Bill McC

You cannot even quote me correctly so where do you come off being sarcastic? Perhaps a little less minus some water and oils in the kernels used to pop it. But almost the same weight. The volume and mass of the popped corn would be greater, I am using mass in the sense of its volume, not weight or amount of inertial force it has.

When an object shrinks, Mass/Volume goes down, and the density of the substance the object is made from goes up. Mass/volume increases when a substance expands and the density decreases. It is like popcorn, kernels are dense the popped corn is less dense. You can get 600 hundred kernels into measuring cup, but you need a hefty bag to put the popped corn in.

There used to be a lot of information about Antimony and how it expanded upon cooling right near the melting point. It does some wild color change too. Today on the net, I cannot find much. But regardless if you stated that you knew those other gentlemen and noted some of your finds and matched my reality to some extent or introduced new information, I would be highly impressed. There is no such thing as stealth if you use passive devices that read the ambient background radiation and look for blocks to the ambient radiation. Stealth might work on goat herders but would not work against an equal or superior adversary. Radar works by raising the voltage on the plane's surface, the air in particular in contact with it, turning it into a transmitter. It becomes an air capacitor charged to a point the dielectric breaks down on the surface like lightning is formed on a rain cloud surface and reciprocates with a burst of high voltage. If you have ever listened to the radio during a lightning storm, you know you see the light hear the crackle on the radio, and later hear the thunder. By keeping the plane's surface abundant with particles of electricity constantly, the effect is greatly diminished. Benjamin Franklin created the solution to this by using three fireplace balls to create an open-air transistor. He tied one fireplace ball to a ground rod in the ground, the next fireplace ball to an air capacitor charged with an air capacitor to about 30,000 volts, and the third to a copper wire that sat on his hillside home's roof. He was able to stave off the lightning from reaching the grounded ball with this setup. Until he drained the center ball connected to the copper plate air capacitor suspended from the wooden beams of his basement ceiling by fine silk strands. He could turn the lightning on and off by charging and discharging his gate. By maintaining a certain abundance of particles of electricity around the plane, there is no ARC-like reciprocation from the air touching a plane's surface. Only electricity stops electricity, and only electricity stops radar. Some prototype stealth reconnaissance planes had fine Tungsten wire built into the composite skins. The Russians can hear us coming a long way off with their ultrasonic equipment. Now with drones, they will set up listening stations to give early warnings. So it will come down to jamming and taking out millions of drones. Or a couple of EMP weapons. We used drones against Germany. Most metals follow a linear or curved rate of expansion upon heating. As they expand density measured by volume/mass to weight changes, they become less dense per cubic, whatever increment you want to use to measure the cube. Atoms move apart from one another when heated; the atoms vibrate more slowly between cycles, if only because of the distance between them. If you have hit a cold and then a yellow hot piece of metal with a hammer, you know what I am saying. It sounds like a broken bell; when it is yellow hot, you get a thud. Antimony, in my world, water, Bismuth, and perhaps some other radioactive elements and silicon as well have a point that this reverses; the chart is no longer linear or a curve; it has a jagged area over a certain temperature range. They get denser as they get hotter; they shrink as they get hotter so you can get more into a cubic whatever. The same is true with water; the water at 32 degrees Fahrenheit is less dense than at 40 degrees Fahrenheit water.

I speak in Fahrenheit; Antimony melts at about 1,167 degrees Fahrenheit 630.30 degrees Celcius. The temperature quoted for Antimony's density of 6.68 grams per cubic centimeter is for its room temperature density at 77 degrees Fahrenheit 25 degrees Celsius, which is just slightly over the density at the melting point of 6.53 grams per cubic centimeter when molten. There is over a 1,000-degree Fahrenheit difference there, over a 600 degree Celsius difference there, not to mention the enlargement, increase in mass, and drop in density upon changing states from a solid to a liquid. So if there is an embarrassment, it is not mine. My point is that from your understanding given by you and your understanding of the "scientific data" presented; Antimony does not expand from room temperature density till it sits, still solid at 1,166 degrees Fahrenheit, 630 degrees Celsius. Instead of battling me, why not try being civil? The intelligent individual will question, alter his point of view, and bring understanding to a conversation, not cheap shots.

So you can explain why 1000 degrees does not cause Antimony to expand from it room temperature density?

