Glancer

What an odd thing to say. You don't know where physics constants come from. You also haven't noticed that a wave function solution to Schrodinger's equation is the heart of quantum mechanics in the sense that: you will solve for it mathematically for every standard model particle. If that is true, then the wave function would be a good place to put the physics constants, to cover the most ground. Without physics constants, physics of our universe can't be expressed. So you have to put it somewhere that is most common, so that everything in the physical universe has access to physics constants and can be expressed. Does that make sense to you? Well, a science consultant can hardly be expected to see the underlying pattern in real physics. But there is one. What's wrong with string theory and loop quantum gravity is that they don't have big bang expansion and the Hubble equation (Hubble expansion) built into them without resorting to dubious hand-waving. So in my model, I made "expansion at the speed of light" a fundamental characteristic of the building blocks of spacetime. In doing so, the invariance of the speed of light for all observers is more natural. Next, I looked at the two slit interference pattern. For every slit that is open, there seems to be this ripple thing that is also a wave function. Since the interference pattern works for single photons, then it looked to me like the interference pattern is always there in the same way that a road or highway is always there whether there is traffic or not (traffic represents photons). As I looked closer, a highway is not the perfect analogy because it's static and always there. Something more like a river or a waterfall, something that from far away might look static, but if you look very closely, a river or waterfall is really the dynamic condition of water molecules traveling by. I couldn't tell you how many Expanding Gravitons are passing through the two slits per second, but someday, with enough information, somebody could calculate it. You may not like that I am suggesting that a wave function has a dual existence as both mathematics and as a real mechanism that enjoys the status of existence because it performs the job of being the carrier of the physics constants. But it is a simple enough explanation that anybody could understand it. It is the Occam's razor of intuition and simplicity. Then, if the building blocks of spacetime are Expanding Gravitons, then you can easily place two expanding gravitons on the x-axis. EG1 (expanding graviton 1) has it's center fixed at x = 0 (for all time). EG2 can travel along the x axis, from left to right, at velocity v. The Expanding gravitons together can reproduce the derivation of time dilation. X2 + Y2 + Z2 - c2t2 = X'2 + Y'2 + Z'2 - c2t'2 If the transformation satisfies the above equation, it will be consistent with Einstein's postulates; Anderson pg 10. So I have a wave function ripple that I got from the two slit interference pattern. I upgraded it to a sphere that obeys the equation above, making it a 4 dimensional object. I gave it the job of being the carrier of the physics constants (which makes it real). I don't have to do anything else, and I have a building block of spacetime that has relativity and quantum mechanics built into it. Superstring theory and Loop quantum gravity require graduate level bulls**t to convince you. I only require some geometry, algebra, and a 2nd year college Modern physics book to do the same thing. This is what your comment sounds like to me: When I look outside my window, I do not see kangaroos. They don't exist inside my house. Anybody who says they have seen kangaroos is lying. Anybody who has video of kangaroos is hoaxing it. The odds of an animal that has a pouch and can kick the crap out of you, with tiny little hands, even slimmer. Fat chance.

Are you a defender of Sean Carroll's many world interpretation? Or do we agree that s**t is crackpottery!

Do you know what the difference is between woo woo and woo hoo? Woo woo is when you are too afraid to do what it takes to do something amazing because you think your reputation is worth more. Woo hoo is what happens when you are determined to do something amazing.

The definition of consciousness is the ability to have an opinion. The definition of intelligence is the ability to have an informed opinion. Who would have thought that the inevitable fate of any intelligent life-form is to have endless arguments with people who also claim to be well informed.

