Jukka Petteri Savorinen

Yeah, suddenly this should be a 3 D animation. Perhaps the matter will become clearer if these small-scale densities are replaced by galaxies so that galaxies flow in one direction really much and they encounter protruding galaxies really much. The trajectories of the galaxies meet and push through each other. Just a few dozen stars that collide with stars in another galaxy. Now a lot of energy is released from these stellar collisions and as the galaxy pushes through the next galaxy, this energy released in previous stellar collisions pushes inside thousands of stars and boosts their internal pressure and releases much more energy and more about their ten star direct collisions. Now, this galaxy that has protruded through the two galaxies is already interacting much more with the stars of its third protruding galaxy, and so on. Fortunately, within the visible universe, the trajectories of galaxies meet very rarely, but on a small scale, these expanding densities that transmit pushing force protrude from every direction in every direction at the speed of light, so there are many more encounters that happen. Pushing through the Moon or Earth amplifies their internal pressure because an expanding pushing force pushes inside them, which is circulated by the expanding nuclei of atoms. Suddenly complicated, but described by 3D animations, a pretty simple thing. 😃

First, the supermassive objects of the centers of the galaxies arose in their own 3 D “initial explosions” from the pre-existing pushing force into existing space, and later these space-expanding supermassive objects collided with each other at a steep angle from their initial journey and new colliding galaxies from those collisions. The space-expanding stars arose from the expanding dark matter protruding from the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of the galaxies. Expanding stars have always protruded away from a supermassive object in the center of their own galaxy along a spiral orbit in roughly the same proportion as they have expanded. Although they are constantly protruding away from the center of their space-expanding galaxy, they do little to move away from it in relative terms because they are expanding in the same proportion. Atomic model by Savo In space, the expanding nuclei of atoms recycle with all the cores of other expanding atoms an expanding dark pushing force that has e.g. the nature of the expanding light and thus they constantly push each other away from each other on average in the same proportion as they expand. Push your expanding hand over your expanding chest and feel your heart expand in pulses as the expanding atomic nuclei of your heart expand in sync, pushing each other away from each other pulse by pulse. Expanding lights consist for the most part of an expanding pushing force that cannot be registered with our devices. These dark expanding waves of expanding light have VERY much more mass than the recordable photons, which also consist of an expansive pushing force in space. The registrable electrons and photons arise from these zillions of separate expanding densities of which the expanding dark waves of expanding light consist and are constantly protruding from the separate expanding densities of the nuclei of the expanding atoms. Electrons and photons are generated on the same principle as expanding supermassive objects and expanding stars in space. All that is needed is an external factor that accelerates the expansion of the separate expanding densities of the zillions to momentarily explosive, thus creating a new larger entity with a very high pressure immediately in the center without any pulling forces. In the center of the expanding photon, there is not much pressure on our scale, but relatively similar to the center of the expanding star. In space, the dark expanding waves of expanding lights interact with each other, accelerating each other’s expansion, and thus the speed of the expanding lights accelerates in proportion to the expansion of matter and light. This is evidenced by the following observations. 1. The cosmological redshift of light 2. The so-called gravitational lens phenomenon 3. The so-called gravitational redshift 4. The fact that all lights always move at the speed characteristic of light. 5. Double slit tests Lights expand and accelerate each other’s expansion when interacting with each other = a scientific argument. For example, one can try to manipulate the trajectory of light with the help of billions of years old lights in space far from Earth. My questions to Esko Valtaoja, Kari Enqvist and Syksy Räsänen, who are the so-called experts. How could an expanding space be studied scientifically so that its existence could be scientifically proven? I understand that is not possible because space itself does not radiate information. That is, one cannot try to manipulate space itself in such a way that the success of the manipulation is informed. I think expanding space is a concept similar to what the gods of antiquity were. Jukka Savorinen https://puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/author/jukka-savorinen/ Love 😃