Water is the only substance we know of that in its liquid state expands when it approaches its freezing point. There is evidence that silicon is a liquid in what we currently call it's solid-state, but there is too much conflicting information for me to pick a side and call it the accurate side. Highly educated sorts have stated that silicon is a solid, not a liquid, and stories of old glass moving due to gravity, pressure, and time were just poor castings. So I am not going to take a stand one way or the other at this time. Antimony used to expand upon freezing; perhaps it had some contaminants like bismuth in it? But it did expand upon freezing; they add it to silver bearing low-temperature solders for that reason, or so they claimed. Also, where you mine your Antimony and the contaminates in it may also play a role. I am curious where you get your information about Antimony's density and the range of temperatures for which you are referring. As Antimony starts to solidify, it expands, so if you are talking about a one-degree differential, you might be incorrect. If you are talking about a 1000 degree differential, you may be right. Antimony differs from water in that way. Antimony expands while it is solidifying in a semi-solid state and shrinks while it is melting. So it happens over a narrow range of temperature. You must have this information to make such a statement. You could claim that water at 100 degrees is almost the same density as water at 33 degrees Fahrenheit and hide the importance of the water's ability to float on itself when it is colder than 38-40 degrees Fahrenheit. Consider that at room temperature, Antimony is almost 1,000 degrees cooler than at its melting point. I think that 1,000 degrees from the density you listed for room temperature solid Antimony would cause it to expand some as it approached its melting point wouldn’t you? Technical information often leaves out the subtle differences of time and range. Even though the temperature range may be right, there is a time that it takes for the substance to equalize and change state. Antimony changes density upon solidifying, so as it cools, it expands as a solid or semi-solid. You would have to know what temperature ranges to which you are referring.

Antimony expands, increases its mass upon becoming a solid. Not sure why you would attack that. It is just like ice. Ice can bend metal if it is in a metal container upon the water becoming a solid. I see now they have a list of other metals and substances that also do this. Years ago, I could only find water and antimony. I will check out Bismuth. It is used for bearings in air compressors as a bronze bi-metal. Thanks.

If it is a magnetic field, three walls of steel with spaces in between will stop it or a junkyard magnet. Sounds and strange effects transmit in a magnetic field in an almost eerie way. If the field is around part or all of you, a small static discharge can affect nerves and muscles in your body involuntarily. The three walls of steel should be earth grounded to ensure they are not used as a transmitter. If you think it is sound, you want what they call rub in the trade or small cell foam Trade-make Armor Flex, sheet. It absorbs sound in a comical way when you are in its vicinity. It reminds me of the cone of silence on the old Get Smart series. It is light and used in critical HVAC systems that cannot transmit sound through the ductwork. You have to stand near a piece and talk to believe it; it is funny. It is also a fantastic insulator. It is small closed-cell sulfur cured carbon rubber foam.

Water and Antimony being the only two substances on earth that expand upon cooling, make them fascinating substances with very interesting roles both in nature and in man's industrial endeavors. If you have ever gone deep in tropical waters, you know that the warm blanket of water above keeps that water below cool. It floats up there like oil on water. If you go to the arctic, break through the ice, and go deep, you find 38 to 40 degree Fahrenheit water just under the ice, which may be -50 degrees on its surface. Ice is an excellent insulator. If water were not most dense in the 38 to 40-degree range, during the winter in the arctic, the night sky would absorb just about any amount of heat the earth had, the warmest water would continue to rise and cool until the whole mass of the ocean water to the ocean floor froze solid. That ice would not melt again and would cause an ice cap down to NY. When winter sets in, in the arctic, the arctic air absorbs heat from the ocean, causing the cold water to create a blanket of cold water over the 38-40 degree water, the colder water rides on top of the 38 to 40 degree water, like oil on water, until it freezes solid at the surface further protecting the warm water below. The scientist that made this observation over two hundred years ago called it God's thermostat. He was an excellent chemist and did not realize this or its importance until later in life; he was humbled by the universe's subtleties that create rather powerful, far-reaching effects. Many of those old chemists made fluorine and purified it in lead retorts; it is amazing any of them lived to tell about it. I would bet that if an American university tried it, they would lose most of their students and professors in the science department. If you take wax and melt it, as you add more solid wax to the liquid wax, it sinks to the bottom. The same is true of all metals except Antimony. When you add solid Antimony to a molten pot of Antimony it floats. Just like solid water/ice floats on molten water. When you add other solid metals to a crucible in their pure molten states, the solid form sinks in the liquid. They use Antimony for this property in typeset as it cools in the typeset mold. It expands unlike other metals and presses against the mold to form a perfect character. It is also a common additive in lead, silver, and tin solders to help create a better bond between substances soldered with it. We need to refrain from allowing contamination into the waters that could take this property away from water. Substances like vinegar cause water to loose that property as well as anti-freeze and others.

