toucana
-
Posts
270 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by toucana
-
-
On 3/18/2024 at 5:52 PM, Airbrush said:
To show off to the world what the US could do? Japan was already beaten. We also found out that the Nazis never developed anything close to an A bomb. Japan was already totally cut off from the world by US submarines and air force. No more imports so they were on the verge of starving. They were also having their cities systematically destroyed by huge B29 incendiary strikes, like the one that killed 100,000 people in Tokyo IN A DAY. All that happened by using the A bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to REVEAL to the world that such a weapon EXISTS. What they should have done, IMHO, is realize that nobody needs to know about IT, and that IT should be covered up so nobody else can create an A bomb. There should have been a HUGE, Manhattan-Project-sized, intelligence operation to do everything we can to make sure that no country can create such a bomb, except for the US. The US would TRY keep the A bomb a secret as long as possible. That would have saved so much money. Of course you can't keep something like that a secret forever, but at least stall it as long as possible. Or is this a naive proposal?
I would suggest that you read The Fall Of Japan by William Craig (1968) which provides a good readable account of the Pacific war, and which covers the following points in some detail:
i. The USA leadership did not know it had a viable atom bomb until the Trinity test took place in the New Mexico desert on Monday July 16th 1945. Even the top US military commanders i.e. General MacArthur and Admiral Nimitz who were leading the war against the Japanese in the Pacific knew nothing about the Manhattan project until they were subsequently shown films of the test firing at Los Alamos.
ii. All of the US planning for the military defeat of Japan had been finalised at the Honolulu conference a year earlier in July 1944, and was predicated on a massive amphibious assault using conventional forces that might well cause over 1 million American casualties according to American planners who had recently witnessed US casualties of over 40,000 suffered when capturing the tiny garrison island of Okinawa in May 1945.
iii. The Japanese knew perfectly well that the allies would need to carry out a two-stage occupation of the Japanese archipelago, starting with the capture of the island of Kyushu. Their defensive plan Ketsu-Go developed by the Japanese army aimed to break the morale of the invading forces by inflicting massive casualties on the only two suitable landing beaches available on Kyushu as they came ashore.
iv. When the Japanese did surrender, and turned over the details of their battle plans, American strategists found that Japan’s Ketsu-Go planners had anticipated almost every single detail of the Allied invasion plan. One of the few details in the US order of battle that had eluded Japanese military intelligence was the real purpose of the 509th Composite Bombing group, which was the unit that actually dropped the atomic bombs.
v. The Japanese government had absolutely no intention of surrendering to the US under any circumstances, Their premier Suzuki had rejected an ultimatum issued to Japan by the allies following the Potsdam conference on 2nd August using the Japanese phrase mokusatsu 黙殺 which means “with silent contempt”. Even after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed on August 6 and August 9 respectively, high ranking Japanese military officers staged a bloody coup in a failed attempt to prevent the recording of Emperor Hirohito’s surrender speech from being broadcast on Japanese radio the next day.
vi. It was the US Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson who first suggested using the new atom bomb to end the war at a cabinet meeting shortly after the Trinity test. It was said that Stimson himself personally removed Kyoto from the list of possible targets, because he and his wife had spent their honeymoon in that beautuful ancient city some years earlier. President Truman later confided to a biographer that one compelling reason why he authorised the atom bombing of Japan was because he believed that he would have been impeached for incompetence by Congress in his role as Commander-in-Chief if he had refused to use the bomb, and had proceeded with a conventional amphibious assault that cost a million allied casualties instead.
(Archive photo taken at the Honolulu conference in July 1944. Neither MacArthur nor Nimitz knew of the existence of the Manhattan project).
0 -
Researchers in the Graduate school of Engineering at Chiba University Japan have discovered that adding caffeine to specific platinum electrodes can enhance the efficiency of hydrogen fuel cells.
Their study which was published in Communications Chemistry on February 3rd, 2024 claims that
QuoteCaffeine, one of the chemicals contained in coffee, enhances the activity of a fuel cell reaction 11-fold on a well-defined Pt electrode, of which atomic arrangement has a hexagonal structure.