Well, nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling dark expanding pushing force and small part of that expanding pushing force have nature of expanding electrons and expanding photons. So, expanding lightwaves is dark for us and this expanding light dark waves interactive with eachothers and get eachother expanding faster and faster same way what matters and lights expanding 😃 Expanding space is naked emperor. 😃 Attempts can be made to manipulate the trajectory of light expanding in space so that information is obtained as to whether it was successful. Expanding space or curving space cannot be attempted to be manipulated scientifically in any way. And even if you somehow try, you can't get information about the manipulation that would prove that the manipulation was successful. Space itself when it does not radiate information !!! Ok, how then can we try to manipulate the trajectory of the expanding light in space so that we get the info that we succeeded. First we use a telescope to find out the location of a distant galaxy without a gutter and then add a long gutter to shade space or rather the gutter of course overshadows the area where photons from that distant galaxy move and so the effect of dark waves of expanded lights in space. This is, of course, done far from Earth in space That is, exploiting the entropy of billions of years experienced expanding light on us in dark waves Now, under the cover of the gutter, photons moving towards the telescope are pushed towards the bottom of the gutter and thus that distant galaxy appears to be in a different place than what it seemed to be when the gutter was not yet in place. This experiment is done far from Earth in space Expanding space is naked emperor. 😃 This protrudes just as I have told you many times 😃 The expanding densities in space that transmit the pushing force are affected by entropy. Pushing-expanding densities from the moon meet thrust-transmitting densities from the center of the Earth to the counterpart, and thus their interaction intensifies whenever they encounter expanding densities against the following, etc. Thus, the expanding sea on the lunar side expands due to these expanding densities that originate from the center of the expanding Earth. On the other side of the expanding Earth, the expanding sea is expanding more strongly due to expanding densities from the Moon. And the perceived perturbations of these pendulums are based on this same phenomenon. The better the center of the expanding Aurigo, the center of the expanding Moon, and the center of the expanding Earth, the more clearly the disturbances in the pendulums are observed. At least the internal pressure of these expanding densities transmitting the pushing force increases and at the same time the internal movement / time accelerates and thus the mountain effect with the environment intensifies. That is, the fact that disturbances in the pendulums are not always detected is logically explained by the fact that these solar eclipses, in which experiments have been performed without disturbances, have been in areas where there has been morning, evening, or closer to either pole than the equator. This is very logical 😃 😃 😃

This my first thread here is closed 😮 One more thing to consider when examining during an eclipse is whether the pendulums are disturbed then. One has to look at whether Mars or one of the gas planetary Moons as seen from behind the Earth. That is, if the alignment of the Sun, Moon, and Earth is followed by one of the gas planets or Mars, then it adds to the disturbances in the pendulums. And this is because then these expanding densities that transmit the pushing force meet each other for a long time against the same ball, whereby the internal pressure of the expanding densities increases, the internal movement / time accelerates and the interaction with the environment intensifies, etc. 😃

Among them, stupidity condenses 🤣🤣🤣 Black Holes May Gain Mass From the Expansion of the Universe Itself https://scitechdaily.com/black-holes-may-gain-mass-from-the-expansion-of-the-universe-itself/ "Over the past 6 years, gravitational wave observatories have been detecting black hole mergers, verifying a major prediction of Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity. But there is a problem — many of these black holes are unexpectedly large. Now, a team of researchers from the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, the University of Chicago, and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, have proposed a novel solution to this problem: black holes grow along with the expansion of the universe.” If we were to first try to figure out for ourselves what that expansion of expanding space is And then what that dark energy is and how it makes this somehow somehow expanding space expand somehow at an accelerating rate Then one could consider such a new hokkus pokkus way to increase mass Well, that's how this pushes. As I have said for a long time. From the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of the galaxies, expanding dark matter is constantly protruding out from this expanding supermassive concentrations and protruding through expanding stars, planets, and other expanding objects, transmitting a pushing force away from the center of the expanding galaxy. A small part stops at the centers of the expanding planets and from there some with a delay out as gas flows that cause hurricanes and e.g. a lot of water vapor out of Earth = with a delay then floods etc. It can protrude much less through the centers of the expanding stars, and it may not be able to protrude at all through the expanding black stars, so yes, yes, more expanding dark matter is constantly being absorbed by these expanding black stars. Here we can still see the evidence that the expanding Earth has received a new expanding substance from outside the expanding Earth and, when it entered the expanding Earth, it was still an unregistered or dark expanding substance. Expanding Earth Theory 😃

