MJ kihara

I'm not refuting the models that have been developed...I look at their mathematics enviously,but l just want away of explaining it to a layman's,to make it more accessible to everyone from where someone can move on and refine the language.anyway when I look at the rotation curves of Galaxy and Galaxy shapes then have something that happens to explain that,the same concept helps me understand electrodynamics,helps me understand wave function collapse..and goes further to tell me that gravity is not just a force of attraction between mass, and Spacetime time curvature influence but it's deeper to exchange of information through entanglement.isn't that great? It's all about explaining what has been already established in an alternative way then adding something to make the science wheel keep rolling. Mainstream science am not against it,,,the problem is that I have not been polished to use it's terms efficiently...but am trying to use terms in a manner that they won't lose meaning..and where I lack terms,I use what is closer. e.g consciousness hue...i saw it appropriate,hue, to describe the extent..that reduces overtime as it spread,however the overall content remains the same.

please please don't do that.....hhhh...oo.... my..am 🙈... its a whole big issue up to wave function collapse ,spacetime curvature to cosmic filaments,cosmic web.I was told to take baby step,,,it might be gibberish to some,but don't cut my legs,if i get stuck up on consciousness i won't move anyway,being thrown to the trash bin,its too much,without that how can i explain spacetime curvature using the concepts being displayed on the diagram,i think if i was given time the whole idea will emerge...short of words...u could have tolerated plain language,just for a while till am done,then someone reformulate it using proper science terms and jargon. they is follow up concepts and diagrams that could have helped me settle this thorny uncomfortable thing that many fear going near it or even handle just a bit of it...its good if i was looked at, as a straw man looking for away.the problem is that they are major issues to deserve a topic but they are interrelated. after the full picture emerge i could have been asked for clarification....i just posses plain language, am ...i don't know

gate keeper....gravitation my off springs.

warping and unwrapping consciousness dominate...at least we exist, conscious human beings.

There issues here to clarify virtual particles, are not the 'conventional virtual particles' or virtual photons' those ones will be tackled on electrodynamics as derived from the diagram,in this case it arises from containment of emptiness by consciousness,meaning that once it disintergrate the two(consciousness and emptiness ) part ways and since consciousness is everywhere it travel almost instantly,as what happened during big bang..the inflation thing...'consciouness concentration hue diffusion'. This fact is critical when wave function collapse takes place. Filter my typos,my editor goes nuts sometimes. I feel it's time to go further on clarification.

The virtual particles outlined in the diagram,moves at the speed of light.unless they disintergrate and they fall back to the source...here I escape the 'ether' thing,no forces are being transferred magically.

When I was doing this 'the diagram thing' and relating it to other things to get the whole picture....I was surprised about the contradictions...' I know I exist because there is no existence' only to find out that a century ago there was discussions about the same,during formulation of set mathematics,the issue about Empty set,the Russell paradox..only to see that the paradox was there because they could not put consciousness and emptiness into the arguments.

Who? Or what ? Are words used by you to pass information to me in form of a question,you expecting an answer. That 'information' is predated by consciousness and emptiness.How can I answer about that? We talk of emptiness...using a word empty...that which we don't know about...what is it? But there is a word for it.in my case consciousness is synonymous with existence,and I happen to exist because I know there is no existence (emptiness).from that diagram consciousness and emptiness is fundamental.we know of consciousness cause we happened to be conscious. The question should be how does that lead to Spacetime fabric,dark energy,dark matter,normal matter and the four fundamental forces of the universe.

This is the best part about it,after struggling to understand why, and if it's true,then will it be the end of physics/science? Then start applying it in the theory of Evolution taking into the account structure of DNA.then u end up realising it's the beginning of another exciting phase. MigL just a question,if the universe is made up of consciousness....what is the place of Earth in that universe?(space of Earth relative to the Universe) in general terms very tiny,we are in that Earth and we happen to be conscious homo sapean sapean,then what's our extent of consciousness relative to universe consciousness.again in general terms very tiny.. a new age of exploration is ahead of us before we even start to scratch what is consciousness. Pliz don't run away. Time zones and langauge barriers. We(human) conquer them as we evolve,I meant just like that.joigus I would like the time when the AI will do automatic translations..so that scientific thoughts could be exchanged using native and neighborhood langauge.

