insane_alien

yes, it uses arbitrary precision, but don't you have to tell it when you want really high precision? try increasing it and see what happens.

well, the CO2 is pretty close to being a supercritical fluid at that point. what you're looking at here is not likely solvency but miscibility. edit: hang on, if you wanted to look at the solubility of water in CO2 wouldn't you want to look at the liquid phase of CO2? and a droplet of water would evapourate quire quickly at that temperature provided the humidity of the CO2 gas was low.

its likely just due to the way wolfram alpha calculates this for plotting, its not going to be going for accuracy as the servers will typically be under a heavy load. it is obviously not calculating with sifficient resolution. looks like it is rounding error to me.

you'd need a LOT more of them to cause large scale heating like a heatwave. and most of the energy is dumped in the upper atmosphere where it can just radiate out into space.

science is only mean to people when they fail to accept the rejection and rebuttal the first time round. its only the clingy ones that actuallly get any spite.

sisyphus already answered this one.

we don't just give you the answers here. if you just want the answer then go google it

perhaps tom should draw a diagram clearly showing the flows of gas and energy flows.

might want to move this to its own thread then sayo, so, deadmeat, according to your hypothesis(it is nowhere near a theory) the hydrogen (not hydrogenium) should have more gravity than the iron(not ferrum) since it has more atoms and hence, more gravitons. you also haven't explained why it should be an equal amount per atom, or whether they have a finite amount or just a set rate.

these are the only ones that had anything to do with this thread. funny how you had to go to other threads to find enough stuff to claim i'm persecuting you. i'm off to bed.

darwin's evolution didn't include a whole lot of things. mainly because they hadn't been discovered. science progresses, it doesn't remain static.

you're not doing a very good just of building up a level of trustworthiness with us. especially by saying 'i won't tell you anything till 2012 but yet you keep going on an on about it. that makes you very untrustworthy. just like the guys selling stuff at the barras

i'm not regularly viewing, i just don't care anymore, everytime we try to give you feed back its like talking to a brick wall.

elas, perhaps you'd be better off getting yourself a blog

it would still take more energy to make the waste products back into fuel again.

who's scared of 2012? have you actually read anything on this forum?

it wasn't pointless, the mission hasn't been going on for very long, its not the main purpose of the satellite and it can only gather dat on that particular phenomenon if it happens to capture a glimpse of something that resembles a disintegrating black hole with little possibility of it being anything else. the point of that(although i don't see its relevance) was that the level of technology rises rapidly once it gets going. there'd be what, maybe a 200 year window of opportunity for detecting recognisable radio transmissions? as our own level of communications technologies gets better, the size of this window will increase. only the little ones leak at an appreciable rate. all known black holes are very very big. its hard to detect a microwatt signal when the noise is over a yottawatt. thats because they haven't been looking. and as swansont says, the first thing they'd need to do is make a black hole. the ability of the LHC to do this is as yet unknown. quit denouncing stuff before there has even been a test.

it's a product of the derivation of the equation. besides, its better to have the one constant with an operator instead of making up a second constant so it doesn't require an operator.

i was just glancing over the thread and seen these, come on pywakit, really? 1/ not its primary function 2/ its only done about a year of a long long mission. this is like saying an expecting woman is never going to give birth because after only a few weeks the baby still hasn't popped out. LHC is still undergoing testing to make sure it works like it's supposed to. do you expect a car to be winning a race when its still in the factory? no. well then.

so there's maths but you don't know how to write it down(and therefore don't know how to use it either)

nope.

oh many people have pointed out the problems to you. you just flat out ignored it.

yep, you're not just going to get it handed to you while you sit on your arse doing nothing.

not completely.

i'd rather have a leader who changed his ideas according to new information and circumstances to someone who just put on some blinkers and plunged on regardless. besides, anytime anyone tries to live up to an ideal situation always fails.