The F-111 was also a United States Air Force nuclear bomber. If you read my post, I stated that a prototype F-14 built here at Bethpage Grumman had trial GE magnetically levitated tubular impellers that drove quarter-circle impeller blades at very high RPMs to create moderately high pressure. It never became a production aircraft, like the F-14A through the F-14D with the massive camera guided rockets in the seventies. The motor that drove the impeller of the electric GE engine was hollow so that you could look right through the engine and plane. They did it for two reasons: a flock of birds, or softball sized hail could not take it down, and rounds would travel right through the engine, not harming it. There were thrust-bearing magnetic windings and levitating windings on the ends of the hollow tubular motor that were larger in diameter to make it appear the motor and tubular impeller around it were one piece from the outside looking in, for aerodynamics. There were helical drive windings along its length. The impeller was just a tube with the quarter circle impeller blades that created a very efficient pumping action. The inside diameter of the motor was about 30". There was an adjustable venturi at the outlet that, when open, you could blow dry your hair behind the plane with the impeller running all out. As you adjusted the venturi, the pressure and velocity rose, and you could no longer blow dry your hair because you would be blown away. It sounded like a bottle rocket at that point. It is similar to a paint spray gun powered by high-pressure air when you open the paint valve by retracting the tapered pin that keeps the paint from coming out. Even though the air that will propel it is already running, you can feel the weight of the spray gun and paint cup lesson as the paint starts to flow. That was the rather simple principle of the engine. The venturi only adjusted the outlet of the impeller pressure; it did not alter the large 30" diameter hole through the engine and plane. So when the pressure started getting very high, the velocity became extremely high around the central hole in the motor, which had about 1,000 square inches of area. As the high-velocity air is passed around that hole in the motor, it causes a partial vacuum to occur that pulls air through the motor where it mixes with the high-pressure air giving you a moderate pressure high-velocity propulsion. A 400-hertz fuel-powered generator drove an inverter that drove the motor. I knew Roy Grumman personally since I was two, and I was very good friends with a Marine that worked for Roy; he was an engineer that worked on high tech prototype projects for Roy. He was Roy's caddy when he was a kid. I tried to purchase the two engines, they tried to set up an auction so I could, but it was still classified, so unless I wanted to pay $25,000 a piece, they couldn't push it through, I was still young at the time and in the seventies that was a lot of money. No one wanted to get caught letting them slip out the back door as I planned to put one on a boat that probably would have become rather popular. There were a couple of plane magazines that mentioned the motors years ago. But as they did with Rigel ramjet rockets of the early fifties, they played down the rocket's success; they also played down the success of the F-14 with the GE electric levitating bearing motor. For years they denied the Rigel Ramjet Rocket. I welded up a railing for this museum, when I saw some of the projects, I was surprised they had the courage to display them with the facts. Most people didn't know we had a submarine-launched nuclear weapons platform in the fifties. https://www.cradleofaviation.org/history/exhibits/exhibit-galleries/exploring_space/grumman_xssm-n-6_rigel.html The attachment is my garage.

Standard bicycle ball bearings offer very little resistance. Magnetic bearings create a small amount of resistance to movement. The idea of magnetically levitated bearings has been done before in military aircraft for the propulsion system in the late sixties on a prototype F-14. They also rotationally powered the levitated impeller in the pump with a 400-hertz inverter. When in trials against other planes, the pilots turned off the fuel-powered generator and ran on batteries, and the other planes had no firing solution without a heat signature. Having a plane in the air, they had no firing solution for infuriated some, and the plane was shelved. Today this would not be a factor because other methods are used to lock up targets as well as a heat signature. Large refrigeration compressors working in the field use magnetic bearings, so that oil added to the refrigerant to lubricate the bearings is not necessary. No oil in the refrigerant makes reclamation of refrigerant much easier. Refrigerants can remain in oil even after a reclamation unit has removed the freon from the decommissioned system. Part of the reason magnetic bearing systems are so much more efficient is not just the bearing but the design used for pumping. https://www.energy.gov/eere/femp/magnetic-bearing-chiller-compressors The number one problem today with refrigeration contamination comes from technicians using the same gauges on other systems with different oil types. Today in the common home HVAC systems, larger building HVAC systems, and refrigeration systems, the oil used in a new system is Polyester oil. However, many systems still use Alkyl-benzene oil or mineral oil for older R-22 systems. Even a small amount of contamination from one system to the other can cause the oil to gum up and affect metering devices in the system. The piston-type metering valve on smaller commercial refrigeration is often affected. It is often a combination of mixed oils, water, and suspended solid contaminants in the glue like oil that cause failure. These metering systems act as a venturi to limit flow and create the pressure differentials that cause movement of heat within the system. There are capillary, piston, and TXV valves that create the regulation of flow. The metering device is where contaminated oil will cause trouble. High-pressure line filter dryers and low-pressure line dryers help with very small amounts of contamination and become clogged with larger amounts of contamination. If you are taking your Unlimited Refrigeration License test this is the stuff that is on it.

