for their own awareness in the SPHERES of activity. Thus realms of systems came into being; as vast as the power of thought in attempting to understand infinity, or to comprehend that there is no space or time. “Yet time AND space, in patience, you may comprehend.” Reading 5755-2 (19 JUN 1941 four years before E = mc^2 was demonstrated incontrovertibly and this profound Physics, still misunderstood by Physicists (space and time incomplete, the observer or soul integral), was made part or the consciousness even of layfolk.) “23. (Q) Give name of books to help entity to open himself up for the perfect demonstration of this idea. (A) First - ye must choose. For there are set before thee today good and evil, life and death - choose thou. “ The better books are those of Holy Writ, for ANY demonstration of spiritual laws in relationship to human experiences. “24. (Q) How can an article by mechanical means be charged with positive electricity continuously and economically? (A) It may not - without having its counterpart in the negative. “For in manifestations, this is the basis of materiality. Only when they become spiritual are they ONLY positive. For materiality IS - or matter IS - that demonstration and manifestation of the units of positive and negative energy, or electricity, or God.” Reading 412-9 (10 AUG 1937 Yet to be recognised that all is one force) When I was a child of three years old or so, I dreamed I had a pretty balloon. I was elated. Then I woke up. My balloon was gone. I wanted it back. What is the difference between the balloon in the dream, and a real one? Moses would say “None”. Psalm 90. Einstein said that this cannot be disputed. But neither can we just wake up out of the “Real World” while we live. We must abide its Physical Laws = Science = Occultations. To anyone interested, this perspective of "reality" is anciently known as Hermetic Philosophy, and underlies many religions, ancient and modern. It may be noted that it necessarily includes a supreme power and does not preclude "miracles".
-
While not so many would be interested in Pangaea, Sprites may be somewhat more topical. This phenomenon has only received credence from the scientific community in the last 30 years. In fact, much of the interest is likely from the birds-eye view offered by the International Space Station: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap150821.html The thread on Sprites is moved to Speculation "Split from Pangaea", since it is related to much of that material.
-
Post moved before the draft could be edited: refinement for clarity and additions follow. If possible, please remove draft: Let me share this link with other puzzlers of the universal manifestation, its phenomena, the laws governing them, and the intelligence behind the Force. The website: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html provides a video of a sprite (positive lightning), a phenomenon of only recent validation for some 30 years: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap210104.html If one may be so bold as to speculate concerning James Maxlow's theory of "Earth Expansion Tectonics: https://www.jamesmaxlow.com/geological-world-map/ these little ultra-transient fairies from the great beyond are linked to several other fundamental elements of Maxlow's theory, which requires above all an explanation for terrestrial dinosaurs on a Water World like unto Noah's Ark days were the planet of half the current radius 180 MYA. "Plate Subduction Tectonics" attempts to "explain" an Earth with a virtually constant radius, which needs to be covered with a plethora of nonsense hypotheses, the most notorious of which is the loss of oceans from Venus and Mars due to the Sun's Solar Wind. The Earth has ostensibly been spared this fate by its magnetic field, deflecting the speeding solar plasma of protons and electrons around the planets, leaving our original oceans virtually intact. This hypothesis has become more and more tenuous with newly discovered facts. It may require many threads to elaborate, and many the hoops of Scientific integrity to jump through, so cutting a long story short, here is shortened take. Earth shared a similar quantity of water with Venus and Mars but has increased and is increasing its H2O by oxidation of the Proton fraction of the Solar Wind (H+ and e- plasma) since cyanobacteria evolved 3900 MYA. These colonised into Stromatolites (as extant in Shark Bay, WA, Australia and other oxygen free highly saline waters) and long dominated the rising global seas until cooling and rifting created sumps (oceans) and fresh waters. The oxidisation of the H+ portion occurs predominantly through Sprites and Aroura Australis: The balance of e- forced North comes down almost purely GREEN as Aroura Borealis: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap210103.html and possibly GENERATES our magnetic field, returning the hydrogen atoms’ lost partners, the RED Sprite Lightning meeting cloud layers discharged by (negative) lightning, and the RED Southern Aroura meeting GREEN electric discharge from below). The trigger for the Sprite would be similar to that of the more prevalent negative lightning. Both required an arcing voltage, but few of the negative lightning strikes cause the cloud layer to facilitate the necessary voltage for the positive lightning to come down out of the plasma. The distance is hundreds of times further to the upper atmosphere where the plasma components become separated in the magnetic field. An investigation of the speculated water source here claimed was quite consistent with material in the book edited by Stephen Gould called "The Book Of Life" on theoretical Palaeontology. https://www.amazon.com.au/Book-Life-Illustrated-History-Evolution/dp/0393321568 A knowledge of extinct flora and fauna is frequently assumed, so a sidecar volume of Iconology called “The Concise Dinosaur Dictionary” (David Burnie, John Sibbick) is