Axion

@Bufofrog why is that heresy? those that are unwilling to use m'rna vaccines should know that they can rush for CBD prevention even do as lack of standardization of the amount on daily intake of CBD is not at all substitution for vaxing, yet this is due to systematic ignorance by the authorities to invest in CBD studies ... thus is ambigous alternative for now but useful info for all ... @swansont claiming m'rna vaxing has no risks is more than garbage how is closed the m'rna vaccine risks thread, You are moderating debate as if You are on big'pharma payroll, tho think this is solely from personal prejudice coz I've questioned the standard particle model as science!

@To_Mars_and_Beyond this is due to overwhelming work they have, on top private life too, simply now this the reality, with recent introduction of e-teaching this could be easen as interactive Q&A sessions, but until there not introduced Institutional and Academic eForums like this one but focused on particular science in some university till then any progress will depend on good will lucky circumstances and slow push-pull debate! if this was case i.e. You had have Academic eForum other students will maybe answer on Your question, maybe already answered to others by the Professors , what would be moderated by the Assistants or Doctorants, thus any inconvenience like this one would be easily avoided, aside the chanse for more profound learning through constant debate, altho it would need two versions of the forum for more stiff debate among professors and students and another on the same topics among the students, maybe cross'linking point between both, but eventually the main would purified clean talk while long and wide elaboration on personal student notion will go in the "Double eFroum" sadly we have good eTools but misusing them en'masse, debating on soc.nets chit'chating on eForums and blogging in newspapers, wrong the last as media should exactly pickpocket certain debate from eForums or showcase from b/v'logs and present to the public as interesting, while now trying to throw them as statements in one pile as news article debate [1][1] yet this kind of reform takes time and maybe we could see it in the next century, even SF as forum need constant reshaping and that simply dont goes smooth [1] for start indent paragraph button should be introduced, then when citing outside sources rule for indent quote etc. its more word for more loosen first site viability etc. etc. anyway as eForum is 4+ and must admit I like it ...

@swansont I clearly showed that CBD is booster of T-Cells, what actually imply the thread title, on top in the last study is shown boosting of IgG by CBD, thus this thread its not any kind of speculation! Your excuse is shallow You'll need to provide other if there is at all!? I dont get here this thread will get just more fuel as true, while in Microbiology Subforum eventually could be further examined proved or disproved by potentially some scientists, this is not some smoking gun that vaccination is bad, i m'rna case is just experimental one and people are afraid of it as such, I dont see how it will hurt if they know that they have natural way of immunization, yet for what we lack true measurement how much CBD intake is enough to be booster of T-Cells and IgG ... Hope You are not biased now coz my propositions about SM lately?

@swansont which point applies for this thread? =https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/31045-why-has-my-post-been-moved-to-speculations/

@Ghideon You know I am used to excuses, when someone is biased normally will say that my reasoning is conspi one, even when that is not a case [1][1][1] what about in this topic where I really cant claim theory but dismiss one so I can grasp what-if question ... ... so what to say enjoy your show, after all its only that as an exclusive theater for exceptional scientificism that actually happens to exists coz mids capitalism through it are derived funds for cocktail jams instead park walks ...

@MigL hm how You are responding as concerned about mine simple backhand says big time how eager You are to stay lobotomized, its Your Free Will, after all if someone intentionally burn down your lab for sure You will feed pigeons in parks too, to Tesla was forbiden even leaving usA ... ... the thing is that Einstein was indeed half'minded lets say, proposing theory which has so much variables and in the end is proven that its super'symmetry cant handle the case its just more than false pseudoscience but indeed nut mainstream dogma to which many still kneel and bows, and that is not the biggest problem but how such dogmatics is imposed upon everyone as finite altho fake! cant understand Why so much time spent in waste learning mathematical poetry and physical abstract art all introduced finally as unmeasurable thus fake, only question is when this will became consensus among the physical societies at least!? hm, I know to admit that after such a long time that some mainstream elitism was wrongly imposed and used is difficult, and above with future technocracy risk coz that, so I dont expect some quick change to happen, altho sooner or later it will ... it is already time for idea shift, but lets see how soon in now and whether that will be on our fortune or our debacle as civilization ...

