StringJunky

Tey hey can also have charged surfaces that attract the air-borne debris to them,

I cannot argue with you because your perception of things is what it is.

Then you've lost me because I thought you were being sarcastic. They either filter and/or use charged ions to take the crap out of the air.

Yes, they were but they are an acquired taste because of the complexity of their arrangements, rather like 70's Genesis. Neal Peart was the engine. His drumming is just amazing.

Things are obvious when you know.

Don't you think these ideas are a function of your schizophrenia? First time I've learnt this about you.

He's about the only one of two I can think of here that seems to do it anywhere near properly imo. Ydoaps is the other person that handles it meaningfully but he's got a very firm science grounding as well.

You don't need to make that leap because if it is infinite it has always been around. and has always been infinite.

It came up in my searches when I was perusing about dogs eating grass.

You pick on "evidences". What about the rest of the B...... Cool down on the weed mate, there's more than a whiff of paranoia in your posts.

In the wild carnivores will get their veggie portion from the stomachs of their prey.

Thanks guys. I thought so but I had enough doubt to ask.

OK, that's another can of worms to be considered.

I suppose the decoy could be differentiated chemically by the chemical profile of it's carrier medium; you have to mix the DNA in something. If it were a commercial product, it would have a known chemical/DNA profile and foresensics could then subtract that profile from what they have.

Why ask a question that may solicit or conceal criminal acts?

I'm interested in the author's intent in the conclusion of this paper in the last bolded line. Are they saying 'yes' optimism is good and 'yes' it is not good, or 'yes' it is good for immunity?

Tread the trodden path before wandering off it.

You are learning nothing just expounding unfounded opinions.

Citation.

Why don't you learn what the science says and stop pulling stuff out of your backside.

This might add to what zztop posted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe

What's wrong with carbon?

It seems to me that he doesn't understand that gravity overwhelms the expansion where it is sufficiently strong.

You need sampling cohorts containing hundreds, if not thousands, of subjects to see any meaningful trends. Personal anecdotes will most probably be unrepresentative of the true picture.