recommended, particularly to supplement interest and visual cues in some dry material: https://www.amazon.com.au/Concise-Dinosaur-Encyclopedia-David-Burnie/dp/0753457547 Unlike Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Fred Hoyle, James Maxlow and myself, Stephen Gould was rather fanatically atheistic, and the book favours chance over design for our evolutionary progress. The simplest free-living organism’s cytoplasm + DNA are sidestepped as of unknowable probability. Travel between solar systems seems prevented by Relativity considerations, stellar distances, the 2,000,000,000-year scattering of Supernova debris before solar systems can form from subatomic particles, and the prevalence of ultra-high energy interstellar cosmic rays. Given that spores wouldn’t survive interstellar scattering, by what coincidence is abs(H+) = 1830 x abs(e-) --> Periodic table --> Astronomy + Homo sapiens + discovery (E = abs(m).c^2) still in dispute (Big Bang contradiction) even without the absolute function. Explaining the factor 1830 (actually 1836.1527095927473784323949292487…)?… what sort of intellect can figure that out?...because for some reason, it worked, and not likely by chance! Tracing an evolution of this planet Earth along the lines given above explains much that is covered in my other posts like "The Anomalous Moon", where meridian rifts + spin + heat induced pressure launched the centre of mass of the system with the Moon. The Theia Scenerio of 4500 MYA is contradicted by the homogeneity of the Earth material and Moon rock. Two Titanium isotopes are in precise proportion. The collision proposed would not allow thorough mixing. Instead, the age ogf the Moon is more likely consistent with its launch being the cause of the Permian Extinction 245 MYA, indicating a much greater rate of meteor strikes per unit time than is currently believed. Also, the location of (precipitated) ores according to the electro-positivity series by the oxidation of lower dissolved salts over geological time would be coveted intelligence. The banded iron formations add weight to such a theory, considering the seasonal character of oxygen generation from stromatolites. Refer to: https://www.google.com/search?q=Geological+Map+of+the+World+(UNESCO)&rlz=1C1ASUC_enAU818AU818&oq=Geological+Map+of+the+World+(UNESCO)&aqs=chrome..69i57.26062j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Ball Lightning, however, has me completely mystified. Any ideas?
-
I would like to share this link with other puzzlers of the universal manifestation, its phenomena and laws governing them. The website: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html provides a video of a sprite (positive lightning), a phenomena of only recent validation for some 30 years: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap210104.html If I may be so bold, and speculate concerning James Maxlow's theory of "Earth Expansion Tectonics: https://www.jamesmaxlow.com/geological-world-map/ these little transient fairies from the great beyond are linked several other fundumental elements of Maxlow's theory, which requires an explanation for terrestrial dinosaurs on a planet that should have been a Waterworld like unto Noah's Ark days on a planet with half the current radius 180 MYA. "Plate Subduction Tectonics" attempts to "explain" an Earth with a relatively constant radius, which needs to be covered with a plethora of nonsense hypotheses, the most notorious of which is the loss of oceans from Venus and Mars due to the Sun's Solar Wind. The Earth has ostensibly been spared this fate by its magnetic field, deflecting the speeding solar plasma of protons and electrons around the planets, leaving our original oceans virtually intact. This hypothesis has become more and more tenuous with newly discovered facts. It would require more threads than I care to engage in to elaborate on, and I am not prepated to jump through the hoops of Scientific integrity. Cutting a long story short, here is my take. Earth shared a similar quantity of water with Venus and Mars, but has increase and is increasing its H2O from the Proton fraction of the plasma H+ e- plasma since cyannobacteria evolved 3900 MYA, to eventually colonise into Stromatalytes. The oxidisation of the H+ portion occurs through Sprites and Aroura Australis. The balnce of e- forced North comes down almost purely GREEN as Aroura Borealis: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap210103.html and possibly GENERATES our magnetic field, returning hydrogen atom's lost partners as RED Sprite Lightning and the RED Southern Aroura meeting GREEN from below. The trigger for the Sprite would be similar to that of the predominant negative lightning, requiring an arcing voltage. On the other hand, few of these strikes cause the cloud layer to achieve the necessary voltage for the positive lightning to come down out of the plasma. The disatnce is many time further to the upper atmosphere where the components are being separated in the magnetic field. An investigation of this speculation will be quite consistent with material in the book edited by Stephen Gould called "The Book Of Life" on theoretical Palaeontology. https://www.amazon.com.au/Book-Life-Illustrated-History-Evolution/dp/0393321568 Tracing an evolution of the planet Earth along these lines explains much that I've covered in my other posts like "The Anomalous Moon", as well as the location of (precipitated) ores according to the electropositivity series by the oxidation of lower disolved salts. In particular the banded iron formations add weight to such a theory, considering the seasonal character of oxygen generation from stromatalytes. Refer to: https://www.google.com/search?q=Geological+Map+of+the+World+(UNESCO)&rlz=1C1ASUC_enAU818AU818&oq=Geological+Map+of+the+World+(UNESCO)&aqs=chrome..69i57.26062j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Ball Lightning, however, has me completely mystified.