There is evidence that GPS signals are being effected by the SkinWalker ranch phenomena. The phenomena on the ranch is effecting GPS coordinates of tests that are performed. I am in full agreement that this needs to be studied and looked into more carefully. The hypothesis remains: are UFO's generating length contraction effects that are effecting the GPS signal. Any smart phone has a GPS program on it. If you run the program, and set your cellphone on a fixed surface, the longitude, latitude and altitude won't change. But if a UFO with a warp field shows up, a significant deviation of longitude, latitude and altitude would be a good way to confirm that a warp field is being used. If I could make a wish, I would literally wish that the correct quantum gravity theory would be developed by the physics community. It can't be all mathematically abstract and averse to experiments. It has to look like Modern physics, cosmology, mechanics, electromagnetism, particle physics. It has to explain where the physics constants come from and how they relate to geometry. It has to have common sense built into it, up to a point where physics is what it is: it is literally made of physics constants, geometry and the Euler equation which in turn give us standard model virtual particles and fields, which lead to real particles. No more theories that are made of mathematical tricks that introduce more dimensions than what we can experimentally account for. A good quantum gravity theory should account for all of the dimensions, even explain what dimensions are made of. Should be self consistent. Should predict something new. Should be cleverly assembled. I call it a model: Expanding Graviton Model. The model leads to an experiment that, if the technological hurdles could be overcome, it would lead to a warp field generator. I don't believe that the Alcubierre drive is the only way to curve spacetime. I think there is a way that uses significantly less energy. We just don't have the technology to build it, yet. Don't be afraid to look into Galileo's telescope and see the moons of Jupiter. I watched Star Trek TNG for years of my youth. I always wished that there was more depth to the physics. When I realized that the physics that we already had could lead to a low energy solution to a warp drive, it made me wonder: why is the theoretical physics community wasting their time with string theory, loop quantum gravity, many world interpretation, and the erroneous belief that QM cannot be understood? So the government is paying close attention to a NASA astrophysicists who is interacting with a real UFO, and the physics community isn't interested. I literally cannot wrap my head around why.

The UFOs that have been sighted on the ranch are hypothesized to be real spacecrafts that generate warp fields. Warp fields introduce length contraction and time dilation effects that might account for all those photogrammetry pixels that are hundreds of feet in the air. It could also be the case that if a warp field is being used, it could be under the mesa. I understand that you don't care to watch this kind of show, but it is a real phenomena that needs to be explained and is being taken seriously by the US government. Any normal person would be dissatisfied with the theoretical physics community for presenting theories with obvious flaws in them, like Loop Quantum Gravity that is not compatible with big bang expansion. I don't want to criticize the theoretical physics community, but you force my hand when you say, "I'd say you have one more shot at salvaging some credibility and giving an indication that you want to be taken seriously but discussing matters of substance." I already handed you a theory that has big bang expansion built into it. It has physics constants unified with geometry built into it. The theory naturally explains quantum entanglement and even has a path to warp field generation. I have presented evidence that the altitude data of a routine photogrammetric analysis of the ranch had corrupted points. Seriously, I don't know what kind of data you think you are looking for. If it can't be woo, it can't be you.

There is no experiment that would be able to tell the difference between a sphere of radius 10^-35 meters across, and a geometric point. It is not even clear that geometry has any meaning at this scale. There is every justification to treat an expanding graviton at time t=0 as a point of radius 10^-35 meters. Over a very short period of time, it will be a sphere, until it overlaps with a charge of potential energy U(x,y,z,t), at which time it will become the solution to the Schrodinger equation. Spin-2 refers to the second order stress energy tensor that is part of the Einstein equations. I admit that it would take many PhD candidates to eventually show that the Expanding Graviton is the carrier of all forms of energy. So in the mean time, if we have to call it the Expanding Spherical boson wave function and carrier of all of the physics constants, then ... Nobody is saying that mathematics doesn't help with experimental results. Nobody is saying that the physics is wrong. What is being argued is that more information comes from a better, physics based interpretation. The real goal is to get to warp fields. If Expanding Gravitons exist, also known as wave functions that expand spherically at the speed of light (to accommodate the invariance of the speed of light), are bosons, are the carriers of the physics constants and have a surface area that is defined to be a virtual photon... The traditional definition of a virtual photon is that it can only come into existence if it obeys the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle, Delta E Delta t < h-bar/2. But the Expanding Graviton Model redefines virtual photons to be the surface area of an Expanding Graviton. The surface area is the medium for electromagnetic energy to exist on. If there is energy E = hf, it will exist somewhere on the surface of the expanding graviton. In the case of two entangled photons, there is energy E = hf on opposite sides of the Expanding Graviton. If we had the technology to frequency shift a difference in frequency between the entangled photons, it would be equivalent to Planck constant h*Delta f + Delta U = 0. Delta U is gravitational potential energy. A beam or field of entangled photons with a gravitational potential energy between each entanglement of Delta U is equivalent to a warp field.

