Jump to content

Genady

Senior Members
  • Posts

    5521
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    54

Everything posted by Genady

  1. It is rather a lousy way to sneak in the link at the very end of the 'essay':
  2. Quantum entanglement does not involve information transfer in any way.
  3. Isn't your model similar to one discussed here:
  4. In your model, is the universe homogeneous and isotropic on a scale 100+ Mpc?
  5. Is metric you use different from FLRW?
  6. So, it is space expansion. Why do you call it spacetime expansion? What is 'fabric of the universe'?
  7. Scientific writing guidelines, "Using Quotations in Scientific Writing": Etc. quotes_082014 _quoting_and_paraphrasing.pdf Using Literature – Write Like A Scientist
  8. Depends. What is 'spacetime expansion'?
  9. I maintain that this is preaching, which is against the rules.
  10. No, we do not. We rather continue modifying our concepts and models and inventing new ones striving to make them fit signals we get from nature. One can call the latter, 'understanding' if one wishes so.
  11. Solved. The leak found and fixed. Thank you to all for participation. If you wonder how I have found the leak, the hint is here:
  12. The scale of this uncertainty is Planck's constant. It is too small to affect calculations for stars.
  13. A star in position A has velocity V. This does not depend on when it happens or when we observe it.
  14. See Relativity of simultaneity - Wikipedia.
  15. It is all known for more than hundred years now and it is a part of calculations. After all the delays are taken into account, more mass is required for the motions to be what they are. Nobody calculates galaxy rotation "as if a fixed connected disk is rotating." You do not have any basis to claim that astronomers do not take distances and times into account. Can you show how your calculation makes a difference? I mean calculation, not words.
  16. This is incorrect. See Dark matter - Wikipedia.
  17. What do supernovas have to do with the dark matter in our galaxy?
  18. Thank you. Almost there (I think.)
  19. It is well-known and taking it in consideration is so elementary that, as you've said,
  20. No, we are not. We know how to calculate the difference.
  21. No, and no. Instead, the distances between unbounded parts of the universe increase.
  22. It says that quiet mind is the result, not a cause of this condition.
  23. This is incorrect. It is noticed in the rotation of our own Milky Way.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.