IvoryEbony
Senior Members-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by IvoryEbony
-
Some people NEED to lose their good qualities eternally
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Ethics
The problem is choice. I should be able to choose who chooses me. -
Some people NEED to lose their good qualities eternally
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Ethics
No, I mean I REALLY need to lose my good qualities pronto. Where Jessica Chastain? Why is she not at location yet Once you cross that line, there's no going back It's been too little too late since I was 10 I only got 18 years left -
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-end-of-physics-20201124/ Of course creative ideas are gone because we're more concerned about hand motions than saving lives and we think that there's nanites swimming in our blood and lasers augmenting our dna 🧬 That would never happen even if we could find precise coordinates because we'd be turning each other into lavafrogs after crossing a shady deed
- 2 replies
-
-1
-
initial state is well known, and there is a limited set of basic elements (qubits) that can be manipulated by a simple set of rules—rotations of the vector that represents the quantum state. But observing the system during those manipulations comes with a severe penalty: If you take a look too soon, the computation will fail. there's analog gravity immonating from my vectors, that doesn't merely rotate but moves my m-branes (pyramids in spheres) in chaotic and unpredictable ways when the algorithms are run. You don't need to guess. https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/computing/hardware/photonic-quantum-computer-shows-advantage-over-supercomputer.amp.html This is fake news I know because I work on the foundational arithmetic in which these computers are assembled and I can tell you there hasn't been a single development since the double slit experiment. If I give you key loggers and landlords proofs you'll probably kill me as I'm no longer useful
- 2 replies
-
-1
-
I been making the tough decisions to long. I know what your thinking, reverse it you selfish dick
- 6 replies
-
-1
-
You use words like D Trump, Senate, Replic, that have no meaning. What are we talking about here? Some random person who never sees a penny for his thoughts committing small crimes here and there as a result? And what is impeachment to someone who has been impeached since he hit puberty? Maybe that's why he's an asshole
- 66 replies
-
-1
-
Don't be dramatic. I meant I was quoting Clint Eastwood on page 1 and instead it went to page 2 and since he was the last post naturally I quoted you. Cellphone texting is like my new Chess Your priorities should be on the physics not whether or not I intentionally put a comment in the wrong thread I didn't even say anything like that. What language you speak?
- 5 replies
-
-1
-
I get along fine with everyone who maintains respect. But then again being born in this shithole doesn't make me a word "American" you are how you conduct yourself and so is your country, you are the decisions you make which are the result of the sum of your experiences and genetic utilities etc But obviously my country is not how I conduct myself
-
I wasn't even in this topic when I posted that Are you quoting metallica? No I meant asymptotes stick when it comes to 13.8 billions years ago but not when it comes to the borderless .
- 5 replies
-
-1
-
Infinity is just a word. What matters is how many ways in which you can hit it with potential flaws and which ones stick.
-
Objective Truth & Ethics Vs High-Potential Truth & Ethics
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Ethics
I hear you. Were I not a careful person, I wouldn't apologize. Sorry. Don't mistake caring for fear -
In my aforementioned Murphy's law applied to e8 Vacuum Fluctuations thread, the m-brane portion of the model dictates that di-branes overlap it is like combining mathematical infinities, can't be done, so instead we must reduce the space between them in increments equal to their radii (the planck length) per transformation (which represents a planck time). You can measure distance in three dimensions of direction. The time is change in these reductions in space created as the m-branes overlap Sorry just apart of a potential thesis paper. Maybe I'll write it maybe I won't. Depends on which decision will get me what I want. Apparently it's neither decision, or both, or just dependent on the judge.
- 392 replies
-
-2
-
Has the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved here ?
IvoryEbony replied to Boson Quark's topic in Analysis and Calculus
Emma Watson is from there I hope she is the exception. We won't see, she's gone rogue. Like me. Total media blackout -
Does Hybridization Always result in superior genes?