The same approximations will work approximately for the older model if you find they work well enough now. I see deviations in orbit velocity ratios of low and high orbit satellites. If you really wanted to get accurate math I believe we would need to look into considering the media the gravity is passing through before it gets to the planet. As an electrical effect that should effect it. So that a planet with a dense deep atmosphere would probably cause greater gravity than a planet with a shallow atmosphere. When I see the large sun in the morning a tiny sun in the afternoon I witness the refraction caused by the ramping density atmosphere.

The curriculum was mandated in that year 1973. Before that, teachers could teach what they learned and what they had done in life. My teachers, some of whom were Universal Scientists, like Benjamin Franklin and other German and foreign scientists, were scientists that adhered to the scientific method as I outlined. Even though the Universal Scientists won the debate over the neutron fair and square, the government still backed and funded the “neutron scientists,” as I call them, after the war. The neutron scientist quickly moved to hide much of the work of Universal Science. They used Enrico Fermi, a poor Universal Scientist who still wanted to bridge the gap between the two bodies of scientists, to kill Universal Science. His hypocrisy and flawed science gave Universal Science a bad name publically. Most Universal Scientists went around lecturing after that, and if you were lucky enough to catch a lecture, there was no doubt who the scientists were and who were con artists selling garbage. Once the government got involved, it was like selling drugs. The government rewarded teachers for pushing garbage on kids instead of creating a quality, demonstrable curriculum for kids. Even the American economic system could not be taught after 1973 in any school receiving federal funding or tax breaks even though it played a major part in our breaking away from England. We used to be taught how the Founding Fathers when sure war was imminent, all agreed that they needed to understand all the systems needed to run a country. When it came to tying money to gold, they did not know how England did it; they just accepted the fact it needed to be done and assumed they needed to do it too. They had just fought a war against the French and the Indians with no food, clothes, weapons, or shoes because England said they did not have enough gold to back money to give them. The tax at the time was a 50 percent stamp tax on money spent on goods. So the founding fathers sat down to demonstrate the existing system of money. Benjamin Franklin printed the first money, and George Washington brought gold from his rich wife. They made the exchange Ben acting as the government they began the demonstration. George Washington bought 100 dollars worth of farm equipment from Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin put out his hand and asked for fifty dollars tax. He looked down at the gold and the fifty dollars and declared, “we are rich” he instantly saw the sick game. He had already debunked slavery as nothing but a poison pill for the colonies. If you do not condone slavery, you cannot be made a slave, was his conclusion. That is why they condemned slavery at the start of the revolution. They realized that England had been keeping them poor, and some of the strange events reported were all true. Like the English buying up all the bacon in the colonies to a point colonists were going hungry, and dumping it at sea before reaching England to keep the price of bacon high in England and the craftsmen poor. As the founding fathers were now sure, they could lower the tax. They demonstrated their system, but with just a penny tax on the dollar spent, and to their amazement, a penny tax collected every dollar in circulation and returned it to the government. Immediately, many of the treasonous souls planing the revolution wanted to hang the lords and governors outside their homes. George Washington and Benjamin Franklin had a better idea; they wanted to build homes in Virginia and greet the British regulars on the beach with overwhelming numbers and offer them a home to live in or a sudden death. Unfortunately, when England canceled all taxes, one loyalist tea company decided they were going to collect a three pence on the pound tax because they wanted to, not because they had to. This infuriated the colonists, and the Boston Tea Party became a reason for British troops to arrive in numbers, immediately messing up the amazing plan they were working quickly to accomplish. The three pence on the pound tax would be equivalent to 1.27 cents tax on the dollar. The rest is history. Even if you are in an armchair in the clouds with no foundation, you can see how money is just a tool to trade goods. A penny tax alone would collect all the money in circulation and return it to the government, making tying it to gold scientifically impossible. George Washington left standing orders to take up arms against the government if they ever levied more than a penny tax on the dollar federal income tax. The government can print any amount of money for the infrastructure or people in need, which costs no one anything—inflation as taught in school slams Germany for printing money and building great cities quickly. The education system claims that is why bread in Germany rose to 200 marks a loaf. Yet scientifically, if you examine that claim, any currency in Germany, any commodity traded for bread would be equally devalued as there was no bread. Before you can be objective about science, you need to face the pressure on science created by your government.

That would be correct. If you watched the Apollo missions on TV, you might remember many times ground control was being filmed live by the networks perhaps not known to them. They would communicate and instantly get a reply from the moon, especially when something unexpected happened. That is why so many people thought it was a hoax. But if you establish a radio beam, you can instantly communicate over any distance. But you have to establish a beam first that will take a second and a half to the moon. It could be why they lost most of the tapes of the Apollo missions. My intent was to relay to people claiming to have science that the known flaws of science have skewed them and their "science." They must also have missed the government announcing that they would rape science of its dignity so countries that already had the bomb would not learn it from us. Some of the math and experiments of modern science are beautiful but done on a skewed foundation making it silly, a lesson not to repeat.

