They are not more peaceful, but more mature than children. Specifically, they don't care if another pirate got a larger share than them. Each one cares only that his share is not less than one fifth of the total, in his evaluation.
Yes, the assumption 1 is necessary. We assume that the treasure is as close to a continuum as needed. The assumed precision is the precision of their evaluation of the pieces.
I'm not sure why the other assumptions are required. For example, why there would be a conflict between who divides and/or who picks in the case of two, given the assumption 1.
Not peaceful enough
We don't want to introduce any other incentives, such as a desire not to be killed. The only criterion should be that each one is satisfied with his own portion of the treasure.
They should not be forced to accept. They should be individually satisfied.
Not by majority either. Literally, each pirate should leave satisfied.
A solution should be as good for each one of the five pirates as in the example of two pirates above.
Five aging pirates decided to split their treasure and to retire. Each one will be satisfied if in his estimate his share is not smaller than one fifth of the total. Their estimates vary. How can they do it peacefully?
I cannot speak of the jobs I'm not familiar with, but as I look back on the jobs I've been ever involved with, NONE of them would've been in danger from the ChatGPT and alike.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.