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Genetics
You have to destroy all these thoughts at some point. It's just dick measuring. Any way you go, whatever side you choose, white, black, Asian, whatever. Is wrong and your fault for doing and you'll make allies and friends with both the side you pick and the side you didn't for both reasons. It's called drama. 🥱 I used the title as a joke. See what happens when there's a small descent? Poof! Gone. Luckily a one man descent a waco siege does not make. People laugh at it. -
Does Hybridization Always result in superior genes?
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Genetics
Okay, now believe it or not. These are all considered perversions by some, while the opposite cases are made by others. Some of these are urges but urges with a background, and more commonly it's divide and conquer. Is that a bad thing, to consume to survive? To weed out the weak, on an evolutionary level? At the same time, those who hack it in the military keep their families, that that get divided and conquered get adopted. So there is no government! Just white military and black street. Now I have managed to hold to my own, not get conquered and adopted, not get enlisted and cucked. And I'm just wondering, when do I get a crack at the accused? I'll take down the ghetto and the Navy singlehandedly. -
Has the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved here ?
IvoryEbony replied to Boson Quark's topic in Analysis and Calculus
What even makes you think your rights are protected just because you hear it? Smart people are also careful people. Just hand out trust to strangers and we can all hold hands and sing combiya and go to a great afterlife as we were promised. -
Has the Riemann Hypothesis has been proved here ?
IvoryEbony replied to Boson Quark's topic in Analysis and Calculus
& why is that? I mean, information is power. Would you share power with someone who may be irrational? -
To put it simply, if any of you inquisitors wish to proceed with these potential prospects (the fruits of my hypothesis) than simply put Saint Charles on blast for injustices such as these publicly "At the time of his death in 2016 at age 74, Ali had an estimated net worth of $80 million, according to Forbes." "Justin Bieber Net Worth 2020: Justin Bieber is a Canadian pop singer who has a net worth ... The pair had an on-and-off relationship until March 2018. Net Worth: $285 Million Salary: $80 Million Last Updated: 2020 Nationality: Canada" Give me Saint Charles and I'll clean up the mess they made and such injustices will cease to exist and I can continue in own field of study.
-
It's whatever can happen does happen. Something going wrong implies feeling. Emotions not included, it's whatever can happen does happen. Pessimism has no purpose here. I only gave away up to the second dimension, the equation for the grav constant x reduced lp over c^5 for the pyramid would be in reference to the second of two third dimensional shapes I had to cut off or down to 2 dimensions I'm case a clever hack steals it. At this point I'd be worried about someone stealing it off a site like jopa that says it's copyright protected. You have ever-weakening and expanding -in proportion to the weakening-waves of gravity moving the m-branes (6D) that made them in two different ways (+2) that I would use to support the spectroscopic data collated in regards to accelerated expansion and dark matter results. To confirm or deny the hypothesis. This a partial demo (of a rough draft to boot) of a potential thesis paper. That I won't even write or give the complete if you have me running in circles on meaningless post-scarcity contradicted monetary scams. We didn't even use money for the first 170,000 years of our civilizations 😂 Go public on saint charles missouri unnecessary menial labor and eviction & tax schemes if you care to play devil's advocate I can't continue to play make believe with a non-property land tax and play pick objects up and put them down and so this type of real actual science
-
Tilt one corner of a plane and you have the simplest 3D "alpha" (murphy's law) shape (source of the antiparticles gw charge direction) 3-sided pyramid. 