Professor Nagahiro Hoshi, along with colleagues Masashi Nakamura, Ryuta Kubo, and Rui Suzuki conducted their experiments by submerging platinum electrodes of varying types in a caffeine-containing electrolyte. They discovered that caffeine increases the ORR (oxygen reduction reaction) activity by up to 11 times with Pt(111), and by 2.5 times, with Pt(110) at a molar concentration of 1 × 10^−6 . This can potentially increase fuel cell efficiency, and decrease the need for extra platinum catalysts.
The really intriguing question is however, what prompted this line of research ? Did someone accidentally drop an extra strong cup of コーヒー or kawa in the electrolyte one morning ?
1 -
A new YT video by the well-known ‘Mentour Pilot’ channel goes into more detail about the overlap between the Inmarsat ACARS satellite tracking data of the MH370 flight, and that of the WSPR (weak signal propagation reporter) dataset mentioned above.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5K9HBiJpuk
It provides a highly lucid account of the flight operations procedures from a pilot’s POV, based on research by two French pilots Capt Blelly and Jean Luc-Marchand, along with links to the latest WSPR research sites including a very recent paper from 15 February 2024 by Dr Hannes Coetzee and Prof. Simon Maskell - ‘How Does WSPR Detect Aircraft over Long Distances - 15FEB2024’
This offers some worked examples of how WSPR data can be used to track large aeroplanes in flight.
0 -
A Chilean LATAM Airlines LA800 flight from Sydney to Auckland NZ suffered a ‘Technical Event’ on Monday that sent the 787 Dreamliner jet plunging 500 feet in an instant, injuring some 50 passengers, 12 of whom needed hospital treatment on arrival in Auckland.
Passengers subsequently told reporters that the pilot had apologised to them after the incident, and said that he had lost control of the plane after “All the gauges went blank”. The nature of this technical event appears to be related to an AD (Airworthiness Directive) originally issued by the FAA in 2015.
https://www.aviationtoday.com/2015/05/05/boeing-787-power-issue-to-receive-software-fix/
The issue identified is a glitch with the GCU processors which control the AC generators used to power the aircraft’s electrical systems. The problem can arise if the aircraft’s avionics systems are left continuously powered up for 248 days or longer. An internal system counter in the controller chip overflows and forces a fail-safe system reset. This previously unknown issue was apparently only detected during extended laboratory bench-testing over an 8 month period.
This was a potentially catastrophic failure in a fly-by-wire passenger jet. It was mitigated only by the fact that the the airliner was flying at a cruise altitude of 35,000 feet. During the emergency the plane was briefly descending at 4000 feet/minute (according to FR24) before the the event was fully brought under control. If this had happened at a lower altitude during the final landing approach, it could easily have led to the total loss of the airplane along with all the passengers and crew.
0 -
On the eve of the 10th anniversary of the disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, the BBC have broadcast a new documentary about the mystery called ‘Why Planes Vanish:The Hunt for MH370’
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001x0yh/why-planes-vanish-the-hunt-for-mh370
This documentary (currently available in UK on iPlayer) provides a concise history of the disappearance of the Boeing 777 flight with 239 souls aboard on March 8th 2014, and updates the story of the ongoing international search to find it.
One of the most intriguing leads comes from new research by a retired Aviation engineer Richard Godfrey who has studied the possibility of using the WSPR network dataset to track the exact position of MH370 on the night of its disappearance. WSPR (weak signal propagation reporter) is an amateur radio protocol system set up in 2008 which is based on small MF and HF transmitters around the world that broadcast low power test signals to evaluate the conditions of their propagation paths through the earth’s atmosphere. The transmission and reception data is automatically logged in a large database.
