fluctusequitantes

My apologies, you are correct , it was late when I replied back. It's rest mass stays constant. Yes they would fly apart if they where in space, but they make up the space.

Nope , would do that a stardard electric field. With positive and negative. However this is just positive. I didn't want to use the word electromagnetic as they are stationary electric fields. Could cause some confusion. I have uploaded a image of a proposed electric field.

Sorry made a mistake in my reply. The electron will then start to orbit the proton as it's being pulled not pushed on by the surrounding Rytons. Then the electromagnetic force takes over and binds the two together.

They do repel each other, it's like if you had a handful of positive magnetic monopoles, and placed them on a flat sheet of paper, they wouldn't fly apart, they would space eachother out. The Rytons are a lower entropy form of higher energy particles outside of the cluster. When they lose energy , they gain mass and lose most of there charge. This is what I speculate our universe was created in. With some outside force , putting work into the cluster and heating it up. It wouldn't fly apart as each ryton is being pushed against. You push on one, it may move alittle but you might as well be pushing on every single ryton Infront of it. Weak gravitational attraction, sort of , There's the mass of the Rytons in the cluster which is uniformed, and its that matter in our universe is what distorts the cluster. Yes but not in a negative way, first we need to look at the electrostatic force. if we take a proton or positively charged particle it would be accelerated though the cluster, while negatively charged particles like electrons would be pulled on. Putting anything negatively charged inside the cluster will attract the moving positively charged particles to it. The electron will then start to orbit the proton as it's being pushed on by the surrounding Rytons. Then the electromagnetic force takes over and binds the two together. The pulling on the electron also has the added benefit of restraining the electron , instead of it just flying away. Driving the creation of atoms. They have electric fields, so are not electromagnetic. If you where to go into a empty part of space, you would measure a constant positive electric field in all directions. Which would be hard to measure as you might mistake it as the baseline for your mesurements.

Hi, This is my speculative idea on how a universe like structures could come into existence. Let's start with dark matter candidates, Axioms , Wimps. Sterile neutrinos. "A Ryton is a subatomic particle that has a weak mass and a weak positive charge associated with it, giving rise to a weak electric field. Making them somewhat different to the other dark matter candidates. These particles form a volume of space with a uniformed mass and energy density. each Ryton is separated from one another by its weak positive electric field, forming a Ryton Cluster. To the best of my knowledge 3 of the forces including the strong nuclear force, the electromagnetic force and the weak nuclear forces are not effected by such a particle field and with the exception of gravity , the only change is from the curving of space time to a distortion of the ryton cluster by mass. I Have tried to simplify things in a presentation you can find @ url deleted

Okay will do , To joigus , The state change section, Now there is a issue you have just made me think of, if the energy is brought into a system where it it shared in a BEC. And if the energy is shared uniformly throughout the system. it would not spread out as the whole system would move to a higher state of entropy. So any matter would clump together but have no where to spread out too. The only thing that comes to mind is that if it was a sudo barrier between two systems of high and low entropy. Producing a zone where energy transfer can take place via propagating waves. Obviously this is just speculations. And Swansot. The big bang theory I have no issue with. The matter in our universe is understood. So I'm just throwing in the idea that the rest of the universe we can't explain could be part of a separate system. However I do agree with you, currently I would equate my ideas as p*ssing in the wind.

Joigus thankyou for you reply back. I have some ideas on that 🙂, each for compression, wave propagation and state change, probably will change the name of the latter. I will put together a list. One item I have been struggling to comprehend is what are magnetic monopoles. Kind regards, Rick