I am the one who explained how the universe works. To this day, in 2021, physicists still do not have a theory of everything in physics. Why. Because current small-scale and large-scale theories misrepresent the universe. Mathematically, these theories have worked excellently. But they cannot be combined mathematically into an all-encompassing theory of everything in physics. It is a big problem for physicists when it comes to pursuing the theory of everything in physics. Doubt arises. Do quantum theories and the theory of relativity describe the universe correctly. I think they misrepresent the universe. The theory of relativity contains concepts that man cannot understand. This is openly stated by the so-called experts themselves. For example, the so-called the expansion of space cannot be described in words, nor visually. The light has been found to be more elongated, i.e. more redshifted, from the more distant galaxy clusters the light comes from. This has been interpreted as galaxy clusters moving away from us the farther away they are. Suddenly it could be concluded from this that we are in the middle of the universe and all the galaxy clusters are moving away from us the faster the farther they are. This, of course, was not an appropriate view almost immediately after we had abandoned the country-centered model, whose erroneous view was that we were at the center of the universe. No, we cannot be in the middle of the universe. Something had to be invented and so it was done. Georges Lemaître, a Belgian astronomer and priest, developed a completely new view from the beginning of everything where at first there was nothing, not even space, nor time. This new theory was called the Big Bang. According to the theory, everything comes from one point so that there was no energy at that point and space did not expand outward into an already existing place. That is, it is not an explosion in the traditional way. It's about something else entirely. Something you can't describe in words, not visually. It is therefore very special that this model has developed into a so-called a standard model taught as truth. That is, even if the event in question cannot be described in words, nor visually. This was so special to me about 20 years ago that I decided to figure out how the universe really works. I did the same. I assumed that space is an infinite three-dimensional ever-existing space that is itself nothing at all. That is, according to this premise, I had to be able to explain all observations using space-based, space-moving, and space-changing systems. What is the change based on. The change is, of course, based on the fact that the separate parts of the changing system move in relation to each other and that movement takes place somewhere. That place is this always-existent infinite three-dimensional space that is absolutely nothing. And when space itself is absolutely nothing, then then it cannot change in any way and thus no space is needed in the background of space anymore. How, then, do we explain that the farther the lights come from, the more stretched the cosmologically redshifted. That is, if space does not expand. Well, simply so that there is no separate matter and four separate forces, as is currently assumed. It must be understood that everything basically consists of one and the same thing, which in itself is a pushing force. The substance consists of congestion areas of this pushing force so that these congestion areas circulate this pushing force with all other corresponding congestion areas. Recycling requires nothing more than what is being recycled because these areas of thrust congestion are able to slow down the pace of thrust within themselves by their thrust. Thrust congestion areas consist of even smaller thrust congestion areas, and since these smaller congestion areas circulate this thrust force, then a system of these smaller congestion areas automatically has an internal pressure that causes the thrust force in it to dissipate into a larger and larger space area. . That is, it expands outward in space into already existing space. This recyclable pushing force also consists of separate pushing force peak areas that recirculate the pushing force. And thus we can say that the atomic model is pushing new ones. The nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding pushing force with the cores of all other atoms expanding in space, and thus they push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. For this reason, this has not been realized, nor observed. The trick is that this recyclable expanding pushing force is in the form that our devices cannot register it. This explains the mystery of light. That is, the wave of light and the nature of particles. The waves of light expanding in space are dark to us, meaning we cannot register them. However, with the help of registrable photons, the wave nature of light has protruded. The