pardon mm'observation here the main problem is that any debate about any alternative theory even less idea must be projected through the SM and normally GR, so any alternative debate is at best drawn to blatant dismissal tho not rarely on instant ridiculing, here I've seen both, altho must say it was somehow pleasure for me finding all those extra SM debunking videos and at least saw three physicist that are acknowledging publicly SM is pseudoscience, this just gives me more hope that as humanity we can quickly circumvent the current misuse of science for capitalistic lobotomy and free energy would come more quick to the tables ... ... altho I am somehow convinced that the secret services already have all this buried deep down in bunkers and keep this current fallacy of capitalistic exploitation so they can easily keep control and power upon states and masses, and lets say like this we have more easier means for good deeds for Spiritual Growth till Christian Salvation because otherwise it would be discutable how quick one can evoke empathy or gain Christian virtues, on top knowing now how people put on pedestal individualism and posesivity it is extra risk some elites to misuse scalar waves for ultimate authoritarianism and strive for superhuman chimeras, its like giving to wild beast katana claws ... ... this dont means that we cant come to common ground as humanity and impose more ethical rule on all levels, but knowing how deep is interwoven the power principle nowadays it will be really naive to think that current "shadow elitist" western imperialism pushed by freemasonry will not misuse any future technocracy for soulscraping of Christians, but here is not place for metaphysics so I'll skip further such hidden fears of mine from eventual misuse of this kind of knowledge ... ~ what was interesting from the last proposed video of JankoM is his suggestion of Konstantin Meyl, who , as the proposed notion of bioresonance quote in the first post of this topic, also points to the same logic ... altho per'se mine idea wasnt that but how mm'observation eventually can change the Maxwell equation ... ~ You know if I lean to Einstein indeed I will become lobotomized, some say he was half-literate, on top coz what his wife Mileva Marich done his math, so I'll say ridiculing Tesla will just keep your current mainstream scientific dogmas live for continual lobotomy further and further of new generations physicists i.e. if You are not open'minded that dont means that others should be narrow'minded altho the current physics is not just in vacuum but already decomposing quickly in the same!

@swansont that is Your interpretation by the agreed existing "laws of physics" which didnt get us further than exploitation and destruction as civilization! @Ghideon the problem what connects my what-if notion to the 2009 gm'observation and those after is the true understanding how things works in our universe, as EricD said the Sun (Stars) are portal from where that energy comes, thus the same is not nuclear, but until our current understanding of physics dont fundamentally change You will argue here through the current mainstream scientific dogmas as if they are final, but what they are is just agreement upon certain methodologies of calculations and expressions which excluded radiant energy i.e. socalled aether ... last night I listened to some popular interview with Janko Mihelich member of the the slovenian NT ngo, if someone translated it in english it would be very useful for any newbie about radiant energy, I'll say not just as theory explanation of RE (radiant energy) but also comparison to the current scientific dogmas! JankoM gives very precise explanations from the speed of light to bigbang normally seen through radiant energy, where he sees it as life energy explained as neutrino spin (consistent of positron and electron) in spiral path (spiral wave) in electromagnetic field i.e. the spiral is between the current and the field, what he is postulating as basic interpretation through the "coulombs inverse square law" [1][1][1]

I pointed to radiant energy and those sources explain to some extent the Tesla notion [1][1][1] again I am not postulating new theory, for that as I said You should ask others and pointed who that might be ... btw its not true there is not word of RE, here is excerpt of the EricD book p.212/206 ... ... You stuck to my assumption as I am knowing what kind of force is in question, I guess, I just say that the observed phenomenon as magnetic monopole (as observed in 2009 first time (without the need to be particle)) could be other thing, so again the question is would then that observation change the maxwells equation, just imagine it, will then divB=0 became divB<>0 ... I cant ask simpler than this as what if ...