I know I am in a blackhole where many won't go near...some times it can happen to be a microblack hole that evaporates promptly....I was intially dancing just safely away from the event horizon, throwing away usual things neutrinos,z-bosons then pap! Thrown to it,joigus I wil try to come out of it bits by bits, because eventually that is allowed.

The idea is that it's the beginning of everything interpretable, anything we know of e.g numbers,it's source of information it's self,that's the best I could arrange the diagram. The interplay of consciousness and emptiness,leads to that.what consciousness is doing at that boundary to emptiness becomes information. Let's go first to definition of consciousness...it's knowing there is emptiness...how? By containing it. It's contained by warping it,warping becomes a process,this process becomes information,initiation and continuation of this process becomes events,and flow of events become time completion of the process giving rise to a virtual particle therefore space emerge. Therefore,information is generated concurrently with formation of virtual particles.information is therefore coded in the sequence events that lead to formation of virtual particles,these events become time and the virtual particles become space it's self. Virtual particles give rise to Spacetime fabric. Information,time and space are embedded on virtual particle. Don't ask me what is consciousness the idea is,it's synonymous to existence,is only there because without it,is emptiness...nothing,zero.the intial part is philosophical.. Don't throw me to the rubbish bin that is the best I can explain here.

I feel I jumped to my gun by realising the diagram without first settling neutrino,z-boson,w-boson,quark and graviton dance.of course Higgs fields,why I talk about Primordial Higgs fields and the Higgs boson. And eventually what is the interplay between mass and enegy leading to a layman's understanding of general relativity by merging Einstein fields equations with the principle of uncertainty,therefore joining general relativity with quantum gravity. And remember all this,there is the issue of consciousness,which some of us associate with wave function collapse. I feel trapped..may be am now in the black hole (jokes). Let's see how I will evolves with a diagram here and there....while fearing not to throw all the ammunitions.

Spelling corrections....it's Primordial quantization...not primodial quantization...in the diagram.that's prior to quantum formation.we take photons as our quanta of energy.... Primordial in these case means having 'some properties' below the threshold of quantum formation.

Back to the hijack,a little bit,from the diagram there is the issue of graviton,the discussion about general relativity it's predictions have been tested and proved beyond doubt.Dark matter and dark energy influence is said to be there from it's gravitational influence of normal matter.given that from the definition of graviton as indicated( in the diagram) does that diagram not reconcile general relativity and quantum gravity? Then the issue of time dilation becomes easier to understand... because entanglement comes into the picture...I struggled to understand the tough 'words/terms' then I had to come up with this diagram and a few others for people like me, take me as an invited guest using plain language.

I tried to take baby steps earlier on by looking at Neutrino and later on at Z boson,so that I bring the Fuller picture which is huge but short,then I was afraid not to be swallowed by blackhole(the recycle bin of speculation). Spacetime fabric here is being created,where our Special relativity and General relativity can take place, Virtual particles are not the 'the virtual particles, virtual photons' which come later on in quantum foam and quantum fluctuations when planck's 'microscope' start resolving things. Dark photons they are under primodial quantization 'then a Full stop' beyond the standard model,cause our ''planck's 'microscope'' can't resolve them. About hot and dense those are properties,a longside with frequency that are explainable. There is no issue of 'ether' here I fear that a lot.Its all about the Model.In this case special relativity and General relativity is highly regarded.But go beyond by explaining even the rotation curves of galaxies and cosmic web ( the cosmic voids sorrounding cosmic filaments).too much. Emptiness you happen to know that it's there because your are conscious,I doubt if you were dead even us you left behind could be able to describe what you are and have become. I know the diagram because my imagination fits there,No.Thats not the purpose,just take the scientific knowledge you have and use the diagram as a template if it doesn't fit there then am done.scientist keep complaining about similarities across different subjects/discipline,how don't we know consciousness I just everywhere? Thanks alot for the response so far I thought the black hole will swallow me,my cries down there are being heard....hhhh...Hawking radiation at least keep escaping. you

It explains everything (The diagram). Swansont, Joigus, Genady.....let me hide..hhhh.. hope am not on madness steroids. Hope I won't vanish in the blackhole, where mental breakdown will swallow me, incase I vanish remember to associate that diagram with me.