expanding waves of expanding light consist of zillions of discrete expanding densities that circulate with each other this expanding pushing force. To form a single expanding photon, these separate expanding densities of which the dark expanding waves of light consist are required. The zillion is not the right number in mathematics, but it illustrates well that it is a very large number of discrete expansive densities. It is good to understand that light has a very large mass, but almost all of the mass of light expanding in space is in these dark waves. And it is precisely because of this that it is very difficult for registrable photons to measure mass. Electrons are also generated from these densities which make up the dark waves of light for us. That is, from this expanding dark pushing force that the expanding nuclei of atoms circulate with each other. Physicists studying matter do not cause an existing electron to detach around the nucleus of an atom, although the physicist thinks so when he emits light of suitable energy towards the nuclei. That is, physicists have not realized that they themselves are causing new electrons to emerge from the dark expanding pushing force that protrudes from the expanding nuclei of atoms. The photons they send face this expanding dark push force at a suitable distance from the expanding atomic nucleus, and as a result of the interaction, the expansion of the dark push force densities accelerates to explosive and thus the zillion discrete densities combine into a new larger entity, the new registrable. Alright. On this basis, when we start to perceive the universe from a small scale, we also get to build a large-scale model of the universe so that we have the opportunity to develop a functional theory of everything in physics. Jukka Savorinen

I am the one who explained how the universe works. To this day, in 2021, physicists still do not have a theory of everything in physics. Why. Because current small-scale and large-scale theories misrepresent the universe. Mathematically, these theories have worked excellently. But they cannot be combined mathematically into an all-encompassing theory of everything in physics. It is a big problem for physicists when it comes to pursuing the theory of everything in physics. Doubt arises. Do quantum theories and the theory of relativity describe the universe correctly. I think they misrepresent the universe. The theory of relativity contains concepts that man cannot understand. This is openly stated by the so-called experts themselves. For example, the so-called the expansion of space cannot be described in words, nor visually. The light has been found to be more elongated, i.e. more redshifted, from the more distant galaxy clusters the light comes from. This has been interpreted as galaxy clusters moving away from us the farther away they are. Suddenly it could be concluded from this that we are in the middle of the universe and all the galaxy clusters are moving away from us the faster the farther they are. This, of course, was not an appropriate view almost immediately after we had abandoned the country-centered model, whose erroneous view was that we were at the center of the universe. No, we cannot be in the middle of the universe. Something had to be invented and so it was done. Georges Lemaître, a Belgian astronomer and priest, developed a completely new view from the beginning of everything where at first there was nothing, not even space, nor time. This new theory was called the Big Bang. According to the theory, everything comes from one point so that there was no energy at that point and space did not expand outward into an already existing place. That is, it is not an explosion in the traditional way. It's about something else entirely. Something you can't describe in words, not visually. It is therefore very special that this model has developed into a so-called a standard model taught as truth. That is, even if the event in question cannot be described in words, nor visually. This was so special to me about 20 years ago that I decided to figure out how the universe really works. I did the same. I assumed that space is an infinite three-dimensional ever-existing space that is itself nothing at all. That is, according to this premise, I had to be able to explain all observations using space-based, space-moving, and space-changing systems. What is the change based on. The change is, of course, based on the fact that the separate parts of the changing system move in relation to each other and that movement takes place somewhere. That place is this always-existent infinite three-dimensional space that is absolutely nothing. And when space itself is absolutely nothing, then then it cannot change in any way and thus no space is needed in the background of space anymore. How, then, do we explain that the farther the lights come from, the more stretched the cosmologically redshifted. That is, if space does not expand. Well, simply so that there is no separate matter and four separate forces, as is currently assumed. It must be understood that everything basically consists of one and the same thing, which in itself is a pushing force. The substance consists of congestion areas of this pushing force so that these congestion areas circulate this pushing force with all other corresponding congestion areas. Recycling