I will not act physicist and defining hot water here, but will urge You follow already established patterns of research, in this case about radiant energy ... "True" Electromagnetism of Nikola Tesla ~ Eric P. Dollard ~ http://www.stannet.ne.jp/kazumoto/dollardEm-v3.pdf http://www.build.mk/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1719&PID=165390#165390 or similar alike propositions Ighina's Magnetic Monopole Generator ~ http://www.rexresearch.com/ighina/ighina.htm and obviously for more answers maybe I should start asking questions elsewhere ... just not sure whether I'll need to repeat all that SM talks like here ...

it would be illogical me to spam in this thread about SM but till someone open new sm'sos'thread I really find interestingly the reasoning of Alexander Unzicker [1][1][1] I wonder how Tesla in its own time was arguing against Einstein let me be precise general relativity is one point of view but as is extended its proving that is not the main even less complet understanding of the nature life and reality ... sorry for this mine offtopic jump'in but the point is if indeed magnetic monopoles as assumption exists in nature seen through the current science, then we can say scalar waves or energy is more than plausible, now is that case evenif I knew when cant be postulated theoretically and expressed mathematically even less like that detected by measurements then what the use of me juggling with assumtions!? so I'll rest till physics postulate new model so I can try to point what kind of technology would be needed so such waves could be detected and harnessed i.e. mine interpretation of those sensors transponders transducers etc. for what I think we need just our bodies, but how focus is now drawn to SM pseudoscience we are too far from bioresonance grasp [1][1][1] as in physics so as biology and chemistry, thus for now we need new en'masse theoretic debate around alternatives and till after experimental work ... I know laughing is comforting, freely use it, but take my word this paradigm shift would/will be A Life Less Ordinary for many ...

@Ghideon no it dont need to be particle I am continually saying this, it could be wave of some fringe energy as is already observed ... and please open new SM thread we can argue about the validity of SM as approximation of new theory, You are aware that this sounds like my toy knife will be one day surgical blade, no it wont tho that dont means You cant try doing operations with toy knife, let me see You can for sure spread mayo on bread about scientific elitism and dogmas, hm, are You aware how ridiculed are all alternative theories on basis of mainstream trend in this case SM, electric universe is one extremely bashed like this, yes one pseudoscience saying to all other you are pseudoscience, simply theory is theory but power principle is above all so who has become somehow authority he is imposing what is or not mainstream trend or imminent truth for academic and public following, but all of that is wrong how public money are spent on just one idea, so wrong like with m'rna immunization vs natural CBD one ...

@Ghideon all answers I've got are negative but rests on SM thus not answering my what-if question! @Markus Hanke hm definitely You are finding excuses but defacto the mainstream physics is in vacuum, trying to say the vacuum void is present its like saying wait we will build bigger colider and we will prove that SM is correct, in case of SM my argument in this thread is its not valid excuse so it wouild be rejected the proposed notion that divB=0 now with the detection of g'monopoles becomes dviB>0 if You are concerned on SM viability please open new thread and we can examine how big reflex has the LU inconsistency as measurement! dont forget that at stake is not just physics with this discrepancy between SM and LU but also the humanistic elitism as technocracy who was claiming till now how the scientific superiority is indisputable and need that claim to be postponed until they introduce true technocratic system on west, I know this as political reflex dont have nothing to do with the physics, but gives answer why SM will be streched and reshaped further altho defacto is dead!

@CharonY You are deliberately spinning my conclusions, btw with m'rna vaccines rna editing is defacto present and is introduced in the cells, like that it hijacks the ribosomes, which are not attacking the virus eg. as Zinc does [1] but trigger immune response [2] for what as alternative I am claiming now it could be circumvented by CBD indirectly ... ... I dont understand why people are not debating my CBD points, claiming just CBD is only useful for inflammation, Please are You seeing what I've posted in my previous post about IgG antibodies!? and again why You are hooking on my m'rna filling inbetween the points, Please I pointed to Arete too open new thread for m'rna vaccines functioning and risks and we can debate there more neatly all my m'rna points that are discutable for You in this thread! what I've established do is that CBD is treated in same way like hydrogen as energy source in worlds economy, it is in abundance but still its left on the margins ... for sure there will be many that will say why using hydrogen when fracked methane is easier choice, but that is just wrong excuse that will lead to deluge! not that per'se solely CBD is the cure in this case I numbered few key factors as immunity booster as Citric Acid or Zinc also stress or circulation etc. ... ... yet still You thatare opposing me are claiming only vaccination is the right solution, I dont mind its Your Free Will, but for me and all those that dont want to be experimental group now there should be info what is more than potentially good alternative for immunization, and I hope this would be debated en'masse by scientists! https://www.cbd-intel.com/cbd-events/ but obviously many are pushing the "mainstream" mantra "there is no alternative", and now what, we will argue which stance is more valid, tho I'll say yours as "mainstreamers" will be indeed for many because institutional blackmail i.e. when and if vaccination becomes mandatory by law or imposed indirectly as mandatory through introduction of health-passports, but till then most probably this sars-cov-2 hype will be over, tho even then again my points will hold ground for many other infections or diseases ... just hope it would become free rural legal plant instead corporative ace, which in Macedonia still its not case ...