If I went to a sci-fi convention and they were all taking Klingon, and all were in agreement, and I tell them the building is on fire, you need to get out, and they told me it is ok they are going to time dilate their way out. First, I would have to explain that time is a human conception of movement, nothing else. With rays, we can change the rate atoms vibrate, so even atomic clocks can be made to error significantly. By triangulating rays upon an atomic clock, we could detonate it. A study in the '50s done by a university showed that slowly, over time, by speeding up a person's surroundings, he could function many times as fast as what was normal to him, and he would not even know it happened. Time has no force; it is an observation and comparison of movements of a collection of objects. When a satellite does not stay in exact orbit, they tweak the output of the atomic clock to match the earth's rotations anyway. The universe is a giant perpetual motion clock. I am sharing the history I grew up with because I was part of the Grumman family that built a ship that put individuals on the moon. Something that modern science is struggling heavily with over 50 years later. Science is burning down, and I can highlight the reasons. They came out and told everyone they were going to hide science. Many want to play and act like everything is ok till the end. With real science, we could fix it.

A miscommunication I am new to the quote format. I worked in the all-Chinese Manahatten schools and other schools when it broke out. So many employees in the schools were sick. I also got the first SAR about ten years ago, which put me down hard; My projectile vomiting made the movie the Exorcist seem silly. I got it a second time when I did a big job outside in the cold a week after feeling a little better. Closest I came to death. With this one, I couldn't get warm, not at any temperature. I switched to aspirin and tonic water which helped me during the first SAR; I instantly came around. The aspirin helps with the clotting and the tonic helps with inflammation. My brother, who had it too, told me to sit outside in the sun on that warm day in March 2020 that helped a lot. I thought there would be more discussion of science, rather than insults. I hope everyone with it gets better.

A man's mind cannot duplicate the distance across the universe; even if given some exact number of miles, whose digits would fill all the servers on earth, he would just be dealing with some vast but unknowable distance. A single human cannot deal with that amount of distance with any sanity. A stranded individual upon the ocean will explain how he suddenly knew very little about where he was, despite being highly confident seconds before. He will explain how large the ocean suddenly became. Nevertheless, the distance across the ocean, compared to the distance across the universe, would be laughable because no sane or known comparison is humanly possible. So a man can discuss, he can postulate, he can extrapolate through tools and equipment, he can scale down the universe, but he can never know that distance. However, upon finding that particles are moving through dark space at a velocity that is not affected by any distance we know, one can then assume they cross the universe in the blink of an eye. During the Apollo missions, an astronaut somewhat facetiously put his glove in front of the laser they were using to time laser light from the moon to earth. Ground control immediately mentioned they recorded a partial block of the laser beam, and the recorded time on synchronized timing instruments was the same. The particles that create a beam of light are moving at an exponentially higher velocity than the beam, very much like electricity flowing through a tungsten element or a plasma ARC. The electricity has been flowing long before the created light. That is how a beam of light works. The atoms of gas in the beam must be excited before the creation of the light beam. Once created, instant communication over the beam is possible. It would be similar to slightly lowering the voltage to a lit tungsten element in a bulb; the effect would be instantaneous to the human eye.

Here is a link about thoriated tungsten that is rather old but will demonstrate where things were 50 years ago. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5760281 Thorium is a naturally occurring substance, and it is all around us. We would use thoriated mantles in kerosene lanterns to spearfish at night when we were kids. It creates sunlight-like effects on the sea bottom. If thorium becomes airborne during the welding process, it breaks down relatively quickly to radon, and radon lasts about three days. With studies done using pure tungsten, pure tungsten produced hazardous substances with very long half-lives. Worse than those created with thoriated tungsten. Thoriated tungsten melts at a higher temperature than pure tungsten. Thoria, the substance in thoriated tungsten rods, has a melting point similar to tungsten. When combined, it raises the temperature at which tungsten melts, which is one of the purposes of adding it.. The end of the tungsten rod in the experiment melted during the heating of it. The same result will occur by substituting a pure tungsten rod; it will melt more quickly than a thoriated tungsten rod.