requires nothing more than what is being recycled because these areas of thrust congestion are able to slow down the pace of thrust within themselves by their thrust. Thrust congestion areas consist of even smaller thrust congestion areas, and since these smaller congestion areas circulate this thrust force, then a system of these smaller congestion areas automatically has an internal pressure that causes the thrust force in it to dissipate into a larger and larger space area. . That is, it expands outward in space into already existing space. This recyclable pushing force also consists of separate pushing force peak areas that recirculate the pushing force. And thus we can say that the atomic model is pushing new ones. The nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding pushing force with the cores of all other atoms expanding in space, and thus they push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. For this reason, this has not been realized, nor observed. The trick is that this recyclable expanding pushing force is in the form that our devices cannot register it. This explains the mystery of light. That is, the wave of light and the nature of particles. The waves of light expanding in space are dark to us, meaning we cannot register them. However, with the help of registrable photons, the wave nature of light has protruded. The expanding waves of expanding light consist of zillions of discrete expanding densities that circulate with each other this expanding pushing force. To form a single expanding photon, these separate expanding densities of which the dark expanding waves of light consist are required. The zillion is not the right number in mathematics, but it illustrates well that it is a very large number of discrete expansive densities. It is good to understand that light has a very large mass, but almost all of the mass of light expanding in space is in these dark waves. And it is precisely because of this that it is very difficult for registrable photons to measure mass. Electrons are also generated from these densities which make up the dark waves of light for us. That is, from this expanding dark pushing force that the expanding nuclei of atoms circulate with each other. Physicists studying matter do not cause an existing electron to detach around the nucleus of an atom, although the physicist thinks so when he emits light of suitable energy towards the nuclei. That is, physicists have not realized that they themselves are causing new electrons to emerge from the dark expanding pushing force that protrudes from the expanding nuclei of atoms. The photons they send face this expanding dark push force at a suitable distance from the expanding atomic nucleus, and as a result of the interaction, the expansion of the dark push force densities accelerates to explosive and thus the zillion discrete densities combine into a new larger entity, the new registrable. Alright. On this basis, when we start to perceive the universe from a small scale, we also get to build a large-scale model of the universe so that we have the opportunity to develop a functional theory of everything in physics. Jukka Savorinen The way the universe works in Savo terms. Recycling is the A and O of everything Everything basically consists of one and the same thing. What it all basically consists of is in itself a pushing force. There is no separate substance and four separate forces separately. The atomic model and worldview will be revolutionized in the near future. A direct observation of how galaxies are born from the middle / inside out proves the current theories to be incorrect. That’s to be discovered at the latest with the new space telescope James Webb. Ok, and now for that matter. The birth of a visible universe expanding in space. First, the supermassive objects of the centers of the galaxies arose in their own 3 D “initial explosions” from the pre-existing pushing force into existing space, and later these space-expanding supermassive objects collided with each other at a steep angle from their initial journey and new colliding galaxies from those collisions. The space-expanding stars arose from the expanding dark matter that protrudes from the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of the galaxies. Expanding stars have always protruded away from a supermassive object in the center of their own galaxy along a spiral orbit in roughly the same proportion as they have expanded. Although they are constantly protruding away from the center of their space-expanding galaxy, they do little to move away from it in relative terms because they are expanding in the same proportion. Atomic model by Savo In space, the expanding nuclei of atoms recycle with all the cores of other expanding atoms an expanding dark pushing force that has e.g. the nature of the expanding light and thus they constantly push each other away from each other on average in the same proportion as they expand. Push your expanding hand over your expanding chest and feel your heart expand in pulses as the expanding atomic nuclei of your heart expand in sync, pushing each other away from each other pulse by pulse. Expanding lights consist for the most part of an expanding pushing force that cannot be registered with our devices. These dark expanding waves of expanding light have VERY much more mass than the recordable