360 degree rotation + spin yields the 3d "omega" (murphy's law) shape. Einstein scheimstein. Kill 5 birds with one stone, antimatter problem, quantum entanglement, black hole information paradox, accelerated expansion, & dark matter Using 1. Perfect sphere 2. Graphing it's quantum gravity using trivectors in the planck units of volume you'd have to look like Abigail to get this level clearance not even a shadowed photo for kmc 3. Graph perfect 3 sided triangle people have died for less of the portion of the proof I'm giving away freely 4. Change the speed of light for it's trivectors per planck units of volume any crackpot model can say it's okay to treat your planck time this way but it's only correct with the missing 🧩 (free hint it's not 9^28 it's the 3 sided pyramid derivative for sphere) Dormant black holes (we've observed 2) are naked (horizonless) planck singularities. That's octillions of planck branes posing as one singular planck brane. When a stray proton hits it it's planck brane components get octillions of planck lengths in a planck time far faster than it's horizon can propagate to full size again. Ie dark matter. Technically black holes already have superluminal gravitational lensing which folds space faster than light inside the event horizon which is why light can't escape. The trick to dark matter is that these black holes become a bare singularity, so when a proton meets that event horizonless exposed singularity it will be tugged away faster than the gravity ripple in a pond can propagate. Which is why it's dark matter. Anywho in an infinite universe these superluminal dark matter particles come into our cosmic particle horizon from outside and have entangled counterparts which both explains the additional mass and accelerated expansion. Which means there's too much collating data to simply ignore my model. 😈 Point being there's the vectors you were shown to use, then there are nonlinear vectors (((Derived from a the di-ordinates of a perfect circle) and dynamic grav waves both at and slightly greater than c and if anyone can It would be me. So I need to end this silly redundant right to work tax filing scheme they got going here in Saint Charles missouri (go public mods) and free room and board at Yale Or else you'll always have molecular flaws in your carbon nanotubes, which means they will never be 600 times stronger than industrial grade steel and you'll never get nanoelecteokinetic velocities in your space craft. You won't even get the correct automata in your rotating polarizing light filters to achieve gravitational lensing in light rays to focus them into free vacuum energy (lasers) or quantum computers that actually work Idk if omission is against the rules but I've shown enough that I know what exactly I'm talking about. Even a chimp can learn how to use high tech weaponry if given the proper instructions so I'm not just going to go all in with civilians and the easily influenced
-
Does Hybridization Always result in superior genes?
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Genetics
Let's say in the overall picking of mates the result is 65% ceniven, & 35% Denivens. Whereas ideally you want to retain 50/50 balance overtime. This is what I mean by too much hybridization, think of having too much favoring of one ethnic group over the generations. -
Actually, Neil, there are 5 kinds of truth. The forth being an unreliable source, i.e. a non-proven expert or "pseudoscientists", whom is offering a low-potential truth and a proven source who has demonstrated a superior grasp of overall physics and mathematics compared to others with the same education and resources. In other words, a quick learner. Recently this prodigy has, without aid, hit some geometric bullseyes and now has hit 4 physics mysteries with one "potential" theoretical stone with a possible medical implication that would increase longevity if disclosed. Given his expertise and confidence in the matter compared to how reluctant is to share this new data now as opposed to older and less accurate data in the past, combined with intentionally shadowed proofs that seem legit, we have a high-potential truth. Herein lies the ethical delima, now suppose in some dystopian future medical corporations decide when a person becomes a "grown-up" and where money and politics are just distractions or games until they get there. The reason for this is one objective truth, longevity = average age of parents during subjects conception / average age in which subject's parents hit puberty. So in this allegedly "hypothetical" dystopia people who retain their youths longer in the unlucky control groups are forced to wait longer and longer to have kids. Now one of these unlucky chastity belted lads was the one person in the example who allegedly possesses this "high-potential truth" that has some chance of ending biological aging...period. Yet he demands that in order to reveal his math proofs and match the cosmological constant amount of dark matter and dark energy before revealing to the biologists their rule in aging as a previously unseen variable, he wants to be a 'grownup' before the medical corporations had planned on him becoming a parent which we know will decrease his child's potentially greater fertile lifespan albeit it will still be greater than those of the other control groups. Decisions decisions.
-
Does Hybridization Always result in superior genes?
