Michael F. D.

Are you sure? Then you should acknowledge as invalid a following facts, observations and theories: - within the range of the temperature ( -1C ... +1C ) a water can be in hard, fluid and gaseous condition; - all alive objects at the change of temperature does changes the program of operation - a plants throws the foliage, animals falls into the hibernation etc; - a local temperature of terrain forms the specific type of objects existing here; - a chemical reactions occurs under determined warm-up condition; - a physical nucleus reactions of the fission and merging occurs at super high temperature; - after BB, the universe passed all known stages of evolution in accordance with change (the reduction) of temperature; The Earth is a demonstrative and available for observation an example of complex system with automatic regulation. Here temperature, falling down to the range which is possible for life, holds at this range a billion years already. This is not a casual blind coincidence of external and internal conditions. This is realization of the program of existence of object, which is occurs in accordance with the law of conservation of life (time) cycle.

What about my thread? I am waiting the replies.

I wonder at your reaction. You reject my offer as invalid. Then you are talking the same thing, confirming that this faithfully. The USUAL WATER changes the state depending on the temperature. Exactly the temperature starts this process. This is a reliable fact.

A reason?

All things and phenomenas exist in balance. Any action meets the reluctance. This is a necessary condition of conservation of the cycle of existence of any object. So is created our universe.

Oddly to say such conclusion possible to do by using of existing theory. - A BB theory . - A theory of expanding universe. - A theory of the expansion of space at the speed of light. - A red shift in spectrum of the stars which "confirms" all these theories. So. Is it not strange, that the observer is residing on the Earth, of a thousand of the years does observes a not changed picture of starry sky? Considering "theoretically maximum speed of the light" with which occurs the expansion of space, observer must see enough a quickly changing picture of the location of stars. Accepting all enumerated above a theories as reliable, it is possible to expect several explanations why this does not occur. 1) The Earth founds in the centre of universe and all stars are slowly moves relative the Earth from this point. The red shift can be observed in ALL DIRECTIONS without exception. 2) Whole visible universe in process of the expansion runs at a speed of "c" to a one direction together with the Earth from a Zero Point. But, why to a one direction? If expansion occurs in the manner of 3D sphere then the whole matter must exist in the manner of fine shell of this sphere. Herewith with an each instant the shell must becomes some fine. This must be exactly so, since BB was began with a flashing of light. But we does not observe this.. And once again a red shift persistently exists on all directions. 3) Space enlarges at the speed of light without any object having mass. In the manner of light radiation and gravity field. Any Star does not takes the participation in this process . They are moves off from the Earth with a small speed . Consequently a space and stars are independent and comply with a different law. All objects having mass "has fallen out" from space and live its life. The Single reliable fact this red shift under unchanging picture of the mutual location of the stars. Considering this fact, variants 2) and 3) it is possible to acknowledge as not having sense. From these three variant the less absurd and confirmed by observations is a first . Existing on today a picture of universe could be formed , if the material from which were formed stars, was evenly portioned in a whole volume of universe SIMULTANEOUSLY. WITHOUT EXPANSION OF SPACE SUBSEQUENTLY. But how it is possible to combine this statement with a red shift? This is possible to do if do recall about "fourth dimension of spacetime" . This is TIME. It is exactly a moving of time which we observe as expansion of universe. In ONE DIRECTION ONLY. ALONG WITH ALL OBJECTS. The red shift proves that move of time has a different speed for miscellaneous objects i.e each object exists in its Time Cycle. But what is a Space? This is illusion of Time. Space exists in the limit of sphere with Plank's lenght diameter. Since a spatial volume of universe is close to a zero value, we can take any object as the centre of this "sphere" . The Earth is not a worse object by comparison any other one and can be correspond to this "spatial centre of universe". Thereby a one statement is proved with two completely different standpoint. Consequently it is a TRUTH.

Of course, even the most measly example "from life", which can not been explained by the theory, generates the equitable doubts in its faithfulness. Are you agree? Usually, for the such events, the paradoxes was inventing. So, what the next paradox?

I claimed, in my first reply, that nor one of other dimensions can not exist in our one. Are you agree?

The traditional "Whut?" is absent. So, I do not see the reasons for such displacement of my topic. Your explanation?

A notion "time" has been arised at everyday life of people for indication of occurring events and periodic changes in life and surrounding their world. We can observe the existence of time on occurring changes or at events only. For orientation at time, people are using the reiterative events, such as the orbiting of moon, a rising of sun or the sundown, tide of water on seeshore, and a clock, later. Thereby, the CYCLES this is an integral, main characteristic of time. Each object in universe (the universe also) has the inherent to him Time Cycle (TC). Indeed, time shows itself as TC of object. What starts all events? I claim - the time. Since the time contains necessary information and energy for realization of events. This a strange at first thought conclusion, I can motivate by using mathematical transformation and logic . For these purposes, I use known mass-energy relation: E=mc^2 (1) Here c is a speed of light. If we speak of speed, in any event, this means the attitude of the way s to time t. So, c=s/t (2) Bearing in mind c=const this attitude defines "the linear expansion of space " in accordance with the existing "analog" (non digital) theory. Having substitute (2) in (1) we get: E=m(s/t)^2 (3) Whence t=s/sqrt(E/m) (4) or t=s (sqrt m/sqrt E) (5) That can we see? Obviously that time has a complex structure and contains the space, energy and mass (information) . SPACE, MASS And ENERGY EXISTS AT TIME ONLY. TIME CYCLE is the UNIVERSAL SOURCE and a SINGLE ACTOR OF ALL EVENTS for ANY OBJECT. It is A PROGRAMM of EXISTENCE . © 2003 Michael F. Dmitriyev

If for acknowledgement of theory is needed to apply the paradoxes , this theory is paradoxical itself. Time is "terra incognita" in the science hitherto. So, I don't see the reasons for unconditional rejection of any theories.

Exactly, what does have do with a quantum number, sub shells and transition metal complexes to change a colour of paper in this instance?

Explain the result of following experiment, please. If take the sheet of the white paper and drip on it a water, then we'll see the gray spot. We note that a water is transparent.

Seems, you want to make the collection of my topics (I see at first, that my topics are settles down in Pseudoscience & Metaphysics.) . Well, we'll leave the poetry at rest. Then all of dividends will be my. I expect of disclaimers of my point stated in original thread. So?

Why no? It is possible to consider the poem as the reliable observation of nature. It not worse than observations which made with microscope, for instance. The birth and death this a most conclusive evidences of existence of the cycles of time for all objects.