photons, which also consist of an expansive pushing force in space. The registrable electrons and photons arise from these zillions of separate expanding densities of which the expanding dark waves of expanding light consist and are constantly protruding from the separate expanding densities of the nuclei of the expanding atoms. Electrons and photons are generated on the same principle as expanding supermassive objects and expanding stars in space. All that is needed is an external factor that accelerates the expansion of the separate expanding densities of the zillions to momentarily explosive, thus creating a new larger entity with a very high pressure immediately in the center without any pulling forces. At the center of the expanding photon, there is not much pressure on our scale, but relatively similar to the center of the expanding star. The dark expanding waves of space-expanding lights interact with each other, accelerating each other’s expansion, and thus the speed of the expanding lights accelerates in proportion to the expansion of matter and light. This is evidenced by the following observations. 1. The cosmological redshift of light 2. The so-called gravitational lens phenomenon 3. The so-called gravitational redshift 4. The fact that all lights always move at the speed characteristic of light. 5. Double slit tests Lights expand and accelerate each other’s expansion when interacting with each other = a scientific argument. For example, one can try to manipulate the trajectory of light with the help of billions of years old lights in space far from Earth. My questions to Esko Valtaoja, Kari Enqvist and Syksy Räsänen, who are the so-called experts. How could an expanding space be studied scientifically so that its existence could be scientifically proven? I understand that is not possible because space itself does not radiate information. That is, one cannot try to manipulate space itself in such a way that the success of the manipulation is informed. I think expanding space is a concept similar to what the gods of antiquity were. Jukka Savorinen I think there are already evidence for that, that i am right or i am wrong 😃 😃

This video complements my text on what disturbances in pendulums are based on during solar eclipses and why there are not always disturbances when is solar eclipses. 😃 I think like expanding space and curving space is speculation. My idea is science 😃 Did you know that in the future a long gutter can be built in space with a telescope at one end that can detect a distant galaxy whose location is known. And when that galaxy is observed, it is found to be in a different place than what it is known to be. At that point at the latest, we have scientific evidence that curved space is an emperor naked, a concept snatched from Einstein’s hat that can be compared to the gods of antiquity. This is because the dark waves of the lights actually expanding in space interact with each other, accelerating the expansion of each other, causing the speed of the expanding lights to accelerate in the same proportion as the substances and lights expand. That is, where members of the early explosion sect are unable to manipulate hokkus pokuks their space scientifically so as to obtain information about it, it is possible to try to manipulate the trajectory of the expanding lights moving in space in such a way that it is possible to obtain information on whether the trajectory of the light trajectory has been successfully manipulated 😃 😃

The way the universe works in Savo terms. Recycling is the A and O of everything Everything basically consists of one and the same thing. What it all basically consists of is in itself a pushing force. There is no separate substance and four separate forces separately. The atomic model and worldview will be revolutionized in the near future. A direct observation of how galaxies are born from the middle / inside out proves the current theories to be incorrect. That’s to be discovered at the latest with the new space telescope James Webb. Ok, and now for that matter. The birth of a visible universe expanding in space. First, the supermassive objects of the centers of the galaxies arose in their own 3 D “initial explosions” from the pre-existing pushing force into existing space, and later these space-expanding supermassive objects collided with each other at a steep angle from their initial journey and new colliding galaxies from those collisions. The space-expanding stars arose from the expanding dark matter that protrudes from the expanding supermassive objects in the centers of the galaxies. Expanding stars have always protruded away from a supermassive object in the center of their own galaxy along a spiral orbit in roughly the same proportion as they have expanded. Although they are constantly protruding away from the center of their space-expanding galaxy, they do little to move away from it in relative terms because they are expanding in the same proportion. Atomic model by Savo In space, the expanding nuclei of atoms recycle with all the cores of other expanding atoms an expanding dark pushing force that has e.g. the nature of the expanding light and thus they constantly push each other away from each other on average in the same proportion as they expand. Push your expanding hand over your expanding chest and feel your heart expand in pulses as the