Richard Godfrey who likens WSPR to a global network of tripwires has suggested that close study of the WSPR data can disclose signal-to-noise and frequency drift anomalies caused by the passage of MH370 on its final flight into the southern Indian Ocean. It’s a suggestion that raised eyebrows and was met with much scepticism at first, but the idea of using WSPR as a form of OTH (over the horizon) radar happens to be testable. A number of proof of concept studies have been undertaken recently, including one led by Professor Simon Maskell at Liverpool University, and the results are said to be sufficiently encouraging that deep-sea search specialists Ocean Infinity are now negotiating with Australian and Malaysian authorities to resume their search for MH370.
Richard Godfrey believes the WSPR data indicates that MH370 will be found within a 30Km sector just beyond those on the 7th Arc previously searched by Ocean Infinity. The hypothesis is that the pilot extended MH370’s flnal flight path by gliding the unpowered plane for another 20m or so after its engines flamed out from fuel depletion. (photo below)
0 -
23 hours ago, StringJunky said:
The 2020 GOP presidential election spend was $793m. With inflation, let's say it will be $1B this year. The GOP will have to find the $1B plus his court fees, which are nearing half a billion already. He could easily clean up an election years worth of revenue. Can his fanbase support that?
The fanbase recently started a GoFundMe campaign to cover his costs after the latest Judge Engoron ruling. The GoFundMe allegedly raised around $84,000 in the first 24 hours - which equates to around 0.01% of the billion or so that TFG will need to cover all his legal costs, fines and interest payments. That's a "long row to hoe" as they say.
1 -
On 2/11/2024 at 12:43 AM, iNow said:
Ours, apparently. The trolling and rubbing of other people’s faces into the dirt is the entire point… reinforcing their “otherness.”
Roberta Kaplan the counsel for E. Jean Carroll recently recounted the experience of meeting Donald Trump at Mar a Lago to take a deposition, and of him telling her “See you next Tuesday”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/02/robert-kaplan-trump-c-word-e-jean-carroll-lawyer
“What are you saying ?” she replied , “We are not due in court until next Wednesday ?”. It was only when she was being driven away from Mar a Lago that her staff explained to her what TFG had really meant.
Meanwhile Trump who famously congratulated “The great state of Kansas” back in 2020 when the Kansas City Chiefs won Superbowl LIV (they play in Kansas City Missouri) is having another meltdown about the same team winning Superbowl LVIII at the w/e.
https://www.marca.com/en/nfl/kansas-city-chiefs/2024/02/12/65ca04b746163fa5638b457e.html
Apparently it’s all a ‘Deep State’ psy-op involving Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift to prevent him from winning the 2024 election.
0 -
Donald Trump apparently confused Nikki Haley with Nancy Pelosi 4 times in a single sentence while addressing a rally in Concord NH on Friday. TFG was trying to run one of his habitual lies about the Jan 6 insurrection by claiming that the Speaker Nancy Pelosi was to blame for the lack of security around the Capitol that day. Unfortunately Trump’s cognitive failures are now so frequent (and so severe), that he thinks Nancy Pelosi and Nikki Haley are one and the same person, and that the latter was Speaker of the House in the last months of his presidency.
He also referred to George Conway (not Concord) as the capital of New Hampshire in the same speech. This is unlikely to end well.
0 -
An integral part of Mexican cuisine ?
2 -
Quote
“A state’s legitimate interest in protecting the integrity and practical functioning of the political process permits it to exclude from the ballot candidates who are constitutionally prohibited from assuming office.” -
(Neil Gorsuch - Sep. 4th 2012 Hassan v. Colorado & Scott Gessler at the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit)
The SCOTUS will need to consider this interesting ruling which was penned by none other than Neil Gorsuch back in 2012 when he was a circuit judge on the appellate bench of the Tenth District. This was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court in their ruling this week.
https://www.newsweek.com/neil-gorsuch-could-strike-death-knell-donald-trump-1853993
0 -
Donald Trump has just been kicked off the GOP primary ballot in Colorado by the Colorado Supreme Court.