I have a limited amount of time; I didn’t overlook your points; I was doing many things. Proximity and the angle of the radiation bombarding the object are why a small object creating a lot of gravity does not affect distant objects with the same force. When you are standing on the planet, just about all ambient radiation hitting you from above will also pass through the planet that will slow it, and cause it to impart gravity force upon you. As you move away from the planet, some of the rays striking you from above are not going to strike the planet, so they will not slow, and they will not impart a repulsive force upon you towards the planet. Subsequently, causing less repulsive force/gravity, the original definition of gravity. Not the new and incorrect light-bending definition of gravity. Once you realize what gravity is, you know it will not and cannot bend light. Light passing nearby to planets bends from the ramping density gases around the planet, not the gravity. The hydrogen gas that fills space is at extremely low pressure. Near planets, there is a ramping density of gas that creates a spherical lens that will cause refraction of light passing through it. There is even ramping density gas around a galaxy because it is a structure that slows ambient radiation heading to it. So a tiny object creating a lot of gravity will only affect objects very close to it. As bomb cores get larger, they can create a rather large amount of gravity towards the bomb before the bomb detonates and creates the pressure wave. About “government” I was speaking of my American government but we know that other governments follow what America does with education for the most part. If we re-released Universal Science other countries would have to follow and the world would be a better place. People tend to suffer from strong reproductive impulses when they are under duress, stress, overworked have no future, it is a natural body survival instinct. That is why countries that suffer under socialism or communism usually have massive over population problems.

I am of the school that standard means a correct way of doing something that most or all will follow by an agreed-upon successful demonstration of it being correct, sustainable, and good for the whole. Sabotage better describes what colleges did to electricity. As I had mentioned, they threw out Du Fay's two-particle theory of electricity 300 years ago, and for a good reason, it held electricity in the dark ages. Electricity works exactly like pneumatic, hydronic, or hydraulic pressure; no difference, which is how Benjamin Franklin described and demonstrated it. And colleges for money brought back Du Fay like Frankenstein. What we have done to the terminology of the electrical industry is similar to changing the terminology in the elevator business to Raise it down and Lower it up instead of raise and lower it. As far as having to follow the Universal Scientific methods order, you must. But I believe most are not aware of what it takes to do an experiment for presentation as fact. As I had mentioned, you may have been doing experiments and found something amazing. But at that point, it is just an amazing thing that is unexplained. If you feel you know what it is and have a hypothesis of what causes it, you are at step two. You must, at this point, demonstrate your hypothesis with words, hand or body gestures, or objects. If you cannot easily go through the demonstration of what will happen or has happened in the experiment you have done, you do not have a hypothesis, and you do not even know what you did during your experiment or will do during your experiment; you have nothing. The Universal Scientists scientific method was a test to ensure accuracy; it was truly an amazing set of rules to do so if you were interested in truth, something that has fallen out of favor in what I call the dark ages. I understand they couldn't get past cohesion with the original Scientific Method. But that is no reason to keep it from young people; they need it more than you know. As far as why the earth is "attracted" to the sun, it is the same as all apparent attraction forces, a force of repulsion. Rays are moving through all matter from all directions in the universe. They are just particles of electricity traveling at a velocity not conceivable by a man's mind. When slowed, they create gravity, x-rays, UV, light, heat, and any other effects in our universe. They stabilize matter; matter is particles of electricity stuck in spherical shapes hydrogen protons. Higher elements are just numerical increments of hydrogen protons trapped by ambient radiation in a new structure. Matter is a filter for ambient radiation. Matter cannot exist without the bombardment of ambient radiation, and radiation cannot travel without matter to travel through. If a perfect vacuum was created, the surrounding matter would be repulsed into the void at speeds far faster than light. Matter and particles of electricity have no actual mass, which explains my previous statement; it is all an electrical effect, an illusion of sorts. We see particles carrying information about a surface they have left. But we do not see the object. Particles of electricity are trapped in spherical shapes by the ratio of surface area to volume of a sphere. If you take the area of a sphere Pi times diameter squared and the volume of a sphere Pi times diameter cubed divided by six and look at the ratio created between them for a small sphere and a large sphere, you will see that the surface area of a small sphere compared to its volume is enormous compared to a large sphere's surface area to volume ratio. This ratio limits the size of living cells; the cell membrane of a large cell, like some cancer cells, cannot absorb enough food and expel enough waste when forced to metabolize faster or become contaminated with poison. Well, this same ratio is how particles of electricity become trapped in spherical containers we call matter. There is such a huge surface area compared to the volume inside a hydrogen proton that it is all surface; the bombardment of ambient radiation becomes all-encompassing and traps the particles in those spheres. The matter without bombardment would dissipate into particles of electricity. The matter has no stored energy. It acts only as a sail in the wind of ambient radiation. A bomb is just ambient radiation dispersing an area too high in voltage for ambient radiation to pass through. A bomb causes a bottleneck to ambient radiation and is removed/dispersed, or it would consume the universe. A planet and a sun both slow incoming ambient radiation to a tune similar to the rate we calculate or approximate gravity now. Like in an electrical circuit, if you create resistance, the whole circuit is instantly slowed, you get a voltage drop, you get work done, heat is produced. Well, that is what happens when ambient radiation nears a planet; it is slowed and starts delivering power. Repulsive power that pins you to the surface with a form of electrical repulsion. I have been warning people in the chemical industry for years about the ratio of surface area to volume of a small and large sphere. The imaginary spherical shape in a cubical tank often creates a barrier that heat in a chemical reaction cannot pass through. So, although the walls of the cubical tank are big enough to absorb the heat, the imaginary spherical shape will not allow the heat to get to the walls. I have been to the site of a few runway chemical reactions; I can assure you they were not aware of this until after the accident. And these were highly educated individuals. Excuse some of my gramatical errors; I really cannot read this repeatedly to find them all.