expanding atomic nuclei of your heart expand in sync, pushing each other away from each other pulse by pulse. Expanding lights consist for the most part of an expanding pushing force that cannot be registered with our devices. These dark expanding waves of expanding light have VERY much more mass than the recordable photons, which also consist of an expansive pushing force in space. The registrable electrons and photons arise from these zillions of separate expanding densities of which the expanding dark waves of expanding light consist and are constantly protruding from the separate expanding densities of the nuclei of the expanding atoms. Electrons and photons are generated on the same principle as expanding supermassive objects and expanding stars in space. All that is needed is an external factor that accelerates the expansion of the separate expanding densities of the zillions to momentarily explosive, thus creating a new larger entity with a very high pressure immediately in the center without any pulling forces. At the center of the expanding photon, there is not much pressure on our scale, but relatively similar to the center of the expanding star. The dark expanding waves of space-expanding lights interact with each other, accelerating each other’s expansion, and thus the speed of the expanding lights accelerates in proportion to the expansion of matter and light. This is evidenced by the following observations. 1. The cosmological redshift of light 2. The so-called gravitational lens phenomenon 3. The so-called gravitational redshift 4. The fact that all lights always move at the speed characteristic of light. 5. Double slit tests Lights expand and accelerate each other’s expansion when interacting with each other = a scientific argument. For example, one can try to manipulate the trajectory of light with the help of billions of years old lights in space far from Earth. My questions to Esko Valtaoja, Kari Enqvist and Syksy Räsänen, who are the so-called experts. How could an expanding space be studied scientifically so that its existence could be scientifically proven? I understand that is not possible because space itself does not radiate information. That is, one cannot try to manipulate space itself in such a way that the success of the manipulation is informed. I think expanding space is a concept similar to what the gods of antiquity were. Jukka Savorinen I am the one who explained how the universe works. To this day, in 2021, physicists still do not have a theory of everything in physics. Why. Because current small-scale and large-scale theories misrepresent the universe. Mathematically, these theories have worked excellently. But they cannot be combined mathematically into an all-encompassing theory of everything in physics. It is a big problem for physicists when it comes to pursuing the theory of everything in physics. Doubt arises. Do quantum theories and the theory of relativity describe the universe correctly. I think they misrepresent the universe. The theory of relativity contains concepts that man cannot understand. This is openly stated by the so-called experts themselves. For example, the so-called the expansion of space cannot be described in words, nor visually. The light has been found to be more elongated, i.e. more redshifted, from the more distant galaxy clusters the light comes from. This has been interpreted as galaxy clusters moving away from us the farther away they are. Suddenly it could be concluded from this that we are in the middle of the universe and all the galaxy clusters are moving away from us the faster the farther they are. This, of course, was not an appropriate view almost immediately after we had abandoned the country-centered model, whose erroneous view was that we were at the center of the universe. No, we cannot be in the middle of the universe. Something had to be invented and so it was done. Georges Lemaître, a Belgian astronomer and priest, developed a completely new view from the beginning of everything where at first there was nothing, not even space, nor time. This new theory was called the Big Bang. According to the theory, everything comes from one point so that there was no energy at that point and space did not expand outward into an already existing place. That is, it is not an explosion in the traditional way. It's about something else entirely. Something you can't describe in words, not visually. It is therefore very special that this model has developed into a so-called a standard model taught as truth. That is, even if the event in question cannot be described in words, nor visually. This was so special to me about 20 years ago that I decided to figure out how the universe really works. I did the same. I assumed that space is an infinite three-dimensional ever-existing space that is itself nothing at all. That is, according to this premise, I had to be able to explain all observations using space-based, space-moving, and space-changing systems. What is the change based on. The change is, of course, based on the fact that the separate parts of the changing system move in relation to each other and that movement takes place somewhere. That place is this always-existent infinite three-dimensional space that is absolutely nothing. And when space itself is absolutely nothing, then then it cannot change in any way and thus no space is needed