Genady

When people ask the bot a question, they don't care if the answer is wrong? If so, it tells about the people more than about the bot.

If you go back to your first post on this question, https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/131410-how-does-chatgpt-work/?do=findComment&comment=1238821, and follow about a dozen or so comments after it, you will find several different wrong answers that the commenters got from the bot.

OK, I will read it, 1 week a year for 10 years. Seriously, thanks for the recommendation.

I got the solution, relativity is safe. Phew . The answer, by MTW, is "a three-dimensional spacelike hypersurface of homogeneity and isotropy." At each event on such hypersurface, the density, pressure, and curvature are the same, and the radiation is isotropic. The fundamental observer is an observer at rest relative to such hypersurface. His worldline is orthogonal to the hypersurface. So, everything else can be moving with c relative to this observer with no problem.

P.1 defines: However, we are in the situation where the substratum moves with c. Thus, there is no observer at rest with respect to it. How do we fix this?

Yes, I've read it before, but I still try to understand the meaning of it. If everything moved with c, relative to what did everything move?

Imagine we have "an electron simulator", which simulates behavior of an electron in various conditions. Let's run two instances of the simulator and let them communicate with each other. Would they simulate an interaction between two electrons?

Ignoring new physical effects that we don't understand, can we simulate everything we know well about electron? If not, what aspects we cannot simulate?

How?

Something like this. The input is an electron's state and an interaction, if there is one, and the output is result of a measurement.

Can a computer program be made that fully and accurately simulates an electron?

If you travel to US and make online reservation to rent a car, look for a little checkbox, 'foreign resident'. Some rental companies (e.g., AVIS) in some destinations (e.g., Newark) give quite a big discount (e.g., 30%) to visitors with a foreign driver's license.

LOL But seriously, "maximum speed of causality" is rigorous. It means that two events can be causally related if and only if their distance d and time difference t are such that d <= ct.

Firstly, as you said, any other medium would only permit lower speeds, saying "maximum speed" says it all. Secondly, there is no "maximum speed". For example, a shadow of moving object can move with any speed. Or a spotlight of projector. Or a dot on computer screen. Etc.

Yes, but I'm not sure he is talking about light now. I suspect he means any speed. Also, I don't know why he specifies vacuum...

What do you mean by "the maximum speed in a vacuum?" Does such thing exist?

Ah, you're looking for somebody who just knows the answer...

Does it have anything to do with Astronomy and Cosmology? Looks like Classical Physics to me. Do you have any objection to my answer that the center of mass will not move?

I guess it will.

It might change position, orientation ... But the center of mass will not move because the total momentum has to be conserved.

The wing will experience force. The center of mass of the system will not move.

I recommend you read the article you have linked. It explains why your speculation is wrong, and supports what I've said. They are not. This is another factually wrong speculation.

This is untrue. It is well known. Your speculation in this case is simply wrong.

As @Eise said above, the maximum speed of causality. Transformation of spacetime coordinates between relatively moving reference frames. Speed of gravitational waves. Relation between energy and mass. Schwarzschild radius. ..... Thank you!

This short article sheds more light on the OP question: OpenAI's ChatGPT Powered by Human Contractors Paid $15 Per Hour (gizmodo.com)