- 34 replies
-
-1
-
Because, as with magnetism, there is an imbalance created in the forces emanating from positive and negative particles due to space contraction so that these unbalance fluxes produce slightly different attraction or repulsion on the two species of charged particles that make up matter or antimatter. However, these charges being reversed in antimatter, this residual force manifesting as gravity will separate the atoms neutral atoms formed from the charged particles, particularly if there are no neutral material particles in existence as exhibited by the spontaneous breakdown of neutrons outside of a nucleus or part of a neutron star. There are no stable neutral particles in a free state except for energy quanta. Also, if neutrino's are properly the antiparticle that materialises with photons in intergalactic space (where no materials annihilate one of the pair produced), White Holes would be repelling photons which pass through antimatter unimpeded, while Black Holes would repel converted material and energy as neutrino's likewise. There are a hoard of astrological phenomena that may find explanations in this scenario (gamma ray bursts, Centaurus A, Hoag's Object, M 82 with hydrogen materialisation normal to the galactic plane, recycling of matter and energy and the accelerating expansion of the Universe, and perfect conservation if anti-mass is negative). We see the photons, but are we sure we are observing ANY phenomena due to neutrino interactions with anything other than their antiparticle the photon (energy sufficient)? Could the energy range of beta rays be because they are triggered by neutrinos from our galactic core, materialising the energy bound to relativistic nuclear electrons we had to invent mesons and short range forces to explain? Was that a long unrecognised faulty hypothesis? Are we making subatomic physics more complex than necessary? Who knows? But science advances by speculative hypotheses which need to be tested, like all of Einstein's work once the world could no longer doubt his ideas. Frankly, it took a World War to make it happen, or remained in the crackpot category. So also is all this speculation. I don't have the resources for more than that in this lifetime. The idea came to me in 1969 when I hear of antimatter and the universal expansion, and has been evolving in my mind since.
-
Your mathematics is beyond me, unfortunately. Intuition alone may not be enough. But...perhaps the concept of a Gravitational Dipole is not inconsistent with what you have explained. The concept of White Holes is mentioned in Wiki and used in astronomy. It is postulated as the back of a Black Hole absorbing nothing, but only emitting the Black Hole food. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole Others are entertaining the concept of White Holes on a subatomic level. I have personally entertained the concept as this: mass density reaches a maximum at the singularity where time stops and space has collapsed and is discontinued. The food must be maintained to make this singularity continue to exist so that when the equilibrium of hydrogen drawn into the galactic corona and the mass vanishing into the black hole is reversed due to the draining of surrounding intergalactic space, the singularity eventually cannot be maintained, the [fossil] galaxy becomes a swarm of very old stars, and drifts toward areas where minimal density has begun the accumulation of a typically giant elliptical galaxy to become one of the typical thousands of globular clusters needed to begin the more rapid star formation in the growing mass of pure hydrogen, while huge red giants are forming to do the same. My question is, anti-hydrogen has protons and electrons with opposite charges. If these electrons produce a force akin to magnetism but due to General Relativistic considerations (electrons as actual particles moving in circular motion = acceleration toward the nuclear proton) then this force will be in opposite directions for matter and antimatter hydrogen, and gravitational fields will cause these two species to move opposite directions. In this way we would have both Black Holes and White Holes, a Gravitational Dipole. This particular dipole however would be one where like attracts like and unlike repels unlike. It would explain an accelerating universal expansion, while maintaining a status quo in a finite Universe. It would also solve the anomalies currently covered by: 1. Dark matter; 2. Dark energy; 3. Assymetric matter-antimatter reactions. Of particular interest is the fact that there must also be an anti-photon that displays the properties of matter and our photons symmetrically. There is a particle that fits the job description, on and of, since it was postulated to cover beta-ray energies. Is such a situation mathematically feasible, or is this scenario contradictory to what may be so determined? If this is a possibility, we have a Universe that was once created to continue indefinitely (ancient Egyptian idea in Book 2 of "The Divine Pymander" of Hermes). Else the Universe has always existed as is and will always continue to do so. I must leave this to more accomplished mathematicians to evaluate as possible or impossible.
-
If G becomes resolve like the permeability constant as a function of the permittivity constant and the speed of light, it is my opinion that many of the problems of subatomic physics and astrophysics will evaporate, and the knowledge of the source from which all power comes will be ours again, to rebuild the Great Pyramid, or even to explain its existence, or the age of the stalagmites and stalactites in the Bahama Blue Holes. It may however, not be our fate to reacquire such power on this world, which likely is not our first to leave behind us, if the author of "Jap Herron" is to be believed (concerning the last note from Mark Twain at the end of the prologue "The coming of Jap Herron"). It promises to be a hard nut to swallow. The World has much to thank the US for besides in so many ways. Thank you all for your input. Good luck with your ventures.