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Genetics
You just contradicted yourself. It's sounds like we're going forward in phyla combinations amongst the strains that originated in abiogenesis to the newest (sapiens) from the oldest. If anything we should be more immune to birth defects, a midget is still smarter and still posses the superior motility (albeit less motility than normal) than that of a chimp and even if inbreeding make him more susceptible to dwarfism he's still the result of more evolutionary changes and combinations, just as many in fact as his parents. Just because a human has MORE (meaning there's more that can go wrong because he has more than the comparison an asexual plant) doesn't mean you can say that he's not playing by the same rna strains just more into the future of mutation quantity and mixture as we Mammals go through the early stages of former vertebrae amphibians, reptillians, etc in the womb yet every creature on this plant was printed out of the same hydrthermal vents on the chemical ingredient level. It is an impossible to follow line of descent from various homini without a time machine, however if you're lacking in a certain ancestry it should go to reason that would be a better pick. And actually the Denovens were in Asia, and other hominids existed outside of Africa prior to the existence of homosapiens which are ALL mutts of other hominids it's just a question of how much more dominant one hominid strain is than another. And this wanting to mix it up comes from the same logic as inbreeding. We generally want more traits, so Asian given my ancestry, not black. Even being Sicilian, a .000001% black, I still have more black than Asian so Asian slightly takes the cake. True Romance is a matter of science, not emotions or cultural or linguistic barriers. An argument can be made that because one relates more, has more sexual attraction to, etc etc to their own gender or culture or WHATEVER is an unscientific way to choose a mate. An argument can be made that a homosexual or racist can just give a sperm sample to the desired effect of genetic diversity to their offspring, however it is better for a child to observe how their different parents work through cultural barriers or sexual disagreements and remain open to love as not a victory dance but a cold and broken hallelujah. -
Does Hybridization Always result in superior genes?
IvoryEbony replied to IvoryEbony's topic in Genetics
Let's see I already got the Moors (black) Gothic (white) thing going as a Sicilian, but zero Asian in my ancestry afik time to bridge the gap, for science. My pool needs the right combo what it's missing I think we should all ask ourselves this question, what in our ancestry are we lacking? That's your soulmate right there! -
Let's look at the liger. It does not have superior hunting capacities to the prides of the two different species (lion and tiger) it being larger no more makes it ferocious than another feline species, the Jaguar, at least not pound for pound the Jaguar is still more 'fit' The issue I have with hybridization is that at some point it dilutes the strain. And there is a real genetic basis for this, sure every once in a while you'll get liger-like advantages, but, eventually you have less variety/genetic components when one strain has more oil than water or more glue than rubber as it were. If you have a liger that is 99.999999999% Tiger and .00000000001% Lion than it will probably not have as many genetic components as a liger that is 50/50. We also have to take note that plants self-pollinate! A lot of the issues with birth defects is more stigma than science. Anyone can have birth defects, and not every single inbred has a birth defect, just more so than otherwise. Which is why I stress having a fair variety is always better. I would argue that Moors Sicilians are in desperate need of Norwegian or Celctic. Otherwise we lose some variety, and we already have Spaniards and Middle Easterners so there's no need to continue elimaniting an already endangered ilk population wise (too many chiefs not enough indians). We have an unequal balance, and the result is psuedo-incest. Those refered to as the minority, are the majority globally btw. It's genocide of the fair haired/skinned strain I tell you! Seriously look it up. There's way more Asians/Spaniards/Indians/Africans than there are plain white people. More of each (except Africans but we don't know how much African is in Middle Eastern Indian [black plus white] or MexiSpaniard [black plus Asian]). It's complicated, really Spaniard is black and white, because Europe is closer to Africa, yet Mexican is Asian and Black because native american Indians are Asian by ancestry. Yet middle eastern is either black and white or black and asian so we have this other 'East Indian's confusion and I swear they called Western Natives Indian just to confuse the genocide of lilly white issue. Basically you start with three hybrid hominoids, Cro-magnum (black), Neanderthal (white), and Deniven (Asian) and poof you get a higher percent Neanderthal and it's a blonde haired blue eyed pale skinned devil (the minority here), you get more cro-magnum and it's George Foreman, you get more Deniven and it's Michio Kaku. Spaniards, Mexicans, and Eastern Indians (the majority) definitely have too much Deniven and Cro-magnum and too little Neanderthal and Deniven. We're missing the Asian-Caucasian equation. Too bad Alexander didn't have sons to conquer Rome as well and go against Kahn's sons.