Genady

No, we did this exercise before with the Moon receding from the Earth, and at the end of it you lied about your own answer. I'm not doing it with you again. It is enough that you call this formula "simple" to know that you don't understand its meaning.

Yes, this diagram is not wrong. It is empty of contents. It is not a summary of anything in physics. It is just nonsense. You obviously don't understand the "simple" formula E=mc^2, too.

I think that this video describes very accurately the case of this thread and many others of this kind. Most or all of the features and elements she talks about in the video are present in and characterize the constant stream of theories of everything these forums experience, by the form and by the contents. Our main advantage compared to her is that we are hidden. Or are we?

If it were correct, I would be all for it. But it is wrong. It does not promote the spirit of making science. It promotes only misunderstandings and false illusions of understanding. Knowing that one does not understand something is better than wrongly believing that they do.

It is not what you don't say that makes your blabbering pseudo-scientific. It is what you say. You repeatedly say wrong things. You use words from science, but you don't understand their meaning in science. The worst symptom is that when others point to your mistakes and to your misunderstandings you reply that it is them who don't understand. If your misunderstandings help you sleep better, it is an issue between you and your therapist and it has nothing to do with a science forum discussion.

Sorry @MigL for not making clear in my first comment above that I was referring to the article's title and not to what you said.

This is not true. What you do throughout this entire thread is making up pseudo-scientific statements and declaring them resulting from your diagrams.

Not sure in this case. They refer to 8.6 keV, which assumes a precision of 10% rather than 100%, I think. Also, they compare to the previous max of 5 keV, which means that a factor of ~2 is not ignorable.

What part don't you understand?

Google it.

But not F.

This is what happens if the pencil is pulled to the right: and to the left: How to get it out?

I can speculate in good faith. You don't do it in good faith, this is a point. You are playing, not discussing.

You are right. At least, it is agreed that it is incorrect to say, degrees Kelvin, isn't it?

This is math.... simple math. Pointing to 4/2 = 2 as math in this thread is one more evidence that OP doesn't discuss in a good faith.

Here, the OP is trying to sneak their religious believes into the science discussion.

"It appears the colonel's comments were taken out of context and were meant to be anecdotal."

Your thinking is mistaken. You have never explained it, partially or fully. You have only declared it. Nothing. You get nothing. Do you understand the logic: "particles are excitations of something" does not mean that "excitations of something are particles"? I have looked at your answer again. You have not explained what you say you have. You are not discussing in a good faith. You violate the rules of discussions on this forum.

You are right. OTOH, e.g., Kelvin - Wikipedia

Here comes the GOD.

I was taught that the correct phrase is "100 million kelvins" rather than "100 million degrees Kelvin."

Please, do. This is just another meaningless statement.

No respect to the meaningless blabbering.

I've prepared a simple toy: It consists of a pencil and a string that goes through a hole in the pencil and makes a loop. The ends of the string are glued together. The loop is shorter than the long end of the pencil: so, it can't be moved over it. Then, I insert the pencil through the buttonhole like this: This is how it looks from the other side: I can separate them again and repeat without cutting, breaking, untying, etc. Can you figure it out? I can take more pictures, from different angles, if you need. There are no hidden cuts or anything like it. You can make it yourself.

Rito.