Macedonia Di Frutta ... look either You are not aware how studies work or intentionally You are derailing the discussion, otherwise You'll know that these studies are done with intention provoked inflammation i.e. the knockouts specific target are particular inflammation, altho its same with the sars-cov-2 where the rush is to be stopt hyperinflammation [1] also with m'rna editing its not attacked directly the virus but indirectly through provoking immune response in the body by vaccination, so I present the same approach but naturally and thats why I am wondering why You intentionally overlook the facts!? first I've provided evidence that the T-Cell boosting in norm with CBD and now even came to the conclusion that CBD induces even the antibodies read the next paragraph ... eventually if You was insightful on the covid-19 for sure You'll pick the first sentence of the last paragraph "CD36 and type II receptor for the Fc region of IgG (FcγRII) were upregulated" and if You know that IgG antibodies are fighting this sars-cov-2 infection [1] then this should be another sufficient proof to recognize that CBD indeed is natural alternative not just for this infection but any other ... bonus: interestingly CD36 gene regulates many other issues [1][1][1] and if indeed CBD upregulates its protein proliferation then this is huge thing, altho I am not literate enough so I could say how and why this is observed in the study, but this points just how we have not invested not even close in phytotherapy studies about CBD ... what I point do again and again be aware of that I respect everyones free will I am not some authority nor microbiologist but will say Those Who Are Not After Vaccination have in mind that You must search for alternative ... additional remark: in some studies CBD is pointed as factor for downregulation of IgG but as I noticed most probably this is due to use of synthesized CBD , while in this above quoted last study the accent is on natural CBD derived from Cannabis Sativa ...

tell that to mathematicians here we need compactness and viewability, coz I still wait on answer to my prime question ...

@Ghideon @swansont think we went too offtopic and would propose to open new threa, altho how this one in offtopic part of the forum maybe it wont hurt if we continue hear to argue about the unstandard model probably with that name indeed could still exist here is another nice definition whats happening from the opening of this linked video > the standard model is fundamentally mistaken ... I know SM is too big to fail, and we as civilization are on many field in such mirage, yep living on planet with finite resources chasing exponential economic growth, its same with the standard model because for long time its in place it will be extending for continual symmetrical mathematical poetry and imagination So it would find excuses for the measurements that dont support the model, as is said in the last link just an idea, now You are telling me look dollar is stable yeas as fictive as it could be that stability, but which only rests on particular agreement but not on reality! now when measurements dont supports the mathematical and theoretical juggling, I can freely say to me more useful would be funding of every alternative theory in same amount as the current SM particle physics, altho it would need some time the current attention discrepancy to be leveled , stil it would be interesting to hear even for simple ideas as theories, but as i can see here for a while that will not be case ...

@Arete how should we communicate like this on Your provisional statements or better said m'rna clannishness responses instead debate on the CBD as booster of immunity, its like arguing about what oil have better performance in the car exxons or castrol, altho we cant have clear comparison coz the billions that goes in genetics research are incomparable to the thousands that goes in endocanabinoid research ... what I know do is that gmo because the missing variable of bioresonance [1][[1][1][[1] is en'masse trial&error experiment, now exercized on large population of humanity without any bioethical debate evaded paradoxically by the below 2% mortality of sars-cov-2, I am not stating tho that this virus is not dangerous but imposing health-passports that is forcible eugenics with no space for any negotiation, its like subtle modern conctration camp methodology for marking of the "unfit" humans for normal living if they are against the jab ... btw for 3rd and 4th point in whole about this experiment please open m'rna vaccine risks thread so we would not go offtopic further in this one, or ask to be reopened the last locked one ... 1. either You are forcing m'rna agitprop or jump to conclusion, false is something that has not any connection to the immunity in this case, aside that not only has indirect through the boosting of T-Cells in the organism but has also direct because is present in the lungs too! 2. here is two quotes that point to the significance of the CBD for immunity ... keep in mind that all this is stalled as research in microbiology how is underfunded and thrown on the margins ... 5. I am deriving The point for the Sativa Smoothy because there are reports that intensive intake is leading to contra'effect that was found in hiv studies ~ 17 February 2018 ~ Heavy Cannabis Use Associated With Reduction in Activated and Inflammatory Immune Cell Frequencies ~ https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/66/12/1872/4869752 1. 2. + 5. 12 February 2021 ~ Nicole Paland ~ The Immunopathology of COVID-19 and the Cannabis Paradigm ~ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349291556_The_Immunopathology_of_COVID-19_and_the_Cannabis_Paradigm

