Genady

I see. Just like any other model, e.g., ether.

Easy: all words are more words 🤡

No problem for me, but what is that term in the OP?

Maybe just to replace the word disorder with something that does not have this connotation. How about special circumstances? Other suggestions are welcomed.

Exactly What does make you say silly things?

You say it using words and therefore, it is silly.

ALL experiments do.

Plagiarized from here:

They have already posted it here: which was plagiarized from here:

Mathematics is disinformation?

From the @swansont's link above: There are criteria in the disorder definitions that are aimed to distinguish between these situations. This is very wrong, from my experience. In a normally functioning system, including human's body, different parts should cooperate with each other. When parts of the system are in conflict, there is a disorder. When a system or its parts are in conflict with the outside world, it is not a sign of disorder. When a person has a disorder, good neighbors help the person to live as happily as possible.

Can't be true. There are only several thousand hairs in a man's beard.

Here is a paradoxical aspect of adding, and removing, roads: Braess's paradox - Wikipedia

Various. $1,000,000 as a non-refundable downpayment would do.

There are different ways to be social. And different circumstances for sharing experience. You're very simplistic, again.

We are different. If I didn't know this, I'd feel sorry for you.

Politeness. Yes.

And I politely refuse. No motivation to do so.

Why would I do so?

No, I do not.

Such set of simplistic questions... No, thank you. No.

There were certainly no gulags then and the entire "dissemination" of the "Moral Code" was publishing it in Pravda and including it in several lessons in schools. It was quickly ignored in the years after that. No repressions related to it ever occurred. No violence was there in connection with it or its dissemination. Yes, I don't like your cartoon picture of humans. And I am free to express my dislike here, as long as I don't violate the forum rules. What I suggested to drop earlier was specifically the conversation about MY experiences. Not generally about your proposal.

Which manner? I don't know where to start. There is no historical connection between the "Moral Code" and the violence. Your understanding is wrong. I think that your principles are as good as this "Moral Code", where the latter is an example.

I don't understand. Where is violence mentioned in my post?

By following the "Moral Code of the Builder of Communism": (adopted at the 22nd Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1961) [Moral Code of the Builder of Communism - Wikipedia] 🤣