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/colorado-trump-14th-amendment-12-19-23/index.html
This reverses a finding by a Colorado District Court just a couple of weeks ago, where the judge reached the baffling conclusion that Donald Trump *had* engaged in insurrection, but should *not* be disqualified under section III of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution, because even though he was the POTUS at the time, he wasn’t technically deemed to be an ‘Officer of the United States Government” in the sense referred to by the 14th Amendment.
The Colorado Supreme Court made it clear in a 217 page ruling that they regarded this finding by the lower District Court to be a clear and reversible legal error. They also made it clear that the earlier finding that Trump had engaged in an insurrection was correct and factually based on evidence of record, and that Trump’s inflammatory speech which provoked the riot and breach of the Capitol was not protected political speech under the First Amendment.
This latest ruling will undoubtedly be appealed immediately to the SCOTUS by Trump and his lawyers. In reality the Colorado decision by itself will make little difference to the calculus of the electoral college in the 2024 Presidential election, because Trump probably wouldn’t have have won any EC votes in Colorado to start with - but the new ruling does set a very interesting legal precedent.
2 -
-
1 hour ago, iNow said:
The poetry slam is on Thursday
I think Burns Night is on the 25th of January ?
0 -
11 hours ago, MigL said:
If they want to inspire confidence in their product, and demonstrate they are worth the assessed value, they should put the AI in charge of the company.
I, myself, think the current state of AI is slightly more relevant than social media, spitting out the 'best' response, chosen by an algorithm ) learning ? ) from a multitube of possibilities.
That people are willing to assign that kind of value to this product demonstrates the depths of our gullibility, and the greed of market investors.
Or, maybe ... I'm a 'Luddite'.But I guess this rant is off topic ...
The title of my OP in this thread was a ‘HAL 9000’ joke about who was actually running OpenAI. But it’s a topic that has also been receiving some more serious attention recently e.g.
The article by Benjamin Granger from August 2023 cites a famous comment originally made by IBM in 1979.
0 -
3 hours ago, iNow said:
Yep, and what did Bruce recommend we do to protect against that (or was this just another “go shit your pants” clickbait story that we can’t do anything about)?
From the original article by by Bruce Schneier in Slate Dec 4th 2023: https://slate.com/technology/2023/12/ai-mass-spying-internet-surveillance.html
QuoteWe could limit this capability. We could prohibit mass spying. We could pass strong data-privacy rules. But we haven’t done anything to limit mass surveillance. Why would spying be any different?
From the follow-up article by Benji Edwards in Ars Technica the following day Dec 5th 2023: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/12/due-to-ai-we-are-about-to-enter-the-era-of-mass-spying-says-bruce-schneier/?comments=1&comments-page=1
QuoteSo what can people do about it? Anyone seeking protection from this type of mass spying will likely need to look toward government regulation to keep it in check since commercial pressures often trump technological safety and ethics. President Biden's Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights mentions AI-powered surveillance as a concern. The European Union's draft AI Act also may obliquely address this issue to some extent, although apparently not directly, to our understanding. Neither is currently in legal effect.
0 -
On 12/1/2023 at 3:18 PM, iNow said:
But Q-star is certainly another massive leap in feature/function that will be worth watchingT
It moves from language prediction instead to actual reasoning, which is new and VERY different
A recent article by Bruce Schneier (first published by Slate) highlights the risk of how a new era of mass spying may be triggered by advanced AI systems that enable a shift from observing actions to interpreting intentions, en masse.
Quote"Spying and surveillance are different but related things," Schneier writes. "If I hired a private detective to spy on you, that detective could hide a bug in your home or car, tap your phone, and listen to what you said. At the end, I would get a report of all the conversations you had and the contents of those conversations. If I hired that same private detective to put you under surveillance, I would get a different report: where you went, whom you talked to, what you purchased, what you did."
In the context of OpenAi’s recently reported AI breakthrough Q*, this passage makes particularly worrying reading:
QuoteWhat's especially pernicious about AI-powered spying is that deep-learning systems introduce the ability to analyze the intent and context of interactions through techniques like sentiment analysis. It signifies a shift from observing actions with traditional digital surveillance to interpreting thoughts and discussions, potentially impacting everything from personal privacy to corporate and governmental strategies in information gathering and social control.
