insane_alien

Heres a clue. its prime if you can only divide it by itself and 1.

well they are made of antimatter and that has been extensively researched and when they produced antihydrogen in a collider we got the expected gamma bursts when the particles hit the walls of the chamber. Not unless we find a natural source for them. but there are none on earth, in the solar system, galaxy, probably the universe. we would see them because of the intense gamma rays as they annihilate on the bounday with normal matter.

Reflects IR. although the blast and radiation will probably still get you if your close enough to get burned.

On their own, anti elements are nothing special and interact exactly like "normal" elements in theory at least. put a bunch of anti atoms next to normal atoms and you'll be bathed in gamma radiation from annihilation.

Anti elements are visible and are very reactive with matter. if an electron wandered into an anti element it would annihilate violently. can i throw positrons at you to disprove that? seriously if you got a kilogram of an anti element(doesn' matter what one) it would release more energy than if you detonated every single nuclear warhead, conventional bomb, various explosives, oil, bullet on earth at once. we have found an antiparticle for every matter particle. although some are their own antiparticle eg the photon

for density it is between osmium and iridium depending on the test either one can come up densest. i think i seen this on wikipedia. RyanJ: with the bunker busting nukes, how the hell do you focus a nuke? i mean its a lot of power to control. the tsar nuke had a higher wattage than the entire sun(although only for a fraction of a fraction of a second). i would assume just get the warhead as close as possible to the target and let the blast do all the hard work.

I thought he was just being a nuisance. not unlike the way my brother acted when he was four. eg. Me: I'm going to get a drink(just saying it randomly) WeeBro: no your not Me: huh? WB: no your not. Me: but i am WB:no your not ... ad nauseum

Force of gravity = 0 when the distance is infinite. in a word, never. ever.

could be potentially usefull in the future. BTW i scanned it and its clean.

the energy released would probably leave you with 6 seperate protons, electrons and how ever many spare neutrons; assuming matter chlorine and antimatter sodium. This is mostly speculation since we can barely manufacture antideuterium. although the speculation is based on interactions between more fundemental particles.

What would probably happen is that the electron and positron cloulds would partially annihilate leaveing the additional positrons in anti chlorine. then the nuclei would fall into each other and partially annihilate again antichlorine would leave some antiparticles after annihilating sodium. the remaining antiparticles (6 positrons, anti protons and however many antineustrons depending on the isotopes) will either congregate into anticarbon or fly off individually at high speed. This is speculation but it seems pretty reasonable.

if there was any use for it, it would already be used in physics and probably engineering. i'm sure that in the 300 years of calculus some physicist has asked the question.

Yes. basically it is unditinguishable from matter unless you can interact it with matter or a known magnetic field.

"squeeglish moxmonor"

That stuff rules. in highschool we used to have a competition to see who could drink the most. rules: 1. first to giveup/puke up/ passout and/or die loses 2. it is taken one teaspoon at a time 3. spoonful must be held in the mouth for at least 10 seconds. 4. loser has to do a forefeit (unofficially this involved nudity and a long cold street and lots of running)

when i eat at McDonalds its usually if i haven't ate anything for a week and am about to collapse from starvation and its the nearest food place. i also know that its incredible unhealthy. only ever ate a mcdonalds burger 5 times. quite tasteless and looks nothing like the picture(i know its never going to look exactly like the picture but there are limits, like having the burger cooked and maybe some of that green stuff in the pictures)

you could always attach solarpowered thermo electric coolers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoelectric_cooling

Not very.

calculate the heat content of both with a reference temp(eg. 0 c) then add them and apply that heat to the 150ml.

the only reactions i can think of that would cause such a drop in temperature are poisonous salts. i suppose if you put them in a small bag it would act like an icecube. won't make it instantly cold though. you would have trouble getting it through health and safety i would imagine.

uh huh. one of my uni friends scored "retarded"(68) in his last IQ test but i'd say hes just as intelligent as me and i scored 120 on that same test. I severely doubt that IQ tests are even remotely accurate.

can't remember but isn't the tibetan platform a bit far north. i think you get a better fuel saving by launching at the southernmost part of the country. its rotation that is the major factor in space launches. the lower gravity is just a bit on the side.

yeah hes been doin this for a while and i'm losing patience with him.

1/2 year. bit of a no brainer.

theres some stuff that can turn you urine blood red but i can't remember the name of it(i had it used on me once i was scared i had something seriously wrong with me). or you could try a simple laxative. oh wait that last one isn't benign.