As of 1973, my teachers had to stop teaching the cathode ray tubes we had learned about and had to introduce the new cathode ray tube with reveres markings on it. He explained that he would be teaching the wrong cathode ray tube and the wrong markings for electrical pressure from now on. He cried that day after tossing it down. At the time, I didn't care much about him because he was sacrificing education for a paycheck. Looking back, it took guts to say that to a class about his love in life. They had reversed battery markings during the war years. At one time, colleges bragged about their decision to do so. Claiming Benjamin Franklin couldn't have known which way electricity was flowing, which is a little comical because he invented the experiment to prove it. He invented the pointed and flat electrode experiment and burned his face, arms, and body badly with UV rays doing it. I will include a link to a video you should check out; it shows how Benjamin Franklin's test demonstrated the direction of electricity. And it also highlights how particles of electricity are anything but negative. They repel other particles of electricity and matter; matter was taught in American schools as being made of particles of electricity up until 1973. Particles of electricity have absolutely no negative traits. When something is negative, either air pressure or fluid pressure, it always flows from a positive pressure to negative pressure. For whatever reason, the government gave colleges grant monies to change that. Today, electricity flows from the terminal marked "-" mistermed negative on a modern car battery to the "+" terminal of a modern car battery mistermed positive. Many manufacturers would not incorrectly put those new symbols on their equipment during the war years and long after. Welding companies in particular refused. Instead, they called the terminal creating positive pressure "Straight Polarity, DC current," which means that the current flows from the electrode straight to the workpiece. If you wanted to ARC (Anode, Rectified, Cathode) weld, you would switch the machine to "Reverse Polarity, DC current. " In the latter state, Reverse polarity, the current flows to the electrode from the workpiece and then creates a liquid diode very much like a mercury rectifier or lightning clouds surface. The molten surface of the electrode reciprocates with a cathode ray against the flow of the power supply that created it and beams back to the workpiece. The problem is that when people that know this by actually using it for decades are told by people fresh out of college/counterintelligence centers something unreal, they often lose their cool. They may let that person ruin tens of thousands of dollars worth of stuff rather than say something; I tend to chuckle and explain some of the histories behind it, if they act crazy, I go to the boss, and at that point, I can watch something be ruined without worry as I have done all I can do. In this video, the first demonstration shows particles of electricity leaving the tungsten electrode charged "-" as on a modern car battery and beaming directly to the workpiece, taking the shortest distance possible between the two objects. Next, I show what happens when I send AC current to the workpiece. Finally, I send a reverse polarity current from the workpiece to the electrode, and you can see what Benjamin Franklin saw as he hit the pointed electrode but with lightning voltage from a storm cloud and burned his face. In this case, the torch is charged "+" as on a modern car battery. This polarity creates a high voltage ARC a cathode ray that is steerable with heat, electrical current, or magnetism because it is not an A to B communication of electricity. It is an A to B to any place of lesser voltage which is often back to its source of creation, like lightning. I have to go and weld a race car part for a friend so I will not be back till late tonight. I hope this finds you healthy wealthy and wise.

Warning: do not try this at home. I used a thoriated tungsten rod which creates a rather large amount of ionizing radioactive gas in seconds. Thorium was used because Thoriums half-life is so much shorter than, Uranium or other trace elements used for melting metals in an electric ARC. Pure Tungsten Rod, although rather pure, can contain other trace radioactive elements with much longer half-lives and can manufacture them in the 35,000 degree-ARC they are used to create in the noble gas that shields them. I used an exact mix of oxygen and acetylene that is capable of heating parts to 5,000 degrees. The flame itself burns at 6,332 degrees Fahrenheit, which I may have heated the Tungsten to nearly that temperature. Because it was so small in diameter 1/16", the tip of the tungsten rod was completely engulfed in the flame at the flame's hottest point. The flame is rated for 5,000 degrees when heating larger parts. But as you say, how did I measure the temperature? I relied on the rating of experts who know by testing the flame with known materials and their known melting points that have set known standards. As far as measuring the gravity created by the tungsten rod, it "apparently" pulled nonmagnetic substances to it. I have built electromagnets that lift silver, gold, and aluminum, from rare plans I bought on E-bay comically enough. Those magnets create a limited, precise central spot of less repulsion and a surrounding area of repulsion. The object, when in the right place, is repulsed into the area of less repulsion. And "apparently" attracted to the magnet, I can demonstrate no force of attraction to make that conclusion, though. So my answer would be that the Tungsten was causing rays inbound to it to slow and push all objects in close proximately to it. I did this many, many years ago. I have to do something today so I will not respond till this evening in my timezone.