0 -
2 -
George Santos has been expelled from the House of Representatives after a vote on the house floor.
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2023/12/01/congress/santos-expelled-00129588
The voting went 311 - 114 in favour of his expulsion, following a damning Ethics Committee report. He becomes only the third politician to be expelled in this way without a federal conviction since the Civil War. The four top GOP leaders in the house (including Speaker Mike Johnson) voted against expelling him.
1 -
A report by Reuters on 30 November 2023 which went largely unnoticed, throws more light on what might have provoked the sudden 4 day ouster of Sam Altman the CEO of OpenAI:
QuoteAhead of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s four days in exile, several staff researchers wrote a letter to the board of directors warning of a powerful artificial intelligence discovery that they said could threaten humanity, two people familiar with the matter told Reuters
QuoteAfter being contacted by Reuters, OpenAI, which declined to comment, acknowledged in an internal message to staffers a project called Q* and a letter to the board before the weekend's events, one of the people said. An OpenAI spokesperson said that the message, sent by long-time executive Mira Murati, alerted staff to certain media stories without commenting on their accuracy.
Some at OpenAI believe Q* (pronounced Q-Star) could be a breakthrough in the startup's search for what's known as artificial general intelligence (AGI), one of the people told Reuters. OpenAI defines AGI as autonomous systems that surpass humans in most economically valuable tasks.
The new model was able to solve certain mathematical problems in a way that made researchers very optimistic about Q*’s future success according to Reuter’s source.
0 -
7 hours ago, CharonY said:
Polling on perceived economic and crime situation suggest that facts don't really matter anymore, assuming they ever did.
Argentina has just elected a chain-saw wielding far-right ‘libertarian’ fringe candidate called Javier Milei as their new president.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-67470549
Popularly known as ‘El Loco’ (the madman), his economic objectives include replacing the peso with the US dollar and “blowing up” the central bank. On social issues, he wants to loosen gun laws, abolish abortion - which was only legalised in Argentina as recently as 2020 - and allow the sale and purchase of human organs.
The victory of Milei who won a decisive run-off by almost 12% against Mr Massa the economy minister of the outgoing left-wing government has been welcomed by Donald Trump and former president Bolsonaro of Brazil who say that he will “Make Argentina great again”.
One salient factor that probably influenced many voters was a deep economic crisis that had seen the annual inflation rate rise to 143%, with around 40% of Argentines living below the poverty line.
0 -
The ongoing speculation over Sam Altman’s dismissal has provoked a heated discussion of some quite outre theories as to how and why it happened. BBC Technology Editor Zoe Kleinman who says her phone ‘blew up’ on Friday when the news broke, points out that there were only 6 people on the board of OpenAI, so it was just 4 of them led by the Chief Scientific officer who dismissed both the President and the CEO of the company.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-67461363
Some have noted that Elon Musk’s company X (formerly Twitter) has recently released a new LLM chatbot called Grok, while others have drawn attention to a blog article published by Sam Altman on the OpenAI website on 24 February of this year titled “Planning For AGI and Beyond”
https://openai.com/blog/planning-for-agi-and-beyond
This article discusses his understanding of the nature of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) which is widely seen as the Holy Grail and next step of AI development, and sets out the possible timeline and challenges involved. The final part of the article includes this paragraph which seems to have a certain resonannce in the light of what has just happened:
QuoteWe have a clause in our Charter about assisting other organizations to advance safety instead of racing with them in late-stage AGI development. We have a cap on the returns our shareholders can earn so that we aren’t incentivized to attempt to capture value without bound and risk deploying something potentially catastrophically dangerous (and of course as a way to share the benefits with society). We have a nonprofit that governs us and lets us operate for the good of humanity (and can override any for-profit interests), including letting us do things like cancel our equity obligations to shareholders if needed for safety and sponsor the world’s most comprehensive UBI experiment.
