Genady

That's what I meant "without algebra", and that's the same mental picture I've used. +1

Correct. +1. Couple words, hidden, about your "trick"?

No, it is not.

How tall is the table? BTW, I could not make ChatGPT answer this question correctly, with or without algebra.

Right. +1. Counterintuitive, isn't it?

Good! +1 And,

It might seem that if we continue this way, we get a series 1 +1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ..., which converges to 2. That would mean that by building the tower this way we can make it maximum 2m "wide". However,

I thought that you were saying this. Anyway, I think this generalization is wrong. There are many paths to survival.

I can't agree with this generalization. All? My ancestors? Maybe, but I can't find it.

Sorry @Externet, I've misread your statement above. I agree with you, as well as with So, this "project" is off the table as well.

Reminder:

Yes, 100% government ran. Regarding the hurricanes, look here (we are #2, in alphabetical order): 7 Hurricane-Free Caribbean Islands – Caribbean Blog (home.blog)

I understand this. As I have mentioned above in this thread, here, where I live, almost half of electricity in the grid is already generated by wind, and the plan is to get 60% by 2025. That's why I consider other factors.

I am not sure how to apply this hypothetical scenario to an AI of today, because it is a TM with only two symbols in its character set, namely 0 and 1.

True. However, the transportation to recycling facilities and recycling process will add to the net disadvantage of initial manufacturing and transportation. Are there efficient wind turbines for individual use?

I have already decided for myself against this project. Today I've read this, additional drop pushing in the same direction: Solar panels - an eco-disaster waiting to happen? - BBC News It also adds to what

I think that probability pattern matching is an interpretation of what AI is doing, rather than its actual functioning. There are no, AFAIK, explicit steps of probability pattern matching neither during its training nor during its run. During the training, parameters (aka weights) of a function of specific form are calculated based on a set of input-output pairs. During the run, an output of this function is calculated according to accumulated history of inputs and responses. This is a basic mechanism, although there are variations, additions, modifications, randomizations, human interventions, etc.

And not only for that session, but also for past sessions of that user.

You're right. +1

For the moment, the Southern Caribbean is fine in this respect, i.e., no Sargassum to talk about. However, there is a new problem here, namely, Stony Coral Tissue Loss Disease (SCTLD). It started in Florida about 9 years ago and finally got here, recently. See details here: Bonaire National Marine Park - Stinapa Bonaire.

Promises, promises...

However, there IS a more satisfactory procedure. The pirates are reasonable to the extent that each wants to get a share that he thinks is at least one fifth of the total value. Think about it this way: if such a procedure exists in the case of two pirates, what would prevent it to exist in the case of five?

OT. G. Bruno has nothing to do with quantum gravity.