Conflation hypothesis. The main difference between conflation and current theories such as inflation, is that the latter would be like blowing up a balloon. As you blown more air into it , you would see the space and surface area of the balloon expanding at every point, getting further and further apart. However with conflation, You could imagine the balloon is already inflated with air, So to move energy into the balloon. We need a outside source of kinetic energy and a medium such as the air inside the balloon to transform that kinetic energy in heat. We know there are 5 types of kinetic energy, however only 4 apply here. * Radiant * Thermal * Acoustic * Mechanical * Electrical ( Not used in this example) In the four examples all of them give us a increase in temperature inside the balloon, so the type of kinetic energy isn't important at this point. As it would be akin to being the heat generated inside a damper of a car, there's this complex machinery outside, that you may never understand. But if you could detect the gas inside the damper , one hypothesis could be that your part of a larger system or you could conclude that what you see spontaneously emerged or a myriad of different ideas. However I am a Engineer, it is my job to build things, when I look at a cars engine,it isn't just a engine, its lots of different parts working together to covert the petrol into energy to turn the wheels. The damper may only be in the system to aid in prolonging the life of the car by stopping it from shaking to pieces. Its still very speculative at the moment, So as you read on you will realise there's many paths we can go down. But not all roads lead to Shagri La. But its the fact we can go down new roads and explore new ideas. Now Im just a a guy this is not my field. Most is merely a passion for the unknown, with the only way to give any validation to it is a high school science education and a wild imagination. You may think moving the problems away to a unknown area, cheapens the science. But I would argue that a quite popular idea of where the energy came from in our universe, was explained as 0 = -1000 plus 1000. So from zero came everything, this is one hell of a dead end for any inquiring mind. Now for me to develop this idea , I need to know I am going down a sensible path and if you are currently working on a idea, experiment, even just knowledge about certain principles in your field that could help. Here is my email.************** Pure speculation There are a few potential mechanisms I would like to explore on how energy could be brought into said system. Wave propagation A wave propagating though a medium. Could be imagined as having two pieces of graph paper in-front of you and two pencils, one is fresh out the box while the other is only half the length. With the first pencil you fill in the bottom row of the first piece of graph paper, you then continue row after row until you have used up the first pencil. You then repeat the experiment with the shorter pencil on the other piece of graph paper. The reason for repeating the experiment with a pencil of a different length, is because we can say if the pencil is the energy and the graph paper is the medium. That this system obeys the first law of thermodynamics. But you could also conclude that the system is self limiting & maybe that universes can come in any size. Compression The compression of a medium , Now when I talk about compression there could be some misconceptions on what I mean to “compress a medium” . it is not to be confused with elastic potential energy, which is the energy stored as a result of applying a force to deform a elastic object. Where when force is removed, the object springs back to it original state. We need to imagine a imagine a medium at absolute zero entropy, So when energy is then applied to it. The medium moves up to a higher state of entropy. Allowing energy to only flow in a single direction thus obeying the first law of thermodynamics State change If said medium is at a near zero absolute entropy it may exhibit similar effects to that of a Bose Einstein condensate, where the atoms begin to bunch together into a dense quantum state. The atoms are indistinguishable from one another and behave as if they were one giant singular atom. So if you imagine you have a row of wooden domino s, you would knock the first one over, and domino by domino they fall down. Instead of a row of individual domino s. Where I could influence the behavior of just one of them, imagine the row of domino's as the length of wood in which they were made from. whatever we do to the wood , we could say has a effect on all of the domino's. How is a bit of a brain teaser, but going back to the graph paper , it would be like dropping a dark pencil onto the paper and the pencil disappearing and all the squares filling with a shade of light grey. Now there are also super fluids, which I feel should be looked at, As they have zero velocity and can flow without any loss in kinetic energy. This is a issue for the conflation model as I need kinetic energy for it work. The only solution that comes to my mind is that super-fluids may be one step up in entropy from absolute zero entropy. The balloon analogy may give some incite as when heat is added to the medium , there is a increase in the space between the particles. Turning from solid to a sudo liquid. Now by now you probably realize that we haven't spoken about the ubiquitous medium, is it dark matter, is it dark energy. First we need to look at both of them together, ones being described as a attracting force and ones described as a repelling force. However if I had a glass of vegetable old and placed a drop of ink in there, I would see the ink particles being kept together but I would also see it start to spread out, with each ink particle getting further and further apart. A common process called diffusion, where higher concentrations flow to lower concentrations. Now not for a minute I am claiming the process is diffusion. But sometimes things are not the way they look. However if this medium is warm in temperature , then that could be some evidence pointing towards conflation. We will be looking at forming the universe we see today in part 2. But I will leave part one here. as said above any help ,or criticism I am all ears.

This can include your preferred Hypothesis or theory, Big bang, Big bounce , Inflation , The big bulk... ect. Please write the name of the Hypothesis / theory at the top of the page, With examples of any problems you see with that Hypothesis / theory below. Please respect everyone's views and only comment on the ideas that best fit your own preferences, So two proponents of the Big bang can disagree on a subject as a example. Kind regards, Rick

You can find the pdf above , also I have edited the previous comment as it had structural issues. If you do find the PDF interesting or atleast worth a read by others. Please comment below. Thank you for your interest. Kind regards, Rick

Thank you for your comment, Im not 100% happy with the hypothesis, As the assumptions I have made a just that, But that is a great idea I will probably start another post asking people for current issues with current hypothesis and theories. I think that it does some what address some of the issues. Why the universe is expanding, with this hypothesis it is merely spreading out , also the structure issue of the cosmic web. It so far doesn't break the first law of thermodynamics as energy is recycled. It may also address the cooling issue of the early universe and what iv hypothesized what may be dark matter / dark energy . I would say due to this topic having 80views but only 3 download of the pdf. If you feel it is worth a read please comment below. Kind regards, Rick.

Sorry will resolve the issue.

Hi my names rick, Now before you click off and designate this post to the forum's trash can, Because iv just mentioned some new ideas i have on how the universe may work, I would love for you to read part 1 of my paper on my blog url deleted you can click the PDF button and it will show up in the browser. I am looking to seek validation and scrutiny of the hypothesis as i feel it does address some of the current pitfalls with previous theories. if you would kindly share or even better if your working in any field of physics , where this hypothesis may match up with experiments or Documented / personal observations. I will be happy to post your replies and see if this topic is one we want to take further. Im not going to lie my job is engineering problem solving, I have no qualms with sneaking over to the boffins as one man/ women cant do it all. Kind regards, Rick Conflation.pdf