1 -
15 hours ago, swansont said:
Fired for giving plausible-sounding but false information? The deuce, you say.
New reporting says that Greg Brockman the president and co-founder of OpenAI who had been stripped of his board position on Friday, but was supposed to remain with the company because he was of “vital importance”, has also resigned and left OpenAI.
There is a good deal of speculation as to what has prompted the sudden ouster of the founders, with some commentators suggesting that concerns at boardroom level about the prioritisation of profit over safety in the future development goals of OpenAI played a key role.
Others have drawn attention to Microsoft’s sudden ban on their own employees from using internal access to OpenAI tools which was implemented without warning on Friday - shortly before the dismissal of Sam Altman was announced.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/10/microsoft_blocks_chatgpt/?td=keepreading
This was said to be due to “data and security concerns”, which lines up with a recent report by UK spy agency GCHQ that sensitive prompts fed into public LLM (large language model) AI systems may allow them to learn confidential information from such inputs, and leak it to other users.
https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/15/gchq_warns_against_sensitive_corporate/
0 -
Sam Altman the head of ‘OpenAI’ has been ousted by the company’s board in a move that has sent shockwaves through the sector.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67458603
Altman was the co-founder of the non-profit in 2015 which has become best known for its ground-breaking ChatGPT bot. The company which is now backed by Microsoft was recently reported to be in talks to sell shares to investors at a price that would value it at more than $80bn (£64bn).
The company said its board members did not have shares in the firm and that their fundamental governance responsibility was to "advance OpenAI's mission and preserve the principles of its Charter".
The Chief technology officer Mira Mirauti is set to take over on an interim basis.
0 -
6 hours ago, nec209 said:
What is the psychology assessment of neo con fascism alt right?
So most countries have liberal and conservative parties but in the US the conservative party has been moving more to right with the neo con and fascism views. I remember when Bush was in power he was painted has fascism and hard core conservative. But today he would be a liberal compared to Trump and where GOP is today. When you look at Trump and Ron Desantis you see how party has moved more to right.
So what is driving this move to right? And why are the politicians more crazy like why can’t you have politicians with Trump views but speak like Bush than a third grader and more crazy like. Why is it that moving more to the right is losing the ability to speak and more crazy like?
But now it seems the GOP and conservative people hate Bush now but love Trump. So there is more of shift to right. I would think in 10 to 15 years from now Trump would be very liberal because the GOP would move even more to right than where Trump is today.
The liberals have also moved more to left on identity politics and social issues but still being same on economic issues with some even moving more to right on economic issues.
It like the US is being split in middle moving away unless that the news media is doing?
But I don’t know why every new president the GOP moves more to right, I remember the Bush days and how he was hated and viewed has hard core conservative and now liberals would love for Bush to win over Trump or Ron Desantis.
There is even some liberals hoping Ron Desantis would win over Trump because of the similar views but he less crazy like and speaks better. But again in 10 to 15 years from now Trump would be very liberal because the GOP would move even more to right than where it is today.
So has any psychologist or psychiatrist done a psychology assessment of neo con fascism alt right and where the US going down rabbit hole of mental hospital in the way they talk and the way things are going?
The liberals don’t look good has in the US now is identity politics and more left on social issues possible pushing centrist to right conservatives more to the alt right.
One fundamental problem is that many people on the far right-wing of US politics don’t really believe in democratic values anymore, and nor do they wish to live in a constitutional democracy. A good few of them apparently want to live in a Christo-Fascist theocracy based exclusively on evangelical fundamentalist readings of the bible as interpreted by self-appointed ‘ayatollahs’, some of whom want to declare a holy war on unbelievers, and execute non-Christians (and no, that is not a joke or an exaggeration).
Intermingled with these Christian zealots are self-indoctrinated members of the QAnon cult which originally began as an online prank on the 4CHAN image board - a cult which some believe was secretly promoted and encouraged by Russian intelligence operatives as part of a black-ops campaign of psychological warfare against the USA. There is in fact some considerable overlap between the QAnon cult and various wings of the evangelical christian right. There are for example sub-chapters of QAnon that identify strongly with young earth creationists who are also flat-earthers, and follow Bishop Ussher’s chronology which teaches that the (flat) earth was created at 6pm on Tuesday 22 October 4004 BC.
