DeckerdSmeckerd

There is a level of non-verbal communication that is well known, and many books have been written about human body-language. How important is interactive body language? How much deeper of a human connection exists for a person who often engages in deep enough conversations that the body takes part in it with its own language?

Quantum particles? Quantum thinking? Your mind is in the quantum?

Distracting yourself can work to a degree. There is a search for the final answer, that when realized, will cure the problem. That is ok and turns out the answers are multiple and smaller in scale. You decide you are going to go play Tennis with a friend. You blink away from that cloud you were watching while thinking about the past, and you decide to go for a walk.

Whatever the process is, and it might vary from person to person, it probably ends with acceptance and the decision to move forward.

Me either

For example, you could buy an AI that is an expert on the movie Dune. You could ask it any question and it would always do it's best to have a conversation about Dune and learn from what is told by the user base. It can gather statistics about what the audience thinks and catalog information on the Internet.

Sorry I didn't wrap that in a link. Here it is. I admit I didn't read the rules. Thank you for pointing that out. Easy fix. You are totally right. It wouldn't be called quantum. I can't understand quantum physics through a mathematical understanding. I can only understand a physical substance. This idea wouldn't even be in the scope of that theory, and I can't apply anything from quantum theory to this idea I mentioned even for fun. I don't understand the movement of quantum particles at all. I was speculating in a totally different way, but it only makes sense in quantum physics if quantum particles are what space is.

People love science. It is very interesting. Science might not alternate between mathematical reasoning and physics reasoning. People do the reasoning.

Neither of you need to be worried. Neither of you are fooled by my level of expertise. Is the community less likely to understand that I am just having some fun. I don't mean it as an attack on science. What can be predicted? Will you give an example or two?

I think you can count on Maxwell's equations, but I don't know what they are. I have heard of him. Quantum physics doesn't conflict with proven math does it? That's hard. I hope they will be ok.

That space is not quantum fabric is the normal theory. Space as a quantum fabric of energies and/or substances is only an idea. I can't go so far as to say I have a real theory. I would just prefer to avoid thinking of this thread as a proposal of a Scientific Theory.

In short, you don't believe that quantum physics should be thought of as the fabric of space.

It would not be as simple as a cloud of photons. It would be some quantum phenomenon.

I will look into it. From Google, if it is correct: So to vibrate, an object has to have a force acting on it. This force always acts to push the object back towards its equilibrium position. This is called a restoring force. (The highlighting of the second sentence of the quote was unintentional) Is the idea that a force must act on an object pertaining to discreet objects like particles? If quantum were to be understood as a continuum of energies rather than particles, then the force could act from the ends of the continuum. Forces that act upon a continuum of quantum energies, the fabric of space, cause the vibrations from source to the limit of the range. The vibrations are quantum chain reactions. Quantum physics exists simultaneously with Newtonian physics. It seems natural that things that happen on the larger scale also happen on the quantum level. If a star explodes, the quantum fabric is also changed.

Check out that video. I got the idea from them. A connection exists between quantum and larger scale events. The connection is a chain reaction of events.