StringJunky

What I find ironic, given the disgust, is that many heterosexual people engage in 'unnatural' sexual practices not unlike LGBTQs. I think they call that 'hypocrisy'. The simple solution is to not think about it. There is much I would not do, but if two or more consenting people wish to do such filthy things, I'm not going to judge.... time for golden shower.....

I'll @Kerrowman as that should send them a note you have responded, if they have notifications enabled..

This marketing reminds me of past marketing campaigns targeting peoples insecurities about their social acceptability potential, like deodorant campaigns. The difference I think this time is that scientifically-naive women will cause themselves real harm following this particular campaign because to me it's a new frontier that the idiot is pursuing for personal enrichment. I can see allied products coming in future in a trend that wil cause tangible, long term adverse effects to their bodily function... the thin end of a commercially-motivated insidious wedge. I think goverment agencies should come down hard on this quack science. The first adverse effects could well be altering pH outside of its protective functional range to precipitate population booms of pathogenic organisms, which are always there, but are suppressed by larger popuations of Lactobacillus spp etc I've used this Mirror article purely because it came up first and I think it reasonably presents the issue.

For your reassurance that you are not being singled out, have a look at this niggling thread between members who are pretty well versed in physics matters:

Apparently, reading YT comments, Satie hated peope stopping what they were doing to listen to this. He intended it as Muzak or wallpaper music. I think it too irregular a pace with some dynamics to be muzak.

It might be bagpipe soundsthat are earworms for me:

Beatles. I had as this an earworm today. What songs are earworms to others here?

One should expect it. This is image only slightly exaggerating... I jest not.

"Daddy, why is that F22 flying towards our balloon?"

I think ya gonna need all your planes out.

I realised today how robust we are, even after visceral-level disputes.

Another split on the horizon

Right. Adverse and malign social engineering.

Right. OK.

It seems plausible to me. Countermeasures can be learned and applied. The adversary would then be using a lemon, completely unaware.

Perhaps, in general, governments like to keep this sort of stuff under wraps, so they cn exploit these things geopolitically... stuff like equipment secrets they discover and don't want their adversary to know they know. The balloon we saw was perhaps too blatant to apply the usual protocols of secrecy and so they had to talk about it and react publicly.

It's not expressed in both identical twins all the time. I think that supports that position: incomplete..

200m high

Methinks 66000ft will no longer be left unwatched.

Yes, splitting would be appropriate if the mods agree. By design or consequence, the Zionist aspirations mirror Aryanism and Apartheid.

Aliens moved into Palestine after 1947 with our assistance and then proceeded to suppress the natives so that they can act out a spurious dystopian societal fantasy depicted by a book.

JC has not shown one hint of racism. He's explained what he meant. If people want to hold him to another interpretation that's their issue.

Intent is everything, and most of us know JC is a pedant/stickler for definitions. I've been feeling quite gay today. The onus is on the reader to parse which version of 'gay' I meant. "Confusion will be my epitaph, as I walk the cracked and broken path" - King Crimson

It overlaps, but satire can be devoid of it and still be satire. Swift's A Modest Proposal is one. It is not a required component to qualify. You seem to be tapdancing with your clause in brackets, are you not going to commit yourself that it is or isn't?

Are we conflating humour with satire?