ArtsyGirl

An Invisible mental image is a type of mental image, That's invisible. I'm confusing any brain parts of Homo Neanderthalis. All Homo Sapiens think, but all of them don't picture things, that's why 100% of cave people didn't form mental images back then, They imagine without visualizing. All cave people had thoughts back then, but they didn't form mental images, They'd imagine without visualizing.

I'm not a chatbot, Thank you.

Again, It's not a claim, 100% of cave people really did not form mental images back then, they've only formed invisible mental images/imagine without visualizing, and cavemen do think.

It's not a claim, 100% of Cavemen not forming mental images is possible and it's real, you know. And they do form invisible mental images.

The comorbidity isn't very much real, It's a very unexplained phenomenon and no one knows for sure that this phenomenon has evidence or not, It occurs very much in the stone age, that 100% of cave people didn't form mental images or formed invisible mental images or imagine without visualizing. I'm sorry if I said to you guys that the phenomenon isn't real, but it's very unexplained like Bigfoot that the phenomenon doesn't exist but not forming mental images isn't possible. but people who don't form mental images or forming invisible mental images still have imagination because most things in imagination are merely invisible like a imaginary friend.

I'm not trolling, I am sorry.

I just want this thread locked now.

Yeah, I want this thread deleted now.

Well, you aren't, I want this thread to be deleted.

Yes, I did.

I'm sorry about that, I don't want to repeat myself, though. Yes, Hearing songs in your head is a type of mental representation.

It's not, Hearing songs in your head is different than mental representations. I'm leaving the thread now, bye.

Because hearing songs in your head is just different than mental representations. 100% of people don't form mental images is possible, A lot people form invisible mental images without visualizing is possible as well, but the phenomenon Aphantasia itself is not real and there's no evidence, I'm tired of talking about this, Let the moderators delete the thread, I'm leaving the thread, now.

Hearing a song in your head isn't really a mental representation, though. Mental representations are different than hearing songs in your head.

I'm not trolling Um, okay.

Mental representations are different than mental images, though since people don't see mental representations.

Okay, To say this, While people don't form mental images isn't possible, the phenomenon is not real and A lot of people form mental representations rather than visualizing. All people's brains are different. Even if people don't form IIs, they form IMIs. (Invisible mental images)

No, People don't form Juxtaposing Junctions.

What does JJs stand for? a Invisible image is a type of mental image that is invisible.

I was saying the inability to form invisible images doesn't exist, and no, a song playing in your head is not a invisible image. Visual hallucinations are fake perception. They aren't any other kinds of images besides visible and invisible. What I meant to say was people form invisible mental images, Most commonly since they can't form visible mental images.

*sensory I'm not referring to the pattern. an Artist would form a mental representation of a flower, but he doesn't form a mental image of a flower. The artist doesn't hold the same pattern in his mind as if he actually saw it, but think of it.

I'm not protesting too much. It's not a validated phenomenon, and I don't have sloppy language and I'm not stubborn. and I'm not claiming anything. this is a unexplained phenomenon. Despite being called ''mental images'' people see it visibly in their brain or form invisible images in their brain since they don't see it with their actual eyes.

I mean invisible images as mental representations when people don't see mental images, and I mean visible images as in visible mental images. the phenomenon I'm talking about is aphantasia and it doesn't exist, Nobody recognizes this phenomenon and it's not real, I don't want to talk about this.

It's not a claim, and I'm not wrong. The phenomenon is not real, I'm ending this thread now.

No, I'm saying that the phenomenon doesn't exist. How do you end a thread?