The scientific method was not a tool to make you demonstrate your hypothesis for experimenting with moving your telescope to a secluded wooded area where there are fewer lights. The scientific method is only a test to ensure that you submit your find as truth to the best of your knowledge. It provides that you ran your hypothesis through a demonstration to make sure it is a provable hypothesis with or without evidence. But you must demonstrate your hypothesis, or else your evidence and or experiment is just random information without explanation. You need to demonstrate your hypothesis to understand how it is tied to the experiment done or experiment you plan to do. If you cannot demonstrate your hypothesis, you are out of order by lending importance to an experiment already done or an experiment to be done before demonstrating a workable hypothesis. The scientific method does not care if you did an experiment and now form a hypothesis. It looks at that scenario as "Now you have a hypothesis that you wish to prove, first demonstrate the hypothesis to your peers" if they fall over laughing, and you are sure you are correct, you may have to do what Benjamin Franklin did. But if they show you where you are mistaken, you can laugh at yourself and move on. The demonstration of your hypothesis can also highlight your ignorance of reality and save your life, planet, and your effort. That is why the government paid any sum to remove the line "demonstrate your hypothesis to your peers" from the scientific method. In 1973 by law, no school receiving Federal Tax Breaks or grant money could teach the scientific method that demanded you demonstrate your hypothesis. I am very friendly about this subject because I realize most have gone through their lives, having never heard this "demonstrate the hypothesis theory," which was at one time the standard Universal Scientists method of testing a hypothesis. Universal scientists had the universe at a basic level figured to one unknown variable, which was "why particles repel one another." There was no doubt they do, but because you can never see one particle as it requires billions of particles to create an image in your eye or test equipment, it is listed as an unknown variable. I have seen countless industrial accidents, and I am sure demonstrating a hypothesis for changing procedures in a plant would save many industrial plants and individuals. You mentioned the sun and implied the earth is drawn to the sun by never demonstrated forces of attraction. Kind of like vampires could draw their victims to them against their will "come to me." I have stood next to non-metal-cased explosives. I was looking at the explosive and facing it. Right before the blast, there was a push from behind me towards the bomb. This occurred as the core of the bomb raises in voltage and then pushes me towards the bomb. We have done this many times, and each time, multiple people not knowing when the bomb would go off could tell the moment the ignition system was successful. It takes about a second before the blast occurs. It is highly alarming to feel the pressure pushing you to an explosive device when you know the explosion is imminent. I have also heated a very small piece of tungsten to over 5,000 degrees and found that it created artificial gravity as well. Universal Science explains it as a traffic jam of incoming particles slowed by the repulsive voltage of the bomb core. As the particles are slowed, they impart electrical repulsion to objects in their path towards the bomb. Space offers a place for ambient radiation to travel through that is near 99 percent space. Tungsten and other dense elements are 90 percent space. When these ambient radiation particles that cross the universe in the blink of an eye meet a planet, it creates a bottleneck, a traffic jam of particles. As they slow, they have more time to impart an electrical effect on objects in their path, at least according to Universal Scientists. I can demonstrate this phenomenon as well. As most are aware, the best insulators on earth transmit voltage faster than conductors. They can only stop electricity after the insulator develops a ramping charge through its mass because only electricity can stop electricity. The insulator must charge as a capacitor does in order to stave off the flow of electricity. The common single contact style home light switch is just an air capacitor that charges and discharges 120 times a second to hold off a 60 hertz AC current. Air does not stop the flow of electricity; it just limits it to the pico farads that the air capacitor needs to charge in order to stop the flow of electricity. But that principle applied to gravity and how a planet slows down the ambient radiation to impart a repulsive force on objects near the planet is connected. If you have ever fired a BB through identical aluminum cans, one with a high power BB gun and one with a lower power BB gun, you can note that the higher power BB gun passes through the can, both walls, without moving it. The lower velocity round creates two holes, one in one out but knocks the can off whatever it is on. That is a good analogy of how ambient radiation is harnessed.

If you read that article, I posted you will also see that they are doing away with Daltonian theory. The government-owned scientists are replacing it with Du Fay's theory of electricity. That theory is almost three hundred years old. It was proven wrong and discarded by the Royal Society after Benjamin Franklin flew a kite in an electrical storm at their dare to do so and he had working lightning rods installed up and down the east coast of the American colonies. The Royal Society awarded Benjamin Franklin the Copley award their highest honor. The Du Fay theory had young boys going to church bell towers to ward off lightning by ringing the Church bell. So if you do your due diligence, which is no easy or fun task, you might see things may not be as they appear.