Interest in crystals led to the study of Solid State physics. Introduction to Solid State Physics, Charles Kittel, copyright 1986. What you call woo might become the future of physics. You have a NASA astrophysicist, Travis Taylor, who is being taken seriously by the American government with regard to phenomena that is occurring at the SkinWalker Ranch in Utah, USA. I don't know how familiar you are with photogrammetry, but it usually involves a drone that flies over a region of land and takes thousands of picture. Everyone of those pictures is associated with a GPS (global positioning system) set of data: longitude, latitude, altitude. At 2:25 and 2:48, there is a GPS artifact that looks like a bunch of photogrammetry pictures with a set of corrupted altitude data. Incidentally, GPS is subject to errors associated with general relativity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Error_sources_and_analysis "In 1955, Friedwardt Winterberg proposed a test of general relativity—detecting time slowing in a strong gravitational field using accurate atomic clocks placed in orbit inside artificial satellites. Special and general relativity predicted that the clocks on GPS satellites, as observed by those on Earth, run 38 microseconds faster per day than those on the Earth. The design of GPS corrects for this difference; because without doing so, GPS calculated positions would accumulate errors of up to 10 kilometers per day (6 mi/d).[21]" I assume none of you watch Secrets of Skinwalker ranch nor are you aware of the UFOs that have been spotted there are almost every episode. Nevertheless, the American government is taking these things seriously.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity "As a theory LQG postulates that the structure of space and time is composed of finite loops woven into an extremely fine fabric or network. These networks of loops are called spin networks. The evolution of a spin network, or spin foam, has a scale above the order of a Planck length, approximately 10−35 meters, and smaller scales are meaningless. Consequently, not just matter, but space itself, prefers an atomic structure. " If the big bang goes back to t = 10^-43 seconds, then Expanding Gravitons can begin with a radius r = ct =3x10^8 m/s*10^-43 sec = 3x10^-35 meters. In what way is a sphere of radius r = 3x10^-35 meters not a point? point noun a geometric element that has zero dimensions and a location determinable by an ordered set of coordinates In the Expanding Graviton Model, a wave function exists by being the carrier of the physics constants; "carrier" is intended to mean that the wave function expresses energy, position, momentum and other physics properties as if calibrated to the physics constants to include the speed of light c and the Planck constant h. Light would not exist if it were not for the existence of physics constants. In some way not necessarily understood by some, the physics constants are the medium. The Expanding Graviton is the union between geometry (an expanding sphere boson) and physics constants. If the Expanding Graviton Model is the carrier of physics constants, then it is also the fundamental building block of our spacetime universe. Since an Expanding Graviton is a wave function, and quantum entangled photons can be described with a wave function, then one is led to the conclusion that entangled photons are a piece of spacetime that could be studied in the lab. For example, since the curvature of spacetime is related to gravity and gravitational potential energy, then one might ask if an Expanding Graviton in the form of a pair of quantum entangled photons may be able to store gravitational potential energy. How can you be sure that any of your assumptions about physics are correct? The assumption that a mathematical description is not describing the mechanism that makes physics exist could be the obstruction that has hindered the physics community for the last 40 years. Or misunderstood. The expansion of individual Expanding Gravitons is the speed of light. The centers of mass between many Expanding Gravitons is, at the very least, subject to Hubble's Law. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble's_law Hubble's Law is proof that two points, if separated far enough, can move away from each other faster than the speed of light. The Inflationary epoch is an extreme example of points (the center of Expanding Gravitons) moving away from each other. It is probable that two Expanding Gravitons in close proximity (distances shorter than a light second) can be separated faster than the speed of light if enough energy is applied in the right way. A substance is anything that has mass. Expanding Gravitons are the union between geometry and physics constants, neither of which are required to have mass. If the geometry of a sphere, physics constants and the basics of Modern Physics are not intuitive to you, then something is seriously wrong. You shouldn't be referring to established physics and mathematics as woo. See synonyms for: point / pointed / pointing / points on Thesaurus.com noun