in the background of space anymore. How, then, do we explain that the farther the lights come from, the more stretched the cosmologically redshifted. That is, if space does not expand. Well, simply so that there is no separate matter and four separate forces, as is currently assumed. It must be understood that everything basically consists of one and the same thing, which in itself is a pushing force. The substance consists of congestion areas of this pushing force so that these congestion areas circulate this pushing force with all other corresponding congestion areas. Recycling requires nothing more than what is being recycled because these areas of thrust congestion are able to slow down the pace of thrust within themselves by their thrust. Thrust congestion areas consist of even smaller thrust congestion areas, and since these smaller congestion areas circulate this thrust force, then a system of these smaller congestion areas automatically has an internal pressure that causes the thrust force in it to dissipate into a larger and larger space area. . That is, it expands outward in space into already existing space. This recyclable pushing force also consists of separate pushing force peak areas that recirculate the pushing force. And thus we can say that the atomic model is pushing new ones. The nuclei of atoms expand and circulate the expanding pushing force with the cores of all other atoms expanding in space, and thus they push each other away from each other in the same proportion as they expand. For this reason, this has not been realized, nor observed. The trick is that this recyclable expanding pushing force is in the form that our devices cannot register it. This explains the mystery of light. That is, the wave of light and the nature of particles. The waves of light expanding in space are dark to us, meaning we cannot register them. However, with the help of registrable photons, the wave nature of light has protruded. The expanding waves of expanding light consist of zillions of discrete expanding densities that circulate with each other this expanding pushing force. To form a single expanding photon, these separate expanding densities of which the dark expanding waves of light consist are required. The zillion is not the right number in mathematics, but it illustrates well that it is a very large number of discrete expansive densities. It is good to understand that light has a very large mass, but almost all of the mass of light expanding in space is in these dark waves. And it is precisely because of this that it is very difficult for registrable photons to measure mass. Electrons are also generated from these densities which make up the dark waves of light for us. That is, from this expanding dark pushing force that the expanding nuclei of atoms circulate with each other. Physicists studying matter do not cause an existing electron to detach around the nucleus of an atom, although the physicist thinks so when he emits light of suitable energy towards the nuclei. That is, physicists have not realized that they themselves are causing new electrons to emerge from the dark expanding pushing force that protrudes from the expanding nuclei of atoms. The photons they send face this expanding dark push force at a suitable distance from the expanding atomic nucleus, and as a result of the interaction, the expansion of the dark push force densities accelerates to explosive and thus the zillion discrete densities combine into a new larger entity, the new registrable. Alright. On this basis, when we start to perceive the universe from a small scale, we also get to build a large-scale model of the universe so that we have the opportunity to develop a functional theory of everything in physics. Jukka Savorinen

Check out this video https://youtu.be/DZQTuHqyHQg Now you too have the opportunity to do real science. That is, it should be clarified in which areas these studies related to pendulum disturbances have been performed when disturbances have occurred and in which areas when they have not occurred. One of the mysteries of physics, then, is why the precise pendulums become confused during the eclipse of the Sun. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allais_effect It goes without saying that the conditions in the experiments have certainly not been similar on a small scale due to the very angle at which particles / densities from the center of the Earth have encountered protruding particles from the Moon and particles / densities from the Sun where the shadow of the Moon has moved. In other words, I predict that the more the Sun, Moon and the Earth's center have been aligned, the more disturbances have been observed. This can now be traced back, as these scientific experiments have been carried out for more than 50 years during solar eclipses and disturbances in the movements of the pendulums have often been observed, but correspondingly often they have not been observed 😃 And I suppose it has been, in all its simplicity, exactly where this shadow of the Moon has been in relation to the line of the Sun and the center of the Earth. The better the center of the Sun, the center of the moon and the center of the Earth have been aligned, the more disturbances in the movements of the pendulums 🤔🤔🤔 If so, then my view of how the universe works gives a logical explanation. url deleted 😃