@Markus Hanke hm Your post sounds like robayla response, let me be clear I am not particle physicist, nor physicist as a matter of fact, but reading what they say think that You are not right eg. here is more sincere logic ... [1] "This would certainly give particle physics a kick in the pants. Mark Wise says it doesn’t fit into “the story line that the theorists tell”" or here are more euphemistic lines ... [1] "A shake-up in the Standard Model would be huge." ... "All these converging lines of evidence make an increasingly compelling case that something is systematically fishy. “If [the deviations] turn out to be real,” says BaBar spokesperson and University of Victoria professor Michael Roney, “it would be kind of weird if they weren't related.”" ... "Roney sums up the skepticism: “You don’t bet against the Standard Model.”" ... "The evidence is even harder to swallow given how far lepton universality is from theorists’ expectations of where cracks in the Standard Model might show up. “There’s sort of a story line that the theorists tell,” Wise says, and “this isn’t in the story line.” What’s worse, the proposed explanations for the leptons’ behavior seem ad hoc and unsatisfying. “The kind of models that can fit the…anomalies don’t really do anything else at first sight,” Ligeti says. “For example, they don’t get you any closer to understanding what dark matter might be.”" and here is correct reasoning that indeed opens room for huge revisiting of our current physics, altho I dont believe the academia will be openminded enough to let the alternative theories to roll on, but as usual will chase the rabot hole altho is already fact that the same is not there!

are You aware that without the standard model electric universe is more than plausible, even other theories!? simply holding to the spm its not anymore viable like this, and that is no evidence in big amount on SF forum where people were debating on behalf SPM or through it against every other theory!

the video was once posted as link, then it was overlooked by others too so I pointed again too it, then even that was not enough for You I pointed to other link about the inconsistency of the spm, and again You are bragging about it so I embedded the video part where clearly is pointed Our SPM Is Cracked and still You say my points are lost in translation, this indeed is offtopic pointing again and again that divB>0 cant be perceived from particle perspective ... I am not saying that it must be otherwise, I am just guessing, maybe at all magnetic monopoles dont exist i.e. mm's are just wrong interpretation and its word for fringe force ...

@Ghideon please go consult some particle physicist, there is good comment bellow the video "If Tara wants to retain her job as a physicist and not become a street sweeper, then she has to be careful about her choice of words..." Beyond The Standard Model Understanding, means standard model dont functions as expected, so suggested above how magnetic monopoles are derived due to it, its clear that the argument divB=0 cant become divB<>0 because mm is not observed particle is not substantial, we can continue with offtopic but that is useless ...

no, I am choked exactly by conspiracies, so only way to debunk them is to approach to skepticism by debate [1] but when I offered my skepticism [1][1] it was not debunked by arguments with ontopic points but exceptionalism!

Please dont do it because me, but because Physics as science if You want to say skepticism is most welcome leverage for progress, especially now when the standard model is in question [1][1] and eloquently eg. electric universe theory could be accepted as alternative [2][2] instead bogus one!

@studiot hm, the problem with magnetic monopole comes not from particle physics per'se but from the standard model, thus Your proposition that I want to negate the basics is wrong ... this is why I say maybe in question is some fringe force, or other phenomena, but defacto magnetic monopoles now dont need to be perceived as particles per'se coz the standard model is "I am afraid to say" dead!