Just so that you know where I am getting my ideas about physics… 1. Physics for scientists & engineers with Modern Physics, Serway, second addition. 2. Modern Physics and Quantum Mechanics, Anderson, 1971. My hypothesis is that spacetime is made of units that look like Modern physics. unit yoo͞′nĭt noun An individual, group, structure, or other entity regarded as an elementary structural or functional constituent of a whole. I got the idea from matter which is made of units of matter called atoms. I figured that spacetime is made either of a single thing or it’s made of units too. I used to think that spacetime was one object. But two things changed my mind. First, Loop Quantum Gravity argues that spacetime is made of a large number of loops, like a box of Cheerios. But then I remembered that the big bang began as a point and expanding rapidly, faster than the speed of light. I tried to figure out how a box of Cheerios could expand like the big bang, but couldn’t see it. So, I figured that Loop Quantum Gravity is wrong because it doesn’t take “expansion” into account. Second, I thought about the two slit interference patterns. The wave function in the two slit interference looks like a water ripple. Since I have spent time outside near ponds, I do know that water ripples expand at the velocity of a wave in water. So, if spacetime has to be made of something, something that looks like physics, and something that expands, well why not a wave function ripple? If it’s not obvious, the expanding ripple has to be upgraded to a 4D spacetime sphere. Since spacetime is 4D, then what it’s made of should be 4D as well. The idea is that these 4D spheres are generated continually. How do I know that they exist? Well, the physics constants exist, but the physics community doesn’t know or care where they come from. They are assumed to be universal in some metaphysical (don’t talk about it) way. Solving two problems with one definition, I defined these 4D expanding wave function spheres to be the carriers of the physics constants, including the speed of light. I am sure you are wondering why such a model doesn’t lead to a pile of spheres like gumballs in a gumball machine? The answer is that I assume these 4D expanding wave function spheres are bosons. boson bō′sŏn noun Any of a class of particles, including photons, mesons, or alpha particles, that have integral spins and do not obey the exclusion principle, so that any number of identical particles may occupy the same quantum state. As bosons, these expanding 4D spheres can expand at the speed of light. They can occupy the same space because they do not obey the Pauli exclusion principle. Since “4D expanding wave function boson sphere” is a long name, and they are really just building blocks of spacetime, I decided to call the Expanding Gravitons. Feel free to propose a better name if you think of one. Expanding gravitons expand at the speed of light. That means that their radius is r = speed of light * time; r = ct. The center of the sphere is the center of an inertial reference frame. It’s the same center as described in the derivation of time dilation which assumes a thought experiment of a train car with a source of light on the floor being emitted and reflected of the ceiling. The same experiment can assume the existence of two Expanding Gravitons traveling with relative velocity between their center of masses. Serway pg. 906 figure 39.6.

It looks to me like spacetime is the union of physics constants and geometry. While such a union might not be a familiar physical thing, it certainty has existence enough to be a place where Standard Model particles may exist.

How are the physics constants selected? What does G.O.D. stand for?

Whatever the energy of the universe is, and whatever negative gravitational potential adds to zero, it doesn't look something that could have happened by accident or without planning.

Contactees have been telling us about aliens for at least 80 years. There is no evidence that they came here to eat us. Nor is there evidence that they came here to invade the Earth. Truthfully, some of the stories have involved scary abductions by aliens. There might even be a fertility group of aliens out there that is looking for the right human DNA. How many religious groups have been started in the name of contact with aliens? I'm not suggesting that science follow any of the UFO paths that went to bad places. I am suggesting that there is nothing wrong with reaching out in meditation or intent to make contact with aliens who care about our planet. We might even reach out to them seeking help with our technology. I would think that aliens from Skinwalker ranch would know more about the physics of spacetime, than the dusty historic scientific from the 19th century that we cling to today. The last 50 years of superstring theory has proven that mathematics doesn't lead to new innovations in physics. There is a philosophical problem with thinking that extreme graduate level mathematics can teach us how to build a warp drive or develop the necessary technological breakthroughs that can take our civilization to the next level. There is something wrong with human philosophy that is allowing human civilization to slide into a dark place. Whatever woo New Age crystals that you all don't like, it was taking us in the right direction. I am suggesting that we, as the scientific community, stop and reassess whether or not our philosophies are helping us survive as a species? Or letting us perish.

It sounds like something that wouldn't happen naturally or by accident. Sounds like something that would take some preparation to set up. Yet regardless of how you feel about deities creating universes, it would seem that the more important thing to figure out is: what is spacetime made of? ...and can I test a small piece of it in the lab?