Ocho Cinco Jr

They can swap genertic information with the host, that's called mutation. Bacteria can also do this through conjugation, transformation, and transduction. They aren't creating new genetic information either, just swapping it.

No, I'm saying that viruses aren't living things, therefore, they cannot evolve or mutate.

That is the first thing you have said that I agree with.

Everything that I have stated has been facts, not beliefs. If I were to go into my religion and not only science, I would have a lot more to say. Just an off topic statement; not all religions are the same, not even Catholicism and Christianity. All of them have very different beliefs.

What? I'm just stating that I'm not going around saying that everyone has to believe me.

I'm not even trying to troll. I'm just stating my beliefs and if you don't want to believe me, you don't have to.

VIRUSES AREN'T ALIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!! I agree with Arete. I'm not trolling.

https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/when-whales-walked-on-four-legs.html Apparently the natural history museum says whales walked on land. "Evolution has been clearly witnessed and observed." When, may I ask has it been witnessed or observed? Yes, the world is amazing and works like clockwork, perfectly. It's just amazing that could happen by accident I say sarcastically.😏 The most amazing machines have designers though. FYI, people who read and study learn more, so you get your head in that book. I don't understand why the finches would be different species if the differences between the beaks were less than a quarter of a centimeter. The evidence is always against YOU. You just always say, "look at the science." What do you think the Christian scientists do? Those bones have been found to be important for mating, not for legs.

The chart of evolution, the one with monkeys progressing from monkeys to humans, just shows both made up species and monkeys drawn as standing up. What? You are the one who believes that every complex living creature that's made perfectly all happened by chance after a big bang. Can you fit the entire universe into a period-sized space, I would like to see you try. Every simple machine has a designer. Not to mention complex machines. There was a study that tried to make a cell by recreating the "early-Earth's" atmosphere, but all they made was toxic gasses, like you, and a few amino acids, but to make a cell, you would need those to form proteins, then the proteins to form a cell. This study was also designed by humans. Also, God isn't a fairy. There are recorded historical documents of what we believe. You only have made up monkey/human species and guesses on how the earth began, we have multiple documents on the events of Jesus's life.

Yes, he has a good point. At the time that Darwin discovered those finches, they thought that a cell was just an empty space that made up a body, not the complex mechanism we know it is today. May I also add that the beaks had differences of less than a centimeter, only about 18.92 millimeters. Earnst Haekel's embryo evolution was a fraud. He just drew the pictures without evidence, and they're not even accurate. They don't show real pictures, that's because there are no pictures, it can't be proven, but still it's shown in science textbooks. They even know they're wrong, but they still do. Then there's Nebraska man. A whole in-between species made up because of a pig tooth. The Java man, they found a monkey skull cap and a human thigh bone close to each other and called it Java man, a "new species". Carbon dating can't tell how old the earth is, it's incredibly inaccurate, it once showed a 3 year old bone to be thousands of years old, and animals that have different carbon dating for different parts. There are some large animals that were carbon dated and they got different dates for different parts of the body.