so you know its chlorine straight away since its poisonous.
edit: its actually a national thing, in some countries it isjust a label warning that it is chlorine. its all to do with health and safety.
i f the bible could be shown to be credible in all areas then it would require other proofs to back up what is said about the creation of evidence. If it was prooved to be credible as a historical document then yes it would be acceptable but only just since it is mainly a religious text.
could be a case of "this is the first theory i have heard of so i will believe completely in it and won't put the effort in to read about other theories"
but it still could have happened randomly. i'm more interested in someone providing evidence for biblical literalism but that is the quality of posts i'm looking for.
I challenge any creationist(or anybody else for that matter) to attempt to find a single peice of logical and/or empirical evidence that suggests that creationism is true.
I DO NOT WANT attacks on belief(this is not about belief but science), references to the bible(it can be made to agree with anything) or statements such as "i think evolution is a bunch of crap so creationism must be true"(if something is not A it does not necessarily mean that B is true).
If this erupts into a flame war or personal attacks of any kind are made then i will ask for this thread to be closed by the moderators.
please refer to the following site for some facts about creationism and why there is so little evidence for it (as in NONE). http://www.creationtheory.org/
evolution is a theory it has been observed happening in laboratories and in nature(why do think they need so many different flu vaccines?). fossil records also show a wide range of trasitional species. evolution has also been published in scientific journals. what laws does the big bang defy? lets hear your answer.
Creationism is not science since it is based out of a book that is an account of something no-one ever witnessed and was edited and re-edited based on the whims of the church to turn it into religious propaganda
creationism is not a theory! i know of no (reputable) scientist of any area of expertise who regards creationism as a theory as it has never been published in a scientific journal,
there is no empirical evidence, it defies several established theories and some laws.
its not like moving an army to where a nuclear bomb is going to go off. it like moving an army near to where a nuclear bomb is going to go off but far enough away so they will suffer no ill effects but they are prepared to move in to help survivors.
Why are testicles on the outside of the male body? what is the evolutionary advantage of this? Wouldn't they be better off inside where they would be more protected?
why doesn't the president himself go down there and help with the search and rescue at least it would look like he was doing something
and people might have a bit of respect for the confused bugger that he is
if you could know where everysingle particle was and its velocity perfectly and had a computer that could work it out faster than it was happening then it could be done but such a computer would need to be bigger than all of the mass of the universe combined.
try writing down the reactions then go check on the web if any of the products is insoluble if one or more is then you will get a solid formed. your post is hell to understand by the way.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.