SkepticalSpectacle

It's not a narrow-minded view. Biological males and biological females have starkly different hormones, brain structures, and other things that make them behave significantly different from each other inevitably on average. Biological males have bigger brain volume than biological females do on average, which is why biological males have higher I.Q.s than biological females on average. Biological females have menstrual cycles, higher chance of health disorders, and menopause that all trigger mood swings, physical pain, lack of energy, psychological instability, and other things that make them inferior when completing tasks as employees in the business world compared to average biological males who don't have to deal menstrual cycles, menopause, and stereotypical health disorders biological females deal with. Also, biological males continue to make more money and work more than average biological females. There are more biological females who get sick that cause them to call their employers to let those employers know they won't come into work the following morning than there are biological males who do that. Which is why biological males stastically have more days at work than biological females do on average. There is a difference between misogyny and objective data. Motherhood has successfully caused some biological females to put their careers on hold or end them. Which is why potential female lawyers end up choosing different careers to accommodate their parenting schedule. Sometimes females are paid less from choosing different careers because of them trying to balance a work life and life of being mothers. These females do these things due to hardwired biology that causes an inevitable pattern of behaviour unless transhumanism can reverse that inevitable pattern of behaviour in the future. Only a smaller amount of females have done engineering, architecture, inventing new technologies, philosophical thinking, very heavy lifting of weights, and so forth because they are neither neurotypical nor physically normal because they do not have normal brain activity nor normal physical strength that average biological females do. They are not that common genetically. Yes, through evolution theoretically. There are statistics and employee records that can prove my point. Men have always done jobs that are more dangerous and require more thinking intellectually than women have done in the past. It's always been like that regardless of feminism, egalitarianism, etc. Women have always depended on men more than men depending on women economically due to hardwired biology despite what so-called independent feminists say. Biological males are more likely to be dangerous sociopaths, psychopaths, sexual predators, rapists, antisocial, con artists, violent killers, criminals, geniuses, and so forth than average biological females are. Which is why biological males are more dangerous in the business world than biological females are on average. Not that I'm saying all biological females are perfect saints that will save the world from greed and corruption. Because I know there are biological females who have done horrifying things to gain money, power, popularity, and other sorts of things. But hardwired biology has made biological males more likely to be violent, antisocial, sociopathic, psychopathic, etc. anyway. I've studied and researched criminology, polemology, geopolitics, biology, and psychology enough to know that men are more powerful and dangerous than women are on average despite what the feminists and egalitarians say. Men are the ones who have done the most damage on Earth through war, crime, abusive violence against women, rape, political tyranny, dividing and conquering people through countries instead of uniting them to make a more peaceful world, religious terrorism, tyrannical sexism, greed, causing criminals to exist from the for-profit prison industry, and polluting the Earth's environment from pollutants caused by toxic industrialisation to benefit amoral capitalism that was caused by mostly men due to dangerous hardwired biology that makes men inevitably more powerful and dangerous than women on average. I'm not saying that biological females shouldn't be engineers, politicians, intellectuals, and other types of people, though. I'm just saying that they are less likely to do specific things because of things they can't control until transhumanism can reverse that lack of control.

I would say that personality traits are different in genders due to culture, hardwired biology, and personal interests. Hardwired biology makes biological males physically, intellectually, and psychologically stronger than biological females on average. Which is why there are male-dominated jobs that require heavy lifting, inventing new technologies, and being able to complete tasks without getting distracted with psychological instability, such as being a marine tasked to kill people during war. Politics, technological innovation, and hardcore sports are male-dominated. Most countries are ruled by men. Most technologies get invented by men. And most biological males would have an unfair advantage in women's sports if they all identified as women and participated in women's sports. Because biological females are more likely to have injuries, infertility, and hormonal imbalance that can damage their bodies if they overwork their bodies with hardcore exercise for sports compared to biological males who usually have less fragile bodies than average biological females. Biological males are designed to be the dominant sex from the human race in the animal kingdom. It can't be avoided considering average biological females are sexually attracted to people who are taller than them. Also, average biological females depend on biological males when it comes to engineering, lifting heavy weights, reaching things that require a tall person to get, and topics that require a high I.Q. to understand them successfully when there are more male geniuses than there are female geniuses due to hardwired biology that makes biological males the dominant sex physically, intellectually, and psychologically. Socrates, Plato, Nikola Tesla, Albert Einstein, Ludwig van Beethoven, Leonardo da Vinci, William Shakespeare, Elon Musk, George Carlin, Daniel Tosh, and the creators of South Park all have one thing in common. They are biological males. Another thing they have in common is that they have abnormally high intelligence that is harder to obtain for biological females due to hardwired biology, not culture. Because it's harder to make an offspring of daughters with high I.Q.s than it is to make an offspring of sons with high I.Q.s due to hardwired biology. Transhumanism could get rid of hardwired biology and help improve biological females physically, psychologically, and intellectually. Personal interests can make it harder to determine personality traits from different genders. A person from one gender can be interested in music hypothetically. Meanwhile, another person from another gender doesn't like music and likes writing instead hypothetically.

From my experience, I believe a scientist can have religious beliefs. Because I know there are scientific researchers historically who invented technology and medicine to build their civilisations that believed in their religions. Even though I'm an atheist, I had science teachers in my school who were religious and able to conduct scientific experimentations successfully. They were hired based on their ability to work with children and make scientific decisions for guiding those children's minds into the world of science. I cannot deny those science teachers' intelligence.