Closely associated with both the Christo-Fascist and QAnon cults is yet another bizarre group known as the Sovereign Citizen Movement who back in early 2021 were confidently predicting that Donald Trump would be sworn in as the *19th* president of the USA on 4th March 2021 - Basically this movement believes that every congress since 1871 has been invalid, and that Ulysses Grant the18th president was the last legitimate holder of that office. (For more detail see —> https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/qanon-conspiracy-theories-trump-tiktok-1118668/ ).
A common thread linking all of these cults is what the French Sociologist Émile Durkheim (1858 - 1916) called ‘Anomie’. a word whose Greek root ἀνομία literally means ‘lawlessness’. Durkheim used this word in several ways, but the one that seems relevant here is a general breakdown of collective moral values caused by a conflict or mismatch between existing belief systems and rapidly changing social realities affecting ordinary people such as mass industrialisation, or the types of de-industrialisation and impoverishment seen in the rust-belt areas of the USA.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomie
Many ordinary people in the USA feel alienated, betrayed, disempowered and fundamentally ignored both by modern corporate America, and by what by they regard as the self-centered ‘Washington bubble’ of mainstream american politics. This sense of anger and victimhood makes them ready converts to the teachings of conspiracy cults which provide self-referential explanations, convenient scapegoats (e.g. Immigrants, the ‘Deep State; ‘Fake News’, Liberals, Masks etc) and above all they provide a missing sense of community in the form of the companionship of fellow believers - people who will happily stand together on the Grassy Knoll at Dealey Plaza waiting for JFK or JFK jnr. to magically rise from the dead, restore Donald Trump to the presidency, and join him in his fight against the Deep State to purge the world of satanic child-eating cannibals.
https://people.com/politics/qanon-believers-gather-dallas-john-f-kennedy-jr-died-1999/
0
Why use the atomic bomb on Japan?
in Politics
Posted
As of May 1945, the USA had enough fissile material available to manufacture just 3 atomic bombs. One of these nicknamed ‘Little Boy’ was a ballistic gun-type device that worked by firing a slug of Uranium 235 along a barrel into another sub-critical mass of U235 to cause a chain reaction with a 15 Kiloton explosive yield. This was never tested because the engineers were certain it would work at the first time of asking - so they simply assembled and dropped it on Hiroshima - but there was no other Uranium 235 available. The scientists had used up their entire stock of weapons grade Uranium 235 refined over a 3 year period in building this single weapon.
https://www.census.gov/history/pdf/fatman-littleboy-losalamosnatllab.pdf
The other two devices both relied on an HE implosion lens to compress a hollow sphere of Plutonium 239 into a critical mass with an explosive yield of around 21 Kilotons. This novel Plutonium implosion mechanism was a highly complex engineering challenge to perfect, and absolutely had to be tested by proof firing one of the devices nicknamed ‘The Gadget’ at Los Alamos to ensure it worked.
After the Trinity test on 16 July 1945, the USA now had just 2 atomic bombs left available for use - One Uranium device, and one Plutonium device nicknamed ‘Fat Man’. American military planners believed they would need to drop at least two bombs to convince the Japanese to surrender, and they reasoned it was better to actually run out of ammunition, rather than *look* as though they were running out of ammunition. It was a gamble that worked, because after the bombing of Nagasaki on August 9th, the Japanese concluded that America had an entire production line running, and that a third weapon would shortly be dropped on Tokyo if they did not offer their unconditional surrender immediately.
In reality the USA had no other nuclear weapons that could have been deployed against Japan at that time. It is said that they could have cobbled together another Plutonium 239 device by a cannibalising a laboratory test-rig nicknamed the ‘Demon Core’ - which is another entire story - and would have taken months.