Maybe we are synchronized, we humans we are just starting to scratch about quantum entanglement. I fear the extent to which AI is generating 'every thing' its high time we look for away to secure what is unique about ourselves.

I feel I have been thrown to the black hole(speculation thing) I wonder if I will escape as my friend hawking radiation, what about speculations that goes along with scientific facts and make predictions a head of them. Feynman diagrams never changed science of that time but enhanced our understanding of science. If ranks in speculations was created then chances of escaping the speculation thing could be high.

sorry for the language and time zones, ghost I mean neutrino, let me not stray towards that. anyway there is this issue of neutral currents, it took time for me to understand that, only for that pdf diagram to solve those issues. As for the standard model as I said while new in this forum, its much deeper, the intention is to go beyond the standard model, not refuting it but strengthening it. I know it sounds unreal, but simple reasoning may take us there. therefore, we are in what's new in science. Hope those diagrams are easier for a moderate brain to understand and comprehend as I was once, its time core science belong to every one .Anyway simple things are difficult to come by, as Einstein proved to us, tons of mathematics only to end up with three letters E=mc2 and incase of standard model simple ratios of 1,2 and 3.

Real is what is there,around you but u don't want to see it, finally ur left to be consumed by your own imaginations when the brain start distintergrating cause of age...maybe AI will take over to show us what is real,and personalise a cocoon for every one of us,where we will be swimming in wild imaginations.

Difficulties in comprehending z boson mass and its neutrality, the attached file shows the dance, let make science simple, maybe simple things solves difficult issues and imaginations, what's your take? Z boson.pdf

The main point is why? 'not specific to neutrino' there is where the issue is. Neutrino is unique on itself therefore the ' why?' should not be tagged to the others. They is the question of mass and quark generations.the 'why?' should help us understand that. Anyway (further clarification) from the PDF diagram the arrows direction tells us alot,reverse every arrow and u end-up getting anti Neutrino..in the same diagram there is 'primordial Higgs field' our(Neutrino) small masses,the issue of flavour,in the diagram if we pair the arrows and oscillate within the pairs we end up with three flavors. Then the same problem 'why?' arises, that is, the direction of arrows.And leads us to another issue 'where from?' let us digest that. My take,Neutrino is more 'fundamental' than the other flavored particles i.e it intiates formation of flavors and mass in other elementary particles (or it's at that initial point where those properties emerge from). About being a 'ghost and a wanderer' in the universe..hhhh it's a moderator..it smoothen Spacetime fabric by picking quantum fluctuactions here and throwing them there therefore helps in distributing energy density in the universe as it expand. Hope The moderator won't throw me away(it's a joke)

'don't commute' let us keep it plain..anyway,why do they have in the first place mass? and the masses are not the same? flavour why have three of them? leave alone it's anti-particles. The diagram has more than meets the eye...hhhh..moderate scientific terms it can make an average head(mine)spin.

The PDF diagram...I want it to incite conversation about why Neutrino oscillate within it's three tiny masses, when it's detected,and probably answer the same question. In this case the diagram helps me initiate the dicussion,I intend to use such short diagrams to provoke scientific rethink of our current understanding of the universe. What's new in science? Maybe logic will lead us to the simplest things under our nose hidden from view.

As I move (spin) into the unknown (spacetime fabric) I encounter disturbances(quantum fluctuations) I stretch my primordial arms(primordial Higgs like field) to swim, you won't catch me, though the arms drag (mass) me, they are still primordial , I become a ghost (NEUTRINO),love me like that am a wanderer.. neutrino oscillation.pdf